High speed resiliometer

• US 7,127,933 B2
• Filed: 08/10/2004
• Issued: 10/31/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 08/10/2004
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Acushnet Company (FILA Holdings Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Acushnet Company (FILA Holdings Corp.)
• Inventors: Bulpett, David A., McNamara, Michael, Bissonnette, Laurent C., Correia, Diomar
• Primary Examiner(s): THOMPSON, JEWEL VERGIE
• Application Number:
  US10/914,289
• Publication Number:
  US 20060032288A1
• Time in Patent Office: 812 Days
• Field of Search: 73/120.1, 73/121.1, 273/121.1
• US Class Current: 73/12.11
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2203/001 Impulsive
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 3/48 by performing impressions under impulsive load by indentors, e.g. falling ball G01N3/54 takes precedence

Abstract

An apparatus and method for testing the physical properties of a material is disclosed. Preferably, the physical properties that may be tested include, but are not limited to, the COR of a material. Accordingly, the apparatus includes a projectile that may be capable of being propelled towards a material sample. The projectile is preferably aimed and fired through a tubular barrel towards the material sample. The tubular barrel preferably comprises a propulsion system that controls pneumatic energy via a pneumatic valve. At least two sensors are placed between the tubular barrel and the material sample in order to detect the passage of the projectile. It is desired that the sensors are placed at precise, discrete positions. As the projectile passes through the field of view of each sensor, the time is recorded to a memory, for example, a counter timer board. The projectile may then impact the material sample, which may preferably be held in place by a fixation device. The fixation device is preferably a holding slot, which may be backed by an infinite mass cylinder. Upon rebounding from the material sample, the projectile passes back through the field of view of the sensors in reverse order, allowing the sensors to capture and record the time of passage to a memory, such as a counter timer board. The physical properties of the material sample may be calculated by a processing device that is operatively connected to at least a portion of the apparatus.

Claims

1. An apparatus for determining the characteristics of a mechanical collision, comprising:

a holding device capable of receiving and holding a stationary material sample;

a projectile;

a propulsion device capable of propelling the projectile towards the stationary material sample;

at least two sensors selectively positioned between the propulsion device and the stationary material sample, wherein the sensors are capable of measuring the time and position of the outbound movement of the projectile; and

a processor operatively connected to at least one of the holding device, the propulsion device, and the at least two sensors, wherein the characteristics of the mechanical collision are determined automatically by the processor.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the projectile comprises a metallic sphere.

3. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the diameter of the sphere is between about 0.0625″

and about 0.5″

.

4. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the diameter of the sphere may be between about 0.125″

and about 0.250″

.

5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the elastic modulus of the projectile is at least about fifty times greater than the elastic modulus of the sample.

6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein at least one sensor is positioned less than about 6″

or greater from the end of the propulsion device.

7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor comprises a programmable logic controller.

8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the material sample is backed by a mass which is 100 times greater than the mass of the projectile.

9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the weight of the projectile is between about 0.200 grams and about 0.600 grams.

10. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor is capable of determining the COR of the material sample.

11. The apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the processor is capable of determining the contact time of the projectile.

12. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the propulsion device comprises a pneumatic valve.

13. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a tubing system capable of capturing the projectile after it strikes the material sample and returning it to the propulsion device.

14. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface.

15. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processor is capable of determining at least one of:

velocity;

COR;

contact time;

slope of contact time;

slope of COR; and

averages and standard deviations of COR or contact time.

16. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the propulsion device is capable of propelling the projectile within 5 fps of a predetermined velocity.

17. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the propulsion device is capable of propelling the projectile to strike the material sample within 0.1″

of a predetermined point on the material sample.

18. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the projectile comprises one of steel, aluminum, tungsten, acrylic, titanium, or ceramic.

19. A method for determining the characteristics of a mechanical collision, comprising:

providing a stationary material sample;

firing an object at the stationary material sample;

automatically determining the inbound and outbound characteristics of the flight of the object; and

automatically correlating the ratio of inbound and outbound characteristics to a property of the stationary material sample.

20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the inbound and outbound characteristics comprise inbound velocity and outbound velocity.

21. The method according to claim 19, wherein the automatically correlating comprises determining the COR of the stationary material sample.

22. The method according to claim 19, further comprising automatically determining the contact time of the object based on the inbound and outbound characteristics of the flight of the object.

23. The method according to claim 19, wherein the firing comprises propelling the object at the sample at a velocity between about 50 fps and 200 fps.

24. The method according to claim 19, wherein the firing comprises propelling the object at the sample at a velocity between about 85 and 175 fps.

25. The method according to claim 19, wherein the inbound and outbound characteristics comprises the time of passage of the object.

26. The method according to claim 19, wherein the material sample comprises a section of a golf ball.

27. The method according to claim 19, wherein the automatically correlating comprises determining the anisotropic characteristics of the material sample.

28. A method for determining the characteristics of a mechanical collision, comprising:

automatically selectively positioning a stationary material sample at a predetermined distance from a projectile;

selectively positioning at least two sensors responsive to the presence of the projectile;

propelling the projectile towards the stationary material sample; and

automatically determining the COR of the stationary material sample based on the at least two sensors and the projectile.

29. The method according to claim 28, wherein the projectile is propelled towards the material sample at a velocity between about 50 fps and 200 fps.

30. The method according to claim 28, wherein the projectile is propelled towards the material sample at a velocity between about 85 and 175 fps.

31. The method according to claim 28, wherein the determining is based on the velocity of the projectile.

32. The method according to claim 28, wherein the determining is based on the time of passage of the projectile.

33. The method according to claim 28, wherein the at least two sensors are responsive to the presence of the projectile based on optical sensing.

34. The method according to claim 28, wherein the at least two sensors are responsive to the presence of the projectile based on magnetic variations.

35. The method according to claim 28, wherein the at least two sensors are responsive to the presence of the projectile based on capacitance variations.

36. The method according to claim 28, further comprising automatically determining the contact time of the projectile based on the at least two sensors.

37. The method according to claim 28, wherein the automatically determining comprises determining the anisotropic properties of a golf ball section.

38. The method according to claim 28, wherein the propelling comprises propelling the projectile at a velocity within about 5 fps of a predetermined velocity.

39. The method according to claim 28, wherein the projectile is capable of striking the material sample within about 0.1″

of a predetermined point on a material sample.

40. The method according to claim 39, wherein the density of the projectile is between about 0.01 and about 0.90 lb/sq. in³.