System for improved use of pitch enhancement with subcodebooks

• US 7,117,146 B2
• Filed: 08/27/2001
• Issued: 10/03/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 08/24/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Mindspeed Technologies Inc. (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.)
• Inventors: Gao, Yang
• Primary Examiner(s): Hudspeth, David
• Assistant Examiner(s): Wozniak, James S.
• Application Number:
  US09/940,904
• Publication Number:
  US 20020103638A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,863 Days
• Field of Search: 704/201, 704207-208, 704219-220, 704/221, 704/200.1
• US Class Current: 704/200.1
• CPC Class Codes: G10L 19/08 Determination or coding of the excitation function; Determination or coding of the long-term prediction parameters
• CPC Class Codes: G10L 19/265 Pre-filtering, e.g. high frequency emphasis prior to encoding
• CPC Class Codes: G10L 21/0364 for improving intelligibility

Abstract

A speech compression system capable of encoding a speech signal into a bitstream for subsequent decoding to generate synthesized speech is disclosed. The speech compression system optimizes the bandwidth consumed by the bitstream by balancing the desired average bit rate with the perceptual quality of the reconstructed speech. The speech compression system comprises a full-rate codec, a half-rate codec, a quarter-rate codec and an eighth-rate codec. The codecs are selectively activated based on a rate selection. In addition, the full and half-rate codec are selectively activated based on a type classification. Each codec is selectively activated to encode and decode the speech signals at different bit rates emphasizing different aspects of the speech signal to enhance overall quality of the synthesized speech. The overall quality of the system is strongly related to the excitation. In order to enhance the excitation, the system contains a fixed codebook comprising several subcodebooks. The invention reveals a way to apply a pitch enhancement efficiently and differently for different subcodebooks without using additional bits. The technique is particularly applicable to selectable mode vocoder (SMV) systems.

Claims

1. A method of pitch enhancement in a speech compression system, the method comprising:

providing a fixed codebook comprising at least two fixed subcodebooks;

selecting one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks;

calculating a pitch enhancement coefficient dependent upon the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks;

applying a pitch enhancement in response to the pitch enhancement coefficient and the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks;

where the pitch enhancement is applied both forward and backward, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is applied to pulses selected from the group consisting of forward, backward, and forward and backward pitch pulses, of a main pulse, and where the pitch enhancement coefficient is applied to a first power for pulses one pitch lag away from the main pulse, and the pitch enhancement coefficient is applied to a second power for pulses two pitch lags away from the main pulse.

2. The method of claim 1 comprising:

calculating the pitch enhancement coefficient based on the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks, wherein the pitch enhancement coefficient is calculated according to a quantized long term predictor gain of a previous subframe multiplied by a factor that is different for each of the at least two fixed subcodebooks.

3. The method of claim 2, where applying the pitch enhancement further comprises calculating a pitched-enhanced signal from a codevector selected from the one of the at least two fixed subcodebook, a pitch lag, and the pitch enhancement coefficient.

4. The method of claim 3, where the signal is calculated during a search through the fixed subcodebooks.

5. The method of claim 3, where the signal is calculated during an iterative search through the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks.

6. The method of claim 2, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is a mathematical factor from 0.0 to 1.0.

7. The method of claim 2, where the selecting the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks and the calculating the pitch enhancement coefficient are accomplished by using at least one factor selected from the group consisting of a pitch correlation, a residual sharpness, a noise-to-signal ratio, and a pitch lag.

8. The method of claim 2, where the method is applied to a selectable mode vocoder (SMV) system.

9. The method of claim 2, where the method is applied to a code-excited linear prediction (CELP) system.

10. The method of claim 2, wherein for a first type speech classification the pitch enhancement coefficient is calculated according to a quantized long term predictor gain of a previous subframe multiplied by a factor that is different for each of the at least two fixed subcodebooks, and wherein for a second type speech classification pitch enhancement coefficient is calculated according to a quantized long term predictor gain multiplied by a factor that is different for each of the at least two fixed subcodebooks.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first type speech classification includes speech signals having a harmonic structure, and wherein the second type speech classification includes speech signals having a non-harmonic structure.

12. The method of claim 2, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub>, and the value of 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> is constrained to be between 0.0 and 0.5, inclusive, where g<sub>a—

m</sub> is the quantized long term predictor gain of the previous subframe.

13. The method of claim 1, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.75·

g<sub>a—

m</sub>, where the value of 0.75·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> is constrained to be between 0.5, and 1.0, inclusive, where g<sub>a—

m</sub> is a quantized long term predictor gain of a previous subframe.

14. The method of claim 1, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> and the value of 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> is constrained to be between 0.0 and 0.5, inclusive, where g<sub>a—

m</sub> is a quantized long term predictor gain of a previous subframe.

15. The method of claim 1, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.

16. The method of claim 1, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 1.0·

g_n and the value of 1.0·

g_a is constrained to be between 0.5 and 1.0, inclusive, where g_a is a quantized pitch gain.

17. The method of claim 1, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.5·

g_a and the value of 0.5·

g_a is constrained to be between 0.0 and 0.5 inclusive, where g_a is a quantized pitch gain.

18. A speech coding system comprising:

a pitch enhancement coefficient;

a fixed codebook comprising at least two fixed subcodebooks; and

a pitch enhancement based on the pitch enhancement coefficient and the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks, wherein the pitch enhancement coefficient is dependent on the selected fixed subcodebook, where the pitch enhancement is applied forward and backward;

where the pitch enhancement coefficient is applied to pulses selected from the group consisting of forward, backward, and forward and backward pitch pulses of a main pulse;

where the pitch enhancement coefficient is applied to a first power for pulses one pitch lag away from the main pulse, and the pitch enhancement coefficient is applied to a second power for pulses two pitch lags away from the main pulse.

19. The speech coding system of claim 18 comprising:

the pitch enhancement coefficient calculated based on the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks, wherein the pitch enhancement coefficient is calculated according to a quantized long term predictor gain of a previous subframe multiplied by a factor constant number that is different for each of the at least two fixed subcodebooks.

20. The speech coding system of claim 19, where the pitch enhancement comprises a pitch-enhanced signal calculated from a pitch lag, a codevector selected from the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks, and the pitch enhancement coefficient.

21. The speech coding system of claim 20, where the pitch-enhanced signal is calculated during a search through the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks.

22. The speech coding system of claim 20, where the pitch-enhanced signal is calculated during an iterative search through the one of the at least two fixed subcodebooks.

23. The speech coding system of claim 19, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is a mathematical factor from 0.0 to 1.0.

24. The speech coding system of claim 19, wherein for a first type speech classification the pitch enhancement coefficient is calculated according to a quantized long term predictor gain of a previous subframe multiplied by a factor that is different for each of the at least two fixed subcodebooks, and wherein for a second type speech classification pitch enhancement coefficient is calculated according to a quantized long term predictor gain multiplied by a factor that is different for each of the at least two fixed subcodebooks.

25. The speech coding system of claim 24, wherein the first type speech classification includes speech signals having a harmonic structure, and wherein the second type speech classification includes speech signals having a non-harmonic structure.

26. The speech coding system of claim 19, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub>, and the value of 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> is constrained to be between 0.0 and 0.5, inclusive, where g<sub>a—

m</sub> is the quantized long term predictor gain of the previous subframe.

27. The speech coding system of claim 19, where the algorithm uses at least one factor selected from the group consisting of a pitch correlation, a residual sharpness, a noise-to-signal ratio, and a pitch lag in calculating the signal.

28. The speech coding system of claim 19, where the speech compression system is a selectable mode vocoder (SMV) system.

29. The speech coding system of claim 19, where the speech compression system is a code excited linear prediction (CELP) system.

30. The speech coding system of claim 18, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.75·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> and the value of 0.75·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> is constrained to be between 0.5 and 1.0, inclusive, where g<sub>a—

m</sub> is a quantized gain of a previous subframe.

31. The speech coding system of claim 18, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub>, and the value of 0.25·

g<sub>a—

m</sub> is constrained to be between 0.0 and 0.5, inclusive, where g<sub>a—

m</sub> is a quantized long term predictor gain of a previous subframe.

32. The speech coding system of claim 18, where the pitch enhancement coefficient is 0.

33. The speech coding system of claim 18, where the pitch enhancement coefficient 1.0·

g_a and the value of 1.0·

g_a is constrained to be between 0.5 and 1.0, inclusive, where g_a is a quantized pitch gain.

34. The speech coding system of claim 18, where the pitch eithancement coefficient is 0.5·

g_a and the value of 0.5·

g_a is constrained to be between 0.0 and 0.5 inclusive, where g_a is a quantized pitch gain.