Method and apparatus for just in time RAID spare drive pool management

• US 7,434,090 B2
• Filed: 09/30/2004
• Issued: 10/07/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 09/30/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: RPX Corporation
• Original Assignee: COPAN Systems, Inc. (Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company)
• Inventors: Guha, Aloke, Le, Kim Bang, Hartung, Steve Fredrick
• Primary Examiner(s): McCarthy, Christopher S
• Application Number:
  US10/956,177
• Publication Number:
  US 20060075283A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,468 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 714/6.2
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1092 Rebuilding, e.g. when physically replacing a failing disk
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/2094 Redundant storage or storage space G06F11/2056 takes precedence

Abstract

Spare disk drive management in a storage system. The storage system comprises disk drives and spare disk drives. Spare disk drives are initially kept in power-off state. The storage system detects the failure of a disk drive and selects a spare disk drive to replace the failed disk drive. The spare disk drive is selected on the basis of spare selection criteria. The selected spare disk drive is powered-on and replaces the failed disk drive. Data on the failed disk drive can be reconstructed on the spare disk drive by using RAID parity techniques.

Claims

1. A method for spare disk drive management in a storage system, the storage system comprising a first set of disk drives in a power-on state, a second set of disk drives in a power-off state, the method comprising:

detecting failure of a disk drive belonging to the first set of disk drives;

analyzing location and connectivity to the first set of drives for disk drives in the second set of disk drives, the analysis based on the location and connectivity as applied to one or more spare selection criteria; and

selecting a spare disk drive from the second set of disk drives based on the analysis of the location and connectivity as applied to the one or more spare selection criteria, wherein the selected spare disk drive is determined based on its location and connectivity to the first set of drives as applied to the one or more spare selection criteria;

powering-on the selected spare disk drive; and

replacing the failed disk drive with the selected spare disk drive,

wherein selecting a spare disk drive further comprises;

checking bandwidth loads on the first set of disk drives, the bandwidth loads being one spare selection criterion;

checking power loads on the first set of disk drives, the power loads being one spare selection criterion;

checking environmental conditions on the first and second set of disk drives, environment condition being one spare selection criterion; and

determining one spare disk drive from the second set of disk driver that satisfies at least one spare selection criterion.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting a spare disk drive further comprises selecting a spare disk drive not satisfying the spare selection criteria if no spare disk drives from the second set of disk drives satisfy the spare selection criteria.

3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting a spare disk drive is carried out on a just in time basis.

4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein replacing further comprises powering-off the failed disk drive.

5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein replacing further comprises adding the selected spare disk drive to the first set of disk drives.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein replacing further comprises recreating data, which is present on the failed disk drive, on the selected spare disk drive using RAID parity techniques.

7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein replacing is carried out on a just in time basis.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising maintaining a list of disk drives belonging to the second set of disk drives in the storage system.

9. The method as recited in claim 8 further comprising removing the selected spare disk drive from the list of disk drives belonging to the second set of disk drives.

10. The method as recited in claim 9 further comprising updating the list on addition of a new spare drive to the storage system.

11. An apparatus for spare disk drive management in a storage system, the storage system comprising a first set of disk drives in power-on state, a second set of spare disk drives in power-off state, the apparatus comprising:

a hardware driver, the hardware driver detecting the failure of a disk drive from the first set of disk drives;

a disk manager, the disk manager selecting a spare disk drive from the second set of disk drives to replace the failed disk drive based on spare selection criteria;

at least one power controller, the power controller switching off the failed disk drive and switching on the selected spare disk drive, wherein the selection criteria comprise;

bandwidth loads on the first set of disk drives;

power loads on the first set of disk drives; and

environmental conditions on the first set of disk drives.

12. The apparatus as recited in claim 11, wherein the storage system comprises at least one redundant array of independent disks (RAID).

13. The apparatus as recited in claim 12 further comprising at least one temperature sensor, the temperature sensor monitoring the temperature near a disk drive from the first set and the second set of disk drives in the storage system to determine environmental conditions for the spare selection criteria.

14. The apparatus as recited in claim 11 further comprising at least one vibration sensor, the vibration sensor monitoring vibrations near a disk drive from the first set and second set of disk drives in the storage system to determine environmental conditions for the spare selection criteria.

15. The apparatus as recited in claim 11 further comprising a configuration manager, the configuration manager comprising means for detecting a new disk drive added to the storage system.

16. The apparatus as recited in claim 11, wherein the disk manager comprises means for detecting an error in a disk drive in the storage system.

17. The apparatus as recited in claim 16 further comprising means for maintaining a list of spare disk drives in power-off state in the storage system.

18. The apparatus as recited in claim 11, wherein the power controller can selectively power off a disk drive based on input from the disk manager.

19. An apparatus for spare disk drive management in a storage system, the storage system comprising a first set of disk drives in power-on state, a second set of spare disk drives in power-off state, the apparatus comprising:

a. a hardware driver, the hardware driver detecting the failure of a disk drive from the first set of disk drives;

b. a disk manager, the disk manager selecting a spare disk drive just in time from the second set of disk drives to replace the failed disk drive based on spare selection criteria;

the spare selection criteria comprising;

i. bandwidth loads on the first set of disk drives;

ii. power loads on the first set of disk drives; and

iii. environmental conditions on the first set of disk drives;

c. at least one power controller, the power controller switching off the failed disk drive and switching on the selected spare disk drive;

d. at least one temperature sensor, the temperature sensor sending the temperature of the disk drives to the disk manager; and

e. at least one vibration sensor, the vibration sensor sending the vibrations in the vicinity of the disk drives to the disk manager.

20. A computer program product for use with a computer, the computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein for spare disk drive management in a storage system, the storage system comprising a first set of disk drives in power-on state and a second set of disk drives in power-off state, the computer program product performing the steps of:

detecting failure of a disk drive belonging to the first set of disk drives;

selecting a spare disk drive from the second set of disk drives based on spare selection criteria;

powering-on the selected spare disk drive; and

replacing the failed disk drive with the selected spare disk drive, wherein selecting a spare disk driver further comprises performing the steps of;

checking bandwidth loads on the first set of disk drives, the bandwidth loads being one spare selection criterion;

checking power loads on the first set of disk drives, the power loads being one spare selection criterion;

checking environmental conditions on the first and second set of disk drives, environment condition being one spare selection criterion; and

determining one spare disk drive from the second set of disk driver that satisfies at least one spare selection criterion.