System and methods for quantitatively evaluating complexity of computing system configuration

• US 7,472,037 B2
• Filed: 07/28/2006
• Issued: 12/30/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 08/17/2005
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: GlobalFoundries, Inc.
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Brown, Aaron B., Hellerstein, Joseph L.
• Primary Examiner(s): Cosimano; Edward
• Assistant Examiner(s): Washburn; Douglas N
• Application Number:
  US11/495,336
• Publication Number:
  US 20070043525A1
• Time in Patent Office: 886 Days
• Field of Search: 702/81, 702/182
• US Class Current: 702/182
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Abstract

A technique for quantitatively evaluating a complexity associated with a configuration of a system under evaluation comprises the following steps/operations. Configuration-related data for the system under evaluation is collected. At least a portion of the configuration-related data is quantitatively analyzed using a model of human configuration cost to estimate a configuration complexity of the system under evaluation. A quality of the configuration of the system under evaluation is assessed. The configuration complexity of the system under evaluation is reported based on the quantitative analysis and the quality assessment. The step/operation of reporting the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation further comprises producing a report via an algorithm that computes a financial impact of a specified configuration process. The technique is useable to optimize a financial cost of providing one or more hosting services by selecting one or more system configurations that minimize a configuration cost.

Claims

1. A method for quantitatively evaluating a complexity associated with a configuration of a system under evaluation, comprising the steps of:

collecting configuration-related data for the system under evaluation;

quantitatively analyzing at least a portion of the configuration-related data using a model of human configuration cost to estimate a configuration complexity of the system under evaluation;

assessing a quality of the configuration of the system under evaluation; and

reporting the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation based on the quantitative analysis and the quality assessment;

wherein the step of reporting the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation further comprises producing a report via an algorithm that computes a financial impact of a specified configuration process; and

wherein the method is useable to optimize a financial cost of providing one or more hosting services by selecting one or more system configurations that minimize a configuration cost.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of collecting configuration-related data for the system under evaluation further comprises capturing one or more configuration processes.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of capturing one or more configuration processes further comprises one or more of:

monitoring a behavior of one or more human operators;

analyzing documentation or a script;

allowing direct manual entry of a configuration process; and

loading one or more explicit specifications of a configuration process.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of collecting configuration-related data for the system under evaluation further comprises gathering data on one or more configuration controls.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of gathering data on one or more configuration controls further comprises gathering data comprising one or more of parameters, executable operations, status displays, and configuration repositories.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of quantitatively analyzing at least a portion of the configuration-related data to estimate the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation further comprises computing one or more configuration complexity scores.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of reporting the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation further comprises reporting results of the complexity analysis in one or more of a human-readable format and a machine-readable format.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is useable to dynamically adapt one or more configuration interfaces to minimize configuration complexity.

9. Apparatus for quantitatively evaluating a complexity associated with a configuration of a system under evaluation, comprising:

a memory; and

at least one processor coupled to the memory and operative to;

(i) collect configuration-related data for the system under evaluation;

(ii) quantitatively analyze at least a portion of the configuration-related data using a model of human configuration cost to estimate a configuration complexity of the system under evaluation;

(iii) assess a quality of the configuration of the system under evaluation; and

(iv) report the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation based on the quantitative analysis and the quality assessment;

wherein the operation of reporting the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation further comprises producing a report via an algorithm that computes a financial impact of a specified configuration process; and

wherein the operations performed by the apparatus are useable to optimize a financial cost of providing one or more hosting services by selecting one or more system configurations that minimize a configuration cost.

10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the operation of collecting configuration-related data for the system under evaluation further comprises capturing one or more configuration processes.

11. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the operation of collecting configuration-related data for the system under evaluation further comprises gathering data on one or more configuration controls.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the operation of gathering data on one or more configuration controls further comprises gathering data comprising one or more of parameters, executable operations, status displays, and configuration repositories.

13. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the operation of reporting the configuration complexity of the system under evaluation further comprises reporting results of the complexity analysis in one or more of a human-readable format and a machine-readable format.