Vehicle rollover detection system

0Associated
Cases 
0Associated
Defendants 
0Accused
Products 
67Forward
Citations 
0
Petitions 
2
Assignments
First Claim
1. A system for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. a roll angular velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said roll angular velocity sensor is adapted to measure a roll rate of the vehicle about a roll axis, and said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. a lateral velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said lateral velocity sensor is responsive to a velocity of the vehicle in a direction that is substantially lateral to said vehicle, and said lateral velocity sensor is selected from an ultrasonic sensor, a microwave sensor, a radar sensor, and an optical velocity sensor; and
c. a processor operatively coupled to said roll angular velocity sensor and to said lateral velocity sensor, wherein said processor is adapted to generate a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to a signal from said roll angular velocity sensor and to a signal from said lateral velocity sensor, said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to a deployment threshold, said deployment threshold is responsive to said measure of lateral velocity, said processor is adapted to determine a measure of roll angle by integrating said signal from said roll angular velocity sensor, and said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is further responsive to said measure of roll angle.
2 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A roll angular velocity sensor and a lateral velocity sensor are operatively coupled to a processor, which generates a signal for controlling a safety restraint system responsive to measures of roll angular velocity and lateral velocity. In one embodiment, the processor delays or inhibits the deployment of the safety restraint system responsive to a measure responsive to the measure of lateral velocity, either alone or in combination with a measure of longitudinal velocity. In another embodiment, a deployment threshold is responsive to the measure of lateral velocity. The lateral velocity may be measured by a lateral velocity sensor, or estimated responsive to measures of lateral acceleration, vehicle turn radius, and either longitudinal velocity or yaw angular velocity, wherein the turn radius is estimated from either a measure of steering angle, a measure of front tire angle, or measures of forward velocity from separate front wheel speed sensors.
155 Citations
View as Search Results
GOOD CHECKING FOR VEHICLE YAW RATE SENSOR  
Patent #
US 20110066321A1
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

GOOD CHECKING FOR VEHICLE LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATION SENSOR  
Patent #
US 20110066320A1
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

GOOD CHECKING FOR VEHICLE STEERING ANGLE SENSOR  
Patent #
US 20110071727A1
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

GOOD CHECKING FOR VEHICLE LATERAL ACCELERATION SENSOR  
Patent #
US 20110071726A1
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A VEHICLE  
Patent #
US 20110006890A1
Filed 07/08/2009

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

GOOD CHECKING FOR VEHICLE PRESSURE SENSOR  
Patent #
US 20110068913A1
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

Safety Method and Device for Vehicle Rollover Prediction Using Estimated Lateral Vehicle Velocity  
Patent #
US 20110071719A1
Filed 09/24/2009

Current Assignee
Continental Teves Incorporated, Continental Automotive GmbH, Continental Automotive Systems US Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Continental Teves Incorporated, Continental Automotive GmbH, Continental Automotive Systems US Incorporated

GOOD CHECKING FOR VEHICLE WHEEL SPEED SENSORS  
Patent #
US 20110066319A1
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

Method and apparatus for vehicle rollover mitigation  
Patent #
US 7,894,955 B2
Filed 03/23/2005

Current Assignee
Kelsey Hayes Company

Sponsoring Entity
Kelsey Hayes Company

Methods and Device for Determining the Roll Angle for Occupant Protection Devices  
Patent #
US 20110082614A1
Filed 09/26/2006

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sensor integration for airbag deployment  
Patent #
US 7,922,196 B2
Filed 06/11/2007

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Methods for detecting vehicle rollover  
Patent #
US 8,014,922 B2
Filed 02/12/2009

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

METHOD AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR DETECTING A LATERAL AND/OR A ROOF POSITION OF A VEHICLE  
Patent #
US 20110178683A1
Filed 05/12/2009

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Fast sensing system and method for soil and curbtripped vehicle rollovers  
Patent #
US 7,996,132 B2
Filed 11/06/2008

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH

SELFLEARNING AUTOLOCATION OF ALL TIRE ID'S ON A MULTIAXLE VEHICLE  
Patent #
US 20100191409A1
Filed 06/20/2007

Current Assignee
Compagnie Generale DES Etablissements Michelin SCA

Sponsoring Entity
Compagnie Generale DES Etablissements Michelin SCA

Seatbelt pretensioner arrangement  
Patent #
US 7,643,920 B2
Filed 10/05/2007

Current Assignee
Autoliv AB

Sponsoring Entity
Autoliv AB

Passenger protection apparatus  
Patent #
US 7,761,206 B2
Filed 03/21/2006

Current Assignee
Calsonic Kansei Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Calsonic Kansei Corporation

CONTROL UNIT AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A PASSENGER PROTECTION SYSTEM  
Patent #
US 20100324786A1
Filed 12/28/2007

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Vehicle rollover prediction with occupant restraint system activation  
Patent #
US 20090099735A1
Filed 10/10/2007

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING VEHICLE ROLLOVER USING EHANCED SENSOR INPUTS AND PROCESSING ARCHITECTURE  
Patent #
US 20090105899A1
Filed 05/11/2007

Current Assignee
TRW Automotive USLLC

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Automotive USLLC

Methods for Detecting Vehicle Rollover  
Patent #
US 20090150021A1
Filed 02/12/2009

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

FAST SENSING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SOIL AND CURBTRIPPED VEHICLE ROLLOVERS  
Patent #
US 20090143944A1
Filed 11/06/2008

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH

Motor vehicle with a safety system with a preventive action  
Patent #
US 20090150028A1
Filed 07/29/2005

Current Assignee
Daimler AG

Sponsoring Entity
Daimler AG

VEHICLE INSTABILITY DETECTION AND PREVENTION SYSTEM  
Patent #
US 20090164060A1
Filed 02/16/2009

Current Assignee
SOLIDICA INC.

Sponsoring Entity
SOLIDICA INC.

Rollover prediction and warning method  
Patent #
US 7,573,375 B2
Filed 05/02/2007

Current Assignee
PACCAR Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
PACCAR Incorporated

Seatbelt pretensioner arrangement  
Patent #
US 7,624,833 B2
Filed 10/08/2007

Current Assignee
Autoliv AB

Sponsoring Entity
Autoliv AB

SeatBelt Pretensioner Arrangement  
Patent #
US 20080023246A1
Filed 10/05/2007

Current Assignee
Autoliv AB

Sponsoring Entity
Autoliv AB

SEATBELT PRETENSIONER ARRANGEMENT  
Patent #
US 20080033616A1
Filed 10/08/2007

Current Assignee
Autoliv AB

Sponsoring Entity
Autoliv AB

INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR STABILITY CONTROL OF YAW, ROLL AND LATERAL MOTION OF A DRIVING VEHICLE USING AN INTEGRATED SENSING SYSTEM TO DETERMINE LONGITUDINAL VELOCITY  
Patent #
US 20080059021A1
Filed 08/30/2006

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION  
Patent #
US 20080118020A1
Filed 11/17/2006

Current Assignee
University of Notre DAME Du Lac

Sponsoring Entity
University of Notre DAME Du Lac

Method and Apparatus for Vehicle Rollover Mitigation  
Patent #
US 20080281487A1
Filed 03/23/2005

Current Assignee
Kelsey Hayes Company

Sponsoring Entity
Kelsey Hayes Company

ROLLOVER PREDICTION AND WARNING METHOD  
Patent #
US 20080272899A1
Filed 05/02/2007

Current Assignee
PACCAR Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
PACCAR Incorporated

SENSOR INTEGRATION FOR AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT  
Patent #
US 20080303254A1
Filed 06/11/2007

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING VEHICLE ROLLOVER USING POSITION TRACKING  
Patent #
US 20080312813A1
Filed 06/16/2008

Current Assignee
PeopleNet Communications Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
PeopleNet Communications Corporation

Apparatus and method for measuring speed of a moving object  
Patent #
US 7,289,898 B2
Filed 03/28/2006

Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Methods and systems for detecting automobile rollover  
Patent #
US 20060058934A1
Filed 09/15/2004

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Passenger protection apparatus  
Patent #
US 20060161323A1
Filed 03/21/2006

Current Assignee
Calsonic Kansei Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Calsonic Kansei Corporation

SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING ROLLOVER IN A VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM  
Patent #
US 20060184299A1
Filed 02/11/2005

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Vehicle rollover detection method based on differential zaxis acceleration  
Patent #
US 20060184300A1
Filed 02/11/2005

Current Assignee
Manlove Gregory J., Peter J. Schubert, Charles A. Cluff, Robertson John William, Brogoitti James H., Rich David B.

Sponsoring Entity
Manlove Gregory J., Peter J. Schubert, Charles A. Cluff, Robertson John William, Brogoitti James H., Rich David B.

Impact sensor and method for testing the same  
Patent #
US 20060236745A1
Filed 07/08/2004

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Apparatus and method for measuring speed of a moving object  
Patent #
US 20060293826A1
Filed 03/28/2006

Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Vehiclerollover detecting apparatus and vehiclerollover detecting method  
Patent #
US 20050004730A1
Filed 07/01/2004

Current Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation

Vehicle rollover prediction with occupant restraint system activation  
Patent #
US 8,086,376 B2
Filed 10/10/2007

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Impact sensor and method for testing the same  
Patent #
US 7,305,863 B2
Filed 07/08/2004

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Method and system for iterative reconstruction  
Patent #
US 8,175,115 B2
Filed 11/17/2006

Current Assignee
University of Notre DAME Du Lac

Sponsoring Entity
University of Notre DAME Du Lac

Methods and device for determining the roll angle for occupant protection devices  
Patent #
US 8,185,271 B2
Filed 09/26/2006

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

MOTION CONTROL APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE  
Patent #
US 20120283923A1
Filed 01/30/2012

Current Assignee
Advics Company Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Advics Company Limited

Selflearning autolocation of all tire ID's on a multiaxle vehicle  
Patent #
US 8,204,645 B2
Filed 06/20/2007

Current Assignee
Compagnie Generale DES Etablissements Michelin SCA

Sponsoring Entity
Compagnie Generale DES Etablissements Michelin SCA

Safety system and method for a vehicle  
Patent #
US 8,344,867 B2
Filed 07/08/2009

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Safety method and device for vehicle rollover prediction using estimated lateral vehicle velocity  
Patent #
US 8,346,439 B2
Filed 09/24/2009

Current Assignee
Continental Teves Incorporated, Continental Automotive GmbH, Continental Automotive Systems US Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Continental Teves Incorporated, Continental Automotive GmbH, Continental Automotive Systems US Incorporated

Good checking for vehicle lateral acceleration sensor  
Patent #
US 8,401,730 B2
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

Good checking for vehicle wheel speed sensors  
Patent #
US 8,467,929 B2
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

Good checking for vehicle yaw rate sensor  
Patent #
US 8,494,708 B2
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

System and method for predicting vehicle rollover using position tracking  
Patent #
US 8,560,217 B2
Filed 06/16/2008

Current Assignee
PeopleNet Communications Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Cadec Global Incorporated

Even driven data acquisition switch  
Patent #
US 8,688,380 B2
Filed 04/23/2012

Current Assignee
GeoTab Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
GeoTab Incorporated

Integrated control system for stability control of yaw, roll and lateral motion of a driving vehicle using an integrated sensing system to determine longitudinal velocity  
Patent #
US 8,712,639 B2
Filed 08/30/2006

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Vehicle inertial sensor systems  
Patent #
US 8,712,599 B1
Filed 02/22/2013

Current Assignee
Analog Devices Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Analog Devices Inc.

Good checking for vehicle longitudinal acceleration sensor  
Patent #
US 8,738,219 B2
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

Good checking for vehicle pressure sensor  
Patent #
US 8,754,764 B2
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

Method of determining the lateral velocity of a vehicle during abnormal driving situations  
Patent #
US 8,862,333 B2
Filed 07/16/2010

Current Assignee
Continental Automotive Systems US Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Continental Automotive Systems US Incorporated

SEAT ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, SEAT ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND SAFETY SEAT  
Patent #
US 20140333103A1
Filed 12/23/2013

Current Assignee
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd.

Motion control apparatus for vehicle  
Patent #
US 8,924,116 B2
Filed 01/30/2012

Current Assignee
Advics Company Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Advics Company Limited

Good checking for vehicle steering angle sensor  
Patent #
US 8,935,037 B2
Filed 08/20/2010

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC

Apparatus and method for detecting vehicle rollover using enhanced sensor inputs and processing architecture  
Patent #
US 9,150,177 B2
Filed 05/11/2007

Current Assignee
TRW Automotive USLLC

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Automotive USLLC

System, method, and apparatus to prevent commercial vehicle rollover  
Patent #
US 9,283,825 B2
Filed 02/25/2015

Current Assignee
Mousa Isam

Sponsoring Entity
Mousa Isam

Acceleration sensing of fast roll and slow roll for vehicle  
Patent #
US 9,821,744 B2
Filed 12/15/2015

Current Assignee
ROBERT BOSCH KFT, Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
ROBERT BOSCH KFT, Robert Bosch GmbH

Rollover prevention apparatus  
Patent #
US 10,259,494 B2
Filed 02/24/2017

Current Assignee
ARSUS LLC

Sponsoring Entity
ARSUS LLC

Vehicle rollover detection system  
Patent #
US 6,529,811 B2
Filed 03/01/2002

Current Assignee
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Method for rollover detection for automotive vehicles with safetyrelated devices  
Patent #
US 6,618,656 B2
Filed 05/22/2001

Current Assignee
Temic Telefunken Microelectronic GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Temic Telefunken Microelectronic GmbH

Attitude sensing system for an automotive vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,631,317 B2
Filed 10/01/2001

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Vehicle rollover detection having variable sensitivity  
Patent #
US 6,654,671 B2
Filed 02/15/2002

Current Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Delphi Technologies Inc.

Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable occupant protection device  
Patent #
US 6,341,252 B1
Filed 12/21/1999

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Limited

Configuration for triggering restraining devices in a motor vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,390,498 B1
Filed 02/16/1999

Current Assignee
Continental Automotive GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Siemens AG

Safety arrangement in a vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,421,592 B1
Filed 12/11/2000

Current Assignee
Veoneer Sweden AB

Sponsoring Entity
Autoliv AB

Process for determining lateral overturning of vehicle, and system for detecting inclination angle of vehicle body  
Patent #
US 6,438,463 B1
Filed 09/06/2000

Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

System for detecting inclination angle of vehicle body  
Patent #
US 20020173882A1
Filed 07/03/2002

Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Method and apparatus for deploying airbags  
Patent #
US 20020166710A1
Filed 06/26/2002

Current Assignee
American Vehicular Sciences LLC

Sponsoring Entity
American Vehicular Sciences LLC

Method and apparatus for determining lateral velocity of a vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,477,480 B1
Filed 11/15/2000

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Device and method for controlling accident protection triggering devices in motor vehicles  
Patent #
US 6,169,946 B1
Filed 08/21/1998

Current Assignee
BMW AG

Sponsoring Entity
BMW AG

Method and apparatus for reducing vehicle rollover  
Patent #
US 6,170,594 B1
Filed 06/01/1999

Current Assignee
Gilbert Micky G.

Sponsoring Entity
Gilbert Micky G.

Roll control device of vehicles with tracing of turning course  
Patent #
US 6,178,368 B1
Filed 06/24/1999

Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraint device using crash severity indexing and crush zone sensor  
Patent #
US 6,186,539 B1
Filed 11/20/1998

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Limited

Vehicle rollover sensing using yaw rate estimation  
Patent #
US 6,192,305 B1
Filed 05/18/1998

Current Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Delco Electronics Corporation

Roll sensor system for a vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,212,455 B1
Filed 12/03/1998

Current Assignee
Indiana Mills Manufacturing Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Indiana Mills Manufacturing Incorporated

Rollover detector for vehicles  
Patent #
US 6,225,894 B1
Filed 09/24/1998

Current Assignee
Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC

Vehicle suspension system  
Patent #
US 6,264,212 B1
Filed 08/02/1999

Current Assignee
Technology Investments Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Technology Investments Limited

Method and apparatus for controlling an active suspension system  
Patent #
US 6,259,982 B1
Filed 02/02/1993

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Limited

Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,263,261 B1
Filed 12/21/1999

Current Assignee
Ford Motor Company

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Tipping indicator  
Patent #
US 6,262,658 B1
Filed 12/17/1999

Current Assignee
Intel Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Intel Corporation

Method and apparatus for detecting rollover of an automotive vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,282,474 B1
Filed 06/04/2000

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Vehicle attitude angle estimation using sensed signal blending  
Patent #
US 6,292,759 B1
Filed 11/19/1998

Current Assignee
Invensense Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Delphi Technologies Inc.

Process for determining lateral overturning of vehicle  
Patent #
US 20010029438A1
Filed 03/15/2001

Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Method and apparatus for detecting a vehicle rollover  
Patent #
US 6,301,536 B1
Filed 11/18/1999

Current Assignee
Visteon Global Technologies Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Visteon Global Technologies Incorporated

Process for determining lateral overturning of vehicle and occupant protecting system in vehicle  
Patent #
US 20010038202A1
Filed 03/15/2001

Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Device and method for triggering an occupant protection system in the event of a motor vehicle rollover  
Patent #
US 6,315,074 B1
Filed 10/02/2000

Current Assignee
Siemens AG

Sponsoring Entity
Siemens AG

Roll over detection for an automotive vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,332,104 B1
Filed 12/21/1999

Current Assignee
Ford Motor Company

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Integrated occupant protection system  
Patent #
US 20010048215A1
Filed 01/26/2001

Current Assignee
American Vehicular Sciences LLC

Sponsoring Entity
American Vehicular Sciences LLC

Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraint device using crash severity indexing  
Patent #
US 6,036,225 A
Filed 07/01/1998

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Limited

Vehicle rollover sensing using shortterm integration  
Patent #
US 6,038,495 A
Filed 02/06/1998

Current Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Delco Electronics Corporation

Tilt control apparatus for industrial vehicles  
Patent #
US 6,047,229 A
Filed 04/16/1998

Current Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyoda Jidoshokki Seisakusho

Sponsoring Entity
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyoda Jidoshokki Seisakusho

Arrangement for detecting motorvehicle rollovers  
Patent #
US 6,055,472 A
Filed 09/11/1998

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Antirollover brake system  
Patent #
US 6,065,558 A
Filed 06/30/1998

Current Assignee
Dynamotive IP LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Dynamotive LLC

Controllable cab suspension  
Patent #
US 6,070,681 A
Filed 06/13/1997

Current Assignee
Lord Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Lord Corporation

Method of controlling a vehicle active tilt control system  
Patent #
US 6,076,027 A
Filed 02/03/1998

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Roll over determining method  
Patent #
US 6,104,284 A
Filed 06/14/1999

Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

Method and apparatus for sensing side impact crash conditions with an enhanced safing function  
Patent #
US 6,095,554 A
Filed 09/25/1998

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Limited

Control device in a motor vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,113,138 A
Filed 12/09/1997

Current Assignee
Continental Automotive GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Siemens AG

Method and arrangement for detecting a vehicle rollover  
Patent #
US 6,141,604 A
Filed 04/16/1999

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Method and apparatus for determining oscillation values and other vehiclespecific quantities of a vehicle  
Patent #
US 6,157,295 A
Filed 05/24/1999

Current Assignee
Daimler Chrysler Company LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Daimler Chrysler Company LLC

Vehicle suspension control system  
Patent #
US 5,864,768 A
Filed 09/09/1996

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity


Controller for vehicular safety device  
Patent #
US 5,890,084 A
Filed 05/13/1997

Current Assignee
Key Safety Systems Inc.

Sponsoring Entity


Method of improving response time in a vehicle active tilt control system  
Patent #
US 5,948,028 A
Filed 02/03/1998

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity


Method for enhancing vehicle stability  
Patent #
US 5,948,027 A
Filed 09/06/1996

Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC

Sponsoring Entity


Configuration for controlling a restraining device, in particular for a motor vehicle  
Patent #
US 5,977,653 A
Filed 09/08/1998

Current Assignee
Continental Automotive GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Siemens AG

Vehicle rollover sensing  
Patent #
US 6,002,975 A
Filed 02/06/1998

Current Assignee
Invensense Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Delco Electronics Corporation

Vehicle rollover sensing using extended kalman filter  
Patent #
US 6,002,974 A
Filed 02/06/1998

Current Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
Delco Electronics Corporation

Process and circuit for controlling the control unit of a system for protecting vehicle occupants  
Patent #
US 5,742,916 A
Filed 01/17/1997

Current Assignee
Siemens AG

Sponsoring Entity
Siemens AG

Accelerometer and method of manufacture  
Patent #
US 5,755,978 A
Filed 12/05/1996

Current Assignee
Systron Donner Inertial Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
BEI Sensors Systems Company Incorporated

Rotation rate sensor with optical sensing device  
Patent #
US 5,796,002 A
Filed 04/30/1997

Current Assignee
Systron Donner Inertial Inc.

Sponsoring Entity
BEI SENSORS MOTION SYSTEMS COMPANY INC.

System and method for the detection of vehicle rollover conditions  
Patent #
US 5,825,284 A
Filed 12/10/1996

Current Assignee
ROLLOVER OPERATIONS LLC

Sponsoring Entity
ROLLOVER OPERATIONS LLC

Vehicle pneumatic seat rollover safety vent valve  
Patent #
US 5,590,736 A
Filed 09/08/1995

Current Assignee
Norgren Gt Development Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
GT Development Corporation

Automobile air bag systems  
Patent #
US 5,602,734 A
Filed 09/23/1994

Current Assignee
Methode Electronics Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
ADVANCED SAFETY CONCEPTS INC.

Method and system for detecting vehicle rollover  
Patent #
US 5,610,575 A
Filed 08/25/1994

Current Assignee
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraining device in response to discrete control zones  
Patent #
US 5,626,359 A
Filed 03/22/1995

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Incorporated

Electronic safety device for vehicle occupants including a memory device for storing fault conditions and associated control commands  
Patent #
US 5,646,454 A
Filed 06/06/1995

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Procedure and device for protecting vehicle occupants  
Patent #
US 5,673,932 A
Filed 03/12/1996

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Crash sensor assembly including both an inertia sensor and an accelerometer and method  
Patent #
US 5,684,336 A
Filed 03/04/1996

Current Assignee
TRW Limited

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Limited

Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash  
Patent #
US 5,684,701 A
Filed 06/07/1995

Current Assignee
American Vehicular Sciences LLC

Sponsoring Entity
Automotive Technologies International Incorporated

Offsetdrift correcting device for gyrosensor  
Patent #
US 5,699,256 A
Filed 06/01/1995

Current Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited

Rollover seat system  
Patent #
US 5,492,368 A
Filed 05/22/1995

Current Assignee
General Motors Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
General Motors Corporation

Predictor/check crash discriminator  
Patent #
US 5,508,918 A
Filed 10/08/1991

Current Assignee
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Apparatus and method for sensing and restraining an occupant of a vehicle seat  
Patent #
US 5,573,269 A
Filed 12/02/1993

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Incorporated

Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraining device in response to discrete control zones  
Patent #
US 5,413,378 A
Filed 12/02/1993

Current Assignee
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Sponsoring Entity
TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Incorporated

Seat and occupant restraint system  
Patent #
US 5,451,094 A
Filed 06/27/1994

Current Assignee
Indiana Mills Manufacturing Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Indiana Mills Manufacturing Incorporated

System and method for actuating vehicle safety device using damped measures  
Patent #
US 5,337,238 A
Filed 10/08/1991

Current Assignee
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Vehicle occupant safety system and method for operating the same  
Patent #
US 5,359,515 A
Filed 02/28/1992

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Power rate system and method for actuating vehicle safety device  
Patent #
US 5,363,302 A
Filed 06/04/1991

Current Assignee
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Sponsoring Entity
Automotive Systems Laboratory Incorporated

Yawingmomentum detecting apparatus for a vehicle, a detecting method thereof, and motion controlling apparatus for a vehicle, utilizing the detecting apparatus  
Patent #
US 5,369,580 A
Filed 03/16/1992

Current Assignee
Hitachi Automotive Engineering Incorporated, Hitachi Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
Hitachi Automotive Engineering Incorporated, Hitachi Ltd.

Gyrocompass  
Patent #
US 5,375,336 A
Filed 04/29/1993

Current Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Murata Manufacturing Co Limited

Apparatus for protecting a rear passenger for an automotive vehicle  
Patent #
US 5,203,600 A
Filed 07/01/1991

Current Assignee
Mazda Motor Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Mazda Motor Corporation

Orientation sensing apparatus  
Patent #
US 5,218,771 A
Filed 04/15/1992

Current Assignee
TV Interactive Data Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
TV Interactive Data Corporation

Siliconmass angular acceleration sensor  
Patent #
US 5,233,213 A
Filed 06/04/1992

Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH

Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch GmbH

Control device for an occupant safety device of motor vehicles  
Patent #
US 5,261,506 A
Filed 01/23/1992

Current Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG

Sponsoring Entity
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG

Bias correction apparatus of gyro  
Patent #
US 5,270,959 A
Filed 12/27/1991

Current Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Sumitomo Electric Industries Limited

Calibration apparatus of angular velocity sensor in selfcontained navigational system  
Patent #
US 5,115,238 A
Filed 04/02/1990

Current Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Sumitomo Electric Industries Limited

Apparatus for controlling attitude of passenger  
Patent #
US 5,125,472 A
Filed 12/20/1990

Current Assignee
Mazda Motor Corporation

Sponsoring Entity
Mazda Motor Corporation

Apparatus for determining the attitude of a vehicle  
Patent #
US 5,172,323 A
Filed 12/06/1991

Current Assignee
the united states of america as represented by the secretary of the navy

Sponsoring Entity
the united states of america as represented by the secretary of the navy

Method of correcting zero point of gyro and apparatus therefor  
Patent #
US 5,065,612 A
Filed 09/08/1989

Current Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Limited

Sponsoring Entity
Sumitomo Electric Industries Limited

System for automatically preventing turnover of two wheeled vehicles  
Patent #
US 4,691,798 A
Filed 10/10/1985

Current Assignee
Engelbach Thomas S.

Sponsoring Entity
Engelbach Thomas S.

Apparatus for detecting an overturning moment in a moving vehicle, and jackknifing in a trailertruck combination  
Patent #
US 4,592,565 A
Filed 10/17/1984

Current Assignee
Eagle Leo

Sponsoring Entity
Eagle Leo

Method of adjusting the zeropoint of rate type sensor  
Patent #
US 4,470,124 A
Filed 06/01/1982

Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Sponsoring Entity


Acceleration error compensated attitude sensing and control apparatus and method  
Patent #
US 4,038,876 A
Filed 03/04/1976

Current Assignee
NEW SD INC. A CORP. OF DE

Sponsoring Entity
Systron Donner Corporation

Angular position sensing and control system, apparatus and method  
Patent #
US 3,899,028 A
Filed 08/28/1973

Current Assignee
NEW SD INC. A CORP. OF DE

Sponsoring Entity
Systron Donner Corporation Concord CA

Steering control system for a motor vehicle  
Patent #
US 3,897,846 A
Filed 02/28/1974

Current Assignee
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.

Sponsoring Entity
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.

DEVICE IN VEHICLES, PARTICULARLY AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES, FOR SKID PREVENTION  
Patent #
US 3,719,246 A
Filed 12/16/1969

Current Assignee
Firma Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche K.G. StuttgartZuffenhausen DT

Sponsoring Entity
Firma Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche K.G. StuttgartZuffenhausen DT

26 Claims
 1. A system for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. a roll angular velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said roll angular velocity sensor is adapted to measure a roll rate of the vehicle about a roll axis, and said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. a lateral velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said lateral velocity sensor is responsive to a velocity of the vehicle in a direction that is substantially lateral to said vehicle, and said lateral velocity sensor is selected from an ultrasonic sensor, a microwave sensor, a radar sensor, and an optical velocity sensor; and
c. a processor operatively coupled to said roll angular velocity sensor and to said lateral velocity sensor, wherein said processor is adapted to generate a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to a signal from said roll angular velocity sensor and to a signal from said lateral velocity sensor, said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to a deployment threshold, said deployment threshold is responsive to said measure of lateral velocity, said processor is adapted to determine a measure of roll angle by integrating said signal from said roll angular velocity sensor, and said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is further responsive to said measure of roll angle.
 a. a roll angular velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said roll angular velocity sensor is adapted to measure a roll rate of the vehicle about a roll axis, and said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
 2. A system for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising a. a roll angular velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said roll angular velocity sensor is adapted to measure a roll rate of the vehicle about a roll axis, and said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
 b. a lateral velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said lateral velocity sensor is responsive to a velocity of the vehicle in a direction that is substantially lateral to said vehicle, and said lateral velocity sensor is selected from an ultrasonic sensor, a microwave sensor, a radar sensor, and an optical velocity sensor; and
c. a processor operatively coupled to said roll angular velocity sensor and to said lateral velocity sensor, wherein said processor is adapted to generate a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to a signal from said roll annular velocity sensor and to a signal from said lateral velocity sensor, said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to a deployment threshold, and said deployment threshold is responsive to said measure of lateral velocity; and
d. a longitudinal velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said longitudinal velocity sensor is responsive to a velocity of the vehicle in a direction that is substantially along said longitudinal axis of the vehicle, and said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is further responsive to a signal from said longitudinal velocity sensor.  View Dependent Claims (3)
 b. a lateral velocity sensor operatively coupled to the vehicle, wherein said lateral velocity sensor is responsive to a velocity of the vehicle in a direction that is substantially lateral to said vehicle, and said lateral velocity sensor is selected from an ultrasonic sensor, a microwave sensor, a radar sensor, and an optical velocity sensor; and
 4. A method of providing for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. providing for acquiring a measure of lateral velocity of the vehicle, wherein said measure of lateral velocity is directly representative of a lateral velocity of the vehicle;
c. providing for generating a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, wherein said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to said measure of roll angular velocity and to said measure of lateral velocity;
d. providing for comparing a third measure with a first threshold, wherein said third measure is responsive to said measure of lateral velocity; and
e. providing for delaying or inhibiting deployment of said safety restraint system if said third measure is less than said first threshold.
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
 5. A method of providing for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. providing for acquiring a measure of lateral velocity of the vehicle, wherein said measure of lateral velocity is directly representative of a lateral velocity of the vehicle;
c. providing for generating a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, wherein said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to said measure of roll angular velocity and to said measure of lateral velocity;
d. providing for acquiring a measure of longitudinal velocity of the vehicle;
e. providing for determining a measure of translational velocity of the vehicle, wherein said measure of translational velocity is responsive to said measure of longitudinal velocity and to said measure of lateral velocity;
f. providing for comparing a fourth measure with a second threshold, wherein said fourth measure is responsive to said measure of translational velocity; and
g. providing for inhibiting deployment of said safety restraint system if said fourth measure is less than said second threshold.
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
 6. A method of providing for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. providing for acquiring a measure of lateral velocity of the vehicle, wherein said measure of lateral velocity is directly representative of a lateral velocity of the vehicle;
c. providing for generating a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, wherein said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to said measure of roll angular velocity and to said measure of lateral velocity;
d. providing for determining or acquiring a measure of roll angle from said measure of roll angular velocity;
e. providing for determining a threshold function in a phase space of said measure of roll angular velocity and said measure of roll angle;
f. providing for modifying said threshold function responsive to said measure of lateral velocity; and
g. providing for comparing a measure in phase space with said threshold function, where said measure in phase space comprises a combination of said measure of roll angular velocity and said measure of roll angle, wherein said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to the operation of comparing said measure in phase space with said threshold function.  View Dependent Claims (7, 8)
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
 9. A method of providing for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. providing for acquiring a measure of lateral velocity of the vehicle, wherein said measure of lateral velocity is directly representative of a lateral velocity of the vehicle;
c. providing for generating a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, wherein said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to said measure of roll angular velocity and to said measure of lateral velocity;
d. generating a fifth measure responsive to said measure of lateral velocity and to at least one of a measure selected from the group comprising said measure of roll angular velocity, a measure of roll angle of the vehicle, a measure of lateral acceleration of the vehicle, a measure of vertical acceleration of the vehicle, a measure of steering wheel angle of the vehicle, a measure of longitudinal speed of the vehicle, and a measure of yaw rate of the vehicle;
e. comparing said fifth measure with a third threshold; and
f. controlling said safety restraint system responsive to the operation of comparing said fifth measure with said third threshold.  View Dependent Claims (10)
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
 11. A method of providing for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. providing for acquiring a measure of lateral velocity of the vehicle, wherein said measure of lateral velocity is directly representative of a lateral velocity of the vehicle; and
c. providing for generating a signal for controlling a safety restraint system, wherein said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to said measure of roll angular velocity and to said measure of lateral velocity, wherein the operation of providing for generating said signal for controlling said safety restraint system comprises;
i. providing for acquiring a measure of lateral acceleration of the vehicle;
ii. providing for determining a figure of merit responsive to said measure of lateral acceleration and said measure of roll angular velocity;
iii. providing for determining a figure of merit threshold responsive to said measure of lateral velocity; and
iv. providing for detecting the rollover condition by comparing said figure of merit with said figure of merit threshold.  View Dependent Claims (12, 13)
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
 14. A method of providing for detecting a rollover condition of a vehicle, comprising:
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
b. providing for acquiring a measure of lateral acceleration of the vehicle;
c. providing for acquiring at least one of a measure of longitudinal velocity of the vehicle and a measure of yaw angular velocity about a yaw axis;
d. providing for determining a measure of a turn radius of the vehicle;
e. providing for determining a measure of lateral velocity of the vehicle responsive to said measure of lateral acceleration, to said measure of said turn radius, and to at least one of said measure of longitudinal velocity and said measure of yaw angular velocity; and
f. providing for generating a signal for controlling said safety restraint system, wherein said signal for controlling said safety restraint system is responsive to said measure of roll angular velocity and to said measure of lateral velocity.  View Dependent Claims (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26)
 a. providing for acquiring a measure of roll angular velocity of the vehicle about a roll axis, wherein said roll axis is substantially aligned with a longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
1 Specification
The instant application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/366,148 filed on Mar. 19, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSIn the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1a illustrates a rear view of a vehicle prior to the initiation of a roll event;
FIG. 1b illustrates a rear view of a vehicle during a roll event;
FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a rollover detection system;
FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of a rollover detection algorithm;
FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm incorporated in the rollover detection algorithm;
FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a safing algorithm incorporated in the rollover detection algorithm;
FIG. 6 illustrates a flow diagram of the rollover detection algorithm;
FIG. 7 illustrates a flow diagram of an algorithm incorporated in the rollover detection algorithm for determining if sensor recalibration is required;
FIGS. 8a, 8b and 8c are tables that illustrate details of the rollover detection algorithm;
FIGS. 9a and 9b are tables that illustrate examples of values of parameters of the rollover detection algorithm;
FIG. 10 illustrates a table of conditions associated with various rollover events and nonrollover events;
FIG. 11a illustrates a plot of filtered roll rate, roll angle and filtered lateral acceleration of a vehicle subjected to a corkscrew roll test designated as Test A, resulting in a rollover event;
FIG. 11b illustrates a plot of filtered roll rate, roll angle and filtered lateral acceleration of a vehicle subjected to a corkscrew roll test designated as Test B, resulting in a nonrollover event;
FIG. 11c illustrates a plot of filtered roll rate, roll angle and filtered lateral acceleration of a vehicle subjected to a deceleration sled test designated as Test C, resulting in a nonrollover event;
FIG. 11d illustrates a plot of filtered roll rate, roll angle and filtered lateral acceleration of a vehicle subjected to a deceleration sled test designated as Test D, resulting in a rollover event;
FIG. 12 illustrates plots of a figureofmerit and an associated deployment threshold for a rollover measure as a function of time, in accordance with a measures algorithm, for the rollover event of Test D and the nonrollover event of Test C;
FIG. 13 illustrates a plot of roll rate as a function of time for a signal having a roll rate offset;
FIG. 14 illustrates plots of roll angle as a function of time based upon the data of FIG. 13, for various associated processes for determining roll angle from roll rate;
FIG. 15 illustrates plots of roll rate as a function of roll angle, and plots of associated rollover thresholds, in accordance with an energy algorithm, for the rollover event of Test A and the nonrollover event of Test B;
FIG. 16 illustrates an embodiment of a rollover detection system comprising a lateral velocity sensor;
FIG. 17 illustrates an adjustment of a roll rate—roll angle deployment threshold responsive to a measure of lateral velocity; and
FIG. 18 illustrates a threshold multiplier as a function of lateral velocity.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTThere exists a need for a vehicle rollover detection system that provides for discrimination of vehicle rollover sufficiently quickly to enable associated safety restraint actuators, e.g. seat belt pretensioners, air bags or roll curtains, to be deployed before an initial head contact with the interior of the vehicle, particularly for the types of rollovers resulting in relatively fast head closure times. For example, there are some roll events for which head closure may occur before it can be reliably determined from the physics of the roll event whether the vehicle will completely rollover. There further exists a need for a robust vehicle rollover detection system that provides for sufficiently fast discrimination of vehicle rollover responsive to either relatively slow or relatively fast rollover events.
Referring to FIG. 1a, a rollover detection system 10 is seen mounted in a vehicle 12. The vehicle 12 is shown with a local Cartesian coordinate system with the Xaxis aligned with the vehicle's longitudinal axis—positive forward,—the Yaxis aligned with the vehicle's lateral axis—positive leftward,—and the Zaxis aligned with the vehicle's vertical axis—positive upward. The vehicle 12 has a mass M, and the associated centerofgravity CG thereof is located at a height Z<sub>0 </sub>above the ground. The vehicle 12 is shown sliding at a velocity U in the negative Y direction towards an obstruction 14.
Referring to FIG. 1b, upon one or more wheels 16 of the vehicle 12 engaging the obstruction 14, the resulting reaction force F therefrom causes the vehicle 12 to rotate about the Xaxis relative to a trip point 13, at a time dependent angular velocity ω<sub>x</sub>(t) causing a time dependent angular position θ(t), wherein the vehicle 12 has a momentofinertia I<sub>x </sub>about the associated axis of rotation that is parallel with the Xaxis and intersecting the trip point 13. The rotation of the vehicle 12 increases the height Z<sub>CG </sub>of the centerofgravity CG relative to the height Z<sub>0 </sub>thereof prior to engagement with the obstruction 14, thereby increasing the potential energy M·g·(Z<sub>CG</sub>−Z<sub>0</sub>) of the vehicle 12 relative to the preengagement position and orientation. Accordingly, the potential energy of the vehicle 12 is dependent upon the angular position θ thereof. Furthermore, with rotation, the vehicle 12 gains an angular kinetic energy of
<maths id="MATHUS00001" num="00001"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>x</mi></msub><mo>·</mo><mrow><mfrac><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mn>2</mn></mfrac><mo>.</mo></mrow></mrow></math></maths>The reaction force F also causes a linear acceleration
<maths id="MATHUS00002" num="00002"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>A</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mi>F</mi><mi>M</mi></mfrac></mrow></math></maths>of the centerofgravity CG, as indicated by the lateral acceleration component A<sub>y</sub>(t) along the local Yaxis. Whereas FIGS. 1a and 1b illustrate a roll event caused by the impact of a sliding vehicle with an obstruction, it should be understood that roll events can be caused by other scenarios, e.g. a tire blowout followed by a subsequent engagement of the associated wheel rim with the ground. Accordingly, the rollover detection system 10 is not limited to a particular type of roll event.
Referring to FIG. 2, the rollover detection system 10 comprises a lateral accelerometer 18 and an angular rate sensor 20, which are preferably, but not necessarily, mounted proximate to the centerofgravity CG of the vehicle 12. The lateral accelerometer 18 is responsive to a time dependent lateral acceleration component A<sub>y</sub>(t) of acceleration along the local Yaxis. For example, the lateral accelerometer 18 may comprise an accelerometer, e.g. a micromachined accelerometer having at least one axis of sensitivity, with an axis of sensitivity substantially aligned with the local Yaxis. The angular rate sensor 20, e.g. a gyroscope, is oriented so as to be responsive to a timedependent component of angular velocity ω<sub>x</sub>(t) about the local Xaxis. The lateral accelerometer 18 and angular rate sensor 20 are operatively coupled to respective filters 22, 24 that filter the respective signals A<sub>y</sub>(t) and ω<sub>x</sub>(t) for processing by a processor 26 having a memory 28. It should be understood that the filters 22, 24 can be either separate from or incorporated in the processor 26, and may be either analog or digital, or a combination thereof, as known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Moreover, the filters 22, 24 could be adapted as part of the respective lateral accelerometer 18 or angular rate sensor 20. The processor 26 processes the respective filtered Ã<sub>y</sub>(t) and {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x</sub>(t) signals so as to discriminate whether or not the vehicle would be likely to roll over, and responsive thereto, to control the actuation of appropriate safety restraint actuators 30 so as to mitigate rollover induced injury to an occupant of the vehicle 12. For example, the processor 26 may comprise a digital computer, microprocessor or other programmable device, an analog processor, analog or a digital circuitry, or a combination thereof. Moreover, the safety restraint actuators 30 may include, but are not limited to, a seat belt pretensioner 32 operatively connected to a seat belt 34; a thorax air bag inflator 36 adapted to provide protection from both rollover and sideimpact crashes; a roll curtain 38 adapted to deploy between the occupant and the side window 39 of the vehicle 12; or an overhead air bag inflator 40 adapted to deploy an air bag from the roof or headliner of the vehicle 12. Whereas FIG. 2 illustrates the safety restraint actuators 30 for one seating position of the vehicle 12, it should be understood that safety restraint actuators 30 may be provided at each seating position, and that the rollover detection system 10 can be adapted to control any or all of the safety restraint actuators 30 responsive to rollovers in any direction for which the associated safety restraint actuators 30 are adapted to mitigate occupant injury. Moreover, the particular set of safety restraint actuators 30 need not necessarily include all of those described hereinabove, or may include other types of safety restraint actuators 30 not described hereinabove.
Referring to FIG. 3, in accordance with one embodiment of a rollover detection algorithm 100 for detecting a vehicle rollover and controlling the actuation of one or more associated safety restraint actuators 30—e.g. in accordance with the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 2—comprises the combination of a data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm 150, a measures algorithm 300.1, an energy algorithm 300.2, a safing algorithm 200 and associated logic 330′, 340 that generates a signal 342 that controls the actuation of the safety restraint actuator(s) 30 responsive thereto.
The measures algorithm 300.1 uses a heuristic, timedomain discrimination process to detect a rollover condition, and can be beneficial in shortening deployment times for most rollover events characterized by relatively fast head closure times (e.g. <250 msec) that are typically associated with larger lateral vehicle forces. The measures algorithm 300.1 utilizes both the filtered lateral acceleration component Ã<sub>y </sub>and filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x </sub>signals to evaluate a function that is compared with a threshold, that along with other criteria, are used to make a deployment decision.
The energy algorithm 300.2 uses a phasespace discrimination process—based upon the physics associated with a vehicle rollover process—to detect a rollover condition, and can be beneficial in providing reliable deployment decisions for slower roll events that are caused primarily by vertical forces on the vehicle or by low level lateral forces on the vehicle 12. The energy algorithm 300.2 utilizes the filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x </sub>signal to determine the roll state of the vehicle 12 and to compare the instantaneous total energy (rotational to kinetic and potential) thereof with that needed to cause the vehicle 12 to roll past an associated equilibrium position. The energy algorithm 300.2 utilizes both the filtered lateral acceleration component Ã<sub>y </sub>and filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x </sub>signals in the associated entrance and exit criteria.
Whereas FIG. 3 illustrates the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 used in combination, it should be understood that this is not essential, and that either of the algorithms can be used alone. However, the combination of algorithms increases the robustness of the associated rollover detection system 10, because for some conditions, e.g. “curbtrip” conditions, the measures algorithm 300.1 can provide faster discrimination than the energy algorithm 300.2; whereas for other conditions, e.g. “corkscrew”, “ramp” or “flip” conditions, the energy algorithm 300.2 can provide faster discrimination than the measures algorithm 300.1.
The measures algorithm 300.1 and energy algorithm 300.2 are independent of one another, although each utilizes common, filtered data from the data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm 150, i.e. a filtered lateral acceleration components Ã<sub>y </sub>and a filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x</sub>. Both the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 are characterized by associated entrance and exit criteria, wherein calculations associated with the respective algorithm are commenced if the respective associated entrance criteria is satisfied, and these calculations are terminated if the respective associated exit criteria is satisfied, and then reset if and when the entrance criteria are subsequently satisfied.
The safing algorithm 200 can improve the reliability of the rollover detection system 10 by providing an independent set of conditions, or safing criteria—dependent upon the filtered lateral acceleration components Ã<sub>y </sub>and/or filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x</sub>—that must be met in order to enable the deployment of the one or more associated safety restraint actuators 30. Both the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 are each “safed” by a common safing algorithm 200. Whereas the safing algorithm 200 provides for additional discrimination so as to mitigate against an undesirable actuation of the safety restraint actuators 30 responsive to nonrollover events, it should be understood that the safing algorithm 200 is not essential, and that either measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2 can be used alone, or in combination with one another, with or without the safing algorithm 200.
In the operation of the rollover detection algorithm 100, responsive to data from the data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm 150, if either the measures algorithm 300.1 OR 330′ the energy algorithm 300.2 detects a vehicle rollover condition, AND 340 if the safing algorithm 200 determines that an associated independent safing condition is satisfied, then, in step (350), one or more safety restraint actuators 30 are deployed so as to mitigate injury to an associated occupant of the vehicle, that could result from the rollover event, whether or not the vehicle 12 actually rolls over.
The data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm 150, safing algorithm 200, measures algorithm 300.1, and energy algorithm 300.2 are described hereinbelow with reference to flow charts illustrated in FIGS. 3–7. FIG. 6 illustrates a flow chart of a general algorithmic structure of both the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2, wherein particular details of the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 are provided in table format in FIGS. 8a–c. The algorithms are described mathematically, wherein parameters are used for application specific constants, and these parameters are listed in FIGS. 9a and 9b along with exemplary values for a particular type of vehicle. It should be understood that the parameters are generally adapted to a particular application, e.g. vehicle platform, and that the particular values of the parameters in FIGS. 9a and 9b are illustrative only, and should not be considered to limit the scope of the instant invention.
Referring to FIG. 4, the data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm 150 acquires a measurement of lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>from the lateral accelerometer 18 in step (152), and acquires a measurement of longitudinal angular velocity ω<sub>x</sub>, or roll rate, from the angular rate sensor 20 in step (158). Data from more than 100 rollover tests has indicated that the angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>associated with a rollover generally ranges between ±300 degrees/second
<maths id="MATHUS00003" num="00003"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mo>±</mo><mrow><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>max</mi></msubsup><mo></mo></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></maths>and the lateral acceleration component A<sub>y</sub>(t) associated therewith generally ranges between
<maths id="MATHUS00004" num="00004"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>20</mn></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>g</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.6em" height="0.6ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mo>±</mo><mrow><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>Y</mi><mi>max</mi></msubsup><mo></mo></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>.</mo></mrow></mrow></math></maths>Respective measurements of the lateral acceleration component A<sub>y</sub>(t) and the angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>that exceed these respective limits are respectively clipped thereat in steps (154) and (160) respectively. For example, the value of an lateral acceleration component A<sub>y</sub>(t) measurement less that −20 g would be set in step (154) to −20 g, for the example of an associated range of ±20 g. The polarities of the lateral accelerometer 18 and the angular rate sensor 20 are set so that the corresponding polarities of angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>and the lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>signals are the same as each other during a roll event. Generally, the level
<maths id="MATHUS00005" num="00005"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>Y</mi><mi>max</mi></msubsup><mo></mo></mrow></math></maths>for clipping signals from the lateral accelerometer 18 is set to the minimum of either 20 g or the range of the lateral accelerometer 18. Similarly, the level
<maths id="MATHUS00006" num="00006"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>max</mi></msubsup><mo></mo></mrow></math></maths>for clipping signals from the angular rate sensor 20 is set to the minimum of either 300 degrees/second or the range of the angular rate sensor 20.
The raw lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>and angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>data from the lateral accelerometer 18 and the angular rate sensor 20 respectively are filtered by respective filters 22, 24 in steps (156) and (162) respectively, so as to respectively provide a filtered lateral acceleration component Ã<sub>y </sub>and a filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x</sub>. The use of filtered measurements is beneficial in avoiding a false entrance of the roll discrimination algorithm, and in improving the associated discrimination process by the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2. The filters 22, 24 are, for example, moving average filters having a moving average window of T<sub>Avg</sub>, e.g. between 10 and 15 milliseconds, so as to provide a suitable compromise between fast signal response and noise reduction. As an example, for a processor 26 that uniformly samples the angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>and lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>signals—as is assumed hereinbelow—with a sampling rate of 2500 Hz (corresponding to a sample period dt=0.4 milliseconds) and a window of 12.8 milliseconds, a moving average for each signal would be calculated from the last 32 samples acquired. The individual samples of the moving average are typically uniformly weighted, but could alternately be nonuniformly weighted.
Generally, the lateral accelerometer 18 and the angular rate sensor 20 can exhibit offset and/or drift error (generally referred to herein as sensor offset error), which, unless otherwise compensated, can cause associated roll detection errors. The sensor offset errors are estimated by filtering the associated sensor measurements with associated filters having an effective cutoff frequency that is substantially lower—or, stated in another way, a effective filter time constant that is substantially greater—than the associated abovedescribed movingaverage filters that provide the filtered lateral acceleration component Ã<sub>y </sub>and the filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x</sub>. For example, the acceleration offset
<maths id="MATHUS00007" num="00007"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>and the angular velocity offset
<maths id="MATHUS00008" num="00008"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>are filtered from the associated raw measurements of angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>and lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>respectively, by respective moving average filters in steps (168) and (170) respectively, each movingaverage filter having an associated filter window of width T<sub>Avg</sub><sub><sub2>—</sub2></sub><sub>Offset</sub>, e.g. about 4 seconds. From step (164), the filtered values of acceleration offset
<maths id="MATHUS00009" num="00009"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>and angular velocity offset
<maths id="MATHUS00010" num="00010"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>are updated only if the neither the measures algorithm 300.1 nor the energy algorithm 300.2 have been entered, as indicated by neither associated ONGOING_EVENT_FLAGs—i.e. neither an ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG nor an ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG—being set. Accordingly, in step (166), the relatively longterm filtered values of acceleration offset
<maths id="MATHUS00011" num="00011"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>and angular velocity offset
<maths id="MATHUS00012" num="00012"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>are not updated during periods of time when the associated lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>and angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>could be substantially different from the associated sensor offset values.
Whereas FIG. 4 illustrates the acquisition and processing of the lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>before that of the angular velocity ω<sub>x</sub>, it should be understood that the relative order could be reversed, or these operations could be performed in parallel.
The measures algorithm 300.1, energy algorithm 300.2, and the safing algorithm 200 each utilize values of filtered lateral acceleration component Ã<sub>y </sub>and filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x </sub>that are compensated by subtracting the corresponding sensor offsets, i.e. the acceleration offset
<maths id="MATHUS00013" num="00013"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>and the angular velocity offset
<maths id="MATHUS00014" num="00014"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>respectively, so as to provide a corresponding compensated lateral acceleration component
<maths id="MATHUS00015" num="00015"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><msub><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></maths>and a compensated angular velocity
<maths id="MATHUS00016" num="00016"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><msub><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></maths>respectively.
Referring to FIG. 5, the safing algorithm 200 commences with step (202), wherein associated SAFING_EVENT_FLAGs i.e. an ACCELERATION_SAFING_EVENT_FLAG and a ROLL_SAFING_EVENT_FLAG—are initially reset. Then, in step (204), if either the measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2 have been entered, as indicated by either of the associated ONGOING_EVENT_FLAGs (i.e. the ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG or the ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG) being set, then in step (206), if the magnitude of the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>is greater than a third acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00017" num="00017"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>then the ACCELERATION_SAFING_EVENT_FLAG is set in step (208). Otherwise, from step (204), the process repeats with step (202). Following step (208), or otherwise from step (206), in step (210), if the magnitude of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>is greater than a third angular velocity threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00018" num="00018"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>then the ROLLSAFING_EVENT_FLAG is set in step (212). Then, or otherwise from step (210), the process repeats with step (204). Accordingly, if the conditions on lateral acceleration and angular velocity associated with the safing algorithm 200 have been satisfied—not necessarily simultaneously—after at least one of the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 have commenced and before both have exited, then the respective associated SAFING_EVENT_FLAGs are set so as to enable a deployment of the one or more associated safety restraint actuators 30 responsive to the detection of a roll event by either the measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2. Each of the SAFING_EVENT_FLAGs are set, or latched, separately, but both are reset simultaneously, and both must be set in order for the one or more associated safety restraint actuators 30 to be actuated responsive to the measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2.
Alternately, the safing algorithm 200 may be adapted to incorporate only one of the abovedescribed SAFING_EVENT_FLAGs and associated criteria, so that the safing criteria is responsive to at least one of a magnitude of the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>being greater than a third acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00019" num="00019"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>at a first point of time following a time of inception of either the measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2, and a magnitude of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>being greater than a third angular velocity threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00020" num="00020"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>at a second point of time following the time of inception, wherein the time of inception is the time at which the associated entrance criteria are satisfied for the associated measures algorithm 300.1 or energy algorithm 300.2, and the first and second points of time following the time of inception are arbitrary with respect to one another. For example, the energy algorithm 300.2 could be “safed” responsive solely to the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>being greater than a third acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00021" num="00021"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>at a point of time following a time of inception of the energy algorithm 300.2.
The rollover detection system 10 may be adapted for improved reliability by implementing the safing algorithm 200 on a microprocessor that is separate from that used to implement either the measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2, in which case if the sating algorithm 200 is not aware of the ONGOING_EVENT_FLAGs, then instead of being reset responsive to these flags, the SAFING_EVENT_FLAGs may be reset after a delay, e.g.
<maths id="MATHUS00022" num="00022"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>(e.g. 12 seconds), following a point in time at which either safing criteria was last satisfied so that the safing condition remains active until either a deployment of the one or more associated safety restraint actuators 30, or until after both algorithms will have had to have exited.
The measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 each operate in accordance with the general algorithmic structure illustrated in FIG. 6, wherein each of these algorithms is indicated generally by reference number 300. A decimal designator to a particular reference number will be used herein to refer to a particular algorithm. For example, whereas the general overall process is referred to by reference number 300, reference number 300.1 is used to refer to the measures algorithm, and reference number 300.2 is used to refer to the energy algorithm. As an other example, whereas the general algorithm calculations step is referred to by reference number 326, reference number 326.1 is used to refer to the algorithm calculations step of the measures algorithm 300.1 in particular, and reference number 326.2 is used to refer to the algorithm calculations step of the energy algorithm 300.2. The particular equations associated with particular algorithmic steps, for each of the algorithms, are provided in tabular form in FIGS. 8a–c; and the associated parameters and exemplary values thereof are provided in tabular form in FIGS. 9a–b.
Referring to FIG. 6, the general roll processing algorithm commences with step (302), wherein a corresponding ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG is reset. The ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG, when set, indicates that the entrance criteria has been satisfied for the roll processing algorithm, and the corresponding exit criteria has not been satisfied, so that the associated algorithm is active. Then in step (150), the associated data that is used by the algorithm is acquired and preprocessed in accordance with the data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm 150 described hereinabove. Then, in step (304), if the ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG has not been set—indicating that data from a potential roll event is not being processed, and that the vehicle 12 is not then involved in a roll event—then, in step (306), a set of entrance criteria are evaluated and compared with associated thresholds, and if the entrance criteria are satisfied, then in step (308) the ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG is set, and in step (310), the algorithm is initialized, e.g. by initializing various dynamic variables associated with the algorithm.
Otherwise, from step (304), if the ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG has been set—indicating that data from a potential roll event is being processed,—then in step (312) an associated measure of time, e.g. sample count, is updated, and in step (400), the newly acquired data is evaluated so as to determine if a sensor (i.e. the lateral accelerometer 18 or the angular rate sensor 20) needs to be recalibrated. The process associated with step (400) is illustrated in FIG. 7 and is described more fully hereinbelow.
If, from step (400), one or more sensors require recalibration, then in step (314), the one or more sensors requiring recalibation are recalibrated. For example, both the lateral accelerometer 18 and the angular rate sensor 20 may be testable, wherein a known stimulus may be applied to the sensor, and the corresponding sensor output may be calibrated so as to represent the known stimulus. For example, the lateral accelerometer 18 may comprise a micromachined mass element suspended by springelement beams, and an electrostatic field may be applied between the mass element and a housing so as to deflect the beam by an amount that corresponds to a reference acceleration level. A calibration factor is then calculated so that the calibrated output from strain sensing elements operatively connected to the springelement beams corresponds to the reference acceleration level. If, in step (316), the process of step (314) indicates that one or more sensors have failed—for example, if there is substantially no change in output responsive to whether or not the test stimulus is applied to the sensor, then in step (318) a fault condition is set; a warning device, e.g. light, is activated so as to alert the driver of the vehicle 12; and the rollover detection system 10 is disabled from deploying any safety restraint actuators 30. Otherwise, from step (316), i.e. if neither the lateral accelerometer 18 nor the angular rate sensor 20 has failed, then, in step (320), both ONGOING_EVENT_FLAGs—i.e. the ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG and the ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG—are reset responsive to there having been at least one sensor recalibration, and the process repeats anew with step (150).
Otherwise, from step (400), if none of the sensors require recalibration, then, in step (322), an exit criteria is evaluated so as to determine whether the algorithm should be exited until such time that the entrance criteria of step (306) are again satisfied so as to enable the algorithm to be reentered. If, from step (322), the exit criteria are satisfied, then, in step (324), if the algorithm is the energy algorithm 300.2, and if the energy algorithm 300.2 has consecutively been entered in step (306), and then exited in step (322) as a result of a timeout
<maths id="MATHUS00023" num="00023"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>.</mo><mi>e</mi><mo>.</mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.6em" height="0.6ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>Δ</mi></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>t</mi></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>then reentered in step (306) shortly—e.g. during the next iteration of the algorithm—after exiting in step (322), then after the p<sup>th </sup>consecutive exit in step (322)—e.g. p=3—the process continues with step (314) as described hereinabove, wherein the sensors are diagnosed, and if necessary, recalibrated. Otherwise, from step (324), the associated ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG—i.e. the ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG or the ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG—is reset in step (320), and the process repeats anew with step (150).
Otherwise, from step (322), if the algorithm has been entered in step (306) and not exited in step (322), then the associated algorithm calculations are performed for the particular iteration of the algorithm associated with a particular value of the measure of time from either steps (310) or (312). Then, in step (330), if the associated algorithm detection criteria are satisfied in the particular iteration of the algorithm, and if, in step (340), the SAFING_EVENT_FLAG(s)—i.e. the ACCELERATION_SAFING_EVENT_FLAG and the ROLL_SAFING_EVENT_FLAG—have been set, then in step (350) a roll event has been detected, and the associated safety restraint actuators 30 are actuated. Otherwise either, from step (330), if the algorithm detection criteria are not satisfied, or, from step (340), if all of the SAFING_EVENT_FLAG(s) have not been set—so that the associated safing criteria has not been satisfied at some point in time during either the measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2, then the process continues repeats beginning with step (150) for the next iteration.
Although both the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 depend upon measurements of the lateral acceleration component A<sub>y </sub>and the longitudinal angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>from the data acquisition and preprocessing algorithm 150, the other variables and parameters associated with each algorithm are otherwise independent of one another, as are the associated entrance criteria in step (306), algorithm initializations in step (310), exit criteria in step (322), algorithm calculations in step (326), and algorithm decision criteria in step (330), examples of all of which are detailed in FIGS. 8a, 8b, 8c, 9a and 9b. For example, whereas each algorithm determines a measure of time since inception, and calculates a measure of roll angle by integrating the measurement of longitudinal angular velocity ω<sub>x</sub>, these respective measures of time are independent of one another, as are the respective measures of roll angle. Both the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 assume that the vehicle is initially level (i.e. θ(t<sub>entrance</sub>)=0) when the processing by the respective algorithms is commenced.
The process 400 for determining whether or not either the lateral accelerometer 18 or the angular rate sensor 20 requires recalibration is illustrated in FIG. 7. In steps (402), (404), (406) and (408), if the magnitude of the filtered angular velocity {tilde over (ω)}<sub>x </sub>continuously exceeds a fourth angular rate threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00024" num="00024"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>4</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>for an associated period of time
<maths id="MATHUS00025" num="00025"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>ω</mi><mi>max</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>then a recalibration of the angular rate sensor 20 is signaled in step (410). Otherwise, in steps (412), (414), (416), (418) and (420), if the either the magnitude of the roll angle θ<sup>M </sup>from the measures algorithm 300.1, or roll angle θ<sup>E </sup>from the energy algorithm 300.2, continuously exceeds a roll angle threshold θ<sup>Thr </sup>for an associated period of time Δt<sub>θ</sub><sup>max</sup>, then a recalibration of the angular rate sensor 20 is signaled in step (410). Otherwise, in step (422), a recalibration of the angular rate sensor 20 is not signaled. In steps (424), (426), (428) and (430), if the magnitude of the filtered lateral acceleration component Ã<sub>y </sub>continuously exceeds a fourth lateral acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00026" num="00026"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>4</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>for an associated period of time
<maths id="MATHUS00027" num="00027"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>A</mi><mi>max</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>then a recalibration of the lateral accelerometer 18 is signaled in step (432). Otherwise, in step (434), a recalibration of the lateral accelerometer 18 is not signaled. If a recalibration was signaled in either steps (410) or (432), then the process continues with step (314) as described hereinabove. Otherwise, no sensor recalibration is signaled, and the process continues with step (322) as described hereinabove.
Referring to FIG. 6, FIGS. 8a–c, and FIGS. 9a–b, the measures algorithm 300.1 will now be discussed with greater particularity, wherein the steps of FIG. 6 are suffixed with “0.1” to indicate their association therewith. The ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG for measures algorithm 300.1—referred to as the ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG—is set in step (308.1) upon satisfaction of the entrance criteria in step (306.1), and is reset in step (320.1) upon satisfaction of the exit criteria in step (322.1). The ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG, for example, could correspond to a particular location in the memory 28 of the associated processor 26 that implements the measures algorithm 300.1. After entry following step (306.1), the measures algorithm 300.1 is not subsequently exited until either the measures event exit criteria is satisfied in step (322.1), or until a roll event is detected causing a deployment of the safety restraint actuators 30. Moreover, after the measures event exit criteria is satisfied and the measures algorithm 300.1 is exited, the measures algorithm 300.1 can be subsequently reentered if the associated measures event entrance criteria is subsequently satisfied.
In step (306.1), the entrance criteria of the measures algorithm 300.1 is, for example, that the magnitude of the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>be greater than a first acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00028" num="00028"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>i.e.:
<maths id="MATHUS00029" num="00029"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow><mo>></mo><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>For an example of one particular type of vehicle, based upon actual rollover data, the first acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00030" num="00030"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>was set to about 1.4 g. It should be recognized that this threshold value, as well as the value of the other parameters of the measures algorithm 300.1, is generally dependent upon the characteristics of the particular associated vehicle 12 or class of vehicles, and that the particular value used for a particular rollover detection system 10 can be adjusted for improved discrimination dependent upon the nature of the associated vehicle 12 or class of vehicles.
In step (310.1), upon initial entrance to the measures algorithm 300.1 following step (308.1), the measures algorithm 300.1 is initialized. An event sample count n<sup>M </sup>and the values of angular position θ<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>−1) and a measure function R(n<sup>M</sup>−1) are initialized—e.g. to values of zero. Also the sampled time t<sup>M</sup>(−1) just prior to the time of event entrance is initialized to a value of the time of measures event entrance t<sup>M</sup>(0), which is initialized to a value of the current time t; and the time period Δt<sup>M</sup>(0) since algorithm entrance is initialized to a value of zero. The superscript “M” used herein refers to variables associated with the measures algorithm 300.1.
Upon subsequent iteration of the measures algorithm 300.1, if in step (304.1) the ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG is set, then, in step (312.1), the event sample count n<sup>M </sup>is incremented, the associated current sampled time t<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>) is set equal to the current time t, and the measures event time Δt<sup>M </sup>is calculated as the period extending from the time of measures event entrance t<sup>M</sup>(0), to the current time t<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>) as follows:<FORM>Δt<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>)=t<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>)−t<sup>M</sup>(0)</FORM>
In step (322.1), the exit criteria of the measures algorithm 300.1 is, for example, that the time period since algorithm entrance Δt<sup>M </sup>(n<sup>M</sup>) be greater than time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00031" num="00031"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>i.e.:
<maths id="MATHUS00032" num="00032"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>M</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>M</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup></mrow></mrow></math></maths>For the example of one particular type of vehicle, based upon actual rollover data, the time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00033" num="00033"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>was set to about 165 milliseconds. Upon exit from the measures algorithm 300.1, the ONGOING_MEASURES_EVENT_FLAG is reset in step (320.1), and pending subsequent satisfaction of the entrance criteria in step (306.1), this causes the variables associated with the measures algorithm 300.1 to be initialized in step (310.1).
If, in step (322.1), the exit criteria is not satisfied, then the algorithm calculations are updated in step (326.1) for the particular iteration of the measures algorithm 300.1, as follows.
First, the angular position θ<sup>M </sup>is estimated by integrating the signed value of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>as follows:<FORM>θ<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>)=θ<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>−1)+{tilde over (ω)}′<sub>x</sub>(n<sup>M</sup>)·dt</FORM>wherein the integration time step dt is given by the difference between the time t<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>) at the current iteration, and the time at the previous iteration t<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>−1) which difference would be constant for a uniform sampling rate—as follows:<FORM>dt=t<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>)−t<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>−1)</FORM>and the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00034" num="00034"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><msub><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
A measure function R is then evaluated, which is used to calculate a figureofmerit FOM. The measure function R is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00035" num="00035"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>R</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>M</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mrow><mi>R</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>M</mi></msup><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>·</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo></mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>M</mi></msup></mrow><mi>τ</mi></mfrac></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>+</mo><mrow><msup><mi>F</mi><mo>*</mo></msup><mo>·</mo><msup><mi>KE</mi><mo>*</mo></msup><mo>·</mo><msup><mi>PE</mi><mo>*</mo></msup></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
The first term of the measure function R is a damping term comprising the product of the previous value, R(n<sup>M</sup>−1) multiplied by a damping factor
<maths id="MATHUS00036" num="00036"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo></mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>M</mi></msup></mrow><mi>τ</mi></mfrac></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>.</mo></mrow></math></maths>. The level of damping is determined by a constant τ dependent upon the particular type of vehicle. For example, based upon rollover test data for a particular type of vehicle, the value of τ was determined to be about 400 seconds. The damping term ensures that the resulting figureofmerit FOM will decrease for events for which the values of the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>or the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>do not continue to be significant.
The remaining term of the measure function R, additive with the first term, is the product of the following three measures: a force measure F*, a rotational kinetic energy measure KE*, and a potential energy measure PE*.
The force measure F* is given as the current sample of the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y</sub>, which is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00037" num="00037"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>M</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><msub><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>y</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>Generally, force and acceleration are related by Newton's second law (F=M·A). The force measure F* is not necessarily an exact measure of force—which would generally need to account for the vector nature of force and acceleration—but instead is a measure that is at least related to the reaction force F acting upon the vehicle 12. During a typical vehicle roll event, the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y</sub>, is caused by a lateral force on the tires or wheel rim. This lateral force is the same force responsible for the rotational torque about the center of vehicle mass that leads to eventual rollover. The compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>does not necessarily provide a complete measure of the actual reaction force F. For example, the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>does not necessarily account for the effects of nonrigid body dynamics, e.g. from damping forces in the tire(s) or other damping elements, or from the dynamics of the suspension system. However, the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>is heuristically—for small angles and excluding the effects of nonrigid body dynamics—proportional to the reaction force F that causes the vehicle 12 to roll. Data from fast or tripped rollover tests has shown that the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>becomes significant about 20 milliseconds before significant compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>is observed from angular rate sensor 20. Whereas the force measure F* is illustrated herein as linear with respect to the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y</sub>, it should be understood that the force measure F* could be some other function (other than linear) or power (other than 1) of the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y</sub>.
The rotational kinetic energy measure KE* is given by {tilde over (ω)}′<sub>x</sub><sup>2</sup>. Generally, the rotational kinetic energy measure KE* is related to the rotational kinetic energy of the vehicle. For example, with
<maths id="MATHUS00038" num="00038"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>KE</mi><mo>*</mo></msup><mo>=</mo><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>′2</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>the rotational kinetic energy measure KE* is proportional to the rotational kinetic energy of the vehicle 12 by the proportionality constant I<sub>x</sub>/2. However, the rotational kinetic energy measure KE* could also be represented differently. For example, other powers of {tilde over (ω)}′<sub>x </sub>other than 2 could be used to form the rotational kinetic energy measure KE* from compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x</sub>, or the rotational kinetic energy measure KE* could be some other function of compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x</sub>.
The product of the force measure F* and the rotational kinetic energy measure KE* provides for a measure that predicts rollover more quickly than compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>alone. This also provides a predictive measure of eventual compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x</sub>, because it has been observed that significant lateral force inferred from the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>usually manifests as increased compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>about 20 milliseconds thereafter. Moreover, weighting the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>more heavily than the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y</sub>, e.g. by using the square of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x</sub>, increases the influence of actual compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>upon the resulting figureofmerit FOM.
The potential energy measure PE* is given as PE*=sign (A′<sub>y</sub>(n<sup>M</sup>))·θ<sub>0</sub>+θ<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>) as a constant plus the current sample of the angular position θ<sup>M</sup>(n<sup>M</sup>). The constant θ<sub>0 </sub>is dependent upon the particular vehicle. For example, based upon rollover test data for a particular type of vehicle, the value of θ<sub>0 </sub>is about 0.1 degrees. The constant term has the same sign as either the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>or the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y</sub>, assuming both signals are polarized so as to have the same polarity for a given roll event. Including the potential energy measure PE* in the product term of the measure function R increases the influence of roll dynamics upon the resulting figureofmerit FOM and increases the magnitude thereof for mediumspeed roll events, for example, events having associated actuator firing times (timetofire TTF) of typically between 140 and 230 milliseconds. (The bounds of this range could be extended by 20% or more depending upon the vehicle characteristics, and could be further different for different types of vehicles). Compared with the force measure F* and with the rotational kinetic energy measure KE*, the potential energy measure PE* is relatively less significant, and could be ignored (e.g., by setting PE*=1) in a reduced rollover detection system 10. However, the potential energy measure PE* appears to be beneficial for the subset of roll event cases exhibiting intermediate actuator firing times.
The figureofmerit FOM is then given by:<FORM>FOM(n<sup>M</sup>)=R(n<sup>M</sup>)·(R(n<sup>M</sup>)−R(n<sup>M</sup>−1))</FORM>
The figureofmerit FOM is calculated from the absolute values of the associated R(n<sup>M</sup>) and R(n<sup>M</sup>−1) terms so that the figureofmerit FOM is independent of the direction of roll. The term (R(n<sup>M</sup>)−R(n<sup>M</sup>−1)) provides a measure of the derivative or slope of the measure function R with respect to time, wherein the actual slope would be given by dividing this term by the sampling period dt (a constant in uniformly sampled data systems). This slope factor, in combination with a threshold function described below, has the effect of requiring the figureofmerit FOM to increase with time in order for a rollover event to be detected and for a resulting associated deployment of one or more safety restraint actuators 30.
Alternately, and particularly for relatively small values of (R(n<sup>M</sup>)−R(n<sup>M</sup>−1)), the figureofmerit FOM may be given by:<FORM>FOM(n<sup>M</sup>)=R(n<sup>M</sup>)</FORM>
Following the algorithm calculations of step (322.1), the algorithm detection criteria evaluated in step (330.1) comprise a plurality of detection conditions, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 8c. If all of the detection conditions are satisfied—so that generally a measures event threshold is exceeded—then a rollover is considered likely to occur, and if in step (340), an associated safing criteria is satisfied from the safing algorithm 200, then in step (350), the associated one or more safety restraint actuators 30 are deployed so as to mitigate injury to the associated occupant or occupants. The detection criteria are established in accordance with a particular detection philosophy. Ideally, the detection criteria would IS provide for detection of any roll event for which there would be a head contact with the interior of the vehicle (i.e. a “head closure”) of sufficient severity that injury to the occupant therefrom would be mitigated by a timely deployment of the associated one or more safety restraint actuators 30; and would provide for ignoring other events. However, if such ideal performance is not feasible, then the detection criteria can be adapted to provide a suitable compromise. For example, in order to detect severe roll events sufficiently fast—i.e. sufficiently sooner than the associated head closure time so that the associated one or more safety restraint actuators 30 can be actuated in time, and at a rate, so as to mitigate risk of injury to the occupant—it may be necessary to accept deployment of the associated one or more safety restraint actuators 30 responsive to severe rollover events that do not completely roll the vehicle (e.g. curb trip or midtohighg deceleration type roll events).
As a first detection condition of step (330.1), the measures event time Δt<sup>M </sup>is tested to be within a range of measures event times (Δt<sup>M</sup><sub>min</sub>, Δt<sup>M</sup><sub>max</sub>), as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00039" num="00039"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>min</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>≤</mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>M</mi></msup></mrow><mo>≤</mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup></mrow></mrow></math></maths>For example, the associated minimum and maximum event times for one particular class of vehicles are
<maths id="MATHUS00040" num="00040"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>min</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mn>40</mn><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>milliseconds</mi></mrow></mrow></math></maths>and
<maths id="MATHUS00041" num="00041"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mn>165</mn><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>milliseconds</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>so that the period of time elapsed since the event trigger falls within a particular time window. The minimum measures event time
<maths id="MATHUS00042" num="00042"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msup><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>M</mi></msubsup><mi>n</mi></msup></mrow></math></maths>constraint prevents hard lateral input force events of very short duration from causing an inadvertent detection, while allowing for a sufficiently early safety restraint deployment to satisfy the earliest observed head closure times. (The head closure time is the time at which the head of an occupant contacts the interior of the vehicle). Typically, for severe curb trip or deceleration sled events, the roll discrimination algorithm entrance time would occur about 20 milliseconds after the start of the roll event (i.e. the beginning of the physical event). The earliest that the roll discrimination algorithm could begin to deploy the airbags would then be about 60 milliseconds after the start of the roll event (entrance time plus 40 milliseconds). The fastest observed head closure times are on the order of 115 milliseconds after the start of the roll event. Given that the associated data processing and safety restraint deployment (e.g. airbag inflation) takes about 30 milliseconds, the safety restraint actuator 30 would be fully deployed for these cases at about 90 milliseconds after the start of the roll event. The minimum fire time Δt<sup>min </sup>ensures that the information provided in the signals from lateral accelerometer 18 and angular rate sensor 20 has been utilized as much as possible while still enabling a deployment decision to be made in time to avoid head closure for severe events. The maximum firing time Δt<sup>max </sup>reduces the vulnerability of the roll discrimination algorithm to concatenated events, and may also enable the roll discrimination algorithm to reset and catch a second “real” initiator of a rollover in an accident where the second of two timeseparated lateral events leads to rollover. If, in step (330.1), the measures event time Δt<sup>M </sup>is within the specified range, then the first detection condition is met, and additional detection criteria are evaluated in step (330.1). Otherwise, the process continues with step (150) for the next iteration.
As a second detection condition of step (330.1), the figureofmerit FOM is compared with a threshold function FOM<sup>Thr </sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>) that, for the exemplary vehicle platform, provides for sufficiently fast discrimination times for substantially all events as necessary in accordance with the abovedescribed detection philosophy. The threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>), for example, has the following form:<FORM>FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>)=A·Δt<sup>M</sup>+B</FORM>The associated second detection condition is given by:<FORM>FOM(n<sup>M</sup>)>FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>)</FORM>For example, based upon data from a set of rollover tests of a particular type of vehicle, A and B were given as A=6.46*10<sup>11 </sup>(g<sup>2</sup>deg<sup>6</sup>/ms*s<sup>4</sup>) and B=−2.34*10<sup>13 </sup>(g<sup>2</sup>deg<sup>6</sup>/s<sup>4</sup>) for (40 milliseconds≦Δt<sup>M</sup><96 milliseconds), and as A=2.59*10<sup>11 </sup>(g<sup>2</sup>deg<sup>6</sup>/ms*s<sup>4</sup>) and B−1.36*10<sup>13 </sup>(g<sup>2</sup>deg<sup>6</sup>/s<sup>4</sup>) for (96 milliseconds≦Δt<sup>M</sup>≦165 milliseconds). The figureofmerit FOM and the threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>), for example, both have engineering units of [g<sup>2</sup>deg<sup>6</sup>/s<sup>4</sup>]. Generally, different types of vehicles would have either different parameter values or different functional forms for the threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>). A multisegmented threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>), e.g. comprising a plurality of linear segments, has been found to be beneficial to the performance of the roll discrimination algorithm. The above exemplary threshold line was developed from data that was sampled at a rate of 1250 Hz for a time step of 0.8 milliseconds. The threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>) would be different for different data sampling rates because of differences in the resultants of integrations involved in calculating the figureofmerit FOM. Generally, the threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>) could be represented by either a function of time, a piecewise function of time, or a table lookup with respect to time. Furthermore, whereas the threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>) is generally a function of time—e.g. time period since inception—, it should be understood that this threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>) could in some cases be constant, i.e. constant with respect to time. If, in step (330.1), the figureofmerit FOM exceeds the threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>), then the second detection condition is met, and additional detection criteria are evaluated in step (330.1). Otherwise, the process continues with step (150) for the next iteration.
As a third detection condition of step (330.1), the figureofmerit FOM is tested to see if it is increasing in magnitude with respect to time at the time of prospective deployment of the safety restraint actuator(s) 30, as follows:<FORM>FOM(n<sup>M</sup>)>FOM(n<sup>M</sup>−1)AND</FORM><FORM>FOM(n<sup>M</sup>)>FOM(n<sup>M</sup>−m), where m>1, e.g. m=6</FORM>The third detection condition is intended to prevent deployment in cases, for example, for which the threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt) is exceeded, e.g. at Δt=40 milliseconds, but for which the event was decaying away (e.g. for which the magnitude of either A<sub>y </sub>or ω<sub>x </sub>or both was decreasing). If, in step (330.1), the figureofmerit FOM is increasing with respect to time, then the third detection condition is met and additional detection criteria are evaluated in step (330.1). Otherwise, the process continues with step (150) for the next iteration.
As a fourth detection condition of step (330.1), the magnitude of the compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>at the time of prospective deployment of the safety restraint actuator(s) 30) is compared with a second acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00043" num="00043"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00044" num="00044"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>M</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow><mo>></mo><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>The fourth detection condition prevents a failure of the angular rate sensor 20 in a mode that causes a large, false compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>signal from causing an inadvertent deployment of the safety restraint actuator(s) 30. For example, a second acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00045" num="00045"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>value of 0.7 g would likely not be exceeded during normal driving conditions for which there is no lateral tire slip on the driving surface. If, in step (330.1), the magnitude compensated lateral acceleration component A′<sub>y </sub>greater than the second acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00046" num="00046"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>then the fourth detection condition is met and additional detection criteria are evaluated in step (330.1). Otherwise, the process continues with step (150) for the next iteration.
As a fifth detection condition of step (330.1), the magnitude of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>is compared with an associated second roll rate threshold ω<sup>Thr</sup><sup><sub2>—</sub2></sup><sup>2 </sup>at the time of prospective deployment of the safety restraint actuator(s) 30, as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00047" num="00047"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>M</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow><mo>></mo><msup><mi>ω</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></maths>For example, the second roll rate threshold ω<sup>Thr</sup><sup><sub2>—</sub2></sup><sup>2 </sup>is about 50 degrees/second. The fifth detection condition ensures that the vehicle 12 is experiencing significant angular velocity at the time of deployment of the safety restraint actuator(s) 30. The second and fifth detection conditions in combination prevent severe side impact events from deploying the safety restraint actuator(s) 30. The fifth detection condition also prevents a failed lateral accelerometer 18—indicating a large, false lateral acceleration signal—from causing an inadvertent deployment of the safety restraint actuator(s) 30. If, in step (330.1), the magnitude of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>greater than the second roll rate threshold ω<sup>Thr</sup><sup><sub2>—</sub2></sup><sup>2 </sup>then the fifth detection condition is met, and the process continues with step (340). Otherwise, the process continues with step (150) for the next iteration.
The hereindescribed measures algorithm 300.1 has been successfully tested with data from a series of vehicle rollover tests, and has been demonstrated to provide a reliable prediction of eventual vehicle rollover. For roll events caused by high lateral acceleration, predictions can be made relatively quickly, which enables the measures algorithm 300.1 to deploy the airbags before head closure for the type of roll events where head closure typically occurs most rapidly. Generally, the measures algorithm 300.1 is beneficial in providing relatively early rollover detection and relatively early timetofire (TTF's) of the associated safety restraint actuator(s) 30, for short and medium time roll events, similar to curb trip and highg lateral deceleration type events.
Accordingly, the rollover detection system 10 incorporating the measures algorithm 300.1 provides for improved discrimination of vehicle rollover that allows for rollover airbag deployment times that meet occupant head closure times while minimizing inadvertent deployments, by:
 utilizing the measured lateral acceleration to aid in predicting future (20–30 ms later) roll motion;
 combining lateral acceleration with angular speed and total rotation angle to produce a measure of the current rotation state and dynamics, and the forcing function that is producing the rotation, without requiring the use of initial vehicle angle information for roll events where the starting angle is less than about 20 degrees from horizontal; and
 utilizing vehiclespecific dynamics properties (as derived from rollover test data) combined with early measured vehicle responses to allow for a prediction of eventual vehicle rollover before such outcome is definitive.
Referring to FIG. 10 four different vehicle test conditions—designated as Test A, Test B, Test C and Test D, are tabulated for purposes of illustrating and comparing the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 (the energy algorithm 300.2 is described more fully hereinbelow). Tests A and B are corkscrew type tests, which illustrate conditions for which the energy algorithm 300.2 exhibits faster rollover detection than the measures algorithm 300.1, and Tests C and D are deceleration sled tests for which the measures algorithm 300.1 exhibits faster rollover detection than the energy algorithm 300.2. The vehicle rolled over in Tests A and D, but did not roll over in Tests B and C, but rather achieved a maximum roll angle of 37 and 34 degrees respectively. The initial vehicle speed, average vehicle deceleration, and associated detection and event times are also tabulated in FIG. 10, wherein the head closure time is the time at which the head of the occupant (dummy) actual struck the interior of the vehicle.
Referring to FIGS. 11a–d, the filtered roll rate (angular rate) from an angular rate sensor 20, roll angle, and filtered lateral acceleration from a lateral accelerometer 18 are illustrated as a function of time for each of Tests A–D respectively in accordance with the conditions that are tabulated in FIG. 10.
Referring to FIG. 12, the calculated figureofmerit FOM is plotted for Tests C and D as a function of measures event time Δt<sup>M</sup>, i.e. the time since inception of the measures algorithm 300.1 for actual sled deceleration tests of a particular type of vehicle in accordance with the table of FIG. 10. FIG. 12 also illustrates an associated threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>) for the particular type of vehicle. Test D caused the vehicle to rollover and Test C reached a maximum rotation angle of about 34 degrees. The figureofmerit FOM(n<sup>M</sup>) calculated by the hereindescribed measures algorithm 300.1 in conjunction with the associated threshold function FOM<sup>Thr</sup>(Δt<sup>M</sup>), enabled a firing time (TTF) of 98 milliseconds after inception of the roll event for test D, for which the vehicle rolled over, which was substantially before the associated head closure time of 196 milliseconds, thereby providing 98 milliseconds within which to deploy the associated one or more safety restraint actuators 30. The safing criteria of associated safing algorithm 200 were satisfied 26 milliseconds after inception of the roll event, which was substantially before the detection criteria was satisfied by the measures algorithm 300.1. By comparison, the detection criteria of the hereinbelow described energy algorithm 300.2 were not satisfied for the event of Test D until 594 milliseconds after inception of the roll event, which was substantially after the associated head closure time, thereby illustrating the benefit of the measures algorithm 300.1 for the roll event of Test D.
Referring to FIG. 6, FIGS. 8a–c, and FIGS. 9a–b, the energy algorithm 300.2 will now be discussed with greater particularity, wherein the steps of FIG. 6 are suffixed with “0.2” to indicate their association therewith. The ONGOING_EVENT_FLAG for energy algorithm 300.2—referred to as the ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG—is set in step (308.2) upon satisfaction of the entrance criteria in step (306.2), and is reset in step (320.2) upon satisfaction of the exit criteria in step (322.2). The ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG, for example, could correspond to a particular location in the memory 28 of the associated processor 26 that implements the energy algorithm 300.2. After entry following step (306.2), the energy algorithm 300.2 is not subsequently exited until either the energy event exit criteria is satisfied in step (322.2), or until a roll event is detected causing a deployment of the safety restraint actuators 30. Moreover, after the energy event exit criteria is satisfied and the energy algorithm 300.2 is exited, the energy algorithm 300.2 can be subsequently reentered if the associated energy event entrance criteria is subsequently satisfied.
The energy algorithm 300.2 utilizes the angular velocity sax signal from angular rate sensor 20 to determine the roll state of the vehicle and compare the total energy (rotational kinetic and potential) of the vehicle 12 with that needed to completely roll.
In step (306.2), the entrance criteria of the energy algorithm 300.2 is, for example, that the magnitude of the compensated lateral acceleration components A′<sub>y </sub>be greater than a first acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00048" num="00048"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>OR that the magnitude of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>be greater than a first roll rate threshold ω<sup>Thr</sup><sup><sub2>—</sub2></sup><sup>1 </sup>i.e.:
<maths id="MATHUS00049" num="00049"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>OR</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow></mrow><mo>></mo><msup><mi>ω</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></maths>For an example of a particular type of vehicle, based upon actual rollover data, the first acceleration threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00050" num="00050"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></maths>was set to about 1.4 g (as for the measures algorithm 300.1) and the first roll rate threshold ω<sup>Thr</sup><sup><sub2>—</sub2></sup><sup>1 </sup>was set to about 19 degrees/second. It should be recognized that this threshold value, as well as the value of the other parameters of the energy algorithm 300.2, is generally dependent upon the characteristics of the particular associated vehicle 12 or class of vehicles, and that the particular value used for a particular rollover detection system 10 can be adjusted for improved discrimination dependent upon the nature of the associated vehicle 12 or class of vehicles.
In step (310.2), upon initial entrance to the energy algorithm 300.2 following step (306.1), the energy algorithm 300.2 is initialized. An event sample count n<sup>E </sup>and the value of angular position θ<sup>E</sup>(−1) are initialized—e.g. to values of zero. Also the sampled time t<sup>E</sup>(−1) just prior to the time of event entrance is initialized to a value of the time of energy event entrance t<sup>E</sup>(0), which is initialized to a value of the current time t; and the time period Δt<sup>E</sup>(0) since algorithm entrance is initialized to a value of zero. Furthermore, a second event sample count n<sup>ω</sup><sup>E </sup>is initialized to zero, as is a time period Δt<sup>E</sup>* since roll direction change. The superscript “E” used herein refers to variables associated with the energy algorithm 300.2.
Upon subsequent iteration of the energy algorithm 300.2, if, in step (304.2), the ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG is set, then, in step (312.2), the event sample count n<sup>E </sup>is incremented, the associated current sampled time t<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>) is set equal to the current time t, and the energy event time Δt<sup>E </sup>is calculated as the period extending from the time of energy event entrance t<sup>E</sup>(0) to the current time t<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>) as follows:<FORM>Δt<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>)=t<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>)−t<sup>E</sup>(0)</FORM>
In step (322.2), one exit criteria of the energy algorithm 300.2 is, for example, that the energy event time Δt<sup>E </sup>be greater than a maximum time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00051" num="00051"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>i.e.:
<maths id="MATHUS00052" num="00052"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
Another exit criteria of the energy algorithm 300.2 is, for example, that the energy event time Δt<sup>E </sup>be greater than a minimum time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00053" num="00053"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>min</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>and that the time period since the entrance criteria of step (306.2) was most recently satisfied is greater than a second time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00054" num="00054"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>Event</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>i.e., as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00055" num="00055"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>min</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>AND</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="1.1em" height="1.1ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msup><mi>t</mi><mrow><mi>E</mi><mo>*</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>Event</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
The energy algorithm 300.2 requires a substantially longer period of time than the measures algorithm 300.1 before being restarted (i.e. exited and reset) because of possibility of relatively slow rollover events. For the example of a particular type of vehicle, based upon actual rollover data, the time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00056" num="00056"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>was set to about 12 seconds, the minimum time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00057" num="00057"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>min</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>was set to about 4 seconds, and the second time period threshold
<maths id="MATHUS00058" num="00058"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>Event</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>was set to about 2 seconds. Accordingly, for this example, the energy algorithm 300.2 is executed for at least 4 seconds but not more than 12 seconds, and subject to these limitations, is exited if the time period since the entrance criteria was most recently satisfied exceeds 2 seconds. Upon exit from the energy algorithm 300.2, the ONGOING_ENERGY_EVENT_FLAG is reset in step (320.2), after which a subsequent satisfaction of the entrance criteria in step (306.2) causes the variables associated with the energy algorithm 300.2 to be initialized in step (310.2).
If, in step (322.2), the exit criteria is not satisfied, then the algorithm calculations are updated in step (326.2) for the particular iteration of the energy algorithm 300.2, as follows.
First the angular position θ<sup>E </sup>is estimated by integrating the signed value of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>as follows:<FORM>θ<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>)=θ<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>−1)+ω′<sub>x</sub>(n<sup>E</sup>)·dt</FORM>wherein the integration time step dt is given by the difference between the time t<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>) at the current iteration, and the time at the previous iteration t<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>−1)—which difference would be constant for a uniform sampling rate—as follows:<FORM>dt=t<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>)−t<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>−1)</FORM>and the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00059" num="00059"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><msub><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
In step (326.2), the algorithm calculations are further adapted to compensate for offsets in the angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>signal due either to gyroscope error, or to an offset as a result of significant vehicle motion, that may not otherwise be adequately compensated in the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x</sub>, particularly for rough road conditions for which the angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>signal may exhibit substantial oscillatory behavior. The energy algorithm 300.2 does not exit for at least
<maths id="MATHUS00060" num="00060"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>Event</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>seconds, e.g. 2 seconds, following the most recent time at which the algorithm entrance criteria were satisfied, which thereby provides for extending the duration of the energy algorithm 300.2 for up to
<maths id="MATHUS00061" num="00061"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>t</mi><mi>max</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>seconds, e.g. 12 seconds, which can lead to a substantial roll angle integration errors (e.g. 24 to 36 degrees) for a relatively small offset—e.g. 2–3 degrees/second—in the signal from the angular rate sensor 20. On a rough road, the vehicle 12 can exhibit substantial oscillatory roll motion, and a “rough road event” would be characterized by an angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>that oscillates about the true angular velocity offset
<maths id="MATHUS00062" num="00062"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mover><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>_</mi></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>.</mo></mrow></math></maths>For example, referring to FIG. 13, an angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>signal having a true angular velocity offset
<maths id="MATHUS00063" num="00063"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mover><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>_</mi></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></maths>of −6.5 degrees/second is plotted as a function of time. Because typical roll events do not exhibit a change in sign of compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>during the roll event, it is possible to recognize a rough road condition from oscillation in the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>signal. Under these conditions, the integrated roll angle θ<sup>E </sup>is damped toward zero degrees every time the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>changes sign, according to the following equation:
<maths id="MATHUS00064" num="00064"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>θ</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>θ</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>·</mo><mrow><mi>MAX</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mn>1024</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>n</mi><mi>ω</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mn>1024</mn></mfrac><mo>,</mo><mn>0.5</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>and</mi></mrow></mrow></math></maths><maths id="MATHUS000642" num="00064.2"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msubsup><mi>n</mi><mi>ω</mi><mi>E</mi></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup></mrow></math></maths>wherein the counter n<sup>ω</sup><sup>E </sup>is set equal to the event sample count n<sup>E </sup>at the time of reversal, which provides for damping the roll angle θ<sup>E </sup>by an amount between 0.1% and 50% each time the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>changes direction, depending upon the period of time since the most recent change of direction.
Referring to FIG. 14, the affect of the abovedescribed compensation for the roll oscillation effect is illustrated, wherein the roll angle θ<sup>E</sup>, integrated from the angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>(roll rate) data plotted in FIG. 13, is plotted as a function of time for various conditions. As the first condition, the true angular velocity offset
<maths id="MATHUS00065" num="00065"><math overflow="scroll"><msubsup><mover><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>_</mi></mover><mi>x</mi><mi>Offset</mi></msubsup></math></maths>of −6.5 degrees/second is removed prior to integration. As the second condition, the roll angle θ<sup>E </sup>is integrated from the biased angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>data, and then compensated for roll oscillation as described hereinabove. As the third condition, the roll angle θ<sup>E </sup>is integrated from the biased angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>data without the abovedescribed compensation for roll oscillation, which illustrates the potential for false detection of a roll event as a result of an uncompensated angular velocity ω<sub>x </sub>bias for relatively long integration intervals. The abovedescribed compensation for roll oscillation substantially corrects for rolloscillation induced integration errors, without adversely affecting the detection of an actual roll event for which the angular velocity co, is substantially unidirectional.
In step (326.2), the algorithm calculations further provide for recording the latest time at which the entrance criteria of step (306.2) are satisfied, so as to provide a supplemental basis for the exit criteria of step (322.2), as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00066" num="00066"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mrow><mi>If</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>A</mi><mi>y</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>OR</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow></mrow><mo>></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mrow><mi>Thr_</mi><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>then</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msup><mi>t</mi><msup><mi>E</mi><mo>*</mo></msup></msup></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msup><mi>t</mi><mi>E</mi></msup></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
Following the algorithm calculations of step (322.2), the algorithm detection criteria evaluated in step (330.2) comprise a plurality of detection conditions, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 8c. If all of the detection conditions are satisfied—so that generally an energy event threshold is exceeded—then a rollover is considered likely to occur, and if in step (340), an associated safing criteria is satisfied from the safing algorithm 200, then in step (350), the associated one or more safety restraint actuators 30 are deployed so as to mitigate injury to the associated occupant or occupants. The detection criteria of the energy algorithm 300.2 are established in accordance with a detection philosophy similar to that described hereinabove for the measures algorithm 300.1.
The principal detection criteria of the energy algorithm 300.2 are based upon the behavior of the compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x </sub>and roll angle θ<sup>E</sup>, and the associated trajectory thereof, in the associated phasespace of angular velocity and roll angle (i.e. the ωθ phasespace). An example of the ωθ phasespace is illustrated in FIG. 15.
In accordance with rigid body dynamics, there exists a theoretical threshold boundary in phasespace that distinguishes between roll and nonroll events of an associated rigid body. For example, this theoretical threshold boundary is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00067" num="00067"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>ω</mi><mi>Thr</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>θ</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><msqrt><mfrac><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo></mo><mi>m</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mi>g</mi><mo>·</mo><msup><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><mfrac><msup><mi>T</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mn>4</mn></mfrac><mo>+</mo><msubsup><mi>h</mi><mi>CG</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></mfrac></msup><mo>·</mo><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mi>sin</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>θ</mi><mo>+</mo><mrow><msup><mi>tan</mi><mrow><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo></mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mi>CG</mi></msub></mrow><mi>T</mi></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mi>I</mi></mfrac></msqrt></mrow></math></maths>where mg is the weight of the vehicle, T is the vehicle track width, I is the vehicle moment of inertia in roll, and h<sub>CG </sub>is the height of the vehicle center of gravity. This equation is nearly linear in the ωθ plane over the region of interest. However, because of nonrigid body effects, the practical threshold boundary is beneficially modeled as a piecewiselinear boundary comprising, for example, a series of about 5 or 6 connected line segments that generally follow the above theoretical threshold boundary, but which can be tailored for a particular vehicle 12 or vehicle platform to improve discrimination between roll and nonroll events. Generally, this boundary could be represented by either a function in phasespace (e.g. a function of roll angle θ), a piecewise function in phasespace (e.g. a piecewise function of roll angle θ), or a table lookup in phasespace. Referring to FIG. 15, actual rollover test data—filtered using the hereinabovedescribed running average filter—for Tests A and B of FIGS. 11a and 11b respectively, in accordance with the conditions of FIG. 10, is plotted in the ωθ phasespace, together with an example of the associated theoretical threshold boundary and an example of a practical, piecewiselinear threshold boundary.
The distance between the current ordered pair (ω′<sub>x</sub>(n<sup>E</sup>), θ<sup>E </sup>(n<sup>E</sup>)) and the linear segment of the practical threshold boundary is calculated for each iteration for the linear segment 10 whose associated endpoint angle values θ<sub>k</sub>, θ<sub>k+1 </sub>bound the current roll angle θ<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>). Each linear segment of the practical threshold boundary is defined by its endpoints (ω<sub>k</sub>,θ<sub>k</sub>) and (ω<sub>k+1</sub>, θ<sub>k+1</sub>). The distance D between the current ordered pair and the appropriate linear segment of the practical threshold boundary is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00068" num="00068"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>D</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mover><mi>ω</mi><mo>~</mo></mover><mi>x</mi></msub><mo>,</mo><msup><mi>θ</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>,</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>,</mo><mi>k</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>ω</mi><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>ω</mi><mi>k</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>·</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>θ</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>k</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>k</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>·</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo></mrow><mo></mo><msub><mi>ω</mi><mi>k</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow><msqrt><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>k</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>+</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>ω</mi><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>ω</mi><mi>k</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></msqrt></mfrac></mrow></math></maths>whereby, if this distance is less than zero, then the practical threshold boundary has been crossed.
The slope of the trajectory of (ω′<sub>x</sub>(n<sup>E</sup>), θ<sup>E</sup>(n<sup>E</sup>)) in the ωθ phasespace is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00069" num="00069"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Slope</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>′</mi></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>θ</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><msup><mi>θ</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mfrac></mrow></math></maths>and the associated angle of this slope in the ωθ phasespace is given by:
<maths id="MATHUS00070" num="00070"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><msup><mi>tan</mi><mrow><mo></mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mrow><mi>Slope</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><msup><mi>n</mi><mi>E</mi></msup><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>·</mo><mfrac><mn>180</mn><mi>π</mi></mfrac></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
If, in step (330.2), the angle β is within limits (i.e. β<sup>min</sup><β<β<sup>max</sup>, where e.g. β<sup>min</sup>=75 degrees and β<sup>max</sup>=90 degrees), the magnitude of the roll rate is increasing with time (i.e. ω′<sub>x</sub>(n<sup>E</sup>)−ω′<sub>x</sub>(n<sup>E</sup>−1)>0), the distance to the practical threshold boundary is less than zero (i.e. D({tilde over (ω)}′<sub>x</sub>, θ<sup>E</sup>, n<sup>E</sup>, k)<0) and the roll angle θ<sup>E </sup>is greater than a roll angle threshold θ<sup>Thr </sup>(i.e. θ<sup>E</sup>>θ<sup>Thr</sup>, where e.g. θ<sup>Thr</sup>=10 degrees), then the energy detection criteria are satisfied. Alternately, the energy detection criteria are satisfied if the distance in ωθ phasespace is less than a threshold D<sup>Thr </sup>(i.e. D({tilde over (ω)}′<sub>x</sub>, θ<sup>E</sup>, b<sup>E</sup>, k)<D<sup>Thr</sup>, where e.g. D<sup>Thr=−2.5 √{square root over (deg<sup2>2</sup2>+(deg/sec)<sup2>2</sup2>)}) and the roll angle θ</sup><sup>E </sup>is greater than the roll angle threshold θ<sup>Thr </sup>(i.e. θ<sup>E</sup>>θ<sup>Thr</sup>). If the energy detection criteria are satisfied in step (330.2), and if, in step (340), the safing criteria are satisfied, then, in step (350), the associated one or more safety restraint actuators 30 are deployed so as to mitigate injury to the associated occupant or occupants.
The energy algorithm 300.2 deployment decision is not latched, so that, if the safing criteria has not been satisfied by the time the detection criteria of the energy algorithm 300.2 is satisfied, then the energy algorithm 300.2 continues to be iterated until either the safing criteria is satisfied, or the energy algorithm 300.2 is otherwise exited in step (322.2)
It should be understood that the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 can be executed in series or in parallel, on a common processor 26 or on separate processors 26. If executed in series, then the steps illustrated in FIG. 6 for one iteration are completed for one of the algorithms, then the other algorithm would commence with either step (302) for the first pass, or step (150) for subsequent passes.
Whereas the rollover detection algorithm has been illustrated with equations in a particular form, it should be understood that these calculations may be implemented on a particular processor 26 in a variety of ways without departing from the scope of the teachings herein. For example, the particular calculations described herein may require modification in order to be practically implemented on a particular processor, for example, depending upon the resolution of associated analogtodigital converters, and the type and precision of mathematical operations that can be performed by the particular processor 26, and the preferred word size of the particular processor 26.
Whereas the roll discrimination algorithm is illustrated herein as applied to sampled data, it should be understood that the algorithm could also be implemented continuously, for example, using an analog processor. Moreover, it should be understood that the event sample count n<sup>M </sup>may be either explicit or implicit in the actual implementation of the roll discrimination algorithm, and that the associated timedependent variables can be expressed as functions of either time t or event sample count n<sup>M</sup>, n<sup>E</sup>.
Whereas the measures algorithm 300.1 and the energy algorithm 300.2 have been illustrated as utilizing a measure of roll angle that is found by integrating the associated compensated angular velocity ω′<sub>x</sub>, it should be understood that a measured roll angle, e.g. from an incline sensor, could be used instead of a calculated roll angle.
Referring to FIG. 16, in accordance with another embodiment, a rollover detection system 10.1 comprises the rollover detection system 10 as illustrated in FIG. 2 and described hereinabove, and further comprises a lateral velocity sensor 42 that is operatively connected to the processor 26, and which is adapted to provide a measure of the lateral velocity of the vehicle 12 with respect to the ground surface, e.g. a road surface. The lateral velocity sensor 42 could be based upon any of various sensing technologies, including but not limited to wave or pulse based transmit and receive system based upon sound (or ultrasound), microwave, laser, radar, or other electromagnetic technology, e.g. by measuring speed responsive to a Doppler shift of an associated carrier wave; or an optical velocity sensor that relies upon the underlying spatial frequencies in an image of the ground surface. The lateral velocity sensor 42, for example, would be mounted on a downward or sideways facing surface of the vehicle, such as the undercarriage, under side of a side mirror, or lower vehicle body panel, for example, with the transmitter directed downward at the road surface such that the primary axis of the transmitted signal would be at some angle other than 0 degrees with respect to the vertical as viewed from the rear or the vehicle, for example, with the transmitter laterally tilted at about 45 degrees for a useful compromise between signal strength and sensor sensitivity. The receiver, for example, would be located some lateral distance away from the transmitter so as to receive a wave emitted from the transmitter and reflected from the road surface, for a normal vehicle driving height. Alternately, the transmitter could be oriented substantially parallel to the ground so as to measure the velocity relative to reflective surfaces proximate to and elevated from the road surface. The receiver could be located near the transmitter for ease in mounting, but possibly at the expense of a reduction in signal strength.
The measure of lateral velocity from the lateral velocity sensor 42 can be used to improve the discrimination of roll events by the rollover detection system 10.1. Many roll events—particularly tripped roll events—exhibit preroll motion that includes significant lateral vehicle velocity. As the vehicle 12 experiences lateral deceleration forces from the tires sliding laterally and possibly engaging some obstacle or ground feature, the lateral deceleration forces create the torque on the vehicle 12 about the longitudinal axis causing the vehicle 12 to roll, whereby the initial lateral translational kinetic energy associated with the initial lateral velocity is converted to rotational kinetic energy and potential energy. In accordance with the conservation of energy, absent other roll inducing forces—e.g. vertical forces that might convert the longitudinal translational kinetic energy associated with the vehicle's forward velocity to rotational kinetic energy—the vehicle would not likely roll over responsive to a conversion of the lateral kinetic energy unless the lateral kinetic energy
<maths id="MATHUS00071" num="00071"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></mfrac><mo></mo><msub><mi>mass</mi><mi>veh</mi></msub><mo>*</mo><msup><mi>v</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></maths>is greater than the potential energy (mass<sub>veh</sub>*g*Δh) associated with raising the vehicle center of gravity to the equilibrium height Δh associated with the vehicle on two sameside wheels. Accordingly, a measure of vehicle lateral velocity or speed can provide an early indication of whether or not the vehicle has sufficient energy to roll over. If the vehicle lateral velocity is insufficient to cause a complete rollover (i.e. if V≦√{square root over (2gΔh)}), then the deployment of associated safety restraint actuators 30 can be delayed or inhibited, even for the most initially severe partial roll events.
For example, a vehicle 12 sliding laterally into a fixed curb with lateral impact velocity of 10 mph may likely not roll over, but instead, would be subject to a relatively large, but shortlived, lateral acceleration and roll rate lasting on the order of ½ second. However, a similar curb impact event with an initial lateral speed of at least 15 mph would likely result in a vehicle rollover with an associated occupant head closure time of about 100 to 150 ms after initial impact. A rollover decision criteria adapted to deploy the safety restraint actuators 30 prior to occupant head closure for the latter rollover event, would likely result in deployment of the safety restraint actuators 30 responsive to the former nonroll event if the rollover decision criteria were not otherwise responsive to vehicle lateral speed. If the vehicle lateral speed is known, then the deployment of all or some rollover restraints can be inhibited at an otherwise relatively early decision time that would be necessary to otherwise deploy the safety restraint actuators 30 prior to occupant head closure. The roll motion could continue to be monitored by the rollover detection system 10.1, and safety restraint actuators 30 could be deployed at later times if the conditions changed to those that would lead to a complete rollover.
In accordance with another embodiment of the rollover detection system 10.1, the associated measures algorithm 300.1 or the energy algorithm 300.2 could incorporate two or more different deployment thresholds, the selection of which would be dependent upon the lateral speed of the vehicle at or near the rollover algorithm entrance. The threshold could be a function of initial lateral velocity such that for lower initial lateral velocities, correspondingly larger thresholds for one or more rollover measures would be required to be exceeded in order for the associated safety restraint actuators 30 to be deployed.
The initial lateral velocity of the vehicle 12 does not necessarily account for all of the translational kinetic energy available to be transformed into rotational kinetic energy that would possibly lead to rollover. For example, a vehicle that is traveling forward has a longitudinal translational energy that can be converted into lateral kinetic energy, for example, if the vehicle 12 undergoes a spin on a slippery surface. If this vehicle simultaneously undergoes roll motion, then as the roll proceeds, the rotational kinetic energy and the rotation induced potential energy may increase without significantly depleting the kinetic energy associated with the initial lateral velocity of the vehicle 12.
In accordance with another embodiment, if the total translational kinetic energy—i.e. lateral plus longitudinal—is less than a threshold corresponding to the rotational potential energy at the roll equilibrium position of the vehicle 12, then the deployment of the associated safety restraint actuators 30 could be inhibited because there would be insufficient energy to cause the vehicle to completely roll over.
In accordance with another embodiment of the rollover detection system 10.1, the lateral velocity of the vehicle 12 is monitored during the initial stages of the event to determine if the current lateral kinetic energy plus rotational kinetic energy plus potential energy exceeds the energy required for vehicle rollover. Generally, the lateral velocity of the vehicle can be blended into the rollover algorithm to develop a new measure—or to enhance an existing measure—of roll likelihood, for example, that is a function of the sensed lateral speed in combination with one or more of the following vehicle dynamic signals: longitudinal roll rate, roll tilt angle, height above the road surface, lateral acceleration, vertical acceleration, steering wheel angle, vehicle forward speed, or yaw rate. Combining vehicle lateral velocity with any of these sensed vehicle state parameters can provide a measure that enhances the ability of a rollover algorithm to more quickly estimate or predict whether or not the vehicle will rollover.
For example, in accordance with an energybased approach, a theoretical deployment threshold in the phase space of roll rate and roll angle could be of the form:<FORM>function(ν<sub>lateral</sub>)+function(rollrate), for example:</FORM>
<maths id="MATHUS00072" num="00072"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mrow><msub><mi>C</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo>*</mo><msubsup><mi>v</mi><mi>lateral</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>+</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>roll</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>+</mo><mrow><munder><mo>∑</mo><mi>time</mi></munder><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msub><mi>ω</mi><mi>roll</mi></msub></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>C</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></maths>where C<sub>1 </sub>is a vehiclespecific constant, ν<sub>lateral </sub>is the lateral speed of the vehicle, ω<sub>roll </sub>is the roll rate of the vehicle, and C<sub>2 </sub>is the potential energy required for rollover, which provides a measure roughly proportional to the total energy that may be available or is contributing to roll motion, i.e. the total of the lateral kinetic energy, the roll rotational kinetic energy, and the rollanglecontributed potential energy. For purposes of comparison, the theoretical deployment threshold illustrated in FIG. 15 is given by the latter term of the above function, i.e.
<maths id="MATHUS00073" num="00073"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>roll</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>+</mo><mrow><munder><mo>∑</mo><mi>time</mi></munder><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.3em" height="0.3ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><msub><mi>ω</mi><mi>roll</mi></msub></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>.</mo></mrow></math></maths>Accordingly, the former term of the above function, i.e.
<maths id="MATHUS00074" num="00074"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msub><mi>C</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo>*</mo><msubsup><mi>v</mi><mi>lateral</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math></maths>can be interpreted as a thresholdlowering offset that is dependent upon lateral velocity. Specific threshold characteristics for a particular vehicle can be tailored using either test data or analysis to relate the particular threshold function to a minimum value that results in vehicle rollover.
In other embodiments, the measure of lateral velocity can be used to modify the deployment threshold function(s) of either the hereinabove described energy algorithm 300.2 or the hereinabove described measures algorithm 300.1.
For example, referring to FIG. 17, the roll rate—roll angle deployment threshold of the energy algorithm 300.2 can be adjusted lower responsive to the measure of lateral velocity, as indicated by the dashed line in FIG. 17. For example, the entire threshold curve might be shifted downward by a roll rate that is dependent upon the measure of lateral velocity, in accordance with the associated lateral translational kinetic energy that is available to be converted into roll motion.
As another example, referring to FIG. 18, a threshold for a rollover measure that increases in magnitude for increasing roll probability—e.g. the threshold function of the measures algorithm 300.1—can be adjusted by a multiplicative factor that is a function of the magnitude of lateral velocity. For example, a velocity magnitude, V<sub>1</sub>, could be chosen for which the nominal rollover deployment threshold is not modified (threshold multiplier of 1). For lower speeds the threshold is raised by a threshold multiplier factor (greater than 1), and for higher speeds the threshold is lowered by a threshold multiplier factor (between 1 and 0), wherein the multiplier factor is a function of the measure of lateral speed. Alternately, instead of modifying the threshold in this manner, the particular rollover measure could be changed by adding an appropriate function of lateral velocity so as to achieve an equivalent result.
The measure of vehicle lateral velocity can be either directly measured—as described hereinabove—or indirectly estimated. The estimation of lateral velocity can be based upon measurements from sensors that would already be incorporated in the vehicle, e.g. for vehicle stability or nonroll crash sensing, thereby precluding the need for a lateral velocity sensor to provide a direct measure of lateral velocity.
For example, a measure of lateral velocity can be estimated using a measurement of lateral acceleration from a lateral accelerometer, together with either a measurement of yaw rate from a yaw rate sensor, or a measurement of vehicle forward speed and steering wheel angle respectively from a respective vehicle speed sensor and a steering wheel angle or front wheel angle sensor. The acceleration measurement from the lateral accelerometer can be integrated as a function of time to obtain a measure of lateral speed, and the output of the yaw rate sensor (or forward velocity sensor) combined with the steering wheel or front wheel angle sensor can be used to correct the integrated lateral speed responsive to measured yaw rotational motion. For example, the lateral speed can be estimated by integrating (or discretely summing) the measured lateral acceleration with respect to time after subtracting the centripetal acceleration derived from combining the yaw rate sensor (or forward velocity sensor) and the steering angle sensor as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00075" num="00075"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><mo>∫</mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>A</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>yaw</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>*</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>t</mi></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths><maths id="MATHUS000752" num="00075.2"><math overflow="scroll"><mi>or</mi></math></maths><maths id="MATHUS000753" num="00075.3"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><mo>∫</mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>A</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>t</mi></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>where ν<sub>lateral </sub>is the calculated lateral speed of the vehicle; ω<sub>yaw </sub>is the measured yaw rate of the vehicle; R is the vehicle turn radius as derived from the steering wheel angle, front tire angle sensor, or separate measures of wheel speed from separate front wheel speed sensors; and ν<sub>forward </sub>is the forward vehicle speed.
The input signals used in this calculation would be low pass filtered and compensated to remove offsets. A particular type of vehicle will have an associated maximum yaw rate, or forward velocity, that can occur for a given steering radius, whereby a higher forward velocity or yaw rate would result in lateral tire slippage and an associated lateral vehicle speed, for typical road/tire conditions. The centripetal acceleration correction based upon either the yaw rate and vehicle turn radius or the forward speed and the vehicle turn radius would be limited to a maximum vehiclespecific magnitude. For most vehicles with good tires on dry pavement (ideal conditions) the correction term,
<maths id="MATHUS00076" num="00076"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mi>yaw</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>*</mo><mi>R</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>or</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="1.1em" height="1.1ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths>would be limited to about ±0.8 g corresponding to the vehiclespecific maximum sustainable centripetal acceleration on typical dry, flat pavement. In real driving situations it may be possible to achieve higher centripetal accelerations, for example, if the driving terrain allowed the tires to dig into the driving surface. Notwithstanding that these conditions could produce a larger estimate of lateral velocity than experienced by the vehicle, these conditions are also much more conducive to generating an actual rollover event because the tires and rims are potentially able to cause substantially larger torqueinducing force on the vehicle. The calculation may require some damping term and/or conditions that allow for either only a triggered calculation of the lateral velocity, or an event driven reset of the estimated lateral velocity to zero, so as to preclude the adverse affect of an uncorrected offset when integrating lateral acceleration over a relatively long period of time.
The yaw rate sensor measures the rotation rate about a vertical axis of the vehicle 12. The description hereinabove assumed that the forward vehicle velocity and yaw rate are related by a simple constant: ν<sub>forward</sub>=ω<sub>yaw</sub>*R, which is generally true under conditions for which the tires do not slip on the driving surface. Under conditions for which the vehicle 12 tires are slipping, the vehicle 12 may have some rotational motion about a vertical axis other than the center of the commanded turn radius, in which case the product of the yaw rate and the turn radius could be expected to exceed the forward velocity. In a rollover detection system 10.1 incorporating sensors for forward velocity ν<sub>forward</sub>, yaw rate ω<sub>yaw </sub>and turn radius R, all three of these signals could be utilized to obtain both a measure of lateral velocity and a measure of vehicle spin rate as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00077" num="00077"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><mo>∫</mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>A</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>t</mi></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo><mstyle><mtext></mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mrow><mi>where</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>is</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>bounded</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>by</mi></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo>±</mo><msub><mi>A</mi><mrow><mi>centripetal</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>MAX</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></math></maths><maths id="MATHUS000772" num="00077.2"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mrow><mi>spin</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>rate</mi></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><msub><mi>ω</mi><mi>yaw</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo><mstyle><mtext></mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mrow><mi>where</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>is</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>bounded</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>by</mi></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo>±</mo><mrow><msub><mi>A</mi><mrow><mi>centripetal</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>MAX</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi></msub></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
Vehicle spin rate could be important because if a vehicle is primarily spinning about a vertical axis near the mounting location of the lateral accelerometer, then, especially for low friction road condition (e.g. icy roads), the lateral accelerometer may not adequately detect the change in lateral velocity of the vehicle. Accordingly, the lateral velocity estimate can be further corrected as follows:
<maths id="MATHUS00078" num="00078"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mo>∫</mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>A</mi><mi>lateral</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>t</mi></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>+</mo><mrow><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>forward</mi></msub><mo>*</mo><mrow><mi>cos</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mo>∫</mo><mrow><mi>spin</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mspace width="0.8em" height="0.8ex"/></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mi>rate</mi><mo>·</mo><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>t</mi></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths>wherein the added correction term integrates the estimated vehicle spin rate to obtain a vehicle spin angle, which is then used to determine an estimate of the projection of the forward vehicle speed onto lateral motion that might be otherwise be undetected by the lateral accelerometer.
The parameters of the hereindescribed roll discrimination algorithm are derived from associated test data, and may require adjustment if applied to other types of vehicles than for those for which the parameters were derived, wherein a criteria for the adjustment is, for example, robust and early detection of rollover events while also avoiding, to the extent possible, falsely discriminating nonrollover events as rollover events. The particular values for various parameters described herein are not considered to be limiting, and, for example, may be different for different types of vehicles, which may have different susceptibilities to rollover. For example, a vehicle with a relatively high center of gravity or a relatively narrow wheelbase—e.g. a sportutility vehicle—would be more susceptible to rollover than a vehicle having a relatively low center of gravity or a relatively wide wheelbase—e.g. a passenger sedan. Furthermore, the rollover detection system 10 as could also be adapted to sense pitchover events, i.e. about the local Yaxis of the vehicle, by providing an associated longitudinal accelerometer and a pitch rate sensor.
The lateral velocity sensor—which provides for a direct measurement of the lateral velocity of the vehicle—and the lateral velocity estimation algorithm described herein, provide means for measuring or estimating lateral velocity that are substantially more accurate that might otherwise be inferred by either integrating only a measure of lateral acceleration, or by using a measure of longitudinal velocity of the vehicle, and thereby provides for improved discrimination of rollover events.
While specific embodiments have been described in detail, those with ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims, and any and all equivalents thereof.