Systems and methods for generating applications that are automatically optimized for network performance

• US 7,437,707 B2
• Filed: 12/12/2003
• Issued: 10/14/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 12/12/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Google LLC (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Lubensky, David M., Huerta, Juan M., Ekanadham, Chaitanya J. K.
• Primary Examiner(s): CHAVIS, JOHN Q
• Application Number:
  US10/734,295
• Publication Number:
  US 20050132323A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,768 Days
• Field of Search: 717/151, 717/104, 716/18
• US Class Current: 717/104
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/20 Software design
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/456 Parallelism detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/02 based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/34 involving the movement of software or configuration parameters network booting or remote initial program loading [RIPL] G06F9/4416
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/02 Protocol performance
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/329 in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/40 Network security protocols

Abstract

Systems, methods and tools are provided for generating applications that are automatically optimized for efficient deployment in a computing environment based on parameterized criteria. In particular, systems, methods and tools for generating network applications are provided, which automatically partition a functional description of a network application into a set of application modules (e.g., pages) according to parameterized criteria that optimizes the network application for efficient network performance by minimizing application latency.

Claims

1. A method for generating a software application, comprising the steps of:

receiving a functional description of the software application;

automatically partitioning the functional description of the software application into a plurality of modules based on parameterized criteria; and

automatically generating software application code for each module.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the functional description of the software application comprises a flowchart description.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the functional description of the software application comprises a markup description.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a measure of software application latency.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein automatically partitioning comprises:

partitioning the functional description of the software application into a plurality of different partitions; and

using the parameterized criteria to determine which partition, among the plurality of different partitions, provides a minimal software application latency.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a cost function, which is based on transmission and compilation time for different size modules, as the measure of software application latency.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a probability measure for determining a probability of a given path in a partition being traversed.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising automatically generating a controller that can navigate between the modules of the software application.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of receiving comprises:

automatically fetching the functional description of the software application from a persistent storage location; and

performing on-line dynamic remodularization of the software application.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein performing on-line dynamic remodularization comprises:

adapting the parameterized criteria according to changes in an environment in which the software application is deployed; and

automatically partitioning the functional description of the software application into a plurality of modules based on the adapted parameterized criteria.

11. A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform method steps for generating a software application, the method steps comprising:

receiving a functional description of the software application;

automatically partitioning the functional description of the software application into a plurality of modules based on parameterized criteria; and

automatically generating software application code for each module.

12. The program storage device of claim 11, wherein the functional description of the software application comprises a flowchart description.

13. The program storage device of claim 11, wherein the functional description of the software application comprises a markup description.

14. The program storage device of claim 11, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a measure of software application latency.

15. The program storage device of claim 14, wherein the instructions for automatically partitioning comprise instructions for:

partitioning the functional description of the software application into a plurality of different partitions; and

using the parameterized criteria to determine which partition, among the plurality of different partitions, provides a minimal software application latency.

16. The program storage device of claim 15, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a cost function, which is based on transmission and compilation time for different size modules, as the measure of software application latency.

17. The program storage device of claim 11, further comprising instructions for automatically generating a controller that can navigate between the modules of the software application.

18. The program storage device of claim 11, wherein the instructions for receiving the functional description of the software application comprise instructions for:

automatically fetching the functional description of the software application from a persistent storage location; and

performing on-line dynamic remodularization of the software application.

19. The program storage device of claim 18, wherein the instructions for performing on-line dynamic remodularization of the software application comprise instructions for:

adapting the parameterized criteria according to changes in an environment in which the software application is deployed; and

automatically partitioning the functional description of the software application into a plurality of modules based on the adapted parameterized criteria.

20. A computer-based system for generating a software application, comprising:

a memory device for storing an application partition module;

a processor in communication with the memory device, the processor operative with the application partition module to automatically partition a functional description of the software application into a plurality of modules based on parameterized criteria; and

a code generator that automatically generates software application code for each module.

21. The computer-based system of claim 20, further comprising a user interface for enabling a user to generate the functional description of the software application.

22. The computer-based system of claim 20, wherein the functional description comprises a flowchart description.

23. The computer-based system of claim 20, wherein the functional description comprises a markup description.

24. The computer-based system of claim 20, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a cost function for resource utilization in a computing environment in which the software application is employed.

25. The computer-based system of claim 24, wherein the computing environment comprises a network environment.

26. The computer-based system of claim 20, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a measure of software application latency.

27. The computer-based system of claim 26, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a cost function, which is based on transmission and compilation time for different size software application modules, as the measure of software application latency in a network environment.

28. The toot computer-based system of claim 20, wherein the code generator automatically generates a controller that can navigate between the modules of the software application.

29. A method for generating a network software application, comprising the steps of:

receiving a functional description of the network software application;

automatically partitioning the functional description of the network software application into a plurality of modules based on parameterized criteria of network latency; and

automatically generating network software application code.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the functional description of the network software application comprises a flowchart description or a markup description.

31. The method of claim 29, wherein the network software application comprises a client-server application.

32. The method of claim 29, wherein the network software application comprises a Web application.

33. The method of claim 29, wherein automatically partitioning comprises:

partitioning the functional description of the network software application into a plurality of different partitions; and

using the parameterized criteria to determine which partition, among the plurality of different partitions, provides a minimal network latency.

34. The method of claim 29, wherein the parameterized criteria comprises a cost function, which is based on transmission and compilation time for different size modules, as a measure of network latency.

35. The method of claim 29, wherein each module comprises a network software application view page, and wherein automatically generating network software application code comprises generating markup for each view page and generating server-side code for dispatching the view pages.

36. The method of claim 35, further comprising automatically generating a controller that can navigate between the view pages of the network software application.