Method for accurate estimation of noise for data modems

• US 7,362,801 B2
• Filed: 12/18/2003
• Issued: 04/22/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2003
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: LSI Logic Corporation (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Inventors: Goel, Nagendra K.
• Primary Examiner(s): Ghayour; Mohammed
• Assistant Examiner(s): Williams; Lawrence
• Application Number:
  US10/739,388
• Publication Number:
  US 20050135466A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,587 Days
• Field of Search: 375/222, 375/227, 375/278, 375/285, 375/347, 704/233, 702/94, 700/262
• US Class Current: 375/227
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/3171 BER [Bit Error Rate] test

Abstract

Noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation are relatively straightforward tasks. However, when SNR is small, systematic errors in measurement may result in over-estimation of SNR, which also occurs during runtime monitoring of SNR. Here, sufficient numbers of bits have been preassigned to each channel using QAM modulation scheme. Therefore, SNR relative to QAM lattice size depends on the noise margin and the desired (bit error rate) BER. If a relatively small margin is desired, similar measurement errors may result in over-estimation of SNR. Another problem that arises is that the variance of the noise estimator is relatively high. Therefore, SNR estimates may vary by several dB, and there is only 50% confidence in the usual estimators that the actual SNR value will not be worse than that estimated. Thus, a computationally efficient method for SNR estimation that also allows for specification of a confidence level in the estimates is provided.

Claims

1. A computer readable medium encoded with instructions capable of being executed by a computer to perform a method of curve fitting;

the instructions causing the computer to;

a.) define a predetermined limit of a calculated variance;

b.) collect data having said calculated variance;

c.) apply a correction factor to said calculated variance every time said calculated variance is more than said pre-determined limit; and

d.) derive a true variance of the data by using curve-fitting;

wherein said predetermined limit of said calculated variance depends on the accuracy with which it is desired to measure a SNR (signal-to-noise-ratio), as well as computational resources available.

2. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by table lookup.

3. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by spines.

4. A method defined in claim 1, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by polynomial curve fitting.

5. A method defined in claim 4, wherein polynomial curve fitting is applied to said calculated variances that are above 0.4.

6. A method defined in claim 1, further comprising collecting ten thousand points of data.

7. A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising collecting two hundred fifty-six points of data.