Static and dynamic assessment procedures

• US 7,146,350 B2
• Filed: 01/29/2003
• Issued: 12/05/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 05/10/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Dineen, Paul Laurence, Le, Vu An Minh, Holland, Paul Edward, McDowell, Mark William
• Primary Examiner(s): Knight, Anthony
• Assistant Examiner(s): Datskovskiy, Sergey
• Application Number:
  US10/353,874
• Publication Number:
  US 20030140278A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,406 Days
• Field of Search: 706/47, 706/10, 706/60, 717/102, 717/103
• US Class Current: 706/47
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/04 Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem" market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities G06Q30/0202
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/922 Computer program preparation

Abstract

An assessments framework includes a framework batch processor and a partner batch processor. The framework batch processor performs static assessments based on information obtained from a task definition database and a policy database. The partner batch processor outputs dynamic task definitions and dynamic policy information, to be input to the framework batch processor for executing an assessment when a triggering event occurs. The triggering event may be a schedule-based trigger or an event-based trigger.

Claims

1. An assessments framework for assessing configuration information for software and hardware infrastructure in a computer system, comprising:

a framework batch computer-implemented processor that is configured to perform either a static assessment or a dynamic assessment based on an assessments policy and an assessments task definition for the infrastructure in the computer system;

a partner batch computer-implemented processor that is configured to create a dynamic task definition and a dynamic assessments policy for an assessment created by a partner, wherein the framework batch processor either retrieves the policy and the task definition from a computer accessible database when executing an assessment not created by the partner, or receives the policy and the task definition output from the partner batch processor when executing the assessment created by the partner.

2. The assessments framework according to claim 1, further comprising:

a computer-implemented trigger interface unit that provides triggering information to the framework batch processor and to the partner batch processor.

3. The assessments framework according to claim 2, further comprising:

a computer-implemented scheduler for providing information as to whether or not a time-based trigger has occurred; and

a computer-implemented event determination unit for providing information as to whether or not an event-based trigger has occurred.

4. The assessments framework according to claim 1, further comprising:

a computer-accessible policy database for storing at least one policy corresponding to at least one assessment; and

a computer-accessible task definition database for storing at least one task definition corresponding to at least one assessment.

5. The assessments framework according to claim 1, further comprising:

a computer-accessible tracker database for storing current information on at least one of an enterprise and a node, wherein information from the tracker database is utilized in order to create the dynamic task definition.

6. A method of performing an assessment of configuration information for software and hardware infrastructure in a computer system, comprising:

receiving a triggering event;

based on the triggering event, determining whether or not a static assessment or a dynamic assessment is to be performed for the infrastructure in the computer system;

if the static assessment is to be performed, utilizing a framework batch computer-implemented processor that retrieves static policy information and static task definition information for executing the static assessment; and

if the dynamic assessment is to be performed, utilizing a partner batch computer-implemented processor to provide dynamic policy information and dynamic task definition information, and then providing the dynamic policy information and the dynamic task definition information to the framework batch processor for executing the dynamic assessment.

7. The method according to claim 6, further comprising:

outputting at least one report based on the policy information for the assessment.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the trigger is one of a schedule-based trigger and an event-based trigger.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the event-based trigger is output when a particular event is detected at a particular node of a particular enterprise.

10. A computer program product encoded on a computer readable medium and comprising code that, when executed on a computer-implemented processor performs a method for assessing configuration information for software and hardware infrastructure in a computer system, the method comprising:

determining whether or not a triggering event has occurred;

based on notification of the triggering event,

determining whether or not a static assessment or a dynamic assessment of the infrastructure is to be performed;

based on notification that the static assessment is to be performed,

controlling a framework batch processor in order to retrieve static policy information and static task definition information for executing the static assessment; and

based on notification that the dynamic assessment is to be performed,

controlling a partner batch computer-implemented processor to provide dynamic policy information and dynamic task definition information, and

then providing the dynamic policy information and the dynamic task definition information to the framework batch computer-implemented processor for executing the dynamic assessment.

11. The computer program product according to claim 10, wherein the method further comprises:

outputting at least one report based on the policy information for the assessment.

12. The computer program product according to claim 10, wherein the trigger is one of a schedule-based trigger and an event-based trigger.

13. The computer program product according to claim 12, wherein the event-based trigger is output when a particular event is detected at a particular node of a particular enterprise.

14. An assessments framework for assessing configuration information for software and hardware infrastructure in a computer system, comprising:

first computer-implemented processing means for performing either a static assessment or a dynamic assessment for the infrastructure in the computer system based on an assessments policy and an assessments task definition;

second computer-implemented processing means for creating a dynamic task definition and a dynamic assessments policy for an assessment created by a partner; and

computer-accessible storage means for storing at least one assessments policy and at least one assessments task definition not created by the second processing means, wherein the first processing means either retrieves the assessments policy and the assessments task definition from the storage means when executing an assessment not created by the partner, or receives the assessment policy and the assessments task definition output from the second processing means when executing the assessment created by the partner.

15. The assessments framework according to claim 14, further comprising:

computer-implemented trigger interface means for providing triggering information to the first and second processing means.

16. The assessments framework according to claim 15, further comprising:

computer-implemented scheduling means for providing information as to whether or not a time-based trigger has occurred; and

computer-implemented event determining means for providing information as to whether or not an event-based trigger has occurred.

17. The assessments framework according to claim 14, further comprising:

computer-accessible policy database means for storing at least one policy corresponding to at least one assessment; and

computer-accessible task definition database means for storing at least one task definition corresponding to at least one assessment.

18. The assessments framework according to claim 14, further comprising:

computer-accessible tracker database means for storing current information on at least one of an enterprise and a node, wherein information from the tracker database means is utilized in order to create the dynamic task definition.