Generating high precision ionospheric ground-truth measurements

• US 7,289,061 B2
• Filed: 07/22/2005
• Issued: 10/30/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 07/23/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: California Institute of Technology
• Original Assignee: California Institute of Technology
• Inventors: Komjathy, Attila, Sparks, Lawrence, Mannucci, Anthony J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Issing; Gregory C.
• Application Number:
  US11/187,244
• Publication Number:
  US 20060017610A1
• Time in Patent Office: 830 Days
• Field of Search: 342/357.02
• US Class Current: 342/357.31
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 19/072 Ionosphere corrections
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 19/08 providing integrity information, e.g. health of satellites or quality of ephemeris data

Abstract

A method, apparatus and article of manufacture provide ionospheric ground-truth measurements for use in a wide-area augmentation system (WAAS). Ionospheric pseudorange/code and carrier phase data as primary observables is received by a WAAS receiver. A polynomial fit is performed on the phase data that is examined to identify any cycle slips in the phase data. The phase data is then leveled. Satellite and receiver biases are obtained and applied to the leveled phase data to obtain unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements that are used in a WAAS system. In addition, one of several measurements may be selected and data is output that provides information on the quality of the measurements that are used to determine corrective messages as part of the WAAS system.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for providing ionospheric ground-truth measurements for use in a wide-area augmentation system (WAAS), comprising:

receiving ionospheric pseudorange data and phase data as observables;

performing a polynomial fit on the observables;

examining polynomial fit to identify any cycle slips in the observables;

leveling the phase data using the pseudorange data;

obtaining satellite and receiver biases; and

applying the satellite and receiver biases to the leveled phase data to obtain unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements that are used in a WAAS system.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the leveling of the phase data comprises averaging the phase observables using an elevation-dependent weighting.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein:

unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements are obtained separately for two or more co-located GPS receivers; and

the method further comprises using a voting scheme to select one of the two or more unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the voting scheme utilizes criteria to select the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements, said criteria comprising:

a twenty (20) percent (%) criterion of range agreement between the measurements if three measurements are available;

a forty (40) percent (%) criterion of agreement between the measurements if two measurements are available;

an upper and lower bounds on the data; and

a sigma (scatter of the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements) criterion to minimize data loss.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising providing supplemental data that provides information on a quality of individual data points used to determine corrective information for the wide-area augmentation system (WAAS), said supplemental data comprising:

Earth-centered geocentric coordinates of a satellite used to transmit GPS data upon which the ionospheric observable phase data is based;

a difference in total electron content between the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements and a next closest measurement from a co-located GPS receiver;

satellite arc length in hours; and

a highest elevation angle.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the satellite and receiver biases are obtained by:

obtaining 1-s RINEX dual-frequency pseudorange and carrier-phase observations;

cleaning and decimating the observations to 300 s; and

passing the cleaned and decimated observations through a sequential least squares estimator.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the obtaining satellite and receiver biases uses a sequential least squares estimation method.

8. An apparatus for providing ionospheric ground-truth measurements for use in a Wide-Area Augmentation System (WAAS) comprising a WAAS receiver configured to:

receive ionospheric pseudorange data and phase data as observables;

perform a polynomial fit on the observables;

examine the polynomial fit to identify any cycle slips in the observables;

level the phase data using the pseudorange data;

obtain satellite and receiver biases; and

apply the satellite and receiver biases to the leveled phase data to obtain unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements that are used in a WAAS system.

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the WAAS receiver is configured to level the phase data by averaging the phase observables using an elevation-dependent weighting.

10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein:

unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements are obtained separately for two or more co-located GPS receivers; and

the WAAS receiver is further configured to use a voting scheme to select one of the two or more unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements.

11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the voting scheme utilizes criteria to select the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements, said criteria comprising:

a twenty (20) percent (%) criterion of range agreement between the measurements if three measurements are available;

a forty (40) percent (%) criterion of agreement between the measurements if two measurements are available;

an upper and lower bounds on the data; and

a sigma (scatter of the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements) criterion to minimize data loss.

12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the WAAS receiver is further configured to provide supplemental data that provides information on a quality of individual data points used to determine corrective information for the wide-area augmentation system (WAAS), said supplemental data comprising:

Earth-centered geocentric coordinates of a satellite used to transmit GPS data upon which the ionospheric observable phase data is based;

a difference in total electron content between the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements and a next closest measurement from a co-located GPS receiver;

satellite arc length in hours; and

a highest elevation angle.

13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the satellite and receiver biases are obtained by:

obtaining 1-s RINEX dual-frequency pseudorange and carrier-phase observations;

cleaning and decimating the observations to 300 s; and

passing the cleaned and decimated observations through a sequential least squares estimator.

14. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the satellite and receiver biases are obtained using a sequential least squares estimation method.

15. An article of manufacture comprising a program storage medium readable by a computer and embodying one or more instructions executable by the computer to perform a method for providing ionospheric ground-truth measurements for use in a Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), the method comprising:

receiving ionospheric pseudorange data and phase data as observables;

performing a polynomial fit on the observables;

examining polynomial fit to identify any cycle slips in the observables;

leveling the phase data using the pseudorange data;

obtaining satellite and receiver biases; and

applying the satellite and receiver biases to the leveled phase data to obtain unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements that are used in a WAAS system.

16. The article of manufacture of claim 15, wherein the leveling of the phase data comprises averaging the phase observables using an elevation-dependent weighting.

17. The article of manufacture of claim 15, wherein:

unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements are obtained separately for two or more co-located GPS receivers; and

the method further comprises using a voting scheme to select one of the two or more unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements.

18. The article of manufacture of claim 17, wherein the voting scheme utilizes criteria to select the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements, said criteria comprising:

a twenty (20) percent (%) criterion of range agreement between the measurements if three measurements are available;

a forty (40) percent (%) criterion of agreement between the measurements if two measurements are available;

an upper and lower bounds on the data; and

a sigma (scatter of the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements) criterion to minimize data loss.

19. The article of manufacture of claim 17, further comprising providing supplemental data that provides information on a quality of individual data points used to determine corrective information for the Wide-Area Augmentation System (WAAS), said supplemental data comprising:

Earth-centered geocentric coordinates of a satellite used to transmit GPS data upon which the ionospheric observable phase data is based;

a difference in total electron content between the unbiased phase-leveled ionospheric measurements and a next closest measurement from a co-located GPS receiver;

satellite arc length in hours; and

a highest elevation angle.

20. The article of manufacture of claim 15, wherein the satellite and receiver biases are obtained by:

obtaining 1-s RINEX dual-frequency pseudorange and carrier-phase observations;

cleaning and decimating the observations to 300 s; and

passing the cleaned and decimated observations through a sequential least squares estimator.

21. The article of manufacture of claim 17, wherein the obtaining satellite and receiver biases uses a sequential least squares estimation method.