Promotion pricing system and method

• US 7,072,848 B2
• Filed: 11/15/2001
• Issued: 07/04/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 11/15/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: JDA Software Group Incorporated (Panasonic Holdings Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Manugistics Inc (Panasonic Holdings Corporation)
• Inventors: Nandiwada, Ravishankar Venkata, Monteiro, Brian Lawrence, Guardino, Thomas Edward, Boyd, Dean Weldon, Balepur, Prashandt Narayan, Schwarz, Henry Frederick, Apps, Philip David Reginald
• Primary Examiner(s): Rosen, Nicholas D.
• Application Number:
  US09/987,706
• Publication Number:
  US 20020123930A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,692 Days
• Field of Search: 705/10, 705/14
• US Class Current: 705/14.1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0202 Market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0206 Price or cost determination based on market factors
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0207 Discounts or incentives, e.g. coupons or rebates
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0211 Determining the effectiveness of discounts or incentives
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0244 Optimization
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0254 based on statistics

Abstract

A promotion pricing system produces an evaluation so as to analyze, evaluate, improve, and design promotions. The promotion pricing system generates promotion price evaluations and recommendations for each promotion related to a target product, along with analyzing competing products from the same seller and its competitors. The computerized promotion pricing system includes modules for carrying out necessary analytical steps, where the modules cooperate to implement a statistical market response estimation that provide statistically stable information on customer response to promotions using either an attractive or a multiplicative model, where the model is selected dynamically. The modules include a product segmentation module, an incentive translation module, a customer segmentation module, a data aggregation module, a model selection module, a calibration module, an evaluation module, a constraints generation module, a cost structure module, an optimization module, a market channel performance module, and an alert module.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating a promotion scheme for a product, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a computer to a user;

said computer collecting market data related to said product to create a model of a market for the product, wherein said market model identifies at least one competing good, and wherein said computer defines customer segments for said product and said competing goods in said market model, and wherein said customer segments are statistically independent such that a sale to one of the customer segments does not effect a demand from others of the customer segments,

said computer collecting historical transaction data related to transactions of the product and the competing goods in the consumer segments during at least a first and a second time period;

said computer analyzing the historical data and dynamically selecting a statistical model to evaluate said promotion scheme, wherein said computer selects a multiplicative model when the computer determines during the analyzing of the historical data that;

(a) the historical transaction data satisfies a predefined completeness criterion,

(b) sales of the product and sales of the competing goods are statistically dependent,

(c) sales of the product and the competing goods during the first time period are statistically dependent on sales of the product and the competing goods during the second time period, or

(d) a number of the product and the competing goods exceeds a predefined number criterion, and

wherein said computer otherwise selects an attractive model and

said computer using said statistical model to analyze the historical data and the market model to determine a utility of the product without the promotion scheme; and

said computer using said statistical model to estimate a change in utility of the product from the promotion scheme.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

said computer identifying a driving factor in sales of the product;

said computer determining a future change to the driving factor caused by the promotion scheme;

during the analyzing step, said computer correlating the sales trends of the product and historical changes in the driving factor; and

said computer estimating a future change in sales of the product by associating the future change to the driving factor with similar historical changes in the driving factor.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the driving factor is a relative price for the product.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the driving factor is attractiveness of the product.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

said computer accepting data from the user for defining a business goal; and

said computer using the estimated change in utility of the product to estimate the ability of the promotion scheme to meet the business goal.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the business goal is the elimination of a current inventory of the product.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

said computer updating the historical data to include data from new sales; and

said computer adjusting the estimated change in utility of the product in view of the new sales data.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the promotion scheme is a first promotional scheme, and further comprising the steps of:

said computer forming a second promotion scheme;

said computer estimating the change in utility of the product from the second promotion scheme;

and said computer comparing the changes in the utility of the product caused by the first and second promotion schemes.

9. The method of the claim 1 further comprising the steps of

said computer forecasting future demand for the product without the promotion scheme;

and

said computer using the forecasted future demand in estimating the change in utility of the product from the promotion scheme.

10. A computer-executable program storage medium tangibly embodying a program of instructions to perform a method for evaluating a promotion scheme for a product, the method comprising the steps of:

collecting market data related to said product to create a model of a market for the product, wherein said market model identifies at least one competing good, and wherein said market model defines customer segments for said product and said competing goods in said market model, and wherein said customer segments are statistically independent such that a sale to a first customer segment does not effect a demand from a second customer segment,

collecting historical transaction data related to transactions of the product and the competing goods in the customer segments during at least a first and a second time period;

analyzing the historical data and dynamically selecting a statistical model to evaluate said promotion scheme, wherein a multiplicative model is selected when the analysis determines that;

(a) the historical transaction data satisfies a predefined completeness criterion,

(b) sales of the product and sales of the competing goods are statistically dependent,

(c) sales of the product and the competing goods in the first and the second time periods are statistically dependent, or

(d) a number of the product and the competing goods exceeds a predefined number criterion, and

wherein otherwise an attractive model is selected; and

using said statistical model to analyze the historical data and the market model to determine a utility of the product without the promotion scheme; and

using said statistical model to estimate a change in utility of the product from the promotion scheme.

11. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

identifying a driving factor in sales of the product;

determining a future change to the driving factor caused by the promotion scheme;

during the analyzing step, correlating the sales trends of the product and historical changes in the driving factor; and

estimating a future change in sales of the product by associating the future change to the driving factor with similar historical changes in the driving factor.

12. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 11, wherein the driving factor is a relative price for the product.

13. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 11, wherein the driving factor is attractiveness of the product.

14. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

accepting data from the user for defining a business goal; and

using the estimated change in utility of the product to estimate the ability of the promotion scheme to meet the business goal.

15. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 14, wherein the business goal is the elimination of a current inventory of the product.

16. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

updating the historical transaction data to include data from new sales; and

adjusting the estimated change in utility of the product in view of the new sales data.

17. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 10, wherein the promotion scheme is a first promotional scheme and wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

forming a second promotion scheme;

estimating the change in utility of the product from the second promotion scheme;

and comparing the changes in the utility of the product caused by the first and second promotion schemes.

18. The computer-executable program storage medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

forecasting future demand for the product without the promotion scheme; and

using the forecasted future demand in estimating the change in utility of the product from the promotion scheme.