Method for cleaning a soiled article

• US 7,114,209 B2
• Filed: 12/12/2002
• Issued: 10/03/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 12/12/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: The Procter & Gamble Company
• Original Assignee: The Procter & Gamble Company
• Inventors: Lowery, Colin James, Metzger-Groom, Sabine Ursula, Duncan, Michael
• Primary Examiner(s): Stinson, Frankie L.
• Application Number:
  US10/317,788
• Publication Number:
  US 20030106164A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,391 Days
• Field of Search: 815/8, 815/9, 68/120.2, 134/113
• US Class Current: 8/158
• CPC Class Codes: A47L 15/4297 Arrangements for detecting or measuring the condition of the washing water, e.g. turbidity
• CPC Class Codes: D06F 2103/20 Washing liquid condition, e.g. turbidity
• CPC Class Codes: D06F 2105/42 Detergent or additive supply
• CPC Class Codes: D06F 2105/58 Indications or alarms to the control system or to the user
• CPC Class Codes: D06F 34/22 Condition of the washing liquid, e.g. turbidity
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 33/24 Earth materials G01N33/42 takes precedence

Abstract

A method for measuring soil in a wash liquor or other soil-containing liquid medium, the method comprising:

• • a) a soil sensing step wherein the soil-containing liquid medium is contacted with a plurality of fuzzy-correlated soil-sensing means, each responsive to a distinct physico-chemical soil characteristic and providing one or more soil parameter measurements corresponding thereto;
  • b) a data processing step wherein the soil parameter measurements for each sensing means are entered as input data into a model algorithm defined on the basis of an algorithm dataset comprising experimental or consumer-generated soil parameter and soil concentration information and which functions to generate predicted soil data of enhanced confidence level; and
  • c) a communication step wherein one or more signals dependent upon the predicted soil data is issued to an output device, data store, user interface, data processor, or an appliance director or module.

The invention also relates to methods for measuring the degree of soiling of a soiled article, and methods for cleaning a soiled article in a wash liquor or other liquid medium.

Claims

1. A method for measuring a degree of soiling of a soiled article, the method comprising:

a) a wetting step wherein the soiled article is brought into contact with a liquid medium to initiate removal of soil from the soiled article;

b) a soil sensing step wherein the soil-containing liquid medium is contacted with a plurality of soil-sensing means each responsive to a distinct physico-chemical soil characteristic and providing one or more soil parameter measurements corresponding thereto;

wherein the soil sensing step is iterated at a plurality of time intervals after the initiation of soil removal and prior to the soil-containing liquid medium reaching steady state or otherwise predefined conditions, and wherein the model algorithm is defined on the basis of an algorithm dataset developed under said predefined conditions and functions to generate predicted soil data and the confidence level thereof extrapolated to said predefined conditions;

c) a data processing step wherein the soil parameter measurements for each sensing means are entered as input data into a model algorithm defined on the basis of an algorithm dataset comprising experimental or consumer-generated soil parameter and soil concentration information and which functions to generate predicted soil data of enhanced confidence level; and

d) a communication step wherein one or more signals dependent upon the predicted soil data is issued to an output device, data store, user interface, data processor or an appliance director or module.

2. A method for cleaning a soiled article in a liquid medium, the method comprising;

a) a wetting step wherein the soiled article is brought into contact with a liquid medium to initiate removal of soil from the soiled article;

b) a soil sensing step wherein the soil-containing liquid medium is contacted with a plurality of soil-sensing means each responsive to a distinct physico-chemical soil characteristic and providing one or more soil parameter measurements corresponding thereto;

c) a data processing step wherein the soil parameter measurements are entered as input data into a model algorithm defined on the basis of an algorithm dataset comprising experimental or consumer-generated soil parameter and soil concentration information and which functions to generate predicted soil data of enhanced confidence level;

d) a communication step wherein one or more signals dependent upon the predicted soil data is issued to an output device, data store, user interface, data processor or an appliance director or module; and

e) a cleaning step wherein the soiled article is treated with one or more detergent products of a type or amount determined prior to treatment in accord with the predicted soil data.

3. A method according to claim 2 wherein the algorithm dataset additionally comprises product-specific recommended usage data and the model algorithm functions to generate predicted soil data and/or optimum product usage data.

4. A method according to claim 2 wherein the liquid medium is selected from water, organic solvents, silicone solvents, chlorinated solvents and mixtures thereof.

5. A method according to claim 4 wherein the liquid medium comprises a sensor-compatible amount of a soil-sensing promoter selected from surfactants and emulsifiers and mixtures thereof.

6. A method according to claim 2 wherein the soil sensing means have one or more pair-wise correlation coefficients in the range from about 0.05 to about 0.75.

7. A method according to claim 2 wherein the model algorithm is developed using a plurality of soil sensors appropriate to a heterogeneous mixture of soils selected from greasy/oily, particulate, enzyme-sensitive, bleachable soils, burnt- and baked-on soils, body soils, environmental soils from smoke, grass, etc, incidental soils including food stains etc, applied soils from cosmetics and haircare products, cooking soils, and mixtures thereof.

8. A method according to claim 2 wherein the soil parameters are selected from turbidity, conductivity, pH, surface-tension, refractive index, ionic strength, heat capacity, viscosity, thermal conductivity, coefficient of expansion, dipole moment, adsorption, density, hydrophobicity, optical density, osmosis, optical activity, water-hardness and combinations thereof.

9. A method according to claim 8 wherein the soil parameters comprise a combination of turbidity and conductivity.

10. A method according to claim 2 wherein the model algorithm is a linear regression model, a non-linear regression model, a fuzzy logic model, a neural network model, a neuro-fuzzy network model, or a basis vector model.

11. A method according to claim 10 wherein the model algorithm is a regression model defined on the basis of one or more regression equations, at least one for each soil-sensing means, relating the experimental or consumer-generated soil parameter information to known soil concentration levels and providing best-fit estimates of regression coefficients and corresponding probability distribution functions.

12. A method according to claim 11 wherein the one or more regression equations of soil parameter on soil concentration is linear or linearizable by appropriate transformation with a standard deviation for the regression coefficient of less than about 40%.

13. A method according to claim 12 wherein the model algorithm is at least partly defined on the basis of one or more experimental or consumer-generated soil parameter datasets, p, q, etc, at least one for each sensing means, which have been transformed by offsetting with corresponding measurements under soil-free conditions p⁰, q⁰, etc so to provide offset soil parameter datasets (p−

p⁰), (q−

q⁰), etc.

14. A method according to any of claim 13 wherein the soil parameter datasets are further transformed by normalizing the offset soil parameter dataset (p−

p⁰), etc against the maximum value of experimental or consumer-generated soil parameter measurements, p_max etc in the corresponding offset soil parameter dataset so as to provide the normalized soil parameter dataset pⁿ, qⁿ etc, where pⁿ=(p−

p⁰)/p_max and p_max is the upper n %-ile value of (p−

p⁰) in the corresponding offset soil parameter dataset and n lies in the range from about 80 to about 99.

15. A method according to claim 14 wherein the data processing step includes the step of transforming the soil parameter measurements for the or each sensing means, p_j, q_j etc by offsetting with corresponding measurements of the liquid medium under soil-free conditions, p_j⁰, q_j⁰ etc to provide offset soil parameter measurements (p_j−

p_j⁰), (q_j−

q_j⁰)) etc.

16. A method according to claim 15 wherein the soil parameter measurements are further transformed by normalizing the offset soil parameter measurements (p_j−

p_j⁰) etc against the maximum value of experimental or consumer-generated soil parameter measurements p_max in the corresponding offset soil parameter dataset so as to generate normalised soil parameter measurements p_jⁿ, q_jⁿ etc.

17. A method according to claim 16 wherein the model algorithm generates a predicted soil probability distribution on the basis of 1) the soil parameter input data, the soil concentration versus soil parameter regression coefficients (m_p) and the maximum value of soil concentration s_max in the algorithm dataset, s_max being the upper n %-ile value of soil concentration in the algorithm dataset wherein n lies in the range from about 80 to about 99;

and/or

     2) the normalised regression coefficients (m_pⁿ), p_max and the normalised soil parameter measurements (p_jⁿ), and wherein the predicted soil probability distribution is a sum or weighted sum of terms in respect of each soil parameter.

18. A method according to claim 17 additionally comprising a soil category decision step wherein the soil in the liquid medium is assigned to an optimum one of a plurality of discrete soil category bands on the basis of the predicted soil probability distributions for the or each soil sensing means.

19. A method according to claim 18 wherein the plurality of discrete soil category bands are defined on the basis of the maximum value of soil concentration s_max in the algorithm dataset and product-specific recommended usage data.

20. A method according to claim 19 wherein the optimum soil category band is assigned on the basis of one or more overlap functions between 1) the predicted soil probability distributions (S_p,j, S_q,j etc) for each soil sensing means and the normalised soil category bands (s_μ

ⁿ); and

/or

     2) the normalised predicted soil probability distributions (S_p,jⁿ, S_q,jⁿ etc) for each soil sensing means and the soil category bands expressed in normalised parameter form (s_p,μ

ⁿ, s_q,μ

ⁿ etc), the optimum soil category being a sum or weighted sum of the overlap functions in respect of each soil parameter.

21. A method according to claim 10 wherein the model algorithm is a basis vector model wherein the predicted soil data is represented as a linear combination of soil fractions each associated with a corresponding soil-sensing means and defined by reference to a standard model soil and wherein the soil fractions are combined in relative proportions dependent upon one or more weighting factors including the measured concentration of the soil fraction in the wash liquor or other liquid medium (κ

_p,j).

22. A method according to claim 21 wherein the predicted soil data is represented by a linear combination of soil fractions including one fraction associated with a conductivity-based sensor (c-soil) and one fraction associated with a turbidity-based sensor (t-soil) with weighting factors dependent upon the measured concentrations of c-soil (κ

_c,j) and t-soil (κ

_t,j) in the wash liquor or other liquid medium.

23. A method according to claim 22 including the step of issuing one or more signals dependent upon one or more of κ

_c,j, κ

_t,j, κ

_c,j;

κ

_t,j, T/C or some other function dependent upon turbidity/conductivity proportionality, to an output device, data store, user interface, data processor, or an appliance director or module for purposes of controlling a cleaning or washing process, wherein T is the offset soil parameter measurement for the turbidity-based sensor (t_j−

t_j⁰) and C is the offset conductivity soil parameter measurement for the conductivity-based sensor (c_j−

c_j⁰).

24. A method for measuring a degree of soiling of a soiled article or for cleaning the soiled article in a wash liquor or other liquid medium, the method comprising;

a) a wetting step wherein the soiled article is brought into contact with a liquid medium to initiate removal of soil from the soiled article;

b) a soil sensing step wherein the soil-containing liquid medium is contacted with a plurality of soil-sensing means each responsive to a distinct physico-chemical soil characteristic and providing one or more soil parameter measurements corresponding thereto, said plurality of soil sensing means including at least a conductivity-based sensor and a turbidity-based sensor;

c) a data processing step wherein the soil parameter measurements for each sensing means are entered as input data into a model algorithm which functions to generate predicted soil data of enhanced confidence level;

d) a communication step wherein one or more signals dependent upon the predicted soil data is issued to an output device, data store, user interface, data processor or an appliance director or module; and

optionally

e) a cleaning step wherein the soiled article is treated with one or more detergent products of a type or amount determined prior to treatment in accord with the predicted soil data.