Arrangement for and method of monitoring, calibrating and optimizing a control of an electromedical implant

• US 7,130,695 B2
• Filed: 04/02/2003
• Issued: 10/31/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 04/05/2002
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Biotronik Mess-Und Therapiegeraete GmbH & Company Ingenieurbuero Berlin (Biotronik SE & Company KG)
• Original Assignee: Biotronik Mess-Und Therapiegeraete GmbH & Company Ingenieurbuero Berlin (Biotronik SE & Company KG)
• Inventors: Czygan, Gerald, Schaldach, legal representative, Max Jr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Pezzuto, Robert E.
• Assistant Examiner(s): SARCIONE, JESSICA LYNN
• Application Number:
  US10/405,976
• Publication Number:
  US 20040078061A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,308 Days
• Field of Search: 607/2, 607/27, 607/30, 607/32, 607 59- 60, 607/62, 600/300, 600/301
• US Class Current: 607/59
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/37211 Means for communicating with stimulators
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/37252 Details of algorithms or data aspects of communication system, e.g. handshaking, transmitting specific data or segmenting data

Abstract

An arrangement (10) for monitoring and adjusting a control of an electromedical implant (12) by means of an external control and evaluation unit (14) is made up of the electromedical implant, the external control and evaluation unit and a central, autarchically runnable evaluation logic means (30) which controls the activities of a telemetry unit (16) and a memory unit (34), which is connected to a clock and timer unit (42) and which on the basis of certain communicated data ascertains control sequences and control parameters for monitoring and adjusting the implant and co-ordinates the transmission thereof to the implant. An expert system (ES) may be adapted to assess all monitoring and adjusting tasks on a patient-individual basis.

Claims

1. An arrangement for monitoring and adjusting control of an electromedical implant for intracardial cardiac therapy of a patient by an external control and evaluation unit, wherein the arrangement comprises:

(a) the electromedical implant, which comprises;

a clock and timer unit for the co-ordination of a time sequence of control operations,

an energy source for providing an operating voltage and for stimulation and shock delivery,

at least one electrode which is adapted for connection to myocardium of a heart and which is adapted for the delivery of electrical pulses,

a sensor which supplies measurement data about physiological parameters in a region of the heart and about internal status parameters of the implant,

a memory unit for a storage of internal control sequences, control parameters and measurement data of the sensor,

a telemetry unit having a transmitter and a receiver for bidirectional data exchange with the external control and evaluation unit, and

a central, autarchically runnable control logic unit which controls activities of the at least one electrode, the telemetry unit, the sensor and the memory unit on the basis of the internal control sequences and control parameters, and

(b) the external control and evaluation unit, which comprises;

a telemetry unit having a transmitter and a receiver for bidirectional data exchange with the electromedical implant,

a clock and timer unit for the co-ordination of a time sequence of control operations,

an energy source for providing an operating voltage,

a memory unit for storing control sequences, control parameters and communicated data of the implant,

a central, autarchically runnable evaluation logic unit which controls the activities of the telemetry unit and the memory unit, which is connected to the clock and timer unit and which on the basis of the communicated data ascertains control sequences and control parameters for monitoring and adjusting the implant and co-ordinates the transmission thereof to the implant, and

wherein the evaluation logic unit further comprises an expert system which is adapted to assess all monitoring and adjusting tasks for the intracardial cardiac therapy on a patient-individual basis and divides the control sequences on which the monitoring and adjusting tasks are based into internal control sequences for the implant and external control sequences for the external evaluation and control unit, and wherein the evaluation logic unit of the external control and evaluation unit has a memory for a complex matrix into which at least the transmitted data of the implant and the control values pass and which delivers the control parameters and control sequences on which the monitoring and adjusting tasks are based.

2. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein:

the internal control sequences include therapy and diagnostic sequences which are absolutely necessary for controlling therapy functions or diagnosis of given cardiac events respectively.

3. The arrangement of claim 2, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a first input unit for interaction with the patient, by way of which the patient can input controls values and influence the evaluation logic unit or can implement markings and assessments of given states or symptoms.

4. The arrangement of claim 3, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a second input unit for data exchange with further peripheral devices, by way of which the patient can input control values, and control sequences for the evaluation logic unit can be modified or produced afresh and/or data can be read out of the memory unit for additional evaluation.

5. The arrangement of claim 4, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit for data exchange with external sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

6. The arrangement of claim 5, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit with integrated sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

7. The arrangement of claim 6, wherein:

the evaluation logic unit of the external control and evaluation unit has a memory adapted to maintain a complex matrix into which at least the transmitted data of the implant and the control values pass and which delivers the control parameters and control sequences on which the monitoring and adjusting tasks are based.

8. The arrangement of claim 7, wherein:

the evaluation logic unit is such that the control parameters and/or control sequences which are provided for the telemetric data exchange are interlinked with weighting factors, on the basis of which a time progression and/or a series of transmission of the individual monitoring and adjusting tasks is established in an interaction scheme.

9. The arrangement of claim 3, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit for data exchange with external sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

10. The arrangement of claim 3, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit with integrated sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

11. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein:

the internal control sequences include real time-dependent therapy and diagnostic sequences.

12. The arrangement of claim 11, wherein:

the external control and evaluation unit further comprises a first input unit for interaction with the patient, by way of which the patient can input controls values and influence the evaluation logic unit or can implement markings and assessments of given states or symptoms.

13. The arrangement of claim 12, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a second input unit for data exchange with further peripheral devices, wherein the second input unit is adapted to allow the patient to input control values, to modify control sequences for the evaluation logic unit or to produce control sequences for the evaluation logic unit afresh, to allow data to be read out of the memory unit for additional evaluation, or a combination thereof.

14. The arrangement of claim 13, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit for data exchange with external sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

15. The arrangement of claim 14, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit with integrated sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

16. The arrangement of claim 15, wherein:

the evaluation logic unit is such that the control parameters and/or control sequences which are provided for the telemetric data exchange are interlinked with weighting factors, on the basis of which a time progression and/or a series of transmission of the individual monitoring and adjusting tasks is established in an interaction scheme.

17. An external evaluation and control unit for an arrangement as set forth in claim 16 and adapted for carrying out a method comprising

using the clock and timer unit to co-ordinate a time sequence of the control operations,

delivering electrical pulses by way of the at least one electrode adapted to be connected to myocardium of the heart,

supplying measurement data relating to physiological parameters in the region of the heart and internal status parameters of the implant from the sensor to the memory unit,

storing internal control sequences, control parameters and measurement data of the sensor in the memory unit, and

co-ordinating the activities of the at least one electrode, the telemetry unit, the sensor and the memory unit on the basis of the internal control sequences and control parameters in a central autarchically runnable control logic unit, and

exchanging data between the electromedical implant and the external control and evaluation unit by way of a bidirectional telemetry unit,

coordinating a time sequence of the control operations by the timer unit,

storing control sequences, control parameters and communicated data of the implant in the memory unit, and

controlling the activities of the telemetry unit and the memory unit in a central autarchically runnable evaluation logic unit and ascertaining the communicated data control sequences and control parameters for monitoring and adjusting the implant and co-ordinating the transmission thereof to the implant;

wherein the evaluation logic unit of the external control and evaluation unit includes a memory adapted to maintain a complex matrix into which at least the transmitted data of the implant and the control values pass and which delivers the control parameters and control sequences on which the monitoring and adjusting tasks are based;

wherein the control values include time-dependent control values that include a factor which compels routine checking of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of said control at predeterminable time intervals;

wherein the control values further include event-dependent control values that include a factor which can be predetermined by way of further input units at the external control and evaluation unit with integrated or external sensors, and wherein the factor passes into the evaluation and compels monitoring or adjustment of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of the control at predeterminable time intervals;

wherein the control parameters and control sequences are interlinked with weighting factors, on the basis of which a time progression of the individual monitoring and adjusting tasks is established in an interaction scheme;

wherein the weighting factors serve to establish a series of the monitoring and adjusting tasks which are transmitted during the interaction of the external control and evaluation unit to the implant.

18. The arrangement of claim 15, wherein:

the evaluation logic means of the external control and evaluation unit has a memory adapted to maintain a complex matrix into which at least the transmitted data of the implant and the control values pass and which delivers the control parameters and control sequences on which the monitoring and adjusting tasks are based.

19. The arrangement of claim 18, wherein:

the evaluation logic unit is such that the control parameters and/or control sequences which are provided for the telemetric data exchange are interlinked with weighting factors, on the basis of which a time progression and/or a series of transmission of the individual monitoring and adjusting tasks is established in an interaction scheme.

20. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a first input unit for interaction with the patient, by way of which the patient can input controls values and influence the evaluation logic unit or can implement markings and assessments of given states or symptoms.

21. The arrangement of claim 20, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a second input unit for data exchange with further peripheral devices, by way of which the patient can input control values, and control sequences for the evaluation logic unit can be modified or produced afresh and/or data can be read out of the memory unit for additional evaluation.

22. The arrangement of claim 20, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit for data exchange with external sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

23. The arrangement of claim 20, wherein the external control and evaluation unit further comprises:

a further input unit with integrated sensors, by way of which control values can be inputted.

24. A method of monitoring an electromedical implant and adjusting control of the electromedical implant for intracardial cardiac therapy of a patient by means of an external control and evaluation unit, wherein the method comprises:

providing an electromedical implant containing a clock, a timer unit, at least one electrode connected adapted to be connected to myocardium of a heart, a sensor, a memory unit and a central autarchically runnable control logic unit and providing an external control and evaluation unit containing a bidirectional telemetry unit, a timer unit, and a memory unit, and

using the clock and timer unit to co-ordinate a time sequence of control operations,

delivering electrical pulses by way of the at least one electrode,

supplying measurement data relating to physiological parameters in a region of the heart and internal status parameters of the implant from the sensor to the memory unit,

storing internal control sequences, control parameters and measurement data of the sensor in the memory unit, and

co-ordinating the activities of the at least one electrode, the telemetry unit, the sensor means and the memory unit on the basis of the internal control sequences and control parameters in a central autarchically runnable control logic unit, and

exchanging data between the electromedical implant and the external control and evaluation unit by way of a bidirectional telemetry unit,

co-ordinating a time sequence of the control operations by the timer unit,

storing control sequences, control parameters and communicated data of the implant in the memory unit, and

controlling the activities of the telemetry unit and the memory unit in a central autarchically runnable evaluation logic unit and ascertaining the communicated data control sequences and control parameters for monitoring and adjusting the implant and co-ordinating the transmission thereof to the implant;

wherein the evaluation logic unit of the external control and evaluation unit includes a memory adapted to maintain a complex matrix into which at least the transmitted data of the implant and the control values pass and which delivers the control parameters and control sequences on which the monitoring and adjusting tasks are based.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the control values include time-dependent control values.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the time-dependent control values include a factor which compels routine checking of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of said control at predeterminable time intervals.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the control values include event-dependent control values.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein the event-dependent control values include a factor which can be inputted by the patient by way of the first input unit at the external control and evaluation unit, and wherein the factor passes into the evaluation, and compels monitoring or adjustment of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of the control at predeterminable time intervals.

29. The method of claim 27, wherein the event-dependent control values include a factor which can be predetermined by way of the second input unit at the external control and evaluation unit by suitable peripheral devices, and wherein the factor passes into the evaluation and compels monitoring or adjustment of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of the control at predeterminable time intervals.

30. The method of claim 27, wherein the event-dependent control values include a factor which can be predetermined by way of further input units at the external control and evaluation unit with integrated or external sensors, and wherein the factor passes into the evaluation and compels monitoring or adjustment of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of the control at predeterminable time intervals.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the control parameters and control sequences are interlinked with weighting factors, on the basis of which a time progression of the individual monitoring and adjusting tasks is established in an interaction scheme.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein the weighting factors serve to establish a series of the monitoring and adjusting tasks which are transmitted during the interaction of the external control and evaluation unit to the implant.

33. The method of claim 32, wherein in the normal situation the weighting factors are so predetermined that the impending monitoring and adjusting tasks are carried out in a rest phase of the patient.

34. The method of claim 32, wherein in the acute situation the weighting factors are so predetermined that the impending monitoring and adjusting tasks begin immediately after production of the interaction scheme.

35. The method of claim 25, wherein the time-dependent control values include a factor which can be inputted by the patient by way of a first input unit at the external control and evaluation unit and compels routine checking of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of the control at predeterminable time intervals.

36. The method of claim 25, wherein the time-dependent control values include a factor which can be predetermined by way of a second input unit at the external control and evaluation unit by suitable peripheral devices and which compels routine checking of the entire control of the implant or sub-regions of the control.