Method and receiver for blocking a runaway dialer at a local security system

• US 7,382,242 B2
• Filed: 03/25/2005
• Issued: 06/03/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 03/25/2005
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ademco Inc. (Resideo Technologies, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: Martin, Christopher D.
• Primary Examiner(s): La; Anh V.
• Application Number:
  US11/089,768
• Publication Number:
  US 20060214782A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,166 Days
• Field of Search: 340/500, 340/540, 340/521, 340/514, 455/550.1, 455/418, 455/422.1, 379/210.02, 379/196, 379/207.13, 379/67.1, 379/142.02, 379/142.01, 379/142.07, 379/93.09, 379/210.03
• US Class Current: 340/500
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 11/04 with alarm systems, e.g. fire, police or burglar alarm systems

Abstract

A monitoring receiver having a memory, a control section, a counter and transmitting and receiving section. An operator can input a blocking time period, blocking criteria and a blocking threshold into the receiver. The control section causes a comparator to compare the blocking threshold with a counted number of times a local security systems contacted the monitoring receiver. The monitoring receiver blocks the transmissions when the counted number exceeds one of the blocking threshold values. The monitoring receiver generates a list of all local security systems that are being blocked which is stored in memory and transmitted to an automation system or a remote computer.

Claims

1. A method for selectively blocking incoming transmissions at a central monitoring station, received from a local security system, the method comprising:

receiving an incoming transmission from said local security system;

determining if at least one threshold value corresponding to at least one blocking criteria has been reached; and

blocking the incoming transmission based upon a result from said determining step for a predetermined block period.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

setting at least one blocking criteria; and

setting at least one threshold value for the blocking criteria.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said blocking criteria includes a number of calls received by a receiver from said local security system within a predetermined time period and said threshold value includes a predetermined number of calls.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein said blocking criteria includes a number of reports received by a receiver from said local security system within a predetermined time period and said threshold value includes a predetermined number of reports.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein said blocking criteria further includes a number of reports received by a receiver from said local security system within a predetermined time period and said threshold value further includes a predetermined number of reports.

6. The method of claim 3, further comprising the step of:

counting a number of times said local security system calls a receiver.

7. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of:

counting a number of times said local security system reports to a receiver.

8. The method of claim 5, further comprising the steps of:

counting a number of times said local security system calls a receiver; and

counting a number of times said local security system reports to a receiver.

9. The method of claims 6, wherein the step of determining if a blocking threshold has been reached further comprising:

comparing a result of the counting step with said threshold value corresponding to said blocking criteria.

10. The method of claims 7, wherein the step of determining if a blocking threshold has been reached further comprising:

comparing a result of the counting step with said threshold value corresponding said blocking criteria.

11. The method of claims 8, wherein the step of determining if a blocking threshold has been reached further comprising:

comparing each result of each of the counting steps with said at least one threshold value corresponding said at least one blocking criteria.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of blocking further includes, the step of:

setting a blocking flag based upon said comparison step.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of blocking further includes, the step of:

setting a blocking flag based upon said comparison step.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of blocking further includes, the step of:

setting a blocking flag based upon said comparison step.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein said predetermined block period is set to a predetermined default value when no block period is inputted.

16. The method of claim 1, further including the step of:

determining a type of said transmission received in said receiving step.

17. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

requesting from an operator a command to determine whether said block period should be continued after a lapse of said block period.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising the step of:

requesting from an operator a command to determine whether said block period previously set should be changed or not.

19. A monitoring receiver comprising:

a first timer for counting down a blocking time period;

a counter for counting a transmission received from a plurality of local security systems and for generating a count value;

a comparison means for comparing said count value with at least one blocking threshold; and

a blocking means for blocking said transmission from said plurality of local security systems where said count value is greater than at least one blocking threshold during said blocking time period.

20. The monitoring receiver of claim 19, further comprising a means for selecting at least one blocking criteria.

21. The monitoring receiver of claim 19, wherein said blocking means sets a blocking flag when said count value exceeds said at least one blocking threshold.

22. The monitoring receiver of claim 21, wherein said blocking flag is transmitted to receiving and transmitting section which causes said receiving and transmitting section to block the transmission.

23. The monitoring receiver of claim 19, further comprising a means for selecting said at least one blocking threshold.

24. The monitoring receiver of claim 19, further comprising a second timing means for counting down a block period which is a time wherein said security receiver blocks transmissions from said plurality of local security systems.

25. A monitoring system comprising:

a plurality of receivers each having a receiving and transmitting section for receiving and transmitting transmissions from and to a plurality of local security systems and a control section for processing said transmissions;

a monitoring system configuration computer connected to said plurality of receivers, said monitoring system configuration computer includes;

a first timer for counting down a blocking time period;

a counter for counting a number of transmissions received by each of said plurality of receivers from one of said plurality of local security system;

a comparison means for comparing said number with at least one blocking threshold which is stored in a storage medium; and

a control section for transmitting a blocking signal to one of said plurality of receivers based upon said comparison.

26. The monitoring system of claim 25, wherein said monitoring system configuration computer further includes a means for selecting at least one blocking criteria, at least one blocking threshold, a blocking time period and a block period.

27. The monitoring system of claim 25, wherein said one of said plurality of receivers blocks said transmissions from one of said plurality of local security system when said one of said plurality of receivers receives the blocking signal from said monitoring system receiver configuration computer.