Method and apparatus for monitoring and enhancing on-chip microprocessor reliability

• US 7,454,316 B2
• Filed: 10/08/2004
• Issued: 11/18/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 10/08/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Rivers, Jude A., Bose, Pradip, Srinivasan, Jayanth
• Primary Examiner(s): Nghiem; Michael P
• Application Number:
  US10/961,613
• Publication Number:
  US 20060080062A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,502 Days
• Field of Search: 702/1, 702 81- 84, 702179-186, 714/1, 326/9
• US Class Current: 702/186
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/008 Reliability or availability analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/07 Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance

Abstract

A system and method for projecting reliability to manage system functions includes an activity module which determines activity in the system. A reliability module interacts with the activity module to determine a reliability measurement for the module in real-time based upon the activity and measured operational quantities of the system. A management module manages actions of the system based upon the reliability measurement input from the reliability module. This may be to provide corrective action, to reallocate resources, increase reliability of the module, etc.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring a module, which includes one of a chip, integrated circuit printed wiring board and software module, based upon projected reliability, comprising the steps of:

dividing a module into regions;

determining a module-wide reliability projection by performing reliability evaluations for module operations based upon measured operating physical characteristics of the module while the module is operating, the reliability projection including a measure of the reliability of the module based on current operating conditions of the module;

determining a reliability projection in each region;

comparing the reliability projection to a threshold to determine if an action is needed; and

in accordance with the comparing step, adjusting operating conditions of the module to modify the reliability projection as feedback for continuing operations in accordance with the threshold.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of determining includes determining one or more of power, temperature, frequency and performance of the module as measurements of the physical characteristics.

3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of comparing includes comparing the reliability projection to a previously determined reliability projection to determine if an action is needed.

4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the measured operating physical characteristics are measured using an instruction per cycle analysis.

5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the measured operating physical characteristics are measured by providing counter devices to measure module activity.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of comparing includes comparing the reliability projection for each region to a threshold of that region to determine if an action is needed in that region.

7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the step of adjusting operating conditions includes adjusting operating conditions in that region.

8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of adjusting operating conditions includes adjusting at least one of power, temperature, frequency, and instructions per cycle on the module.

9. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of providing sensors on the module to make measurements.

10. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of providing a reliability module on-module to calculate the reliability projection.

11. A program storage device readable by machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform method steps for monitoring a module, which includes one of a chip, integrated circuit printed wiring board and software module, based upon projected reliability, the method steps comprising:

dividing a module into regions;

determining a module-wide reliability projection by performing reliability evaluations for module operations based upon measured operating physical characteristics of the module while the module is operating, the reliability projection including a measure of the reliability of the module based on current operating conditions of the module;

determining reliability projections in each region;

comparing the reliability projections to a threshold to determine if an action is needed; and

in accordance with the comparing step, adjusting operating conditions of the module to modify the reliability projections as feedback for continuing operations in accordance with the threshold.

12. A method for monitoring a module, which includes one of a chip, integrated circuit printed wiring board and software module, based upon projected reliability, comprising the steps of:

dividing the module into regions;

determining reliability projections in each region by performing reliability evaluations based upon measured operating physical characteristics of the module in each region;

comparing the reliability projection in each region to a threshold to determine if an action is needed; and

in accordance with the comparing step, adjusting operating conditions of the module.

13. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the step of determining includes determining one or more of power, temperature, frequency and performance of the module as measurements of the physical characteristics.

14. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the step of comparing includes comparing the reliability projection to a previously determined reliability projection to determine if an action is needed.

15. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the measured operating physical characteristics are measured using an instruction per cycle analysis.

16. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the measured operating physical characteristics are measured by providing counter devices to measure module activity.

17. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the step of comparing includes comparing the reliability projection for each region to a threshold of that region to determine if an action is needed in that region.

18. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the step of adjusting operating conditions includes adjusting operating conditions in that region.

19. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the step of adjusting operating conditions includes adjusting at least one of power, temperature, frequency, temperature, and instructions per cycle on the module.

20. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising the step of providing sensors on the module to make measurements.

21. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising the step of providing a reliability modtde on-module to calculate the reliability projection.