Avionics system, method and apparatus for selecting a runway

• US 7,382,287 B1
• Filed: 06/03/2003
• Issued: 06/03/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 06/03/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Garmin International, Inc. (Garmin Limited)
• Original Assignee: Garmin International, Inc. (Garmin Limited)
• Inventors: Chen, Susan S., Barber, Clayton E.
• Primary Examiner(s): GOINS, DAVETTA WOODS
• Application Number:
  US10/453,371
• Time in Patent Office: 1,827 Days
• Field of Search: 340/972, 340/951, 340/947, 340/960, 340/988, 340/979, 340/945, 340/970, 701/16, 701/18, 244/75.1, 244/76.R, 244/114.R, 244/183
• US Class Current: 340/972
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0021 located in the aircraft
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0086 for monitoring terrain radar or analogous systems specially adapted for terrain avoidance G01S13/935
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/025 Navigation or guidance aids radar or analogous systems specially adapted for landing purposes G01S13/913

Abstract

A destination runway selection method, system and apparatus for use with a Terrain Awareness and Warning System (“TAWS”). The method involves determining upon which of a number of candidate runways an aircraft is most likely to land so that appropriate Required Terrain Clearance (“RTC”) values and other alert thresholds may be referenced. According to a first aspect of the method, a destination airport is initially selected from among candidate airports. According to a second aspect of the method, a destination runway is selected from among the candidate runways at the destination airport. In one particular embodiment of the invention, the candidate runway is selected solely on the basis of distance calculations between the runway and the aircraft.

Claims

1. A method of selecting a destination runway upon which an aircraft is most likely to land, the method comprising:

grouping at least two runways as at least one candidate airport;

selecting one candidate airport as a destination airport;

selecting one runway of the at least two runways from the destination airport as the destination runway; and

calculating a value of X for each candidate airport, the value of X being dependant at least upon—

a ratio of the distance from the aircraft to the candidate airport and a threshold range, and

a ratio of a bearing angle of the aircraft to the candidate airport and a threshold angle.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein grouping at least two runways as at least one candidate airport comprises associating the at least two runways in a database as belonging to the candidate airport based upon geographic position.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein grouping at least two runways as at least one candidate airport comprises associating the at least two runways in a database as belonging to the candidate airport based upon an identifier indicating the at least two runways are associated with the candidate airport.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the destination airport comprises selecting as the destination airport the candidate airport:

which is in front of the aircraft; and

which is at a distance from the aircraft less than a predetermined distance.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein selecting the candidate airport which is in front of the aircraft comprises selecting the candidate airport for which the absolute value of the aircraft bearing angle to the candidate airport is less than approximately 60 degrees.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein selecting the candidate airport which is in front of the aircraft comprises selecting the candidate airport for which the absolute value of a bearing angle of the aircraft to the candidate airport is less than approximately 30 degrees.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first ratio is the distance from the aircraft to the candidate airport over the threshold range and the second ratio is the bearing angle of the aircraft to the candidate airport over the threshold angle.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein X equals a sum of the ratios, the method further comprising selecting as the destination airport the candidate airport for which the value X is smallest.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting the candidate runway based upon its distance from the aircraft.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of candidate runways each represent one of two ends of an aircraft runway.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein selecting the destination runway comprises selecting as the destination runway the candidate runway representing the aircraft runway end which is closest to a current position of the aircraft.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising selecting as the destination runway the candidate runway representing the aircraft runway end for which a distance between the end of the aircraft runway and the aircraft is decreasing.

23. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the destination airport is based at least in part on a distance ratio to the candidate airport.

13. A terrain awareness and warning system (TAWS) for an aircraft, the TAWS comprising:

at least one information database configured to store elevation and position information for a terrain region, at least one candidate airport and at least two candidate runways within each candidate airport;

a look-ahead warning generator configured to receive indications of terrain clearance alerts and communicate the indications by at least one of a visual display and an aural warning; and

a processor coupled to the information database and the look-ahead warning generator, the processor configured to employ aircraft landing approach warning values upon receiving an indication that a destination runway has been selected, wherein the processor is configured to identify a potential destination runway by identifying the at least two candidate runways from the information database as at least one candidate airport, selecting one candidate airport from the information database as a destination airport, and selecting one candidate runway of the at least two candidate runways from the destination airport as the destination runway, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination airport based upon a fourth criteria which is that a value for X is smallest, wherein the value of X for each candidate airport is dependent at least upon a sum of a first ratio of the distance from the aircraft to the candidate airport and a threshold range, and a second ratio of a bearing angle of the aircraft to the candidate airport and a threshold angle.

14. The TAWS of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination airport based upon at least the first criteria of the airport being in front of the aircraft and the second criteria that the distance between the aircraft and the candidate airport is less than a predetermined distance.

15. The TAWS of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination airport based upon a third criteria that an absolute value of the aircraft bearing angle to the candidate airport is less than approximately 60 degrees.

16. The TAWS of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination airport based upon a third criteria that an absolute value of the aircraft bearing angle to the candidate airport is less than approximately 30 degrees.

17. The TAWS of claim 14, wherein the first ratio is the distance from the aircraft to the candidate airport over the threshold range and the second ratio is the bearing angle of the aircraft to the candidate airport over the threshold angle.

18. The TAWS of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination runway solely based upon a distance calculation between each candidate runway and the current position of the aircraft.

19. The TAWS of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to distinguish between first and second ends of a plurality of aircraft runway and treat each as a candidate runway.

20. The TAWS of claim 19, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination runway based upon the criteria that the destination runway is the aircraft runway end that is closest to a current position of the aircraft.

21. The TAWS of claim 20, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination runway based solely upon a distance calculation between each aircraft runway end and the current position of the aircraft.

22. The TAWS of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to select the destination runway based upon the criteria that the destination runway is an end of the candidate runway for which a distance between the end of the candidate runway and the aircraft is decreasing.

24. The TAWS of claim 13, wherein selecting the destination airport is based at least in part on a distance ratio to the candidate airport.

25. A method of selecting a destination runway upon which an aircraft is most likely to land, the method comprising:

grouping at least two runways as at least one candidate airport;

selecting one candidate airport as a destination airport; and

selecting one runway of the at least two runways from the destination airport as the destination runway, wherein selecting the destination runway comprises selecting a candidate runway having an aircraft runway end for which a distance between the end of the aircraft runway and the aircraft is decreasing.

26. A terrain awareness and warning system (TAWS) for an aircraft, the TAWS comprising:

at least one information database configured to store elevation and position information for a terrain region, at least one candidate airport and at least two candidate runways within each candidate airport;

a look-ahead warning generator configured to receive indications of terrain clearance alerts and communicate the indications by at least one of a visual display and an aural warning; and

a processor coupled to the information database and the look-ahead warning generator, the processor configured to employ aircraft landing approach warning values upon receiving an indication that a destination runway has been selected, wherein the processor is configured to identify a potential destination runway by identifying the at least two candidate runways from the information database as at least one candidate airport, selecting one candidate airport from the information database as a destination airport, and selecting one candidate runway of the at least two candidate runways from the destination airport as the destination runway, wherein selecting the destination runway is based upon the criteria that the destination runway is an end of the candidate runway for which a distance between the end of the candidate runway and the aircraft is decreasing.

27. A method of selecting a destination runway upon which an aircraft is most likely to land, the method comprising:

selecting one of a plurality of candidate airports, as a destination airport by—

calculating a value of X for each candidate airport, the value of X being dependant upon—

a first ratio of a distance from the aircraft to the candidate airport over a threshold range, and

a second ratio of a bearing angle of the aircraft to the candidate airport over a threshold angle, and

selecting as the destination airport, the candidate airport having the lowest value of X; and

selecting one of a plurality of candidate runways of the destination airport, with each candidate runway having at least one runway end, as the destination runway, based solely on distance calculations, by—

monitoring over time, a distance between the aircraft and the runway end, for each runway end, and

selecting as the destination runway the candidate runway for which the distance is smallest and decreasing.