Acoustic fence

• US 7,245,559 B2
• Filed: 10/18/2004
• Issued: 07/17/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 01/17/2003
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Science Applications International Corporation
• Original Assignee: Scientific Utilization Incorporated
• Inventors: Hicks, Gary W., McDonald, Larry R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lobo; Ian J.
• Application Number:
  US10/967,953
• Publication Number:
  US 20060018198A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,002 Days
• Field of Search: 367/131, 367/136, 340/541, 340/566
• US Class Current: 367/136
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 15/04 Systems determining presence of a target
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 15/876 Combination of several spaced transmitters or receivers of known location for determining the position of a transponder or a reflector G01S15/872 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/523 Details of pulse systems short-range imaging G01S7/52017; methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound G10K11/18

Abstract

Methods and apparatus determine if an underwater intruder passes under a protective boundary. A sonar sensor system comprises a plurality of sonar sensor modules that are spaced on a protective boundary. A sonar sensor module comprises a sonar transducer (sonar array) that is characterized by an omni-directional radiation pattern that may overlap an omni-directional radiation pattern of an adjacent sonar sensor module transducer. The sonar sensor module collects sonar data such as range information of the target in relation to time. A central processor obtains the sonar data from each sonar module through a telemetry link. The central processor processes the sonar data from the plurality of sonar sensor modules in order to determine an estimated path of the target and may determine if the target should be considered as a threatening underwater intruder from a calculated threat level estimate based on this data.

Claims

1. A sonar sensor system for determining if a potential underwater intruder passes within a protective boundary, the sonar system comprising:

a first sonar sensor module comprising;

a first sonar array that has a first sonar radiation pattern, wherein the first sonar radiation pattern is essentially omni-directional in a first underwater region; and

a first data collection module that collects first sonar data of a target from the first sonar array;

a second sonar sensor module comprising;

a second sonar array that has a second sonar radiation pattern, wherein the second sonar radiation pattern is essentially omni-directional in a second underwater region; and

a second data collection module that collects second sonar data of the target from the second sonar array; and

a processor that obtains the first sonar data and that obtains the second sonar data, wherein the processor processes the first sonar data and the second sonar data in order to determine whether the target is deemed to be a threatening underwater intruder.

2. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar array is mounted on an entity selected from the group consisting of a pylon of a pier, a surface float, a leg of a water platform, a quay wall, and a water vessel.

3. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar array projects from a water bottom to a water surface.

4. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar array projects sideways, wherein the first sonar radiation pattern corresponds to a first hemispherical region, and wherein the first sonar radiation pattern is substantially attenuated in an associated oppositely oriented hemispherical region.

5. The sonar sensor system of claim 3, wherein the second sonar array projects sideways, wherein the second sonar radiation pattern corresponds to a second hemispherical region, and wherein the second sonar radiation pattern is substantially attenuated in an oppositely oriented hemispherical region.

6. The sonar sensor system of claim 4, wherein the second sonar array projects sideways, wherein the second sonar radiation pattern corresponds to a second hemispherical region, and wherein the second sonar radiation pattern is substantially attenuated in a corresponding oppositely oriented hemispherical region.

7. The sonar sensor system of claim 3, wherein the second sonar array projects from the water bottom to the water surface.

8. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar radiation pattern overlaps the second sonar radiation pattern.

9. The sonar sensor system of claim 8, wherein the first sonar radiation pattern overlaps the second sonar radiation pattern by at least fifty percent.

10. The sonar sensor system of claim 8, wherein a second point is separated from a first point by a distance that is less than a measurement between the water surface and the water bottom.

11. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar data comprises a first set of range information about the target and the second sonar data comprises a second set of range information about the target.

12. The sonar sensor system of claim 11, wherein the processor is configured to:

obtain first tracking data of the target from the first sonar sensor module and second tracking data of the target from the second sonar sensor module, wherein the first tracking data comprises the first set of range information and the second tracking data comprises the second set of range information, and wherein each set of range information is a function of time; and

calculate an estimated path of the target from the first tracking data and the second tracking data.

13. The sonar sensor system of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine a first closest point of approach (CPA) from the first tracking data and a second closest point of approach from the second tracking data in order to calculate the estimated path of the target.

14. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar sensor module gates off a received sonar signal in order to ameliorate bottom reflection effects.

15. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar sensor module varies amplification of a received sonar signal in order to equalize the received sonar signal during a surface reverberation region that follows transmission of a transmitted sonar signal and before a bottom reverberation region.

16. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, further comprising:

a third sonar sensor module that is situated at a third point in the proximity of the protective boundary.

17. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar sensor module comprises a first communications interface that obtains the first sensor data from the data collection module and wherein the second sonar sensor module comprises a second communications interface that obtains the second sensor data from the data collection module, further comprising:

a telemetry link that interfaces with the first and second communications interfaces.

18. The sonar sensor system of claim 17, wherein the telemetry link utilizes Electronic Industries Association (EJA) and Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) standard RS-485.

19. The sonar sensor system of claim 17, wherein the telemetry link utilizes Ethernet.

20. The sonar sensor system of claim 17, wherein the telemetry link utilizes an Internet Protocol (IP) in conjunction with a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).

21. The sonar sensor system of claim 17, wherein the telemetry link comprises a first telemetry bus and a second telemetry bus from an opposite direction so that communications between the processor and the sonar sensor modules can continue if a cable between sensors containing the telemetry busses is cut, or if one of the telemetry busses becomes non-functional.

22. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the protective boundary is in close proximity to an asset selected from the group consisting of a power plant, an oil drilling rig, a river dam, a bridge, a military ship, a commercial ship, military asset near water, and a commercial asset near water.

23. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar sensor module and the second sonar sensor module are sequenced in order to limit interference to a level that does not cause a false detection of the target.

24. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar sensor module and the second sonar sensor module are configured at different frequencies in order to limit interference to a level that does not cause a false detection of the target.

47. The sonar sensor system of claim 6, wherein the second hemispherical region is angularly offset from the first hemispherical region.

48. The sonar sensor system of claim 17, wherein the telemetry link comprises a telemetry bus and a plurality of repeaters, wherein each repeater senses a direction of arrival of a data message and continues to send the data message in the direction of arrival, and wherein, if a cut occurs in the telemetry bus, a first repeater on one side of the cut and a second repeater on another side of the cut isolate the cut so that the data message is transported on an appropriate half of the telemetry bus.

49. The sonar sensor system of claim 1, wherein the first sonar sensor module processes a received sonar signal based on a historical variation of a received amplitude.

50. The sonar sensor system of claim 49, wherein the first sonar sensor module determines whether the received sonar signal deviates sufficiently from the historical variation of the received amplitude.

25. A method for determining if a target passes within a protective boundary, the method comprising:

(a) obtaining first sonar data about the target from a first sonar sensor module and second sonar data about the target from a second sonar sensor module, wherein the first sonar sensor module utilizes a first omni-directional pattern in a first underwater region about the first sonar module and the second sonar sensor module utilizes a second omni-directional radiation pattern in a second underwater region about the sonar second sonar module, and wherein the first sonar data comprises first tracking data and the second sonar data comprises second tracking data;

(b) estimating, from the first tracking data and the second tracking data, at least one characteristic that is associated with a path of the target; and

(c) calculating an estimated path of the target, wherein a portion of the estimated path is under the protective boundary.

26. The method of claim 25, further comprising:

(d) calculating a predicted track of the target.

27. The method of claim 26, further comprising:

(e) providing the predicted track to a user.

28. The method of claim 25, further comprising:

(d) calculating a threat level estimate to determine if the target is deemed to be a threatening underwater intruder.

29. The method of claim 28, further comprising:

(e) generating at least one alarm in accordance with the threat level estimate.

30. The method of claim 28, wherein the threat level estimate is selected from a group consisting of a course direction of the target, a target motion threat score, a target echo width, a target echo amplitude, and other potential criteria that may be available from the sonar signals.

31. The method of claim 25, wherein the at least one characteristic comprises a first closest point of approach from the first sonar sensor module with a first associated time and a second closest point of approach from the second sonar sensor module with a second associated time.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein the first associated time and the second associated time are approximately equal.

33. The method of claim 25, wherein (c) comprises:

(i) fetching a simulated set of tracking data;

(ii) comparing the simulated set of tracking data with the first tracking data and the second tracking data; and

(iii) if the simulated set of tracking data sufficiently matches the first tracking data and the second tracking data, determining a corresponding simulated path of the target, wherein the corresponding simulated path approximates an actual path of the target.

34. The method of claim 33, further comprising:

(iv) if the simulated set of tracking data does not sufficiently match the first tracking data and the second tracking data, repeating (i), (ii), and (iii).

35. The method of claim 25, wherein (c) comprises:

(i) determining an initial estimated path; and

(ii) calculating a final estimated path by reducing an error measure with respect to the first tracking data and the second tracking data and a predicted set of tracking data, wherein the predicted set of tracking data is associated with the final estimated path.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein (i) comprises:

(1) from the first tracking data, determining a first time and a first range that are associated with a first closest point of approach (CPA);

(2) from the second tracking data, determining a second time and a second range that are associated with a second closest point of approach;

(3) subtracting the first time from the second time to obtain a time difference;

(4) subtracting the first range from the second range to obtain a range difference; and

(5) calculating the initial estimated path by utilizing the time difference and the range difference.

37. The method of claim 35, further comprising:

(iii) repeating (i) and (ii) until the error measure is sufficiently small.

38. The method of claim 25, further comprising:

(d) obtaining a third sonar data about the target from a third sonar sensor module, wherein the third sonar sensor module utilizes an omni-directional radiation pattern, and wherein the third sonar data comprises a third tracking data.

39. The method of claim 28, wherein the first sonar data comprises first width data of the target, wherein the second sonar data comprises second width data, and wherein (d) comprises:

(i) comparing measured width data with expected width data, wherein the measured width data comprises the first and second width data and wherein the expected width data characterizes potential underwater intruders;

(ii) if a difference between the expected width and the measured width data is sufficiently small, deducing that the target is a possible underwater intruder.

40. The method of claim 28, wherein the first sonar data comprises a first amplitude data of the target, wherein the second sonar data comprises a second amplitude data of the target, and wherein (d) comprises:

(i) comparing measured amplitude data with expected amplitude data in relation to a range of the target, wherein the measured amplitude data comprises the first and second amplitude data and wherein the expected amplitude data characterizes potential underwater intruders;

(ii) if a difference between the expected amplitude and the measured amplitude data is sufficiently small, deducing that the target is a possible underwater intruder.

41. The method of claim 25, wherein the at least one characteristic comprises a velocity estimate of the target, wherein the velocity comprises a direction and a speed of the target.

42. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing the method recited in claim 25.

43. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing the method recited in claim 28.

44. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing the method recited in claim 33.

45. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing the method recited in claim 35.

46. A sonar sensor system for determining if an underwater intruder passes under a protective boundary by a ship, the sonar system comprising:

a first sonar sensor module comprising;

a first sonar array that has a first sonar radiation pattern that covers a vertical direction from a water bottom to a water surface, wherein the first sonar radiation pattern is essentially omni-directional;

a first data collection module that collects first sonar data of a target from the first sonar array; and

a first communications interface that obtains the first sonar data from the data collection module;

a second sonar sensor module comprising;

a second sonar array that has a second sonar radiation pattern that covers a vertical direction from the water bottom to the water surface, wherein the second sonar radiation pattern is essentially omni-directional;

a second data collection module that collects second sonar data of the target from the second sonar array; and

a second communications interface that obtains the second sonar data from the data collection module;

a telemetry link that interfaces with the first and second communications interfaces; and

a processor that communicates with the first communications interface in order to obtain the first sonar data and that communicates with the second communications interface in order to obtain the second sonar data through the telemetry link, wherein the processor processes the first sonar data and the second sonar data in order to determine whether the target is the underwater intruder, and wherein the processor is configured to;

obtain a first tracking data of the target from the first sonar sensor module and a second tracking data of the target from the second sonar sensor module,

wherein each tracking data comprises a set of range information about the target, and wherein each set of range information is a function of time;

fetch a simulated set of tracking data;

compare the simulated set of tracking data with the first tracking data and the second tracking data; and

if the simulated set of tracking data sufficiently matches the first tracking data and the second tracking data, approximate a path of the target with a corresponding simulated path of the target.