Cross-zone supervision for a security system

• US 7,423,530 B2
• Filed: 09/22/2005
• Issued: 09/09/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 09/22/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ademco Inc. (Resideo Technologies, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: Martin, Christopher D., Babich, Thomas S., Piel, Kevin G.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hofsass; Jeff
• Assistant Examiner(s): Labbees; Edny
• Application Number:
  US11/233,105
• Publication Number:
  US 20070063841A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,083 Days
• Field of Search: 340/501, 340/507, 340/514, 340/522, 340/526, 340/545.1
• US Class Current: 340/545.1
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/191 using pyroelectric sensor means

Abstract

An error condition, fault, defect, obstruction, or defective arrangement of viewing angle is determined in a target security device, such as a motion sensor. A plurality of times a fault is detected in a first security device arranged to sense activity in a first zone, the target security device being arranged to sense activity in a second zone overlapping with the first zone; and the error condition may be determined in the target security device when fault in the target security device is not detected for the plurality of times. The second zone may overlap substantially all of the first zone. The first security device may be a door security sensor, a gate security sensor, a keypad or a motion detector. When the first security device is a keypad or user interface, the fault may be an arm or disarm command or an arm/disarm command cycle.

Claims

1. A method of determining an error condition in a target security device, the method comprising:

detecting a fault a plurality of times by a first security device arranged to sense activity in a first zone, the target security device being arranged to sense activity in a second zone overlapping with the first zone, the first security device and the target security device are remotely located from each other and in a separate housing; and

determining the error condition in the target security device when the target security device signals no fault for the plurality of times.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second zone overlaps substantially all of the first zone.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the target security device is a motion detector.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first security device is a motion detector.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first security device is one of a door security sensor and a gate security sensor.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first security device is at least one of a keypad and a user interface.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of times is a pre-specified number greater than 3 and less than 30 of most recent consecutive faults of the first security device.

8. The method of claim 1, said determining the error condition comprises detecting the fault in the first security device the plurality of times over a period of time longer than a pre-specified time period.

9. The method of claim 1, comprising transmitting a signal to a central station when the error condition is determined.

10. The method of claim 1, comprising confirming the error condition by detecting a fault in a third security device the plurality of times, the third security device being arranged to sense activity in a third zone overlapped by the second zone;

and

transmitting a signal to a central station when the error condition is confirmed.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the fault comprises at least one of an arm setting, a disarm setting, and an arm/disarm cycle at a keypad, the first security device comprising the keypad.

12. A security control system configured to determine an error condition in a target security device, the device comprising:

a signal processor configured to detect triggering a fault a plurality of times in a first security device arranged to sense activity in a first zone, the target security device being arranged to sense activity in a second zone overlapping with substantially all of the first zone, the first security device and the target security device are remotely located from each other in a separate housing; and

a controller configured to determine the error condition in the target security device when a fault in the target security device is not detected for the plurality of times.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the plurality of times is a pre-specified number greater than 3 and less than 30 of most recent consecutive faults of the first security device.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein said controller determines the error condition by detecting the fault in the first security device the plurality of times over a period of time longer than a pre-specified time period.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the target security device is a motion detector.

16. The system of claim 12, wherein the first security device is a motion detector.

17. The system of claim 12, wherein the first security device is one of a door security sensor and a gate security sensor.

18. The system of claim 12, wherein the first security device is at least one of a keypad and a user interface.

19. The system of claim 12, wherein the first security device is at least one of a keypad and a user interface, and the fault comprises at least one of an arm setting, a disarm setting, and an arm/disarm cycle at the at least one of the keypad and the user interface.