Method for detecting combustion failure by filtering

• US 7,072,760 B2
• Filed: 02/11/2004
• Issued: 07/04/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 02/20/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Continental Automotive GmbH (Continental AG)
• Original Assignee: Continental Automotive GmbH (Continental AG)
• Inventors: Rossignol, Alain
• Primary Examiner(s): Vo, Hieu T.
• Application Number:
  US10/546,062
• Publication Number:
  US 20060074543A1
• Time in Patent Office: 874 Days
• Field of Search: 701/111, 701/110, 701/102, 701/101, 731/16, 731/173, 731/181
• US Class Current: 701/111
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 2200/1015 Engines misfires
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/1498 measuring engine roughness
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 15/11 by detecting misfire

Abstract

A method for detecting combustion failure in an internal combustion engine, by calculating an index ln(t) representing engine irregularities at a moment (t) during certain combustion phases in one cylinder; calculating an observation function G(t), which is a function between index ln(t) and an estimated reference value In+/−i(t) at a different moment during engine operation comparing G(t) to a threshold (S), which is a function of engine load (C) and/or rpm (N); and diagnosing a combustion failure when G(t) exceeds (S) or: G(t)=In(t)−ln(t), wherein In(t) is a function of ln(t) and In+/−i(t) represents the index ln(t) after weighting of the values of said index outside an acceptable predefined differential.

Claims

1. A method of detecting misfires of a mixture between a fuel and an oxidizing agent, in any one of the cylinders of an internal combustion engine having multiple-stroke operating cycles, such as two-stroke or four-stroke cycles, this method comprising the following steps:

a) during at least some of the combustion phases in at least one of the cylinders, at an instant (t) of the engine operating cycles, a current value of an index I_n(t) representative of operating irregularities in the engine stroke is calculated,

b) while the engine is operating, and on the basis of the current value at the instant t of the index I_n(t), the current value at the same instant t of an observation function G(t) is calculated, this function being a function of an instantaneous discrepancy between said current value at the instant t of the index I_n(t) and an estimated reference value Ī

_n+i(t) illustrative of this index at a different instant,

c) the current value of G(t) is compared with a predetermined threshold (S) dependent on the engine load (C) and/or speed (N), and

d) a misfire is diagnosed when the value of G(t) crosses the threshold (S), characterized in that;

the observation function G(t) is such that;

G(t)=Ī

_n(t)−

I_n(t),

with Ī

_n(t)=Ī

_n+i(t)+a×

E_n(t)

Ī

_n(t) corresponding to a value representative of the index I_n(t) after the values of this index that lie outside a predetermined permissible discrepancy (BC) have been excluded and/or weighted and where a is a correction coefficient dependent on |E_n(t)|,

and E_n(t)=I_n(t)−

Ī

_n+i(t), i being an operating cycle different from n, E_n(t) being an expression of the instantaneous discrepancy between said current value at the instant t of the index I_n(t) and the corresponding reference value Ī

_n+i(t) illustrative of this index at a different instant.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the coefficient a is also a linear function of the dynamics Δ

N/N of the engine, N being the engine speed of this engine.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that Ī

_n+i(t) is a mean of the values I(t) representative of operating irregularities of the engine over time, this mean eliminating or weighting the values which are remote from the expected normal value.

4. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that n and i are two identical engine strokes, preferably two combustion strokes, of two successive cycles or cycles separated from one another by 720°

crank angle at most.

5. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the fact that a vehicle propelled by said engine is running over a surface or irregular geometry is diagnosed when the function |E_n(t)| adopts at least two consecutive values lying between the maximum value, at the instant considered, of predetermined permissible discrepancy (BC) and the threshold S, this diagnosis inhibiting that of a misfire at step d).

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that Ī

_n+i(t) is a mean of the values I(t) representative of operating irregularities of the engine over time, this mean eliminating or weighting the values which are remote from the expected normal value.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that n and i are two identical engine strokes, preferably two combustion strokes, of two successive cycles or cycles separated from one another by 720°

crank angle at most.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the fact that a vehicle propelled by said engine is running over a surface or irregular geometry is diagnosed when the function |E_n(t)| adopts at least two consecutive values lying between the maximum value, at the instant considered, of predetermined permissible discrepancy (BC) and the threshold S, this diagnosis inhibiting that of a misfire at step d).

9. The method as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that the predetermined permissible discrepancy (BC) has a width dependent on the variance of the function |E_n(t)|.

10. The method as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that the diagnosis that the vehicle propelled by the engine is running over a surface of irregular geometry generates a time period during which no misfire diagnosis is logged.

11. The method as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that the diagnosis that the vehicle propelled by the engine is running over a surface of irregular geometry generates a time period during which no misfire diagnosis is logged.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11, characterized in that the period of time for which no misfire diagnosis is logged is extended as long as the detection that the vehicle is running over a surface of irregular geometry continues.

13. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the index I_n(t) corresponds to an estimate of the value of the engine torque at a given moment in the cycle n.

14. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the index I_n(t) is calculated on the basis of a linear combination of at least two elementary indices (I₁, I₂, I₃, . . . ) each representative of engine operating irregularities in a predetermined operating domain (Δ

C, Δ

N) of this engine dependent on the load (C) and/or on the speed (N) at a given moment, the elementary indices (I₁, I₂, I₃, . . . ) being weighted, in the combination, by predetermined relevance coefficients (α

, β

, γ

, . . . ) obtained in roughly identical operating conditions on a reference engine.