High-speed adaptive structure of elementary firewall modules

• US 7,284,269 B2
• Filed: 05/29/2002
• Issued: 10/16/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 05/29/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Alcatel Canada Inc. (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Alcatel Canada Inc. (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: Marquet, Bertrand, D'Souza, Scott David, Kierstead, Paul
• Primary Examiner(s): ZIA, SYED
• Application Number:
  US10/156,083
• Publication Number:
  US 20030226027A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,966 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 726/13
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0227 Filtering policies mail message filtering H04L51/212
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0263 Rule management

Abstract

A communications security system has been described. The security system in the form of a firewall is made up of a plurality of communicatively coupled sets of modules in a matrix configuration. The modules may be implemented in hardware and software in order to rely on the advantages of each technology. Data packets are typically coupled to an ingress side of the firewall where policy rules having the highest importance are checked first. The result is a high speed system having carrier class availability.

Claims

1. A firewall for a data communications network, comprising:

an ingress module connected to the communications network on a first side of the firewall;

an egress module connected to the communications network on a second side of the firewall;

a modular structure having a plurality of sets of a plurality of modules each, the sets being arranged in series such that one set is upstream of the egress module and the remaining sets are upstream of exactly one of the sets, and such that one set is downstream of the ingress module and the remaining sets are downstream of exactly one of the sets;

for each module in each of the sets, a plurality of connections, each connection coupling the module to one of the modules in the set downstream of the module'"'"'s set; and

for each module in each of the sets, a rule particular to that set, wherein each module in the modular structure forwards a data packet received from an upstream module to one of the modules in the set downstream of the module'"'"'s set if the module determines that information within the data packet complies with the rule of the set to which the module belongs.

2. The firewall of claim 1 further comprising selecting means at each module within the sets for selecting a free module from the set downstream of the module'"'"'s set, and wherein the module forwards the data packet to the free module.

3. The firewall of claim 2 further comprising indicating means at each module within the sets for indicating to an upstream module whether the module is flee to process data packets.

4. The firewall of claim 3 wherein the selecting means comprise means for receiving a signal from each of the modules in the set downstream of the module'"'"'s set, each signal indicating whether the respective module is free, and wherein the selecting means are configured to only select a module as the free module if a signal is received indicating that tat module is free.

5. The firewall of claim 3 further comprising adaptive weighting means within each module of the sets for assigning a weighting to each connection, and wherein the selecting means are configured to randomly select a module as the free module in accordance with the weightings of the connections leading to the respective modules.

6. The firewall of claim 5 wherein the selecting means comprise means for receiving a signal from each of the modules in the set downstream of the module'"'"'s set, each signal indicating whether the module generating the signal is free, and wherein the selecting means are configured to only select a module as the free module if a signal is received indicating that that module is free.

7. The firewall of claim 6 wherein the adaptive weighting means are configured to adjust the weighting of a connection downward if a signal is received from the module to which the connection leads indicating that that module is not free.

8. The firewall of claim 7 wherein the sets are arranged such that the modules in the set at the ingress side of the firewall enforce a most important rule, and such that progressively less important rules are enforced by modules within downstream sets.

9. The firewall of claim 1 wherein the sets are arranged such that the modules in the set at the ingress side of the firewall enforce a most important rule, and such that progressively less important rules are enforced by modules within downstream sets.

10. A method of filtering data packets in a data communication system, comprising:

receiving a data packet at a first module;

determining whether the data packet satisfies a first rule assigned to the first module;

if the data packet satisfies the first rule, selecting a first free downstream module from amongst a first set of a plurality of downstream modules by;

a. applying a respective random weighting to each downstream module in the first set;

b. randomly selecting one of the downstream modules in accordance with the random weightings;

c. receiving from the randomly selected downstream module a signal indicating whether the randomly selected downstream module is free;

d. if the signal indicates that the randomly selected downstream module is free, selecting the randomly selected downstream module as the first free downstream module; and

e. if the signal indicates that the randomly selected downstream module is not free, repeatedly randomly selecting downstream modules and receiving signals as to whether the selected modules are free, until a downstream module is selected for which the received signal indicates that the downstream module is free, and then selecting that downstream module as the first free downstream module; and

if the data packet satisfies the first rule, forwarding the data packet to the first free downstream module.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprising adjusting the random weighting of a downstream module downward if a signal is received indicating that the downstream module is not free.

12. A method of filtering data packets in a data communication system, comprising:

receiving a data packet at a first module;

determining whether the data pack satisfies a first rule assigned to the first module;

if the data packet satisfies the first rule, selecting a first free downstream module from amongst set of a plurality of downstream modules;

if the data packet satisfies the first rule, forwarding the data packet to the first free downstream module;

at the first free downstream module, determining whether the data packet satisfies a second rule assigned to each module within the first set of downstream modules; and

if the data packet satisfies the second rule, repeatedly selecting free downstream modules from successive downstream sets, forwarding the data packet to the free modules, and determining whether the data packet satisfies a rule assigned to respective downstream sets of modifies, until either the data packet fails to satisfy one of the rules or the data packet is passed to an egress module,

whereby the data packet is passed successively through a series of sets of modules, each module in a set applying a rule assigned to the set.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the sets of modules are arranged such that the rules assigned to the sets are progressively less important for downstream sets, such that data packets cascading through the sets of modules are checked for compliance with more important rules before less important rules.

14. The method of claim 12 wherein for each module at which the data packet is determined to satisfy the rule of the set to which the module belongs, selecting a free downstream module comprises:

applying a respective random weighting to each downstream module;

randomly selecting one of the downstream modules in accordance with the random weightings;

receiving from the randomly selected downstream module a signal indicating whether the randomly selected downstream module is free;

if the signal indicates that the randomly selected downstream module is free, selecting the randomly selected downstream module as the free downstream module; and

if the signal indicates that the randomly selected downstream module is not free, repeatedly randomly selecting downstream modules and receiving signals indicating whether the selected modules are free, until a downstream stream module is selected for which the received signal indicates the downstream module is free, and then selecting that downstream module as the first free downstream module.

15. The method of claim 14 further comprising adjusting the random weighting of a downstream module downward if a signal is received indicating that the downstream modules is not free.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein the sets of modules are arranged such that the rules assigned to the sets are progressively less important for downstream sets, such that data packets cascading through the sets of modules are checked for compliance with wore important rules before less important rules.