Method and apparatus for avoiding self-interference in a mobile network

• US 7,072,634 B2
• Filed: 03/26/2002
• Issued: 07/04/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 03/26/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Original Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Inventors: Tillotson, Brian Jay
• Primary Examiner(s): Trinh, Sonny
• Assistant Examiner(s): Phan, Huy
• Application Number:
  US10/106,422
• Publication Number:
  US 20030186712A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,561 Days
• Field of Search: 455/296, 455/114.2, 455/67.3, 455/522, 455/63.4, 455/63.1, 455/25, 342/377, 342/379, 342/383, 342/384, 375/346
• US Class Current: 455/296
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 7/18506 Communications with or from aircraft, i.e. aeronautical mobile service

Abstract

A method for reducing interference in a mobile network in which a node A is to establish a proposed wireless link with node B. The method includes: (a) determining a node E that transmits on a frequency equal to a frequency of the proposed link between node A and node B and which can transmit to a node D; (b) determining an effective gain of an antenna on node D with respect to interference from the proposed link between node A and node B, assuming an X-percentile beam criterion selected in accordance with a desired self-interference limit; (c) estimating a carrier intensity arriving at node D from node E; (d) determining a ratio of node E to node D carrier to potential interference from node A; and (e) conditioning establishment of the proposed link between node A and node B upon the determined ratio.

Claims

1. A method for reducing interference in a mobile network in which a node A is to establish a proposed wireless link with node B, said method comprising:

(a) determining a node E that transmits on a frequency equal to a frequency of the proposed link between node A and node B and which can transmit to a node D;

(b) determining an effective gain of an antenna on node D with respect to interference from the proposed link between node A and node B, assuming an X-percentile beam criterion selected in accordance with a desired self-interference limit;

(c) estimating a carrier intensity arriving at node D from node E;

(d) determining a ratio of node E to node D carrier-to-potential-interference from the proposed link between node A and node B; and

(e) conditioning establishment of the proposed link between node A and node B upon said determined ratio.

2. The method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the X-percentile beam criteria is a worst-case beam criterion.

3. The method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said estimating a carrier intensity arriving at node D from node E comprises applying a selected rotation-independent intensity vs. link range rule to estimate the carrier intensity.

4. The method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising iterating steps (b), (c), (d), and (e) for each node E that transmits on a frequency equal to a frequency of the proposed link between node A and node B and which can transmit to a node D, and iterating, for each node D, steps (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), wherein said iterating for each node D includes said iterating of steps (b), (c), (d) and (e) for each node E.

5. A method for reducing interference in a mobile network in which a node A is to establish a proposed wireless link with node B, said method comprising, operating node A to:

(a) identify a possible node E to node D link on a frequency of the proposed link;

(b) identify other possible links that might impinge on node D;

(c) using a computer to determine a sum of interference from all identified possibly impinging links weaker that the proposed link at node D, plus the proposed link interference; and

(d) prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the node E to node D link;

(e) operating node A to identify other possible node E to node D links on a frequency of the proposed link and to iterate operations (a), (b), (c) and (d) for each node E to node D link until either all node E to node D links are considered or the proposed link is prohibited; and

if the proposed link is not prohibited, further comprising operating node A to send a request to node B to establish the proposed link, and operating node B to;

receive the request from node A;

determine interference to a node C to node B link from other possible interfering links;

rank determined interfering links of the other possible interfering links in order of potential interference;

sum interference to the node C to node B link from the node A to node B link and all determined interfering links providing less interference than the node A to node B link; and

reject the node A to node B link depending upon whether or not the summed interference is greater than a node C to node B interference limit.

6. The method in accordance with claim 5 wherein each node C to node B link is evaluated until the node A to node B is rejected or it is found that no node C to node B interference limit is exceeded, and further comprising accepting the proposed link from node A to node B.

7. The method in accordance with claim 5 wherein operating node A to prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the node E to node D link comprises operating node A to send a message to at least one of node D or node E to determine whether a node E to node D link exists, and operating node A to additionally condition prohibiting the proposed link upon whether the node E to node D link exists.

8. The method in accordance with claim 5 wherein operating node A to prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the possible node E to node D link comprises determining whether the proposed node A to node B link by itself would not exceed an interference limit for the node E to node D link, and, if so, operating node A to send a message to at least one of node D or node E to determine whether a node E to node D link exists, and further operating node A to additionally condition prohibiting the proposed link upon whether the node E to node D link exists.

9. The method in accordance with claim 8 wherein a node E to node D link exists, and further operating node A to send a message to another possible weaker interference link to determine whether the weaker interference link exists, and if not, subtracting the contribution of weaker interference link from the interference of the carrier-to-interference ratio.

10. The method in accordance with claim 5 in a code-division multiple access (CDMA) network, wherein operating node A to determine a sum of interference further comprises operating node A to determine levels of interference utilizing different levels of gain corresponding to a synchronized orthogonal gain, an unsynchronized orthogonal gain, and an nonorthogonal gain, corresponding to whether an interfering signal is, relative to another signal, synchronized and orthogonal to one another, unsynchronized and orthogonal to one another, and nonorthogonal to one another.

11. The method in accordance with claim 5 wherein the proposed link is a TDMA link, and said method is performed for each individual time slot of a proposed TDMA link.

12. The method in accordance with claim 5 wherein the proposed link is a TDMA link, the interference ratio for the node E to node D link is such as not to prohibit the proposed link, and further comprising:

operating node A to send a request to node B for the proposed link, the request including a proposed list of time slots in which node B would receive bursts from node A; and

operating node B to;

determine a potential interference intensity of the proposed link in all node C to node B links using a TDMA-specific signal to noise ratio;

determine whether the interference limit for each node C to node B TDMA link is exceeded by the proposed node A to node B link;

for each node C to node B link for which the interference limit is exceeded, determine overlap times of the node A to node B link with the node C to node B link and remove, from the list of proposed time slots, any node A to node B burst that overlaps a node C to node B burst; and

accept or disallow the proposed node A to node B link, depending upon whether any slots remain in the proposed list of time slots.

13. The method in accordance with claim 12 wherein operating node B to determine overlap times of the node A to node B link with the node C to node B link comprises operating node B to determine a list of physically acceptable receive time slots.

14. A wireless mobile network having mobile nodes, said network including a node A, a node B, at least one node E and at least one node D, and wherein node A is configured to:

(a) determine a node E that transmits on a frequency equal to a frequency of a proposed link between node A and node B and which can transmit to a node D;

(b) determine an effective gain of an antenna on node D with respect to interference from the proposed link between node A and node B, assuming an X-percentile beam criterion selected in accordance with a desired self-interference limit;

(c) estimate a carrier intensity arriving at node D from node E;

(d) determine a ratio of node E to node D carrier-to-potential-interference from the proposed link between node A and node B; and

(e) condition establishment of the proposed link between node A and node B upon said determined ratio.

15. The network in accordance with claim 14 wherein the X-percentile beam criteria is a worst-case beam criterion.

16. The network in accordance with claim 14 wherein to estimate a carrier intensity arriving at node D from node E, node A is configured to apply a selected rotation-independent intensity vs. link range rule to estimate the carrier intensity.

17. The network in accordance with claim 14 wherein node A is configured to iterate (b), (c), (d), and (e) for each node E that transmits on a frequency equal to a frequency of the proposed link between node A and node B and which can transmit to a node D, and to iterate, for each node D, (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), wherein said iterating for node D includes said iterating of (b), (c), (d) and (e) for each node E.

18. A wireless mobile network having mobile nodes, said network including a node A, a node B, at least one node D and at least one node E, and wherein node A is configured to:

(a) identify a possible node E to node D link on a frequency of the proposed link;

(b) identify other possible links that might impinge on node D;

(c) use a computer to determine a sum of interference from all identified, possibly impinging links weaker that the proposed link at node D, plus the proposed link interference; and

(d) prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the node E to node D link.

node A is being configured to identify other possible node E to node D links on a frequency of the proposed link and to iterate (a), (b), (c) and (d) for each node E to node D link until either all node E to node D links are considered or the proposed link is prohibited; and

at least one node C and wherein node A is configured to send a request to node B to establish the proposed link when the proposed link is not prohibited; and

node B is configured to;

receive the request from node A;

determine interference to a node C to node B link from every other possibly interfering link;

rank determined interfering links of the other possibly interfering links in order of potential interference;

sum interference to the node C to node B link from the node A to node B link and all determined interfering links providing less interference than the node A to node B link; and

reject the node A to node B link depending upon whether or not the summed interference is greater than a node C to node B interference limit.

19. The network in accordance with claim 18 wherein node B is configured to evaluate each node C to node B link until the node A to node B is rejected or it is found that no node C to node B interference limit is exceeded, and node B is further configured to accept the proposed link from node A to node B.

20. The network in accordance with claim 18 wherein to prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the possible node E to node D link, node A is configured to send a message to at least one of node D or node E to determine whether a node E to node D link exists, and to additionally condition prohibiting the proposed link upon whether the node E to node D link exists.

21. The network in accordance with claim 18 wherein to prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the possible node E to node D link, node A is configured to determine whether the proposed node A to node B link by itself would not exceed an interference limit for the node E to node D link, and, if so, node A is configured to send a message to at least one of node D or node E to determine whether a node E to node D link exists, and node A is further configured to additionally condition prohibiting the proposed link upon whether the node E to node D link exists.

22. The network in accordance with claim 21 wherein a node E to node D link exists, and node A is further configured to send a message to at least a source or destination of another possible weaker interference link to determine whether the weaker interference link exists, and if not, to subtract the contribution of weaker interference link from the interference of the carrier-to-interference ratio for the existing node E to node D link.

23. The network in accordance with claim 18 wherein said links are code division multiple access (CDMA) links, and to determine a sum of interference, node A is further configured to determine levels of interference utilizing different levels of gain corresponding to a synchronized orthogonal gain, an unsynchronized orthogonal gain, and an nonorthogonal gain, corresponding to whether an interfering signal is, relative to another signal, synchronized and orthogonal to one another, unsynchronized and orthogonal to one another, and nonorthogonal to one another.

24. The network in accordance with claim 18 wherein the proposed link is a TDMA link.

25. The network in accordance with claim 18 wherein the proposed link is a TDMA link, the interference ratio for the node E to node D link is such as not to prohibit the proposed link, and wherein:

node A is configured to send a request to node B for the proposed link, the request including a proposed list of time slots in which node B would receive bursts from node A; and

node B is configured to;

determine a potential interference intensity of the proposed link in all node C to node B links using a TDMA-specific signal to noise ratio;

determine whether the interference limit for each node C to node B TDMA link is exceeded by the proposed node A to node B link;

for each node C to node B link for which the interference limit is exceeded, determine overlap times of the node A to node B link with the node C to node B link and remove, from the list of proposed time slots, any node A to node B burst that overlaps a node C to node B burst; and

accept or disallow the proposed node A to node B link, depending upon whether any slots remain in the proposed list of time slots.

26. The network in accordance with claim 25 wherein to determine overlap times of the node A to node B link with the node C to node B link, node B is configured to determine a list of physically acceptable receive time slots.

27. A method for forming a “

node A”

for use in a wireless mobile network, said node A operating to;

(a) determine a node E that transmits on a frequency equal to a frequency of a proposed link between node A and a node B and which can transmit to a node D;

(b) determine an effective gain of an antenna on node D with respect to interference from the proposed link between node A and node B, assuming an X-percentile beam criterion selected in accordance with a desired self-interference limit;

(c) estimate a carrier intensity arriving at node D from node E;

(d) determine a ratio of node E to node D carrier-to-potential-interference from node A; and

(e) condition establishment of the proposed link between node A and node B upon said determined ratio.

28. The “

node A”

in accordance with claim 27 wherein the X-percentile beam criteria is a worst-case beam criterion.

29. The “

node A”

in accordance with claim 27 wherein to estimate a carrier intensity arriving at node D from node E, node A is configured to apply a selected rotation-independent intensity vs. link range rule to estimate the carrier intensity.

30. The “

node A”

in accordance with claim 27 wherein node A is configured to iterate (b), (c), (d), and (e) for each node E that transmits on a frequency equal to a frequency of the proposed link between node A and node B and which can transmit to a node D, and to iterate, for each node D, (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), wherein said iterating for node D includes said iterating of (b), (c), (d) and (e) for each node E.

31. A method for operating a “

node A”

for use in a wireless mobile network, comprising;

using said node A to;

(a) identify a node E to a node D link on a frequency of a proposed link;

(b) identify other possible links that might impinge on node D;

(c) use a computer to determine a sum of interference from all identified, possibly impinging links weaker than the proposed link at node D, plus the proposed link interference; and

(d) prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the node E to node D link; and

(e) to prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the node E to node D link, node A is configured to determine whether the proposed node A to node B link by itself would not exceed an interference limit for the node E to node D link, and, if so, node A is configured to send a message to at least one of node D or node E to determine whether a node E to node D link exists, and node A is further configured to additionally condition prohibiting the proposed link upon whether the node E to node D link exists.

32. The method of operating “

node A”

in accordance with claim 31, node A being configured to identify other node E to node D links on a frequency of the proposed link and to iterate (a), (b), (c) and (d) for each node E to node D link until either all node E to node D links are considered or the proposed link is prohibited.

33. The method of operating “

node A”

in accordance with claim 32, node A being configured to send a request to node B to establish the proposed link when the proposed link is not prohibited.

34. The method of operating “

node A”

in accordance with claim 31, wherein to prohibit the proposed link depending upon a determined carrier-to-interference ratio for the node E to node D link, node A operates to send a message to at least one of node D or node E to determine whether a node E to node D link exists, and to additionally condition prohibiting the proposed link upon whether the node E to node D link exists.

35. The method of operating “

node A”

in accordance with claim 31, in which the node A further operates to send a message to at least a source or destination of a possible weaker interference link to determine whether the weaker interference link exists, and if not, to subtract the contribution of weaker interference link from the interference of the carrier-to-interference ratio.

36. The method of operating a “

node A”

in accordance with claim 31, in which the node A further operates to determine levels of interference for code division multiple access (CDMA) links utilizing different levels of gain corresponding to a synchronized orthogonal gain, an unsynchronized orthogonal gain, and an nonorthogonal gain, corresponding to whether an interfering signal is, relative to another signal, synchronized and orthogonal to one another, unsynchronized and orthogonal to one another, and nonorthogonal to one another.

37. The method of operating a “

node A”

in accordance with claim 31, wherein the proposed link being formed by a TDMA link.

38. The method of operating a “

node A”

in accordance with claim 31, in which the proposed link is formed as a TDMA link, and the node A operates to send a request to node B for the proposed link that includes a proposed list of time slots in which the node B would receive bursts from the node A.