Document distribution control system and method based on content

• US 7,424,674 B1
• Filed: 08/16/2004
• Issued: 09/09/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 01/27/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: J Nicholas and Kristin Gross Trust U/A/D APR 13 2010
• Original Assignee: Anthony A. Gross, John N. Gross
• Inventors: Gross, John N., Gross, Anthony A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hutton, Doug
• Assistant Examiner(s): Blackwell, James H.
• Application Number:
  US10/919,877
• Time in Patent Office: 1,485 Days
• Field of Search: 715/533, 715/531, 715/500, 715/719, 715/535, 715/200, 715/234, 715/257, 715/262, 715/255, 715/259, 709/206, 709/203, 709/225, 707/5, 704/1
• US Class Current: 715/257
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/232 Orthographic correction, e.g. spell checking or vowelisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/253 Grammatical analysis; Style critique
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/214 using selective forwarding

Abstract

A word processing tool is disclosed for checking the substance and not merely the spelling of words provided by a user. The word checker is capable of identifying potentially inappropriate word choices so that unintentional errors are not introduced into electronic text documents. The word checker can be implemented as a stand-alone procedure, or integrated into a conventional spell-checking program.

Claims

1. A method of permitting a user to simultaneously check both the spelling and meaning of words in an electronic document within a computing system comprising the steps of:

providing a spell checking routine operating on the computing system;

providing a word checking routine operating on the computing system;

retrieving a word to be spell checked and word checked from said electronic document; and

determining whether said word has been spelled correctly using said spell checking routine and a first dictionary; and

when said word has been spelled incorrectly, presenting a first list of alternative words to said user as replacements for said word, and permitting said user to select a first replacement word for said word; and

determining whether the meaning of said word or said first replacement word has been designated as potentially inappropriate for use in said electronic document by using said word checking routine and a second context dictionary;

wherein said second context dictionary includes a plurality of separate language dictionaries, each said language dictionary being independently selectable within said word checking routine for said document and further containing words identified as potentially offensive and/or inappropriate for a separate corresponding target audience; and

when said word or said first replacement word has been designated as potentially inappropriate, presenting a second list of alternative words to said user as replacements for said word or said first replacement word, and permitting said user to select a second replacement word for said word or said first replacement word prior to transmitting said electronic document to a third party;

wherein said word or said first replacement word has a first meaning in a first context specified in a first language dictionary within the word checking routine, and a second meaning in a second context specified in a second language dictionary within the word checking routine, and said method further includes a step of determining with said word checking routine whether said word or said first replacement word has a particular meaning that has been designated as potentially inappropriate for use in either of the first or second contexts.

2. The method of claim 1, further including a step of designating words that have a meaning that is potentially inappropriate by changing a value of a status field for such words in said first or second context dictionaries.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the status field for each of the designated words can have one of N values, where N>

2.

4. The method of claim 2, further including a step of specifying a threshold value which the status field must exceed in order for said designated word to be identified as potentially inappropriate.

5. The method of claim 1, further including a step of generating an alert indicating that said electronic document includes a word that is potentially inappropriate.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said word is checked substantially immediate in time after it is input into said document by a user.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of separate language dictionaries are predefined in advance without input by the user.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the user can configure different thresholds for different ones of said plurality of separate language dictionaries, wherein said different thresholds are used to determine if said identified words are potentially inappropriate.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of separate language dictionaries include at least one customizable dictionary which can be changed by a business entity.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of separate language dictionaries include at least one non-English dictionary.

11. The method of claim 1, further including a step:

checking a second document with different ones of said plurality of separate language dictionaries after checking said document.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the computing system is part of a personal digital assistant and said context dictionary is stored within a non-volatile memory.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein a checking routine executed by the computing system is implemented as firmware within an integrated circuit.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the computing system is configured to check all emails generated by users within a business entity for inappropriate content before they are distributed to respective recipients.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said emails are associated with products or services offered by said business entity.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of separate language dictionaries include at least one customizable dictionary which can be changed by a business entity selling said products and/or services to include additional words inappropriate for a target audience.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of separate language dictionaries include at least one customizable dictionary containing gender specific inappropriate words.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of separate language dictionaries include at least one customizable dictionary containing inappropriate racist words.