Flow control for irrigation machines

• US 6,938,842 B2
• Filed: 05/23/2003
• Issued: 09/06/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 05/23/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Lindsay Corporation
• Original Assignee: Lindsey Manufacturing Co.
• Inventors: Callies, Robert E., Choat, Wayne D.
• Primary Examiner(s): DOERRLER, WILLIAM CHARLES
• Application Number:
  US10/444,613
• Publication Number:
  US 20040232261A1
• Time in Patent Office: 837 Days
• Field of Search: 239/728, 239/729, 239/730, 239/731, 239/732, 239/733
• US Class Current: 239/729
• CPC Class Codes: A01G 25/092 movable around a pivot centre

Abstract

This invention relates to a fluid flow control method that enables a self-propelled irrigation machine to apply varying amounts of fluid as might be required to suitably treat the surface area affected by each of the individual fluid application devices thereon. The control method regulates the total volume of fluid emitted by each application device to a predetermined value as it responds to a suitable control signal to permit or prevent fluid flow. This fluid flow control method involves time-based rapid cycling of the flow control apparatus to provide continuously variable fluid flow as is required to meet the desired average output of each emitting device as the flow requirement varies from time to time as needed to produce a selected, pre-determined application rate throughout the treated surface area.

Claims

1. An irrigation machine, comprising:

a main pipeline supported on movable towers and connectable to a fluid supply, the towers being capable of moving the main pipeline such that it sweeps across a primary field space;

an auxiliary span supported on at least one auxiliary tower and in fluid communication with the main pipeline, the auxiliary tower being capable of traveling either within a secondary field space generally outside of the primary field space or from the primary field space into and out of a secondary field space, such that the auxiliary span selectively sweeps across the secondary field space;

a plurality of auxiliary fluid emitters connected to the auxiliary span, each emitter being adapted for selectively emitting fluid,

at least some of said emmiters being arranged in a plurality of banks with each bank containing several emitters; and

a control system connected to the auxiliary emitters for controlling the emitters such that the fluid flow rates from the emitters produce a selectable, pre-determined fluid application rate across the secondary field space,

said control system being operable to cycle each bank of emitters through repeated operating cycles at predetermined time intervals as the auxiliary span moves through the secondary field space and to cause the on times of at least some of the banks to differ from those of other banks during at least some of the operating cycles,

the length of on time of a bank of emitters during an operating cycle depending at least in part upon the position of the auxiliary span.

2. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein the emitters of each bank are disposed in succession beside one another, said control system being operable to generate a control signal for each bank of emitters, each bank of emitters being connected to the control system such that all the emitters in the bank receive the same control signal.

3. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein the control system generates a control signal for each bank, which control signal cycles the emitters at such a rate as to provide the selectable, pre-determined fluid application rate.

4. The irrigation machine of claim 3 wherein said control system includes a data storage means and wherein the on times of the control signals are stored in one or more data tables in said data storage means.

5. The irrigation machine of claim 4 wherein the on times in the data tables for the various emitters are determined by evaluating the physical size and shape of the fluid application patterns of the emitters, the relative contribution of each toward the desired application to a specific location, and the optimization of their individual on times to approach the desired total application at that specific location.

6. The irrigation machine of claim 5 wherein the on times in the data table are selected in response to a measurement of the control angle between the auxiliary span and the main pipeline and the relative velocities of the end tower and auxiliary tower.

7. The irrigation machine of claim 5 wherein the on times in the data table are selected in response to a measurement of the angle between the auxiliary span and its travel path and the relative velocities of the end tower and auxiliary tower.

8. The irrigation machine of claim 5 wherein the on times in the data table are selected in response to a measurement of the control angle between the auxiliary span and the main pipeline, a measurement of the angle between the auxiliary span and the travel path of that span, and the velocities of either or both of the end tower and auxiliary tower.

9. The irrigation machine of claim 5 wherein, with the total path of the machine known, all necessary table information can be pre-determined and combined into a single table and stored in a database, the on times of the rapid cycling is controlled with a measurement of the physical position of the machine along the travel path of that machine.

10. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein said control system comprises:

means for determining the instantaneous distance D of each auxiliary emitter from the central pivot point;

means for determining the instantaneous effective width W of the zone of responsibility for each auxiliary emitter;

means for determining the instantaneous angular velocity Va of each auxiliary emitter; and

means responsive to the instantaneous effective width W and the instantaneous angular velocity Va of each auxiliary emitter to turn said emitter on as needed to produce an average flow rate Q at said emitter such that Q/(W*Va) equals the selectable, pre-determined fluid application rate.

11. The irrigation machine of claim 10 wherein the instantaneous distance D from the central pivot point to the physical center point of the fluid application pattern of each auxiliary emitter is determined as a function of the angle between the auxiliary span and the main pipeline, the distance of each auxiliary emitter fluid application pattern from the end of the main pipeline, and the length of the main pipeline.

12. The irrigation machine of claim 10 wherein the instantaneous effective width W of the area of responsibility of each auxiliary emitter is determined as a function of the angle between the auxiliary span and the main pipeline, the distance along the auxiliary span of each auxiliary emitter application pattern from the end of the main pipeline, by the radial distance D from the central pivot to the physical center point of the fluid application pattern of that specific emitter, by the radial proximity of the adjacent inboard and outboard emitters, by the relative physical fluid application pattern of each emitter, and by the length of the main pipeline.

13. The irrigation machine of claim 10 wherein the instantaneous velocity V of each auxiliary emitter is determined as a function of the velocity of the main pipeline tower that is closest to the auxiliary span and the velocity of the auxiliary tower.

14. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein the main pipeline travels in a circle and the primary field space is circular.

15. The irrigation machine of claim 14 wherein the control system includes a data table into which appropriate percent on time values for each bank have been placed.

16. The irrigation machine of claim 15 wherein the percent on time values are pre-calculated according to the relation Q/(W*Va)=R where R is the selected fluid application rate, Q is the average flow rate at each emitter, W is the instantaneous effective width of a zone of responsibility of each auxiliary emitter, and Va is the instantaneous angular velocity V of each auxiliary emitter.

33. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein the on times of at least some of the banks of emitters differ from cycle to cycle.

34. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein the actual length of time a bank of emitters is turned on during an operating cycle depends at least in part on the angle between the auxiliary span and the main span.

35. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein the actual length of time that a bank of emitters is turned on during an operating cycle may be zero seconds depending at least in part upon the position of the auxiliary span.

36. The irrigation machine of claim 1 wherein the actual length of time that a bank of emitters is turned on during an operating cycle may be 100 percent of the operating cycle depending at least in part upon the position of the auxiliary span.

17. In an irrigation method using an irrigation machine of the type including a main pipeline supported on movable towers and connectable to a fluid supply, the towers being capable of moving the main pipeline such that it sweeps across a primary field space, an auxiliary span supported on at least one auxiliary tower and in fluid communication with the main pipeline, the auxiliary tower being capable of traveling either within a secondary field space generally outside of the primary field space, or from the primary field space into and out of a secondary field space such that the auxiliary span selectively sweeps across the secondary field space, a plurality of auxiliary fluid emitters connected to the auxiliary span, each emitter being adapted for selectively emitting fluid onto a zone of responsibility, at least some of the emitters being arranged in a plurality of banks with each bank containing several emitters, the improvement comprising:

cycling each bank of emitters through repeated operating cycles at predetermined time intervals as the auxiliary span moves through the secondary field space; and

during at least some of the operating cycles, causing the on times of at least some of the banks to differ from those of other banks,

the length of on time of a bank of emitters during an operating cycle depending at least in part upon the position of the auxiliary span.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the step of cycling the banks of emitters is characterized by calculating the on time to produce average flow rates Q at each emitter which satisfy the relation Q/(W*Va)=R where R is the selectable, pre-determined fluid application rate desired, W is the instantaneous effective width of the zone of responsibility of each emitter, and Va is the instantaneous angular velocity of each emitter.

19. The method of claim 18 further characterized in that the on times are predetermined and stored in a data table.

20. The method of claim 17 wherein the step of cycling said banks of emitters is characterized by the steps of creating a control signal and supplying said control signal to a bank of emitters, the emitters in a particular bank being located on the auxiliary span in succession beside one another.

21. The method of claim 19 further comprising the step of selecting the on times in the data table in response to a measurement of the control angle between the auxiliary span and the main pipeline and the relative velocities of the end tower and auxiliary tower.

22. The method of claim 19 further comprising the step of selecting the on times in the data table in response to a measurement of the angle between the auxiliary span and its travel path and the relative velocities of the end tower and auxiliary tower.

23. The method of claim 19 further comprising the step of selecting the on times in the data table in response to a measurement of the control angle between the auxiliary span and the travel path of that span, and the velocities of either or both of the end tower and auxiliary tower.

24. The method of claim 19 further comprising the step of determining the total path of the machine, pre-determining all necessary data table information and combining that information into a single table and storing it in a database, and selecting the on times from the database based on a measurement of the physical position of the machine along the travel path of the machine.

25. The method of claim 17 wherein the step of cycling the banks of emitters is characterized by trial and error analysis of the water application patterns of the various emitters and their interaction in order to obtain the optimum desired application for each specific area.

26. The method of claim 17 wherein the step of cycling the banks of emitters is characterized by determining the total path of the machine and auxiliary span and storing it in a database, performing a series of initial computer simulations to determine the maximum volume of fluid applied by each of the various emitters to each of its affected areas as that specific emitter travels its full path of the field and adjusting the application volumes of the various emitters affecting any specific area to provide the desired combined application to all affected areas.

27. The method of claim 17 wherein all emitters in a bank are turned on during an operating cycle.

28. The method of claim 17 wherein less than all emitters in a bank are turned on during an operating cycle.

29. The method of claim 17 wherein the actual length of time a bank of emitters is turned on during an operating cycle depends at least in part on the angle between the auxiliary span and the main span.

30. The method of claim 17 wherein the actual length of time that a bank of emitters is turned on during an operating cycle may be zero seconds depending at least in part upon the position of the auxiliary span.

31. The method of claim 17 wherein the actual length of time that a bank of emitters is turned on during an operating cycle may be 100 percent of the operating cycle depending at least in part upon the position of the auxiliary span.

32. The method of claim 17 wherein the on times of at least some of the banks of emitters differ from cycle to cycle.