Method and system of evaluating performance of a crop

• US 7,184,892 B1
• Filed: 12/23/2003
• Issued: 02/27/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 01/31/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Deere & Company
• Original Assignee: Deere & Company
• Inventors: Muehlbach, George Bailey, Halterman, Jerry Ray, Hunner, Gerhard Josef, Dyer, James Scott
• Primary Examiner(s): MCELHENY JR, DONALD E
• Application Number:
  US10/744,419
• Time in Patent Office: 1,162 Days
• Field of Search: 702/2, 702/3, 702/5, 701/50, 705/1, 705 7- 10
• US Class Current: 702/5
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management

Abstract

A method and system for evaluating crop performance obtains weather data and soil data for a defined geographic area. Further, management data is obtained, where the management data is associated with a particular agricultural crop affiliated with the defined geographic area. At least one of the obtained weather data, the obtained soil data, and the obtained management data is evaluated in comparison to reference weather data, reference soil data, and reference management data. The estimated performance level of a performance characteristic is determined for the particular crop associated with at least a portion of the defined geographic area based upon the evaluation.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the performance of an agricultural crop, the method comprising the steps of:

obtaining weather data derived from measurements of a weather sensor for a defined geographic area,

obtaining soil data derived from measurements of a soil characteristic sensor for the defined geographic area,

obtaining management data associated with a particular agricultural crop affiliated with the defined geographic area;

evaluating at least one of the obtained weather data, the obtained soil data, and the obtained management data in comparison to reference weather data, reference soil data, and reference management data;

determining an estimated performance level of a performance characteristic for the particular crop associated with at least a portion of the defined geographic area based upon the evaluation;

identifying preferential growing locations for growing a particular crop in the defined geographic area based on the estimated agronomic performance level meeting or exceeding a benchmark performance level or maximizing the expression of a genetic trait of a crop, without any estimation of potential economic profit or loss for growing the particular crop; and

generating a list of preferential growers associated with the preferential growing locations for marketing seed or a crop precursor for the particular crop based on correlating or matching location data extracted from marketing data to the preferential growing locations.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the evaluating comprises classifying at least one of the obtained weather data, the obtained soil data, and the obtained management data with reference to corresponding critical attributes and associated critical attribute values of the reference weather data, reference soil data, and reference management data.

3. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

determining a benchmark performance level for the performance characteristic for the particular crop based upon at least one of the reference weather data, the reference soil data, and the reference management data.

4. The method according to claim 3 further comprising:

presenting the determined estimated performance level and the determined benchmark performance level to a user.

5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the performance characteristic comprises a measure selected from the group consisting of a starch yield, a protein content yield, an amino acid yield, an oil content yield, a protein profile yield, a volumetric yield per land unit, a weight yield per land unit, and bushel per acre yield for the particular crop associated with a defined geographic area.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the weather data comprises at least one of growing degree days, climate data, temperature data, relative humidity data, precipitation data, sunlight data, and temporal measurements associated with the weather data.

7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the obtaining weather data comprises obtaining weather data from one or more remotely situated weather stations in or near the defined geographic area.

8. The method according to claim 1 wherein the obtaining weather data comprises obtaining weather data from a regional weather station.

9. The method according to claim 1 wherein the soil data comprises a soil type, a soil potential, and nutrient availability.

10. The method according to claim 1 wherein the performance level for the at least one portion of the geographic area is represented by a distinct shade or color on a geographic map to distinguish the performance level from other performance levels near, or adjacent to, the at least one portion.

11. A method for evaluating the performance of an agricultural crop, the method comprising the steps of:

obtaining weather data derived from measurements of a weather sensor for a defined geographic area,

obtaining soil data derived from measurements of a soil characteristic sensor for the defined geographic area,

obtaining management data associated with a particular agricultural crop affiliated with the defined geographic area;

evaluating at least one of the obtained weather data, the obtained soil data, and the obtained management data in comparison to reference weather data, reference soil data, and reference management data;

determining an estimated yield for the particular crop associated with at least a portion of the defined geographic area based upon the evaluation;

identifying preferential growing locations for growing a particular crop in the defined geographic area based on the estimated agronomic performance level meeting or exceeding a benchmark performance level or maximizing the expression of a genetic trait of a crop, without any estimation of potential economic profit or loss for growing the particular crop; and

generating a list of preferential growers associated with the preferential growing locations for marketing seed or a crop precursor for the particular crop based on correlating or matching location data extracted from marketing data to the preferential growing locations.

12. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

preparing yield maps for different varieties of the particular crop for the defined geographic area.

13. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

identifying one or more preferential varieties of the particular crop based on yields of the different varieties indicated in the prepared yield maps.

14. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

recommending later management data to a producer based on at least one of previous management data, current and previous weather data, and current and previous soil data to improve the estimated yield of the particular crop.

15. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

deriving the soil data from analyzing soil samples in the defined geographic area.

16. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

preparing yield maps for the particular crop including the geographic, political boundaries, such as county lines.

17. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

expressing an estimated yield of the particular crop in at least one of a graphical format and a tabular format.

18. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

identifying a producer having a greater yield than a benchmark yield for a particular crop within a geographic region.

19. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

identifying a designated geographic area within a region, the designated geographic area having a greater yield than a benchmark yield for a particular crop during a particular growing season.

20. The method according to claim 18 further comprising:

providing an identity of the identified producer to a processor or potential buyer of the particular crop.

21. The method according to claim 19 further comprising:

providing an identity of the designated geographic area to a processor or potential buyer of the particular crop.

22. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

prospectively allocating the defined geographic area for a particular crop for a growing season to match an estimated demand for the particular crop prior to the growing season.

23. The method according to claim 11 further comprising:

marketing certain seeds for the particular crop to a producer associated with a defined geographic areas where the certain seeds perform better than a benchmark yield level in the defined geographic area.