Method of detecting the presence of an insult in an absorbent article

• US 7,498,478 B2
• Filed: 08/31/2005
• Issued: 03/03/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 08/31/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Incorporated (Kimberly-Clark Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Incorporated (Kimberly-Clark Corporation)
• Inventors: Long, Andrew, Collins, Meghan E.
• Primary Examiner(s): KIDWELL, MICHELE M
• Application Number:
  US11/215,968
• Publication Number:
  US 20070049882A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,280 Days
• Field of Search: 604317-318, 604/358, 604/361, 604/385.01
• US Class Current: 604/361
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 13/42 with wetness indicator or alarm

Abstract

A method of detecting the presence of an insult within an absorbent article is disclosed. An electrical property is monitored and the electrical property is compared to a wet/dry threshold value to determine either a wet characteristic or a dry characteristic of the article. If a dry characteristic, then a first and possibly a second test are applied. If a wet characteristic, then the second test is applied. The electrical property is compared to a first threshold value and a second threshold value is set based upon the function of the comparison. A change in the electrical property of the article is monitored to determine if the electrical property has stabilized after activation of an insult alarm.

Claims

1. A method of detecting the presence of an insult within an absorbent article, said method comprising:

monitoring an electrical property of the article as the article is being worn by a wearer, wherein the electrical property changes in response to an insult;

comparing the electrical property to a wet/dry threshold value to determine a wet characteristic of the article indicating that the article has been previously insulted or a dry characteristic of the article indicating that the article is dry and has yet to be insulted;

if the comparing indicates a dry characteristic of the article, then applying a first test to determine whether an insult has occurred and, if the first test indicates an insult, then applying a second test to the electrical property to determine whether an insult has occurred;

if the comparing determines a wet characteristic of the article, then applying the second test to the electrical property to determine whether a subsequent insult has occurred.

2. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said first test comprises comparing the electrical property to a magnitude threshold value, and wherein said second test comprises at least one of 1) determining a difference in the electrical property over a period of time and comparing said determined difference to a difference threshold value to determine the presence of an insult in the article, and 2) determining a rate of change in the electrical property over a period of time and comparing said determined rate of change to a rate threshold value to determine the presence of an insult in the article.

3. The method as set forth in claim 2 further comprising if the second test is not indicative of an insult, then applying a third test to determine whether an insult is present, said third test comprising at least one of 1) determining a second difference in the electrical property over a second period of time and comparing said determined difference to a difference threshold value to determine the presence of an insult in the article, and 2) determining a second rate of change in the electrical property over a second period of time and comparing said determined rate of change to a rate threshold value to determine the presence of an insult in the article.

4. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said electrical property is resistance and said wet/dry threshold value is greater than about 200 K Ohms.

5. A method of detecting the presence of an insult within an absorbent article, said method comprising:

monitoring an electrical property of the article as the article is being worn by a wearer wherein the electrical property changes in response to an insult;

comparing the electrical property to a first threshold value;

setting a second threshold value as a function of the comparison;

comparing the electrical property to a second threshold value to determine whether an insult has occurred.

6. The method as set forth in claim 5 wherein the second threshold is based on an average of available previous values or the second threshold is based on a preset value if no previous values are available.

7. The method as set forth in claim 6 wherein the first threshold value is a wet/dry indicator value, and wherein when the comparison of the electrical property of the article to the wet/dry indicator value is indicative of a dry characteristic of the article, then the second threshold is based on the preset value, and wherein when the comparison of the electrical property of the article to the wet/dry indicator value is indicative of a wet characteristic of the article, the second threshold value is based on said average of previous values.

8. The method as set forth in claim 7 wherein the electrical property is resistance and the wet/dry threshold value is greater than about 200 K Ohms, and the preset value is between 30 K Ohms and 90 K Ohms.

9. The method as set forth in claim 7 wherein the threshold hold value when there is a wet characteristic of the article is a percentage of the average of the previous values of the electrical property of the article, said percentage being between about 70% and about 90%.

10. A method of detecting the presence of an insult within an absorbent article, said method comprising:

monitoring an electrical property of the article as the article is being worn by a wearer wherein the electrical property changes in response to an insult;

comparing the electrical property to a wet/dry threshold value;

applying a first test comparing the electrical property to a first wetness threshold, said first wetness threshold being a function of the comparison of the electrical property to the wet/dry threshold value.

11. The method as set forth in claim 10 further comprising

applying a second test comparing the electrical property to a second wetness threshold, said second wetness test being a function of the comparison of the electrical property to the wet/dry threshold.

12. A method of detecting and communicating to a caregiver and/or a wearer the presence of an insult within an absorbent article, said method comprising:

monitoring an electrical property of the article as the article is being worn by the wearer, wherein the electrical property changes in response to an insult;

determining the presence of an insult within the article using the electrical property of the article;

activating an insult alarm to notify the caregiver and/or the wearer of the presence of the insult;

monitoring a change in the electrical property of the article to determine if the electrical property of the article has substantially stabilized; and

returning to said monitoring of the electrical property when the monitored change in the electrical property corresponds the electrical property of the article being substantially stable.

13. The method as set forth in claim 12 further comprising

activating a saturation alarm if the monitored change in the electrical property corresponds to a saturated article.

14. The method as set forth in claim 12 wherein monitoring the change further comprises:

determining whether the change in the electrical property is between an upper preset value and a lower preset value, indicating that the electrical property of the pants has substantially stabilized.

15. The method as set forth in claim 13 wherein determining whether the change in the electrical is between an upper preset value and a lower preset value comprises:

comparing the change to a lower preset value;

if the percent change is less than the lower preset value, then activating a saturation alarm,

if the change is greater than the lower preset value, then comparing the change to an upper preset value,

if the change is less than said upper preset value, then returning to said monitoring of the electrical property,

if the change is greater than said upper preset value, then continuing to compare subsequent changes to the upper preset value until a change is less than said upper preset value.

16. The method as set forth in claim 15 wherein monitoring the change further comprises

if the change is less than the lower preset value, then delaying for a preset period and comparing a new change to the lower preset value, and either

activating a saturation alarm if the delayed comparison is less than the lower preset value, or

comparing the change to the upper preset value if the delayed comparison is greater than the lower preset value.

17. The method as set forth in claim 15 wherein the monitored change is one of a percent change and a rate of change of the electrical property of the article.