Failure warning for a tire among a plurality of tires

• US 7,272,536 B2
• Filed: 05/23/2006
• Issued: 09/18/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 05/23/2005
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Test Measurement Systems, Inc. (Mesnac Company Limited)
• Original Assignee: Gerald R. Potts
• Inventors: Potts, Gerald R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Raymond; Edward
• Application Number:
  US11/420,002
• Publication Number:
  US 20060265154A1
• Time in Patent Office: 483 Days
• Field of Search: 702182-185, 702/188, 701 31- 32, 701/35, 701/99, 701/102, 701/46, 701/117, 701/29, 701/101
• US Class Current: 702/185
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 1/225 for vehicle wheels in situ G01M1/28
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 17/02 Tyres

Abstract

Method and system for determining immanence of catastrophic failure for a selected tire among a plurality of tires that are concurrently in operation, the method comprising the steps of: selecting a tire from the plurality of tires; monitoring vibration amplitude versus time signals for the selected tire; using signal averaging to minimize signal noise in the selected tire'"'"'s vibration signals; at selected intervals, fast Fourier transforming the averaged vibration signals to create a harmonic spectrum for the selected tire; cleaning the selected tire'"'"'s harmonic spectrum by applying coherence function and averaging calculations to it for minimizing contributions to the selected tire'"'"'s harmonic spectrum from all other vibration sources including the remaining one(s) of the plurality of tires; comparing the most recent cleaned spectrum with stored values of previous cleaned spectra of the selected tire to track changes in higher order harmonic magnitudes; and determining whether catastrophic failure of the selected tire is immanent by analyzing the changes in higher order harmonic magnitudes and comparing them with predetermined failure criteria.

Claims

1. A method for determining immanence of catastrophic failure for a selected tire among a plurality of tires that are concurrently in operation, the method comprising the steps of:

selecting a tire from the plurality of tires;

monitoring vibration amplitude versus time signals for the selected tire;

using signal averaging to minimize signal noise in the selected tire'"'"'s vibration signals;

at selected intervals, fast Fourier transforming the averaged vibration signals to create a harmonic spectrum for the selected tire;

cleaning the selected tire'"'"'s harmonic spectrum by applying coherence function and averaging calculations to it for minimizing contributions to the selected tire'"'"'s harmonic spectrum from all other vibration sources including the remaining one(s) of the plurality of tires;

comparing the most recent cleaned spectrum with stored values of previous cleaned spectra of the selected tire to track changes in higher order harmonic magnitudes;

determining whether catastrophic failure of the selected tire is immanent by analyzing the changes in higher order harmonic magnitudes and comparing them with predetermined failure critera; and

issuing a warning when the method determines that catastrophic failure is immanent for the selected tire, thereby enabling appropriate actions in response by an operator or machine controller.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the term “

higher order harmonic”

refers to the sixth and higher harmonics.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the term “

higher order harmonic”

refers to the harmonics six through fifteen inclusive.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

determining and storing initial cleaned harmonic magnitudes for selected ones of the higher order harmonics; and

defining one of the predetermined failure criteria such that;

for one or more of the selected harmonics, the difference between the recent selected harmonic cleaned magnitude and the initial selected harmonic cleaned magnitude crosses a predetermined warning limit.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

determining and storing the most recent cleaned harmonic magnitudes for selected ones of the higher order harmonics;

determining the next cleaned harmonic magnitudes for selected ones of the higher order harmonics; and

defining one of the predetermined failure criteria such that;

for one or more of the selected harmonics, the difference between the next selected harmonic cleaned magnitude and the most recent previous selected harmonic cleaned magnitude crosses a predetermined warning limit.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

determining and storing an average of two or more recent cleaned harmonic magnitudes for selected ones of the higher order harmonics;

determining the next cleaned harmonic magnitudes for selected ones of the higher order harmonics; and

defining one of the predetermined failure criteria such that;

for one or more of the selected harmonics, the difference between the next selected harmonic cleaned magnitude and the average of two or more recent selected harmonic cleaned magnitudes crosses a predetermined warning limit.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

storing values and then comparing the stored values of a series of recent cleaned spectra to determine rates of magnitude change for selected ones of the higher order harmonics; and

defining one of the predetermined failure criteria such that;

the rate of magnitude change of one or more of the selected harmonics crosses a predetermined warning limit.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

storing values and then comparing the stored values of a series of recent cleaned spectra to determine rates of magnitude change for selected ones of the higher order harmonics;

storing a series of the rates of magnitude change and then comparing the stored values of the rates to determine acceleration of magnitude changes for selected ones of the higher order harmonics; and

defining one of the predetermined failure criteria such that;

the acceleration of magnitude changes of one or more of the selected harmonics crosses a predetermined warning limit.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of tires are on a vehicle;

and the method further comprises the step of;

warning a vehicle operator to slow and/or stop the vehicle operation when the method determines that catastrophic failure is immanent for the tire on the one machine.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising the step of:

indicating which one of the plurality of tires is subject to immanent failure.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the other vibration sources include periodic vibration generators of a nearby vehicle.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of tires are on a plurality of concurrently operating tire testing machines;

and the method further comprises the step of;

automatically shutting down a one machine of the plurality of tire testing machines when the method determines that catastrophic failure is immanent for the tire on the one machine.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the other vibration sources include periodic vibration generators of a nearby tire testing machine.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the other vibration sources include periodic vibration generators in a drive train that rotates the selected tire.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

using a tire revolution indicator at each one of the plurality of tires for synchronizing a tire'"'"'s vibration signal with the tire'"'"'s rotational angle.

16. A vehicle tire failure prediction and warning system for a vehicle having a plurality of tires, the system comprising:

a vibration sensor mounted close to each one of the plurality of tires;

a computer connected for collecting and storing vibration amplitude versus time signals for each one of the plurality of tires, and capable of calculating fast Fourier transform spectra, and of comparing vibration amplitudes and harmonic magnitudes over time such that indicative changes in vibration amplitudes, harmonic magnitudes, and/or rates of change of harmonic magnitudes can be determined; and

a display system in the vehicle for warning a vehicle operator about values of the indicative changes determined by the computer that are predetermined to be predictive of immanent catastrophic tire failure.

17. The system of claim 16, further comprising:

a tire revolution indicator at each one of the plurality of tires, each tire revolution indicator being connected for sending rotational angle data to the computer.

18. The system of claim 16, further comprising:

an alarm for warning the vehicle operator to slow and/or stop the vehicle operation when the system predicts immanent failure of a one of the plurality of tires; and

a display for indicating the one tire that is about to fail.