Customizable electronic commerce comparison system and method

• US 7,302,429 B1
• Filed: 04/11/1999
• Issued: 11/27/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 04/11/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: William Paul Wanker
• Original Assignee: William Paul Wanker
• Inventors: Wanker, William Paul
• Primary Examiner(s): Pham; Hung Q
• Application Number:
  US09/290,006
• Time in Patent Office: 3,152 Days
• Field of Search: 700/231, 700/97, 700/201, 707/502, 707 1- 7, 707/10, 707/27, 705/26, 405/26
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0203 Market surveys; Market polls
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0623 Item investigation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0625 Directed, with specific intent or strategy
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0627 using item specifications
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0629 for generating comparisons
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99932 Access augmentation or optimizing
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99933 Query processing, i.e. searching
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99934 Query formulation, input preparation, or translation
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99935 Query augmenting and refining, e.g. inexact access
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99936 Pattern matching access
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99937 Sorting

Abstract

In a consumer information system, a method of comparing products and services including providing product specific information, providing merchant specific information on the specified product, providing merchant specific business information, providing product specific information collected by third parties, providing merchant specific information collected by third parties, applying weighting factors to the information provided, producing an aggregate value for each merchant based on the weighting factors as applied to the information provided, and producing a ranking of the merchants offering the specified product based on the aggregate value for each merchant. The system provides for consumers to select a set of standardized weighting factors or to modify the standardized weighting factors or to create their own weighting factors. The system provides detailed information to consumers on the breakdown of factors influencing the rating.

Claims

1. In an online comparison system, a method of ranking merchants, comprising:

entering by a consumer a set of weighting factors prior to receiving query information related to a potential consumer purchase, the weighting factors corresponding to categories of merchant comparison information data;

receiving the query information related to the potential consumer purchase;

receiving a plurality of merchant comparison information data for a plurality of merchants related to completing the potential consumer purchase, the merchant comparison information data for a merchant organized into a plurality of categories, wherein the merchant comparison information data includes non-opinion data from at least two categories from price category, product availability category, product inventory category, time to deliver product category, payment terms category, payment method category, merchant creditworthiness category, and inventory category information;

calculating a plurality of respective merchant data weight resultant values for each merchant of the plurality of merchants by multiplying each weighting factor from the entered set of weighting factors by a data value of the merchant comparison information data from a corresponding merchant data category;

calculating an aggregate score for each merchant by summing the plurality of calculated merchant data weight resultant values;

ranking the merchants based on the aggregate scores to produce a ranking result; and

returning the ranking result to the consumer, the ranking result corresponding to the received query information.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

requesting information from the consumer relating to a potential consumer purchase.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

providing the ranking result to the consumer in response to the consumer'"'"'s response to the request for information relating to a potential consumer purchase.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

excluding a merchant from the ranking result when the merchant receives an aggregate score below a specified threshold.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

requesting weighting factor information from a consumer; and

using the consumer entered weighting factor information in the calculation of the respective merchant data weight resultant value.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the weighting factors are balanced such that the weighting factors sum to a predetermined value.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighting factors sum to a predetermined value.

8. A method of ranking merchants in an online comparison system, comprising the steps of:

entering by a consumer a set of weighting factors prior to receiving query information related to a potential consumer purchase of a user specified product;

receiving the query information relating to said user specified product from the consumer;

retrieving a list of merchants from a database, wherein the list of merchants includes merchants offering said user specified product;

retrieving merchant specific information about the merchants in said list of merchants, said merchant specific information including a plurality of merchant data entry values, the merchant data entry values representing non-opinion data;

for each merchant in the list of merchants, applying the weighting factors to a corresponding subset of the merchant specific information including multiplying each of said merchant data entry values by a corresponding weighting factor from the set of weighting factors to calculate a merchant data weight resultant value, to produce a plurality of merchant data weight resultant values;

for each merchant in the list of merchants, summing the corresponding plurality of merchant data weight resultant values to calculate a merchant aggregate score for said each merchant;

ranking said list of merchants based on the calculated merchant aggregate scores to produce a ranking result; and

returning the ranking result to the consumer, the ranking result corresponding to said user specified product, wherein any merchant for which the calculated aggregate score does not satisfy a specified criterion is excluded from the result.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the weighting factors are chosen by the consumer from a preset grouping of weighting factors.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the weighting factors are specified by the consumer.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising the step of eliminating those merchants from the ranking result if the merchant specific information is incomplete for that merchant.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said eliminating occurs only for merchants whose merchant specific data is incomplete as compared to a predefined screening criterion.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the predefined screening criterion is received from the consumer.

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising the step of excluding from the ranking result comparison information items not common to all merchants in the ranking result.

15. The method of claim 8, further comprising the steps of:

presenting the consumer with a list of merchant information categories;

receiving consumer selected merchant information categories; and

ranking merchants based upon the selected information categories.

16. The method of claim 8, further comprising the steps of:

receiving category weighting factors from the consumer, wherein category weighting factors are applied to all comparison information corresponding to the category in the merchant specific information; and

ranking merchants according to the received category weighting factors.

17. A method of ranking merchants in an online comparison system, comprising:

receiving from a consumer a set of weighting factors prior to receiving query information specifying a product or service, the weighting factors corresponding to categories of merchant comparison information, wherein each said weighting factor is entered as a numerical value and represents the relative importance to be given to corresponding merchant comparison information in ranking the merchants;

receiving the query information related to a product or service from the consumer;

retrieving merchant comparison information data of merchants offering said product or service from a database, the retrieved merchant comparison information data corresponding to the entered query information, the merchant comparison information excluding opinion data and survey result data;

calculating a plurality of weighted category scores for each merchant by, for each of the weighting factors, multiplying the weighting factor by a corresponding data value of the retrieved merchant comparison information data to calculate a weighted category score, and

summing the weighted category scores to calculate a merchant overall score of each merchant;

ranking the merchants according to the calculated merchant overall score of each merchant to produce a ranking result; and

returning the ranking result to the consumer, the ranking result corresponding to the received query information.

18. A method of ranking merchants in an online comparison system, comprising:

selecting, by a consumer, a plurality of weighting factors prior to receiving query information specifying a product or service, the weighting factors corresponding to merchant comparison information;

receiving the query information specifying a product or service from the consumer;

retrieving the merchant comparison information of merchants offering said product or service from a database, the retrieved merchant comparison information corresponding to the query information;

calculating a plurality of weighted category scores for each merchant by, for each of the selected weighting factors, multiplying the weighting factor by a data value of the retrieved merchant comparison information to calculate a weighted category score, and

summing the weighted category scores to calculate the merchant score of each merchant;

ranking the merchants according to the calculated merchant score of each merchant to produce a ranking result, wherein the retrieved merchant comparison information excludes information obtained from surveys and information specifying the opinion of a person; and

returning the ranking result to the consumer, the ranking result corresponding to the query specifying a product or service.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the weighting factors and the query information are specified by the consumer.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the weighting factors are selected by the consumer from a list of weighting factors.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the list of weighting factors corresponds to the merchant information.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein the consumer can modify the selected weighting factors to enter a weighting factor not included in the list of weighting factors.

23. The method of claim 20, wherein the list of weighting factors is entered by the consumer.

24. The method of claim 20, wherein the list of weighting factors is selected by the consumer from a group of lists of weighting factors.

25. The method of claim 18, wherein the selection is made from a drop down list of weighting factors.