Risk assessment for relief pressure system

• US 7,039,502 B2
• Filed: 12/29/2003
• Issued: 05/02/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 03/12/2001
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Siemens Energy Incorporated (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Berwanger, Inc.
• Inventors: Berwanger, Patrick C., Martin, Alexander G., Kreder, Robert A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Bahta, Kidest
• Application Number:
  US10/745,658
• Publication Number:
  US 20040249517A1
• Time in Patent Office: 855 Days
• Field of Search: 700/266, 700/109, 700/310, 700/173, 264/40.1
• US Class Current: 700/301
• CPC Class Codes: F16K 37/0091 by measuring fluid parameters

Abstract

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA) can be applied to provide a more realistic assessment of the risk associated with vessel accumulation due to common mode scenarios. The QRA process takes the results of a traditional flare study and QRA inputs such as the frequencies of the common mode scenarios and the layers of protection that will tend to reduce the severity of the common mode scenario, and generates an system risk profile, such as an accumulation versus frequency relationship for each vessel discharging to the relief header. This relationship provides an estimate of the overall risk associated with the relief header system. The QRA program makes the above analysis process possible by automating the generation, execution, and interpretation of the many possible permutations that are required to characterize the system.

Claims

1. A method implementable with a computer system of assessing risks to pressure equipment associated with at least one pressure relief system having a relief header, comprising:

a. identifying in the computer system one or more relief header inputs associated with the equipment;

b. identifying in the computer system one or more common mode failure scenarios for the relief header inputs;

c. calculating with the computer system a first hydraulic model for the one or more common mode failure scenarios;

d. defining in the computer system a risk acceptance criteria for an accumulation in one or more members of the equipment associated with the relief header inputs;

e. defining in the computer system initiating events frequency of occurrence for one or more common mode failure scenarios;

f. determining with the computer system whether at least one of the risk acceptance criteria is not met by the first hydraulic model to assess risk to the equipment;

g. defining in the computer system a probability of failure for one or more protection systems associated with the equipment; and

h. calculating with the computer system an output that assess risk to the equipment by correlating an accumulation of the one or more members of the equipment with the frequency of occurrence.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing with the computer system the output with the risk of acceptance criteria.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising adjusting the equipment, protective systems, or a combination thereof to produce an output within the risk of acceptance criteria.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating an output comprises:

a. calculating with the computer system a value for a number of possible permutations of relief loads for the relief header inputs and common mode failure scenarios; and

b. determining with the computer system whether to solve the possible relief loads based on the value by sampling techniques.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising solving the possible relief loads by sampling techniques, comprising:

a. generating with the computer system a random number for at least one of the relief header inputs;

b. using with the computer system the random number to categorize which protection system is predicted to fail;

c. calculating with the computer system a variety of predicted relief loads for the relief header inputs based on the categorization of the predicted failure; and

d. repeating with the computer system the generation of a random number and categorization for a predetermined number of simulations.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising ranking with the computer system the predicted relief loads based on the equipment accumulation and analyzing with the computer system the loads until a pre-determined value of reliability is met.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the value of reliability is statistically determined.

8. The method of claim 5, further comprising repeating with the computer system the generation of the random number and the categorization of the predicted failure for each relief header input.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating with the computer system the output by correlating the equipment accumulation occurs for each relief header input.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating with the computer system the output by correlating the equipment accumulation occurs for one or more groups of relief header inputs.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining with the computer system the probability of failure for each type of protection system and calculating with the computer system a probability of failure for each relief header input having one or more of the protection systems.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising determining with the computer system the frequency of occurrence for a combination of protection systems associated with each relief header input.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising identifying in the computer system a plurality of common mode failure scenarios and using the probability of failure for each protection system and the initiating event frequency for each common mode failure scenario to develop with the computer system an output of an equipment accumulation compared to the frequency of occurrence.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising comparing the output to determine with the computer system whether the risk acceptance criteria is within an acceptable predetermined value for one or more specific members of the equipment associated with the pressure relief system.

15. The method of claim 13, further comprising combining the output of the equipment accumulation compared to the frequency of occurrence for a plurality of members of the equipment associated with the pressure relief system to determine with the computer system an overall risk for the equipment.

16. The method of claim 14, further comprising determining with the computer system the frequency of occurrence for a combination of protection systems associated with each relief header input.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising comparing the output to determine with the computer system whether the risk acceptance criteria is within an acceptable predetermined value.

18. A method implementable with a computer system of assessing risks to pressure equipment associated with at least one pressure relief system having a relief header, comprising:

a. identifying in the computer system one or more relief header inputs associated with the equipment;

b. identifying in the computer system at least one common mode failure scenario for the relief header inputs;

c. calculating in the computer system a first hydraulic model for the at least one common mode failure scenario;

d. defining in the computer system a risk acceptance criteria for an accumulation in the equipment associated with the relief header inputs;

e. defining in the computer system initiating events frequency of occurrence for the at least one common mode scenario;

f. determining with the computer system whether the risk acceptance criteria are met by the first hydraulic model to assess risk to the equipment.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the acceptance criteria are not met by the first hydraulic mode, and wherein the method further comprises:

a. defining in the computer system a probability of failure for one or more protection systems associated with the equipment; and

b. calculating with the computer system an output that assess risk to the equipment by correlating an accumulation of one or more members of the equipment with the frequency of occurrence.

20. A system for assessing risks to pressure equipment associated with at least one pressure relief system having a relief header, comprising:

a. an electronic processor;

b. a memory coupled to the electronic processor, the memory containing one or more programs to be processed by the electronic processor, the one or more programs being adapted to;

i. use input data for;

a. identified relief header inputs;

b. identified common mode failure scenarios for the relief header inputs;

c. defined risk acceptance criteria for an accumulation in the equipment associated with the relief header inputs;

d. defined initiating events frequency of occurrences for the common mode scenarios; and

e. defined probability of failure for one or more protection systems coupled to one or more of the relief header inputs;

ii. calculate a first hydraulic model for at least one of the common mode failure scenarios;

iii. automatically calculate probability of failures for combinations of protection systems associated with the relief header inputs; and

iv. automatically correlate an accumulation of one or more members of the equipment with the frequency of occurrences; and

c. an output element coupled to the memory for producing an output of the correlation of the accumulation of one or more members of the equipment with the frequency of occurrences.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein the one or more programs are further adapted to automatically calculate a value for a number of possible permutations of relief loads for the relief header inputs and common mode failure scenarios for a group of relief header inputs.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the one or more programs are further adapted to:

a. generate a random number for at least one of the relief header inputs;

b. use the random number to categorize which protection system is predicted to fail;

c. calculate a variety of predicted relief loads for the relief header inputs based on the categorization of the protected failure; and

d. automatically repeat the generation of a random number and categorization for a predetermined number of simulations.

23. A method implementable with a computer system of assessing risks to pressure equipment associated with at least one pressure relief system having a relief header, comprising:

a. identifying in the computer system a plurality of relief header input associated with the pressure equipment;

b. identifying in the computer system a common mode failure scenario for the plurality of relief header inputs;

c. calculating with the computer system a first hydraulic model for the common mode failure scenario;

d. defining in the computer system a risk acceptance criteria for an accumulation in the pressure equipment associated with the plurality of relief header inputs; and

e. determining with the computer system whether the risk acceptance criteria are met by the first hydraulic model to assess risk to the equipment.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the risk acceptance criteria are not met by the first hydraulic mode and the method further comprises the steps of:

a. defining in the computer system event frequency of occurrence for the common mode failure scenario; and

b. calculating with the computer system an output that assess risk to the equipment by correlating an accumulation of one or more members of the pressure equipment with the frequency of occurrence.

25. A system for assessing risks to pressure equipment associated with a relief system having a relief header, comprising:

a. an electronic processor;

b. a memory coupled to the electronic processor, the memory containing one or more programs to be processed by the electronic processor, the one or more programs being adapted to;

i. use input data for;

a. identified relief header inputs;

b. identified common mode failure scenarios for the relief header inputs;

c. defined risk acceptance criteria for an accumulation in the equipment associated with the relief header inputs; and

d. defined initiating events frequency of occurrences for the common mode scenarios;

ii. calculate a first hydraulic model for at least one of the common mode failure scenarios; and

iii. automatically correlate an accumulation of one or more members of the equipment with the frequency of occurrences; and

c. an output element coupled to the memory for producing an output of the correlation of the accumulation of one or more members of the equipment with the frequency of occurrences.