Methods and apparatus for determining the condition of a sensor and identifying the failure thereof

• US 7,228,249 B2
• Filed: 11/19/2002
• Issued: 06/05/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 11/19/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: General Motors Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Hartrey, Timothy John
• Primary Examiner(s): West; Jeffrey R
• Application Number:
  US10/299,293
• Publication Number:
  US 20040098228A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,659 Days
• Field of Search: 702/116, 702 33- 35, 702/57, 702/58, 702/94, 702/64, 702/65, 702/81, 702/150, 702/151, 702182-183, 702/185, 702/189, 702/104, 702/107, 701/34, 123376-377
• US Class Current: 702/116
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 11/106 Detection of demand or actuation
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/222 relating to the failure of sensors or parameter detection devices
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/40 Engine management systems

Abstract

Methods and apparatus are provided which generate an error signal if a sensor is either anticipated to fail or fails. At least two sensors provide input signals having magnitudes that approximately correspond to a sensed event. A processor calculates an actual correlation error for the two signals. A processor then further calculates an estimated new correlation value based on the difference of a stored initial correlation value and the actual correlation error. After a predetermined number of estimated correlation values are calculated, the error signal is generated if the difference between an estimated correlation value and the actual correlation error exceeds a predetermined threshold.

Claims

1. An apparatus for generating error signals, including in combination:

at least two sensors providing control signals having magnitudes that approximately correspond to a sensed event, said magnitudes being unequal to each other;

memory means for storing estimated correlation values;

processor means coupled to said sensors and to said memory means, said processor means calculating an actual correlation error for said control signals;

said processor means further calculating a difference value based on the difference between a current estimated correlation value and said actual correlation error;

said processor means additionally calculating a new estimated correlation value based on said difference value and said current estimated correlation value;

said processor means comparing a difference magnitude value based on the difference between said new estimated correlation value and said actual correlation error to a threshold value; and

said processor means providing an error signal if said difference magnitude value exceeds said threshold value.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said processor means is configured to store said new estimated correlation value in said memory means in place of said current estimated correlation value.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said current estimated correlation value is an initial estimated correlation value representing a maximum allowable correlation error value.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said processor means calculates a predetermined number of new estimated correlation values before comparing said difference magnitude value to said threshold value to thereby provide a predetermined amount of delay to enable said processor means to evaluate said difference magnitude value.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising means for using said error signal to determine if any of the sensors is failing.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein:

said magnitudes of said control signals correspond to the positions of an accelerator control device for an engine having an electronically controlled throttle; and

each of said magnitudes further corresponding to a desired amount of airflow through said electronically controlled throttle.

7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein:

said at least two sensors each have a movable member whose positions correspond to said positions of said accelerator control device;

said magnitudes of said control signals varying with said positions of said movable members; and

said memory means being configured to have predetermined breakpoints corresponding to said magnitudes of said control signals and to store initial estimated correlation values at said predetermined breakpoints.

8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein at least one of said sensors include a potentiometer having said movable member.

9. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein said processor means compares a sensor position value to the predetermined breakpoints to determine which breakpoint is closest to the sensor position value.

10. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein said processor means determines a proximity value representing a proximity of a position of said movable member to said corresponding breakpoint.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein said processor means calculates said difference value by utilizing said proximity value.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein said processor means squares said proximity value to give more weighting to correlation errors that are closer to said breakpoints.

13. A method for determining a condition of at least one of a plurality of sensors and for generating error signals in response to sensor failure, the method comprising:

receiving input signals from at least two of the sensors, said input signals having different magnitudes that approximately correspond to a sensed event;

calculating an actual correlation error relating to said different magnitudes of said input signals;

storing a current estimated conelation value;

determining a difference value between said actual correlation error and said current estimated correlation value;

using said difference value to calculate a new estimated correlation value;

storing said new estimated correlation value in place of said current estimated correlation value;

repeating said determining, using and storing steps to calculate a predetermined number of updated new estimated correlation values; and

determining a current difference magnitude value based on the difference between a currently updated new estimated correlation value and said actual correlation error, determining that said current difference magnitude value exceeds a predetermined threshold, and generating an error signal in response to the determination that said current difference magnitude value exceeds said predetermined threshold.

14. The method of claim 13 further comprising using said error signal to determine if a sensor is failing.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein said current estimated correlation value is an initial estimated correlation value representing a maximum allowable correlation error value.

16. The method of claim 13 wherein said repeating said steps enables the method to provide a predetermined amount of delay enabling evaluation of said current difference magnitude value.

17. The method of claim 13 wherein said sensors have a movable member having positions corresponding to the sensed event and further comprising:

reserving memory locations for a table of breakpoints corresponding to said movable member positions; and

reserving memory locations for a table of estimated correlation errors corresponding to said movable member position breakpoints.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein:

said sensed event is the position of an accelerator control device for an engine; and

said method being further comprised of mechanically coupling said movable members to said accelerator control device.