Methods for generating classroom productivity index

• US 7,131,842 B2
• Filed: 02/07/2003
• Issued: 11/07/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 02/07/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: John Hollingsworth, Sylvia Ybarra
• Original Assignee: John Hollingsworth, Sylvia Ybarra
• Inventors: Hollingsworth, John, Ybarra, Sylvia
• Primary Examiner(s): Cheng, Joe H.
• Application Number:
  US10/360,110
• Publication Number:
  US 20040157201A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,369 Days
• Field of Search: 434/81, 434/118, 434/322, 434/323, 434/336, 434/350, 434/362, 434/365, 463/40, 705/10, 706/11, 706/16, 707/104.1, 710/111
• US Class Current: 434/323
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

Disclosed is a system and method for evaluating educational effectiveness and establishing an index for comparison. The index is called the Classroom Productivity Index and is determined from four factors multiplied together. Two of the factors come from a Curriculum Calibration of student assignments process: (1) Alignment to Standards and (2) Breadth of Coverage. The two other factors come from a School Wide Instructional Practices Summary (classroom observations) process: (3) Time on Task, and (4) Instructional Effectiveness. The Index is used to quantifiably measure the educational institution'"'"'s overall effectiveness and to identify areas for improvement in the school'"'"'s instructional processes that will result in improved student learning and improved student achievement on state assessments. A repeat determination of the Classroom Productivity Index at a future time can measure a school'"'"'s progress, or lack of progress, in improving its educational processes. The usefulness of the Index is based on the premise that improved teaching results in improved student learning.

Claims

1. A method for generating an index for use in evaluating the effectiveness of an educational institution comprising the steps of:

a. collecting work from students at the institution;

b. analyzing the collected student work to determine its alignment to standards and expressing this as a percentage;

c. analyzing the collected student work to determine its breadth of coverage and expressing this as a percentage;

d. observing the classroom teaching of students at the institution;

e. analyzing the observed teaching to determine time on task and expressing this as a percentage;

f. analyzing the observed teaching to determine instructional effectiveness and expressing this as a percentage;

g. multiplying together the four percentages of alignment to standards, breadth of coverage, time on task and instructional effectiveness to produce an index value; and

h. comparing the produced index value to a norm by a computer, and producing a report comparing the produced index value to the norm for evaluation purpose.

2. The method of claim 1 comprising the additional step of reporting the four percentages and the index value, to the educational institution.

3. The method of claim 2 comprising the additional step of developing strategies for improving any of the four percentages.

4. The method of claim 2 comprising the additional steps of:

j performing a curriculum calibration of the collected student work;

k. preparing a school wide instructional practices summary of the classroom observations; and

l. reporting the results of the curriculum calibration and school wide instructional practices summary to the educational institution.

5. The method of claim 4 comprising the additional step of developing strategies for improvement.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the alignment to standards is determined as a percentage of assignments given to students that are on grade level.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the breadth of coverage is determined as a percentage of coverage of each content strand as compared to the percentage of questions per content strand tested on state assessments.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the instructional effectiveness is determined as a percentage of teacher time using explicit direct instruction.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein the classroom observation is performed by specially trained observers who record student and teacher behaviors for long periods of time.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein each classroom observation takes place for at least one hour.

11. The method of claim 1 Wherein different weights are given to each of the four percentages based on their relative importance.

12. A method for creating an index reflecting the effectiveness of an educational institution comprising the steps of:

a. observing student-teacher classroom instruction at the institution;

b. recording observations onto first data collection sheets;

c. obtaining work from students at the institution;

d. categorizing the work according to grade level, and recording such categorizations onto second data collection sheets;

e. categorizing the work according to distribution of educational subject areas, and

recording such categorizations onto third data collection sheets;

e. entering information recorded on the first, second and third data collection sheets into a computer, and using said computer to determine;

(1) the percentage of work that meets grade level standards,

(2) the percentage of work that meets an established distribution of educational subject areas,

(3) the percentage of time that students are effective engaged in learning, and

(4) the percentage of time of teacher effectiveness based on a direct instruction model; and

f. multiplying the above four percentages together to produce an index value;

(g) producing a report by the computer by comparing the index value to a norm for evaluation purpose.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the report is used to determine overall educational efficiency of the institution.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the index is used to improve the effectiveness of teaching at the institution.

15. A method for generating an index showing the effectiveness of an educational institution comprising the steps of:

a. collecting work generated by students at the institution;

b. determining the amount of the collected work that meets grade-level standards, expressed as a percentage of the collected work;

c. determining the amount of the collected work that meets an established distribution of educational subject areas, expressed as a percentage of the collected work;

d. observing the classroom instruction of students by at least one teacher at the institution for a time period;

e. determining the amount of time that the observed students are effectively engaged in learning, expressed as a percentage of the time period;

f. determining the amount of time that the at least one teacher is matching the attributes of effective teachers as defined by a direct instruction model, expressed as a percentage of the time period; and

g. multiplying together the four percentages produced in steps b, c, e and f to produce an educational effectiveness index;

(h) producing a report by a computer by comparing the index to a norm for evaluation purpose.