Pluggable notations and semantics for visual modeling elements

• US 7,320,120 B2
• Filed: 12/20/2000
• Issued: 01/15/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 12/20/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Oberst, Shawn E., Kiernan, Casey L., Rajarajan, Vij, MacLeod, Stewart P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Zhen; Li B.
• Application Number:
  US09/742,761
• Publication Number:
  US 20020120784A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,582 Days
• Field of Search: 717/104, 717/105, 717/171, 717/143, 707/104, 709/203, 715964-970, 715/771
• US Class Current: 717/104
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/20 Software design

Abstract

Described is a method, system and data structures to logically separate the notations from the semantics of model element objects into separate code components, and to enable subsequent re-association of a selected notation with a selected semantic. Various notations and semantics from different providers may be combined. The invention may be implemented in a Visual Modeling Framework which defines the API set and/or interfaces to which the semantic and notation objects conform, and allows a notation and a semantic to be plugged into each other to create a model element, thereby allowing pluggable notations and pluggable semantics. A paradigm server may load a selected semantic and notation component, combine them, and present the combination to the framework as a model element. The paradigm server may be a pluggable component, having specialized knowledge for validating whether a semantic object can be used in a paradigm and combined with a notation.

Claims

1. In a computing environment for use in computer implemented modeling, a method of creating a model element, the method comprising:

selecting a notation from a plurality of notations, wherein each of the notations among the plurality of notations comprise a visual representation which may be used as a visual representation of a model element, and wherein each notation comprises one or more interfaces that provide information about capabilities of the notation for use in associating a notation with a semantic, but wherein each notation is independent of any semantic;

selecting a semantic, the semantic providing a meaning of a model element in a modeling environment, and the semantic being independent from any notation, the semantic having one or more interfaces for accessing information about the semantic defining requirements of a notation that is to be associated with the selected semantic; and

associating the selected notation with the selected semantic by associating the capabilities of the notation with the requirements of the semantic, where associating the selected notation with the selected semantic comprises;

validating the notation for a paradigm;

validating the semantic for the paradigm; and

validating through the notation and semantic interfaces that the notation has capabilities to meet the requirements of the semantic.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the notation comprises a notation object and the semantic comprises a semantic object, and wherein a paradigm server associates the notation object with the semantic object to provide the model element.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the paradigm server validates that the semantic object can be associated with the notation object.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information identifying a library of notations to which the notation belongs.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides type information corresponding to the notation.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides subtype information corresponding to the notation.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides a name of the notation.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of whether the notation is capable of being resized.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of whether the notation is capable of visually indicating selected and unselected states.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of whether the notation is capable of being in a visible or a hidden state.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of whether the notation is capable of visually indicating hover-related states.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of whether the notation is capable of visually indicating attach-points at which arcs can connect.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of a minimum and maximum size of the notation.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of whether the notation is capable of zooming operations.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of supported color depths.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of an iconic representation.

17. The computer readable method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of whether the notation is capable of doing animations.

18. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the notation provides information indicative of a number of states that the notation can visually indicate.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the semantic provides information identifying a library of semantics to which the semantic belongs.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the semantic provides type information corresponding to the semantic.

21. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the semantic provides subtype information corresponding to the semantic.

22. The method of claim 1 wherein one of the interfaces of the semantic provides a name of the semantic.

23. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation be resizable.

24. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation be capable of visually indicating a selected or an unselected state.

25. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation be capable of being in a visible or a hidden state.

26. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation be capable of visually indicating at least two distinct hover-related states.

27. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation have a number of attach-points at which arcs can connect.

28. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation support a color depth.

29. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation be capable of doing animations.

30. The method of claim 1 wherein one requirement of the semantic requires that the notation have a number of states.

31. The method of claim 1 wherein the model element corresponds to a node, and wherein the node includes at least one method to determine the notation and semantic and corresponding thereto.

32. The method of claim 1 wherein the model element corresponds to an arc, and wherein the arc includes at least one method to determine the notation and semantic and corresponding thereto.

33. A system, comprising:

a notation server, wherein the notation server stores a plurality of notations, wherein each of the notations among the plurality of notations comprise a visual representation which may be used as a visual representation of a model element, and wherein each notation comprises one or more interfaces that provide information about capabilities of the notation for use in associating a notation with a semantic, but wherein each notation is independent of any semantic;

a semantic server, wherein the semantic server stores one or more semantics, each semantic providing a meaning of a model element in a modeling environment, and the semantic being independent from any notation, the semantic having one or more interfaces for accessing information about the semantic defining requirements of a notation that is to be associated with the selected semantic; and

a paradigm server, the server coupled to the notation server and the semantic server connected to a modeling environment and configured to access the interfaces of the notation and the interfaces of the semantic, and further configured to enable a determination as to whether the paradigm server, notation and semantic are each compatible, and if they are compatible, to associate the notation with the semantic by associating capabilities of the notation with requirements of the semantic to provide a model element in the modeling environment, where associating the selected notation with the selected semantic comprises;

validating the notation for a paradigm;

validating the semantic for the paradigm; and

validating through the notation and semantic interfaces that the notation has capabilities to meet the requirements of the semantic.

34. The system of claim 33 wherein the semantic server comprises a component object model class server.

35. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions for performing the following:

selecting a notation from a plurality of notations, wherein each of the notations among the plurality of notations comprise a visual representation which may be used as a visual representation of a model element, and wherein each notation comprises one or more interfaces that provide information about capabilities of the notation for use in associating a notation with a semantic, but wherein each notation is independent of any semantic;

selecting a semantic, the semantic providing a meaning of a model element in a modeling environment, and the semantic being independent from any notation, the semantic having one or more interfaces for accessing information about the semantic defining requirements of a notation that is to be associated with the selected semantic; and

associating the selected notation with the selected semantic by associating the capabilities of the notation with the requirements of the semantic, where associating the selected notation with the selected semantic comprises;

validating the notation for a paradigm;

validating the semantic for the paradigm; and

validating through the notation and semantic interfaces that the notation has capabilities to meet the requirements of the semantic.