Determining masking levels in an automated diagnostic hearing test

• US 7,018,342 B2
• Filed: 05/16/2003
• Issued: 03/28/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 05/23/2002
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Biocell LP, Ototronix, LLC
• Original Assignee: Tympany Inc. (Tympany Holdings LLC)
• Inventors: Wasden, Christopher L., Thornton, Aaron, Stott, Kenneth R., Strasnick, Barry, Harrison, Jeffrey S.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hindenburg, Max F.
• Assistant Examiner(s): SZMAL, BRIAN SCOTT
• Application Number:
  US10/439,982
• Publication Number:
  US 20040097826A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,047 Days
• Field of Search: 600/559, 735/85, 381/60
• US Class Current: 600/559
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/0051 by applying vibrations
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/12 Audiometering
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/121 evaluating hearing capacity
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/742 using visual displays A61B5/339 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 2460/13 Hearing devices using bone conduction transducers
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 25/606 acting directly on the eardrum, the ossicles or the skull, e.g. mastoid, tooth, maxillary or mandibular bone, or mechanically stimulating the cochlea, e.g. at the oval window
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 25/70 Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting

Abstract

Method and system are disclosed for automated testing of a patient'"'"'s hearing. The automated hearing test allows the patient to quickly and accurately test his own hearing with minimal or no assistance from an audiologist or other hearing health professionals. The test prompts and instructs the patient for inputs and responses as needed. The patient can select one or several tests to be performed, including air and bone conduction testing with masking, speech reception threshold, speech discrimination, tympanogram, acoustic reflex, and otoacoustic emissions testing. Multiple languages are supported. Data obtained from one test may be used for another test or another iteration of the same test to calculate masking levels. The automatic hearing test also detects ambient noise and can compensate for it in the test results. If a contingency occurs, the automated hearing test is configured to page the operator for assistance.

Claims

1. In a computer-based, multimedia system for allowing a patient to quickly and conveniently test his own hearing without a sound isolation chamber and with minimal assistance from an operator, a method of estimating masking levels to be used for the testing, comprising:

determining a crossover level for a non-test ear;

calculating a minimum masking level for the non-test ear based on the crossover and an air-bone gap for the non-test ear;

calculating a maximum masking level for the non-test ear based on a masking interaural attenuation and an effective presentation level;

determining a masking level to be used for the testing using one or more of the crossover level, the minimum masking level, and the maximum masking level; and

implementing a hysteresis to prevent changes that are smaller than a predetermined amount from being made to the masking level.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein determining an estimated masking level to be used includes setting the masking level to a level that is higher than the minimum masking level by a predetermined amount provided the minimum masking level meets a turn-on criteria.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the hysteresis is implemented by changing the masking level to be used to the minimum masking level if the minimum masking level is higher than the masking level to be used by a predetermined amount.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the hysteresis is implemented by changing the masking level to be used to the minimum masking level if the minimum masking level is lower than the masking level to be used by a predetermined amount.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of determining the masking level to be used includes setting the masking level to be used to near the maximum masking level if the masking level to be used is loud enough to mask an ear being tested.

6. The method according to claim 5, further comprising declaring a masking dilemma if the setting of the masking level to be used near the maximum masking level results in an insufficient amount of masking.

7. The method according to claim 5, further comprising resetting the masking level to be used to a minimum presentation yet audible level if the setting of the masking level to be used near the maximum masking level results in the masking level to be used not being audible in the non-test ear.

8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising issuing a first use warning to the patient if masking is being used for the first time.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the crossover is determined based on an inter-aural attenuation table.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein calculating the minimum masking level includes adding a predetermined margin to the minimum masking level.

11. A computer-based, multimedia system for allowing a patient to quickly and conveniently test his own speech discrimination threshold without a sound isolation chamber and with minimal assistance from an operator, comprising:

transducers, including an air conduction transducer and a bone conduction transducer;

a hearing test device capable of producing tones, speech, and masking noise connected to the transducers;

a computer connected to the hearing test device and storing an automated hearing test thereon, the automated hearing test configured to cause the computer to;

determine a crossover level for a non-test ear of the patient;

calculate a minimum masking level for the non-test ear based on the crossover and an air-bone gap for the non-test ear;

calculate a maximum masking level for the non-test ear based on a masking interaural attenuation and an effective presentation level;

determine a masking level to be used for the testing using one or more of the crossover level, the minimum masking level, and the maximum masking level; and

implementing a hysteresis to prevent changes that are smaller than a predetermined amount from being made to the masking level.

12. The system according to claim 11, wherein the automated hearing test causes the computer to determine an estimated masking level to be used by setting the masking level to a level that is higher than the minimum masking level by a predetermined amount provided the minimum masking level meets a turn-on criteria.

13. The system according to claim 12, wherein the automated hearing test further causes the computer to implement the hysteresis by changing the masking level to be used to the minimum masking level if the minimum masking level is higher than the masking level to be used by a predetermined amount.

14. The system according to claim 13, wherein the automated hearing test further causes the computer to implement the hysteresis by changing the masking level to be used to the minimum masking level if the minimum masking level is lower than the masking level to be used by a predetermined amount.

15. The system according to claim 14, wherein the automated hearing test further causes the computer to set the masking level to be used to near the maximum masking level if the masking level to be used is loud enough to mask an ear being tested.

16. The system according to claim 15, wherein the automated hearing test further causes the computer to declare a masking dilemma if the setting of the masking level to be used near the maximum masking level results in an insufficient amount of masking.

17. The system according to claim 15, wherein the automated hearing test further causes the computer to reset the masking level to be used to a minimum presentation yet audible level if the setting of the masking level to be used near the maximum masking level results in the masking level to be used not being audible in the non-test ear.

18. The system according to claim 11, wherein the automated hearing test further causes the computer to issue a first use warning to the patient if masking is being used for the first time.

19. The system according to claim 11, wherein the automated hearing test causes the computer to determine the crossover based on an inter-aural attenuation table.

20. The system according to claim 11, wherein the automated hearing test causes the computer to calculate the minimum masking level by adding a predetermined margin to the minimum masking level.

21. A method of establishing masking levels in a computer-based automated hearing test, comprising:

estimating an unmasked pure tone bone threshold at a given pure tone frequency;

estimating an unmasked pure tone air threshold at the given pure tone frequency;

determining a difference between the unmasked pure tone air threshold and the unmasked pure tone bone threshold; and

determining a pure tone bone masking level only if a difference between the unmasked pure tone air threshold and the unmasked pure tone bone threshold is greater than a first predetermined level.

22. The method according to claim 21, further comprising obtaining a poorer ear masked bone pure tone threshold if the difference between the unmasked pure tone air threshold and the unmasked pure tone bone threshold is greater than the first predetermined level.

23. The method according to claim 21, further comprising obtaining a better ear masked bone pure tone threshold if a difference between a poorer ear masked bone pure tone threshold and a poorer ear unmasked bone pure tone threshold is greater than a second predetermined level.

24. A method of establishing masking levels in a computer-based automated hearing test, comprising:

obtaining a first pure tone threshold at a given pure tone frequency for a first ear being tested;

estimating a first masking level based on the first pure tone threshold;

obtaining a second pure tone threshold at the given pure tone frequency for the first ear being tested;

determining whether the first masking level is correct using the second pure tone threshold; and

obtaining a second masking level based on the second pure tone threshold if the first masking level is determined to be incorrect.

25. The method according to claim 24, further comprising using the second masking level for testing of a second ear being tested.

26. A method of establishing masking levels in a computer-based automated hearing test, comprising:

determining a crossover level for a non-test ear;

calculating a minimum masking level for the non-test ear based on the crossover and an air-bone gap for the non-test ear;

calculating a maximum masking level for the non-test ear based on a masking interaural attenuation and an effective presentation level; and

determining a masking level using one or more of the crossover level, the minimum masking level, and the maximum masking level;

wherein the masking level is applied during a speech reception threshold test.