Method of facial coding monitoring for the purpose of gauging the impact and appeal of commercially-related stimuli

• US 7,246,081 B2
• Filed: 05/05/2006
• Issued: 07/17/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/07/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Sensory Logic Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Daniel A. Hill
• Inventors: Hill, Daniel A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Jeanty; Romain
• Assistant Examiner(s): Sterrett; Jonathan G.
• Application Number:
  US11/418,981
• Publication Number:
  US 20060206371A1
• Time in Patent Office: 438 Days
• Field of Search: 705/10
• US Class Current: 705/7.32
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0203 Market surveys; Market polls
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0204 Market segmentation

Abstract

A method of assessing consumer reaction to a marketing stimulus, involving the steps of (a) exposing a sample population to a marketing stimulus for a period of time, (b) interviewing members of the sample population immediately after exposure of the members to the marketing stimulus, (c) videotaping any facial expressions and associated verbal comments of individual members of the sample population during the exposure period and interview, (d) reviewing the videotaped facial expressions and associated verbal comments of individual members of the sample population to (1) detect the occurrence of action units, (2) detect the occurrence of a smile, (3) categorize any detected smile as duchenne or social smile, (4) detect the occurrence of any verbal comment associated with a detected smile, and (5) categorize any associated verbal comment as positive, neutral or negative, (e) coding a single action unit or combination of action units to a coded unit, (f) associating coded units with any contemporaneously detected smile, (g) translating the coded unit to a scored unit, (h) tallying the scored unit by scoring unit category, (i) repeating steps (d) through (h) throughout the exposure period, (j) repeating steps (d) through (h) for a plurality of the members of the sample population, (k) calculating an impact value for each scoring unit category by multiplying the tallied number of scored units for each scoring unit category by a predetermined impact factor for that scoring unit category, (l) calculating an appeal value for each scoring unit category by multiplying the tallied number of scored units for each scoring unit category by a predetermined appeal factor for that scoring unit category, (m) combining the impact values obtained for each scoring unit category to obtain an impact score, (n) combining the appeal values obtained for each scoring unit category to obtain an appeal score, and (o) representing the appeal and impact scores with an identification of the corresponding marketing stimulus to which the members were exposed.

Claims

1. A method of assessing consumer reaction to a marketing stimulus, comprising:

(a) exposing a sample population comprised of a plurality of members to a marketing stimulus for a period of time;

(b) interviewing members of the sample population immediately after exposure of the members to the marketing stimulus;

(c) videotaping any facial expressions and associated verbal comments of individual members of the sample population during the exposure period and interview;

(d) reviewing the videotaped facial expressions and associated verbal comments of individual members of the sample population for purposes of detecting the occurrence of action units from the videotaped facial expressions;

(e) coding a single action unit or combination of action units to a coded unit;

(f) translating the coded unit to a scored unit;

(g) tallying the scored unit by scoring unit category;

(h) repeating steps (d) through (g) throughout the exposure period;

(i) repeating steps (d) through (g) for a plurality of the members of the sample population; and

(j) accomplishing at least one of;

(1) calculating an impact value for each scoring unit category by multiplying the tallied number of scored units for each scoring unit category by a predetermined impact factor for that scoring unit category;

combining the impact values obtained for each scoring unit category to obtain an impact score; and

representing the impact score with an identification of the corresponding marketing stimulus to which the members were exposed, and

(2) calculating an appeal value for each scoring unit category by multiplying the tallied number of scored units for each scoring unit category by a predetermined appeal factor for that scoring unit category;

combining the appeal values obtained for each scoring unit category to obtain an appeal score; and

representing the appeal score with an identification of the corresponding marketing stimulus to which the members were exposed.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein representing the appeal and impact scores comprises visually representing at least one set of appeal and impact scores of at least one member together on a single illustration.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein representing the appeal and impact scores comprises visually representing at least one set of group appeal and group impact scores obtained from at least ten members together on a single illustration.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

(k) repeating steps (a) through (j) with members of the sample population for at least one other marketing stimulus which is different from the first marketing stimulus, and (l) visually comparing the appeal scores, the impact scores, or both the appeal scores and the impact scores of the marketing stimuli.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the marketing stimuli are of the same type.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the marketing stimuli involve sales or marketing of the same type of goods or services.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the sample population is comprised of between about 10 to 200 members.

8. The method of claim 4 wherein the sample population is comprised of between about 10 to 10 to members.

9. The method of claim 4 wherein any associated verbal comment is categorized as positive, neutral, direct negative or sarcastic.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein only step (j)(1) is performed.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein only step (j)(2) is performed.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein both steps (j)(1) and (j)(2) are performed.