Direct logic diagnostics with signature-based fault dictionaries

• US 7,509,551 B2
• Filed: 08/01/2006
• Issued: 03/24/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 08/01/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Siemens Industry Software Inc. (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Mentor Graphics Corporation (Siemens AG)
• Inventors: Koenemann, Bernd, Sharma, Manish
• Primary Examiner(s): TU, CHRISTINE TRINH LE
• Application Number:
  US11/497,977
• Publication Number:
  US 20070038911A1
• Time in Patent Office: 966 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 714/732
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/31703 Comparison aspects, e.g. signature analysis, comparators concerning scan tests G01R31/318566; concerning testers G01R31/3193

Abstract

Disclosed herein are representative embodiments of methods, apparatus, and systems for performing diagnostic from signatures created during circuit testing. For example, in one exemplary method disclosed herein, a signature produced by a signature generator is received. In this embodiment, the signature corresponds to the circuit'"'"'s response to no more than one test pattern. The signature is compared to entries of a fault dictionary, an entry of the fault dictionary is matched to the signature if the entry identifies a fault that explains the signature, and the fault is stored in a list of fault candidates.

Claims

1. A method of diagnosing faults in a circuit, comprising:

receiving a signature produced by a signature generator, the signature corresponding to the circuit'"'"'s response to no more than one test pattern;

comparing the signature to entries of a fault dictionary;

matching an entry of the fault dictionary to the signature if the entry identifies a fault that explains the signature; and

storing the fault in a list of fault candidates.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the signature generator is located on the circuit, and wherein the signature is produced by the signature generator during production testing of the circuit.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the signature generator is a representation of a signature generator, the method further comprising receiving the circuit'"'"'s bit-level response to the no more than one test pattern and determining the signature corresponding to the circuit'"'"'s bit-level response using the representation of the signature generator.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the signature corresponds to the circuit'"'"'s response to a portion of a test pattern, and wherein one or more subsequent signatures correspond to the circuit'"'"'s remaining response to the test pattern.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the list of fault candidates is an initial list of fault candidates, the method further comprising combining two or more of the fault candidates into one or more groups of composite fault behavior types.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising,

simulating one or more of the fault candidates in the list;

and

identifying additional fault candidates based at least in part on the simulation.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating one or more additional entries for the fault dictionary using one or more of the fault candidates in the list.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the additional entries are in the back-trace cones of the one or more fault candidates used to generate the additional entries.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising identifying additional fault candidates based on their physical proximity to the fault candidates in the list of the fault candidates.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the signature is an error signature indicating the difference between an observed signature and an expected signature.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the signature is a raw signature output from the signature generator.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising resetting the signature generator to a known state before a next signature is generated.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the storing includes storing the fault in the list of fault candidates only if the fault has been observed a fixed number of times in signatures received from the circuit.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed by a tester coupled to the circuit during testing.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed by a workstation not coupled to the tester.

16. One or more computer-readable media storing the list of fault candidates produced at least in part using the method of claim 1.

17. A circuit having a circuit design modified in response to one or faults being detected by the method of claim 1.

18. A circuit having a repaired defect, the defect having been detected by the method of claim 1.

19. A method of diagnosing faults in a circuit, comprising:

receiving a signature produced by a signature generator, the signature corresponding to the circuit'"'"'s response to five or fewer test patterns;

comparing the signature to entries of a fault dictionary;

matching an entry of the fault dictionary to the signature if the entry identifies a fault that explains the signature; and

storing the fault in a list of fault candidates.

20. A method of producing a signature-based fault dictionary for use in diagnosing faults in a circuit, comprising:

receiving a description of a circuit design;

simulating a response of the circuit design to application of a test pattern, the simulating including simulating the presence of one or more faults in the circuit design;

simulating a signature generator at least partially loading the test response and generating a signature for the at least partially loaded test response; and

storing an entry in a fault dictionary associated with the signature and indicative of the one or more faults if the signature is a failing signature.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the signature simulated is for a portion of the test response.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein the signature simulated is for the entire test response.

23. The method of claim 20, wherein the entry stored in the fault dictionary includes the signature itself.

24. The method of claim 20, wherein the entry stored in the fault dictionary includes an error signature produced from the signature.

25. The method of claim 20, further comprising compressing the entries of the fault dictionary.

26. The method of claim 20, further comprising repeating the simulating and the storing for additional respective test patterns.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the repeating includes simulating the presence of a respective fault during the simulating until the respective fault is detected in a predetermined number of signatures, and thereafter removing the respective fault from a list of faults to be simulated.

28. The method of claim 20, wherein the faults are modeled faults comprising stuck-at faults, transition faults, or both stuck at-faults and transition faults.

29. One or more computer-readable media storing the fault dictionary produced at least in part using the method of claim 20.

30. A system, comprising:

a circuit-under-test having one or more scan chains;

a signature generator having inputs coupled to outputs of the one or more scan chains, the signature generator being operable to generate signatures associated with at least a portion of one or more circuit test responses captured in the scan chains, the signature generator being further operable to output the signatures after an interval of scan cycles; and

a signature analysis subsystem coupled to receive the signatures from the signature generator, the signature analysis subsystem being configured to compare a respective signature received from the signature generator to entries of a fault dictionary and to create a list of potential fault candidates if the respective signature is a failing signature and if the failing signature matches one or more entries in the fault dictionary, the potential fault candidates in the list being identified by the one or more matching entries of the fault dictionary.

31. The system of claim 30, further comprising circuit components coupled to the signature generator and configured to reset the signature generator to a known state after the interval of scan cycles.

32. The system of claim 30, further comprising masking hardware coupled between the inputs of the signature generator and the outputs of the scan chains, the masking hardware being configured to mask one or more outputs of the scan chains for one or more scan cycles.

33. The system of claim 30, further comprising a linear phase shifting network coupled between the inputs of the signature generator and the outputs of the scan chains.

34. The system of claim 30, further comprising a spatial compactor coupled between the inputs of the signature generator and the outputs of the scan chains.

35. The system of claim 30, wherein the signature generator is a multiple input signature register (“

MISR”

).

36. The system of claim 30, wherein the signature analysis subsystem comprises a data logging subsystem configured to receive the signatures and associate the received signatures with information indicative of one or more of (a) an identity of the circuit-under-test with which a respective received signature is associated, (b) the content of the failing signature, and (c) an identity of the interval with which the respective received signature is associated.

37. The system of claim 30, wherein the interval corresponds to five or fewer circuit responses being loaded into the signature generator.

38. The system of claim 30, wherein the interval corresponds to two or fewer circuit responses being loaded into the signature generator.

39. The system of claim 30, wherein the interval corresponds to a single circuit response being loaded into the signature generator.

40. The system of claim 30, wherein the interval corresponds to less than a single circuit response being loaded into the signature generator.

41. A circuit having a circuit design modified in response to one or faults being detected by the system of claim 30.

42. A circuit having a repaired defect, the defect having been detected by the system of claim 30.