Method for performance and fault management in a telecommunication network

• US 7,159,148 B2
• Filed: 06/11/2002
• Issued: 01/02/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 06/11/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Google Technology Holdings LLC (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Inventors: Dunlop, Colin G., Dill, Harry H.
• Primary Examiner(s): Bonzo; Bryce P.
• Application Number:
  US10/167,305
• Publication Number:
  US 20030229818A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,666 Days
• Field of Search: 714/43, 714/48
• US Class Current: 714/43
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0681 Configuration of triggering conditions
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 24/00 Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements

Abstract

A mobile subscriber (20) initiates a request for packet data services (100). As the request is processed from network node (40) to network node (50), the transmission is checked for errors (104). For successive failures, exceeding a threshold (108), an alarm condition along with a cause code corresponding to the particular network node is sent to a network system manager (114).

Claims

1. A method for network fault management in a UMTS radio access network, comprising the steps of:

initiating by a subscriber a session request to a network via a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),;

determining by a first network node whether an error occurred in transmission of the session request to a second network node;

determining whether an error count exceeded a predetermined threshold; and

if the error count exceeded the predetermined threshold, sending cause codes to a network manager.

2. The method for network fault management as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of sending cause codes to a network manager includes the step of sending an alarm indication to the network manager.

3. The method for network fault management as claimed in claim 1, wherein there is further included a step of incrementing the error count by the first network node.

4. The method for network fault management as claimed in claim 1, wherein there is further included a step of incrementing the error count for the second network node.

5. The method for network fault management as claimed in claim 1, wherein there is further included a step of converting the session request to a packet data protocol context activation.

6. The method for network fault management as claimed in claim 5, wherein there is further included a step of transmitting the packet data protocol context activation from the first network node to the second network node.

7. The method for network fault management as claimed in claim 1, wherein if the error count does not exceed the predetermined threshold, there is included a step of sending by the second network node the cause codes to the first network node.

8. The method for network fault management as claimed in claim 7, wherein if the error count is not greater than the predetermined threshold, then retrying the transmission from the first network node to the second network node.

9. A method for utilizing network cause codes in a UMTS radio access network, comprising the steps of:

sending a packet data protocol (PDP) context activation request via a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) from a first network node to a second network node;

determining by the second network node whether the PDP context activation request was successfully transmitted from the first network node; and

if the step of detennining is unsuccessful, sending network cause codes to a network manager.

10. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 9, wherein the step of determining further includes the step of incrementing an error count for an unsuccessful PDP context activation request transmission between the first network node and the second network node.

11. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 10, wherein the step of determining further includes the step of determining whether a value of the error count exceeds a predetermined threshold.

12. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 11, wherein if the error count exceeded the predetermined threshold, then the step of sending includes the step of sending an alarm and the network cause codes to the network manager.

13. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 12, wherein if the error count does not exceed the predetermined threshold, then there is further included the step of sending by the second network node the network cause codes to the first network node.

14. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 13, wherein if the error count does not exceed the predetermined threshold, then there is further included a step of retrying the step of sending the packet data protocol context activation request from the first network node to the second network node.

15. A method for network fault management in a UMTS radio access network, comprising the steps of assigning a unique cause code to each network node of a plurality of network nodes;

sending a packet data protocol (PDP) context activation request via a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) from a first network node to a second network node;

determining by the second network node whether the PDP context activation request was successfully transmitted from the first network node; and

if the step of determining is unsuccessful, sending network cause codes to a network manager.

16. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 15, wherein the step of detennining further includes the step of incrementing an error count for an unsuccessful PDP context activation request transmission between the first network node and the second network node.

17. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 16, wherein the step of determining further includes the step of determining whether a value of the error count exceeds a predetermined threshold.

18. The method for utilizing network cause codes as claimed in claim 17, wherein if the error count does not exceed the predetermined threshold, then there is further included a step of retrying the step of sending the packet data protocol context activation request from the first network node to the second network node.