Fault localization and health indication for a controller area network

• US 6,959,403 B2
• Filed: 06/26/2002
• Issued: 10/25/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 12/14/1999
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: Dierauer, Isabelle, Dierauer, Peter P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Ton, David
• Application Number:
  US10/185,925
• Publication Number:
  US 20020166088A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,217 Days
• Field of Search: 714/706, 714/25, 714/708, 714/49, 714/47, 370/525, 709/224, 709/225, 707/10, 375/220, 345/734, 345/764
• US Class Current: 714/49
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0677 Localisation of faults

Abstract

A node of a network comprises an error message detector arranged to detect error messages transmitted over the network, a counter arranged to count the error messages in order to produce an error message count, and a controller arranged to count valid messages in order to produce a count of valid messages. The controller is arranged to compare the error message count to the valid message count to indicate the health of the network. The node further comprises a transceiver, a controller coupled to the transceiver by a receive line and a transmit line, and error message first logic coupled to the receive and transmit lines. The error message first logic is arranged to detect a first error message from the receive line and a second error message from the transmit line, and to determine whether the node is closest to a fault by comparing timing between the first error message and the second error message.

Claims

1. A method of determining health of a network comprising the following steps:

a) determining a number of error messages transmitted over the network;

b) determining a number of valid messages transmitted over the network; and

,

c) comparing the number of error messages to the number of valid messages in order to determine the health of the network.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein valid messages are nonerror messages.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein step b) comprises the following steps:

b1) determining a number of all messages; and

,

b2) subtracting the number of error messages from the number of all messages.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein step c) comprises the step of calculating a ratio between the number of error messages and the number of valid messages.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein step b) comprises the following steps:

b1) determining a number of all messages; and

,

b2) subtracting the number of error messages from the number of all messages.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of calculating the ratio comprises the step of dividing the number of error messages by the number of valid messages.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein step b) comprises the following steps:

b1) determining a number of all messages; and

,

b2) subtracting the number of error messages from the number of all messages.

8. The method of claim 4 comprising the further step of calculating the ratio over a plurality of time intervals and monitoring a trend of the ratios.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising the following steps:

d) repeating steps a)–

c) over a plurality of time intervals; and

,

e) monitoring a trend of the health of the network based upon results from step d).

10. The method of claim 1 wherein each of the error messages contains a bit sequence which uniquely identifies the error message as an error message.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the bit sequence comprises bits all have the same value.

12. A node of a network comprising:

an error message detector arranged to detect error messages transmitted over the network;

a counter arranged to count the error messages in order to produce an error message count; and

,

a controller arranged to produce a count of valid messages and to compare the error message count to the valid message count so as to determine the health of the network.

13. The node of claim 12 wherein valid messages are non-error messages.

14. The node of claim 12 wherein the error message detector and the counter are part of the controller.

15. The node of claim 12 wherein the controller is further arranged to determine an all message count and to subtract the error message count from the all message count in order to produce the valid message count.

16. The node of claim 12 wherein the controller is arranged to calculate a ratio between the error message count and the valid message count.

17. The node of claim 16 wherein the controller is arranged to calculate the ratio over a plurality of time intervals and to monitor a trend of the ratios.

18. The node of claim 16 wherein the controller is further arranged to determine an all message count and to subtract the error message count from the all message count in order to produce the valid message count.

19. The node of claim 16 wherein the controller is arranged to calculate the ratio by dividing the error message count by the valid message count.

20. The node of claim 19 wherein the controller is arranged to determine an all message count and to subtract the error message count from the all message count in order to produce the valid message count.

21. The node of claim 12 wherein the controller is arranged to calculate a ratio between the error message count and the valid message count over a plurality of time intervals and to monitor a trend of the health of the network based upon the ratios.

22. The node of claim 12 wherein each of the error messages contains a bit sequence which uniquely identifies the error message as an error message.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein the bit sequence comprises bits all have the same value.