System and method for determining an abused sensor during analyte measurement

• US 7,488,601 B2
• Filed: 10/17/2003
• Issued: 02/10/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 06/20/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Roche Diabetes Care Inc. (Roche Holding AG)
• Original Assignee: Roche Diagnostics Operations Incorporated (Roche Holding AG), Roche Operations Limited (Roche Holding AG)
• Inventors: Burke, David W., Kuhn, Lance S., Maxwell, James
• Primary Examiner(s): Soderquist; Arlen
• Application Number:
  US10/688,561
• Publication Number:
  US 20040260511A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,943 Days
• Field of Search: 422 55- 58, 422 8201- 8204, 436/43, 436/46, 436/68, 436 93- 95, 436/131, 436149-151, 436/183
• US Class Current: 436/150
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 27/02 by investigating impedance
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 27/121 for determining moisture content, e.g. humidity, of the fluid moisture content of the tested material G01N27/048
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 27/3274 Corrective measures, e.g. error detection, compensation for temperature or hematocrit, calibration coding of calibration information G01N33/48771
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 436/11 Automated chemical analysis
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 436/112499 with sample on test slide
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 436/142222 Hetero-O [e.g., ascorbic acid, etc.]
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 436/143333 Saccharide [e.g., DNA, etc.]
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 436/144444 Glucose

Abstract

A method of measuring an analyte in a biological fluid comprises applying an excitation signal having a DC component and an AC component. The AC and DC responses are measured; a corrected DC response is determined using the AC response; and a concentration of the analyte is determined based upon the corrected DC response. Other methods and devices are disclosed.

Claims

1. A method for detecting an abused sensor adapted for determining a concentration of a medically significant component of a biological fluid, comprising the steps of:

a) applying a signal having an AC component to the sensor;

b) measuring an AC response to the signal; and

c) using the AC response to determine if the sensor is abused, wherein steps (a), (b) and (c) are performed before application of the biological fluid to the sensor.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the AC response comprises an admittance.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal is an AC signal.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the AC response comprises phase angle information.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the AC component of the signal has a frequency not less than 1 Hz and not greater than 20 kHz.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the biological fluid is blood.

7. A method for detecting an abused sensor for determining a concentration of a medically significant component of a biological fluid placed upon the sensor, comprising the steps of:

a) placing the biological fluid sample upon the sensor;

b) applying a first signal to the biological fluid;

c) measuring a current response to the first signal;

d) repeating step (c) at least once;

e) calculating a normalized Cottrell Failsafe Ratio using the current response data;

f) applying a second signal having an AC component to the biological fluid;

g) measuring an AC response to the second signal; and

h) combining the normalized Cottrell Failsafe Ratio and the AC response to produce an indication of whether the sensor has been abused, wherein step (h) comprises calculating a FAILSAFE number as follows;

FAILSAFE=1000×

arctan [NCFR/(fs₀+fs₁(Φ

₁−

Φ

₂))]

where;

1000=scaling factor

NCFR normalized Cottrell Failsafe Ratio

fs₀=constant

fs₁=constant

Φ

₁=phase angle at a first frequency

Φ

₂=phase angle at a second frequency;

wherein a value of FAILSAFE below zero indicates an abused sensor and a value of FAILSAFE above zero indicates a non-abused sensor.

8. A method of determining a failure condition indicating an abused sensor in a blood glucose concentration test, comprising the steps of:

a) applying a first test signal having an AC component to a test sample;

b) measuring a first phase angle response to the first test signal;

c) applying a second test signal having an AC component to the test sample;

d) measuring a second phase angle response to the second test signal; and

e) determining a failure condition value based upon the first phase angle response the second phase angle response and a predetermined Cottrell Failsafe Ratio, wherein step (e) is performed based at least in part upon evaluating;

arctan [CFR/(fs₀+fs₁(Φ

_A−

Φ

_B)]

where;

CFR=Cottrell Failsafe Ratio

fs₀=a constant

fs₁=a constant

Φ

_A=first phase angle response

Φ

_B=second phase angle response.