Access control to shared resources

• US 7,373,338 B2
• Filed: 02/24/2004
• Issued: 05/13/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 03/18/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: British Telecommunications PLC (BT Group PLC)
• Inventors: Tan, Zhu, Giles, Nick, Li, Yang, Thompson, Simon G.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lee; Wilson
• Application Number:
  US10/784,919
• Publication Number:
  US 20040243633A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,540 Days
• Field of Search: 707 1- 10, 707/101, 705/8, 705/10, 705/14
• US Class Current: 707/690
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/367 Ontology
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/958 Organisation or management of web site content, e.g. publishing, maintaining pages or automatic linking
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6227 where protection concerns the structure of data, e.g. records, types, queries
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99933 Query processing, i.e. searching
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99935 Query augmenting and refining, e.g. inexact access

Abstract

Controlled access is provided to a shared resource 23 such as an ontology (knowledge database) in order to maintain its quality without restraining the ability of users 21a, 21b, 21c . . . to contribute to that resource.

An edit and query function 26 is used to determine the validity and consistency of individual contributions. The results of these checks and the level of contribution made by individual users to the information resource is used to produce a rating for each user of the resource, which is stored (24a, 24b . . . ) for use in prioritise and manage future contributions to the resource 23, provide metadata on the resource and to prioritise access control 28 to the resource.

When a new contribution is made by a user a threshold of approval can be set before it is accepted into the main database 23. This threshold is based on the sum of the ratings points of the original contributor and of users that give their assent to the inclusion of that contribution.

Claims

1. Apparatus for generating and maintaining a data resource, comprising:

a repository for the data resource;

access means for allowing a plurality of users to make amendments to the data resource;

moderation means for recording said amendments, and for recording moderation inputs made by the users relating to such amendments;

rating means for generating a moderation value for each amendment derived from the moderation inputs received from the moderation means and for storing the moderation values so generated in the repository;

means for generating a user moderation value in respect of each user, from moderation inputs of other users made in respect of amendments made by the user; and

means for applying their respective user moderation values to inputs made by each user.

2. Apparatus according to claim 1 comprising means for input of user-generated data, the data relating to the users'"'"' assessments of the quality of amendments made by other users.

3. Apparatus according to claim 1, comprising an amendment moderation value generation means, comprising means for determining the validity and consistency of amendments, and means for generating a moderation input from the results of such determination.

4. Apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a user moderation value store arranged to store the user moderation values, and means for retrieval of user moderation values from the user moderation value store.

5. Apparatus according to claim 1, comprising means for storing a quality rating for each resource, and wherein the rating means retrieves the quality rating for a modified resource and generates moderation values in accordance with the retrieved quality rating.

6. Apparatus according to claim 5, comprising analysis means for identifying reference links between resources, and means for generating, for each resource, said quality rating in accordance with the number of the links referring to the resource.

7. Apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising amendment storage means for storing amendment proposals prior to implementation, means for receiving moderation inputs relating to the amendment proposals, and means for amending the data resource in accordance with an amendment proposal when the moderation value for that amendment proposal passes a predetermined upper threshold.

8. Apparatus according to claim 7, further comprising means for deleting amendment proposals for which the moderation values pass below a lower threshold, or which have failed to pass the upper threshold within a predetermined period.

9. A method of generating and maintaining a data resource, said method comprising:

recording amendments made to the resource by a user, and retrieving said amendments by use of a data access means;

receiving moderation inputs generated by one or more users relating to such amendments;

generating a moderation value for each amendment, the moderation value being determined by said moderation inputs; and

generating for each user a user moderation value derived from moderation inputs applied by other users made in respect of amendments made by the user, and

applying to inputs made by each user, the respective user moderation value.

10. A method according to claim 9 wherein user-generated data is recorded, assessing qualities of amendments made by other users.

11. A method according to claim 9, wherein the validity and consistency of amendments are determined, and a moderation value is generated from the results of such determination.

12. A method according to claim 9, wherein the user moderation value is stored for subsequent retrieval.

13. A method according to claim 9, wherein a quality rating is stored for each resource, and wherein moderation values are generated in accordance with the retrieved quality rating.

14. A method according to claim 13, wherein reference links between resources are identified, and said quality rating for each resource is generated in accordance with the number of such links referring to the resource.

15. A method according to claim 9, wherein a quality value is generated relating to an amendment proposal, and the data resource is amended in accordance with the amendment proposal when the quality value passes a predetermined upper threshold.

16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the predetermined threshold is set at different values for additions to, and deletions from, the data resource.

17. A method according to claim 15, wherein amendment proposals for which the quality values pass below a lower threshold, or which have failed to pass the upper threshold within a predetermined period are deleted.

18. A computer tangible medium containing a computer program for execution by at least one computer to carry out the method of claim 9.

19. A computer tangible medium containing a computer program for execution by at least one computer to provide the apparatus of claim 1.