Method for modeling and testing a security system

• US 7,308,394 B2
• Filed: 04/22/2005
• Issued: 12/11/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 02/24/2005
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: UltraVision Security Systems, Inc.
• Original Assignee: UltraVision Security Systems, Inc.
• Inventors: Johnson, Dennis J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Rodriguez, Paul
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ochoa, Juan Carlos
• Application Number:
  US11/112,437
• Publication Number:
  US 20060190228A1
• Time in Patent Office: 963 Days
• Field of Search: 703/13, 703/21, 703/22
• US Class Current: 703/13
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/13 Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/20 Design optimisation, verification or simulation optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/20 Calibration, including self-calibrating arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 31/00 Predictive alarm systems characterised by extrapolation or other computation using updated historic data

Abstract

A method of designing, modeling and testing a security system for protecting a defined security area. The method includes modeling the security area, modeling the security system for the security area, and testing the security system using a computer to run various breach scenarios to determine weaknesses in the security system. The testing may be in the form of a computer game with one or more players implementing the models and scenarios or in real-time.

Claims

1. A method of designing and testing a security system using computer modeling, comprising:

selecting one or more security elements of a security system for a security area;

modeling the security system for the security area using the selected security elements placed at selected locations in the security area;

selecting a breach scenario;

executing the breach scenario to test the efficacy of the modeled security system; and

updating the modeled security system based on results of executing the breach scenario, thereby designing the security system prior to implementing the modeled security system at the security area.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more security elements include selected sensors having known specifications.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more security elements include one or more of i) an ultra wide-band (UWB) sensor, ii) a closed-circuit TV (CCTV), iii) a microwave sensor, iv) a laser sensor, v) a contact switch, vi) an infrared sensor, vii) a motion sensor, viii) a heat detector, ix) a smoke detector, x) a pressure sensor, xi) an accelerometer, and xii) a vibration sensor.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more security elements include selected personnel.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more security elements include a response procedure.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the security area includes one or more structures including at least one of i) a man-made structure and ii) a natural structure.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the security area includes facilities that support the security area.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the security area comprises grounds including one or more of i) grounds within a defined perimeter and ii) grounds outside a defined perimeter.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising modeling a command and control center for the modeled security system.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein testing the security system model comprises implementing a computer simulation that utilizes an attack scenario as part of the breach scenario.

11. The method of claim 1 further comprising using the test to determine a weakness in the modeled security system.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising updating the security system based at least in part on the determined weakness.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the security system model is a model of an existing security system.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the testing is performed at least in part remotely using at least two computers connected by one of i) a LAN, ii) a WAN, iii) an intranet, and iv) an Internet.

15. The method of claim 10, wherein the attack scenario is computer generated.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the breach scenarios are selected from a database of predetermined breach scenarios.

17. The method of claim 1 further comprising selecting one or more parameters to promote realism in the test.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the one or more parameters are selected from i) temperature, ii) wind, iii) precipitation, iv) fog, v) natural vibration, vi) machine vibration, vii) high water, and viii) ice.

19. A computer-readable medium with instructions recorded thereon for modeling and testing a security system using a computer, the instructions comprising:

selecting one or more security elements of a security system for a security area;

modeling the security area using the selected security elements placed at selected locations in locations in the security area;

selecting a breach scenario; and

executing the breach scenario to test efficacy of the modeled security area;

updating the modeled security area based on results of executing the breach scenario prior to implementing the modeled security system at the security area; and

recording the updated modeled security system in a storage medium.