Checkout system with a flexible security verification system

• US 7,044,370 B2
• Filed: 07/01/2002
• Issued: 05/16/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 07/02/2001
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: ECR Software Corporation
• Original Assignee: ECR Software Corporation
• Inventors: Denimarck, Paul F, Keys, Barry H, Bellis, Donald C Jr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Kim, Ahshik
• Application Number:
  US10/188,290
• Publication Number:
  US 20030024982A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,415 Days
• Field of Search: 235/383, 235/325, 235/462.15, 235/381, 235/385, 186 59- 61
• US Class Current: 235/383
• CPC Class Codes: A47F 9/047 for recording self-service articles without cashier or assistant
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/4144 for controlling weight of goods in commercial establishments, e.g. supermarket, P.O.S. systems
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 23/3728 with wireless means
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 23/3735 using a digital network
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 23/3742 using a mobile telephone network
• CPC Class Codes: G07G 1/0054 with control of supplementary check-parameters, e.g. weight or number of articles
• CPC Class Codes: G07G 3/006 False operation
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/1472 with force or weight detection
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/246 Check out systems combined with EAS, e.g. price information stored on EAS tag anti-theft systems in point of sale systems G07G3/003

Abstract

A method and system for self-checkout of items from a retail or non-retail establishment is disclosed. The system verifies security by comparing a measured physical characteristic of an item with the stored security characteristic for that item and determining if the measured physical characteristic is within an operator-modifiable tolerance range. The operator-modifiable tolerance range is different for different of items in the store. Moreover, a stored security characteristic of an item can be updated automatically. In addition, the system includes a dynamic-weight scale that reports a measured weight before the scale settles.

Claims

1. A method of checking out items having item codes comprising:

associating a first group of items with a first metric corresponding to a physical characteristic common to every item in the first group;

assigning a first tolerance value to the first metric;

determining a first tolerance range for the first tolerance value;

associating a second group of items with a second metric corresponding to a physical characteristic common to every item in the second group;

assigning a second tolerance value to the second metric;

determining a second tolerance range for the second tolerance value; and

applying a global tolerance variable to the first and second tolerance values.

2. The method in claim 1 wherein applying a global tolerance variable to the tolerance values changes the first tolerance range disproportionately with respect to a stored security characteristic associated with the first group of items relative to the change in the second tolerance range with respect to a stored security characteristic associated with the second group of items.

3. The method in claim 1 wherein the first tolerance value is a number representing a unit of measurement.

4. The method in claim 3 wherein the unit of measurement is a unit of mass.

5. The method in claim 1 wherein the physical characteristic of the items in the first group is selected from a group consisting of a weight, length, width, depth and height of the item.

6. The method in claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

creating a record for a new item after the new item has been scanned for a first time;

storing a measured physical characteristic of the new item as a stored security characteristic of the new item;

calculating a statistically determined value from a plurality of measurements of the physical characteristic for items having the same item code as the new item; and

replacing the stored security characteristic of the new item with the calculated statistically determined value.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising calculating a value representing a tolerance value for the new item based on the plurality of measurements for items having the same item code as the new item.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein the statistically determined value is an average of the plurality of measurements.

9. The method in claim 1 further comprising:

measuring a weight of an item using a weighing scale;

reporting the weight of the item before the weighing scale settles;

retrieving a stored security weight of the item and a tolerance range associated with a tolerance value for the item;

comparing the reported weight of the item with the stored security weight of the item;

accepting the identity of the item if the reported weight is within the tolerance range;

changing the tolerance range of the item by applying a global variable to the tolerance value with which the tolerance range is associated; and

setting a time at which the reported weight is compared with the stored security weight, said time being before the weighting scale settles and said time is modifiable by an operator.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

associating each of the items of the first group with a common identification code;

measuring a physical characteristic of an item identified as belonging to the first group of items;

comparing the measure of the item identified as belonging to the first group with the first tolerance range;

accepting the item as identified if the measure is within the first tolerance range;

associating each of the items of the second group with a common identification code;

measuring a physical characteristic of an item identified as belonging to the second group of items;

comparing the measure of the item identified as belonging to the second group with the second tolerance range; and

accepting the item as identified if the measure is within the second tolerance range.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprising:

changing the global tolerance variable; and

applying the global tolerance variable to the first and second tolerance values to change the first and second tolerance ranges disproportionately relative to the respective metric with which each is associated.