Railroad distributed power communication system and method

• US 7,038,597 B2
• Filed: 10/24/2002
• Issued: 05/02/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 11/16/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: General Electric Company
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Smith, Eugene A.
• Primary Examiner(s): NGUYEN, HUNG T
• Application Number:
  US10/279,338
• Publication Number:
  US 20030094545A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,286 Days
• Field of Search: 340/933, 340/901, 340/902, 340/988, 340/438, 340/536, 340/538, 340/825.5, 340/900, 340/425.5, 340/531, 340/539.1, 340/539.19, 340/825.69, 340/825.72, 246/167, 246/169, 246/187, 301/19, 301/36, 301/70
• US Class Current: 340/933
• CPC Class Codes: B60L 2200/26 Rail vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: B60L 3/12 Recording operating variables ; Monitoring of operating variables
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 15/0027 Radio-based, e.g. using GSM-R
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 90/16 Information or communication technologies improving the operation of electric vehicles

Abstract

A railroad distributed power communication method and system for wireless transceiver units at spaced locations along a train having remote units that may be out of direct communication with the lead unit for indicating that at least one of a plurality of such remote units is in receipt of a command message from the lead unit. The method and system including transmitting a status reply message from each of the plurality of remote units in response to that unit'"'"'s receipt of the command message. Each of the status reply messages may include at least status information of the respective remote that corresponds to command instructions of the command message. At least one of the status reply messages of one of the other respective remote units may be received at an intermediate unit. The received status reply messages may be compared to the command message to determine whether the respective remote unit has received the command message and/or is following the set of command instructions. A command received status bit may be set in a second status reply message for each respective remote unit having received the command message and/or that is following the set of command instructions. The second status reply message may be decoded by a lead unit to determine whether the command received status bit has been set for a respective remote unit.

Claims

1. A railroad distributed power communication method for use with a plurality of wireless transceiver units at spaced locations along a train for determining which transceiver units from among the plurality of transceiver units are in receipt of a command message, the train having a lead transceiver unit for transmitting command messages and receiving status reply messages, where at least same of the plurality of transceiver units are remote transceiver units spaced from and outside of direct communication with the lead transceiver unit, and the train having at least one intermediate transceiver unit in direct communication with the lead transceiver unit and at least some of the remote transceiver units, the method comprising:

transmitting a command message including a command instruction and a unique sequence number from the lead transceiver unit;

receiving the command message at an intermediate transceiver unit and at least one of the remote transceiver units;

storing data indicative of the command instruction and the unique sequence number of the command message received at the intermediate transceiver unit in a database associated with the intermediate transceiver unit;

transmitting a respective status reply message from each of the at least one remote transceiver units for which the lead transceiver unit needs to verify receipt of the command message, each of the respective status reply messages including data indicative of the unique sequence number of the command message and a command function status of the respective at least one remote transceiver unit that transmitted the respective status reply message;

receiving at least one of the respective status reply messages at the intermediate transceiver unit;

storing data indicative of the command function status and the unique sequence number of the command message included in the received respective status reply messages received at the intermediate transceiver unit in the database associated with the intermediate transceiver unit;

comparing the stored unique sequence number of the command message included in the respective status reply messages received at the intermediate transceiver unit to the stored unique sequence number included in the transmitted command message to determine if there is a match;

if the compared unique sequence numbers match, comparing the command function status of the stored respective status reply messages to the command instruction of tile stored command message to determine which of the respective remote transceiver units is in receipt of the command message;

preparing a second status reply message at the intermediate transceiver unit;

setting a respective command received status bit in the second status reply message for each of the respective remote transceiver units that is in receipt of the command message; and

transmitting the second status reply message from the intermediate transceiver unit to the lead transceiver unit.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

decoding the second status reply message to determine which of the respective command received status bits are set to verify to the lead transceiver unit which of the respective remote transceiver units are in receipt of the command message.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

decoding the second status reply message if the lead transceiver unit did not receive at least one of the respective status reply messages directly from the respective remote transceiver unit, the second status reply message decoded to determine which of the respective remote transceiver units is in receipt of the command message.

4. The method of claim 3 further comprising:

waiting a selected period of time for the lead transceiver unit to receive the respective status reply messages directly from each of the respective remote transceiver units before decoding the second status reply message.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

setting a respective command received status bit for at least one of the respective remote transceiver units that is in receipt of a previously broadcast command message.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

decoding the second status reply message by the lead transceiver unit to determine which of the respective remote transceiver units is in receipt of the command message; and

if the lead transceiver unit is not in receipt of a respective status reply message from each of the plurality of remote transceiver units for which the lead transceiver unit needs to verify is in receipt of the command message, broadcasting a retry command message from the lead transceiver unit lithe lead transceiver unit determines that at least one of the respective remote transceiver units has not received the command message.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising:

comparing the sequence number in the received respective status reply messages to the stored sequence number assigned to the command message to determine whether they are equal; and

setting the respective command, received status bit only if the compared sequence numbers are equal.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining whether the lead transceiver unit has received tile respective status reply message directly from each of the remote transceiver units; and

returning to a normal lead transceiver unit transmit sequence if the lead transceiver unit has received the respective status reply message directly from each of the remote transceiver units.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising:

storing a log in a database on-board the lead locomotive, the log including data indicative of each remote transceiver unit for which a respective command received status bit has been set.

10. The method of claim 9 further comprising:

determining whether a reply timer has expired;

determining whether all of the respective remote transceiver units have received the command message; and

returning to the normal lead transmit sequence if the reply timer has expired and all remote transceiver units have received the command message.

11. A method for verifying to a lead locomotive in a train consist that a remote locomotive of the train consist has received a command message including a command instruction and a unique sequence number, the method comprising;

transmitting the command message to a control system configured for repeating messages;

storing data indicative of the command instruction and the unique sequence number of the command message received at the control system in a database associated with the control system;

transmitting a first status reply message from the remote locomotive in response to the remote locomotive'"'"'s receipt of the command message, the first status reply message including data indicative of a command functions status of the remote locomotive and the unique sequence number of the command message;

receiving the first status reply message at the control system configured for repeating messages;

setting a command received status bit in a second status reply message if the command function status of the remote locomotive and the unique sequence number of the command message transmitted in the first status reply message received by the control system match the command instruction and the unique sequence number of the command message stored in the database associated with the control system;

transmitting the second status reply message from the control system to the lead locomotive; and

decoding the second status reply message at the lead locomotive to determine whether the command received status bit has been set to verify to the lead locomotive that the remote locomotive has received the command message.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

declaring by the lead locomotive that the remote locomotive has received the command message if the command received status bit is set.

13. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

activating a communication loss warning by the lead locomotive if the command received status bit is not set.

14. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

decoding the second status reply message only if the lead locomotive does not receive the first status reply message.

15. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

waiting a selected period of time for the lead locomotive to receive the first status reply message before decoding the second status reply message.

16. The method of claim 15 further comprising:

declaring by the lead locomotive that the remote locomotive has received the command message if the command received status bit is set.

17. The method of claim 15 further comprising:

activating a communication loss warning by the lead locomotive if the command received status bit is not set.

18. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

broadcasting a retry command message from the lead locomotive if the lead locomotive does not receive the first status reply message and the status bit is not set in the second status reply message.

19. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

broadcasting the command message from the lead locomotive;

receiving the command message at the control system;

storing data indicative of a content of the command message in a database of the control system; and

providing the control system with a processor configured for comparing the data indicative of the content of the command message to the data of the first status reply message of the remote locomotive.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the control system is on-board a locomotive of the train consist.

21. A distributed power communication system configured to allow a lead locomotive of a train consist to verify which remote locomotives of the train consist are in receipt of a command message, the system comprising:

a lead control system configured to broadcast the command message;

a remote control system configured to receive the command message and transmit a command received message that includes at least one command received status bit set to indicate whether a remote locomotive is in receipt of the command message;

a transceiver for transmitting the command received message to the lead locomotive so that the lead locomotive may verify which of the remote locomotives are in receipt of the command message;

a database for storing data indicative of a set of command functions included in the command message;

a transceiver for transmitting a respective status reply message from each remote locomotive for which the lead locomotive needs to verify is in receipt of the command message, each respective status reply message including data indicative of a command function status of the respective remote locomotive that transmitted the respective status reply message;

a processing module in the remote control system configured for receiving at least one of the respective status reply messages at a receiving remote locomotive;

a database on-board the receiving remote locomotive for storing data indicative of the command functions status of the received respective status reply messages;

a processing module in the remote control system configured for comparing the stored command functions status and the stored set of command functions to determine which of the respective remote locomotives is in receipt of the command message; and

a processing module in the remote control module configured for setting a respective command received status bit in the command received message for at least one of the respective remote locomotives that is in receipt of the command message.

22. The system of claim 21 wherein the lead control system is on-board the lead locomotive and a remote control system is on-board each of the remote locomotives for which the lead locomotive needs to verify is in receipt of the command message.

23. The system of claim 21 further comprising:

a processing module in the lead control system for decoding the command received message to determine which of the respective command received status bits are set to verify to the lead locomotive which of the respective remote locomotives are in receipt of the command message.

24. The system of claim 23 wherein:

the processing module for decoding is configured to decode the command received message if the lead locomotive did not receive at least one of the respective status reply messages directly from the respective remote locomotive.

25. The system of claim 21 further comprising:

a processing module in the remote control system configured for preparing the command received message to include data indicative of a command functions status of the receiving remote locomotive responsive to the set of command functions included in the command message and for setting the respective command received status bits for at least one of the respective remote locomotives that is in receipt of a previously broadcast command message.

26. The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising:

a processing module in the lead control system configured to assign a sequence number to the command message that is broadcast as part of the command message;

a processing module in the remote control system configured to store the sequence number received in the command message in a respective database on-board each remote locomotive for which the lead locomotive needs to verify is in receipt of the command message; and

wherein the remote control system is configured to repeat the command message and the sequence number in a respective status reply message transmitted by a respective remote locomotive.

27. The system of claim 26 further comprising:

a processing module in the remote control system configured to compare the sequence number in a received respective status reply message to the stored sequence number assigned to the command message to determine whether they are equal and setting the respective command received status bit only if the compared sequence numbers are equal.