System and method for throughput measurement

• US 7,440,907 B2
• Filed: 04/12/2006
• Issued: 10/21/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 10/21/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Profuse Group B.V.
• Original Assignee: Infor Global Solutions Michigan Incorporated (Infor Incorporated), Profuse Group B.V.
• Inventors: Lilly, Richard T., Lilly, Michael P., Longmire, Mark A., Maglio, Frank G., Barker, Bruce W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Jeanty; Romain
• Application Number:
  US11/401,932
• Publication Number:
  US 20060253312A1
• Time in Patent Office: 923 Days
• Field of Search: 705/8
• US Class Current: 705/7.16
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0631 Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063116 Schedule adjustment for a person or group
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06312 Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06315 Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/00 Commerce

Abstract

A computerized method for determining throughput includes generating a demand array of item orders and generating a supply array of manufacturing inventory. The method includes selecting an item order in the demand array, and matching manufacturing inventory in the supply array with the selected item order. The method also includes assigning a throughput value to the selected item order based on the matched manufacturing inventory.

Claims

1. A computerized method for identifying the contention severity of a resource, comprising:

(a) identifying a first staff/date time to assign a first task to a resource;

(b) determining whether the resource is already allocated at the first date/time;

(c) determining a second date/time at which the resource is available if the resource is already allocated at the first date/time;

(d) determining the time difference between the first date/time and the second date/time as the contention severity for the first task;

(e) repeating steps (a) through (d), substituting a second task for the first task; and

(f) determining a total contention severity for the resource by summing the contention severity for each of the tasks scheduled to use that resource;

wherein, if;

(i) the resource is already allocated at the first date/time; and

(ii) a second date/time at which the resource is available is determined;

then further comprising;

incrementing by one a contention counter for the resource;

repeating inquiry steps (i) and (ii) for each task assigned to the resource, incrementing by one the contention counter for the resource if inquiry steps (i) and (ii) are satisfied, thereby generating a total contention count for the resource;

evaluating a total contention count for a plurality of resources; and

generating promotions or sales incentives to solicit work orders not involving resources with a total contention count above a predetermined threshold.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second tasks are associated with a first work order and a second work order, respectively.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the resource is a first resource, the method further comprising repeating steps (a) through (f), substituting a second resource for the first resource.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising displaying the total contention severity for the first resource and the total contention severity for the second resource.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

evaluating the total contention severity for a plurality of resources; and

generating promotions or sales incentives to solicit work orders not involving resources with a total contention severity above a predetermined threshold.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

storing the determined contention severity for each task in a storage device; and

retrieving the stored contention severity.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

storing the determined total contention severity for the resource in a storage device; and

retrieving the stored total contention severity.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the second date/time is earlier in time than the first date/time.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein a contention severity for a task is not included in the summing of the contention severity for each of the tasks to determine the total contention severity for the resource if the second date/time for the respective task is earlier in time than the first date/time.

10. A computerized method for identifying contention severity of a material, comprising:

(a) identifying a first date/time to assign a first requirement for the material;

(b) determining whether the material is already allocated at the first date/time;

(c) determining a second date/time at which the material is available if the material is already allocated at the first date/time;

(d) determining the time difference between the first date/time and the second date/time as the contention severity of the first requirement for the material;

(e) repeating steps (a) through (d), substituting a second requirement for the material for the first requirement for the material; and

(f) determining a total contention severity for the material by summing the contention severity of each of the requirements for the material;

wherein, if;

(i) the resource is already allocated at the first date/time; and

(ii) a second date/time at which the resource is available is determined;

then further comprising;

incrementing by one a contention counter for the resource;

repeating inquiry steps (i) and (ii) for each task assigned to the resource, incrementing by one the contention counter for the resource if inquiry steps (i) and (ii) are satisfied, thereby generating a total contention count for the resource;

evaluating a total contention count for a plurality of resources; and

generating promotions or sales incentives to solicit work orders not involving resources with a total contention count above a predetermined threshold.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first and second requirements are associated with a first work order and a second work order, respectively.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the material is a first material, the method further comprising repeating steps (a) through (f), substituting a second material for the first material.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising displaying the total contention severity for the first material and the total contention for the second material.

14. The method of claim 12, further comprising:

evaluating the total contention severity for a plurality of materials; and

generating promotions or sales incentives to solicit work orders not involving materials with a total contention severity above a predetermined threshold.

15. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

storing the determined contention severity for each requirement in a storage device; and

retrieving the stored contention severity.

16. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

storing the determined total contention severity for the material in a storage device; and

retrieving the stored total contention severity.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein the second date/time is earlier in time than the first date/time.

18. The method of claim 10, wherein a contention severity for a task is not included in the summing of the contention severity for each of the tasks to determine the total contention severity for the material if the second date/time for the respective task is earlier in time than the first date/time.