Reciprocating pump performance prediction

• US 7,542,875 B2
• Filed: 03/17/2006
• Issued: 06/02/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/17/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.
• Inventors: Rogers, John Thomas
• Primary Examiner(s): Dunn; Drew A
• Assistant Examiner(s): VO, HIEN XUAN
• Application Number:
  US11/384,020
• Publication Number:
  US 20060228225A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,173 Days
• Field of Search: 702/183, 702188-189, 702/74, 702/91, 702/104, 702/114, 175/24, 417/43, 417/63, 700/90, 700/21
• US Class Current: 702/183
• CPC Class Codes: F04B 2201/0201 Position of the piston
• CPC Class Codes: F04B 51/00 Testing machines, pumps, or pumping installations

Abstract

Performance parameters for a reciprocating pump including pulsation energy, temperature energy, solids, Miller number and chemical energy and the like are monitored and employed to at least periodically compute a total energy number over the operating life of the pump. The current computed value is compared to a predictive failure value empirically determined for the respective pump design, to determine when failure is likely to be imminent. Scheduling of maintenance with other pumping operations and objective rating of competing designs is possible based on the total energy number.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a plurality of sensors each disposed in or proximate to a reciprocating system, wherein each sensor is positioned to monitor at least one parameter related to the reciprocating system'"'"'s performance over time and to periodically measure values of the corresponding at least one parameter, each of the sensors measuring values of at least one of a plurality of parameters differing from a value measured by any other one of the sensors; and

a data processing system configured to

periodically receive values for the parameters based upon measurements from the plurality of sensors,

combine received values based upon measurements during a single measurement interval by different ones of the plurality of sensors;

aggregate the combined values over a plurality of measurement intervals to compute a total energy number for at least one part of the reciprocating system; and

compare a current computed value of the total energy number with a predictive failure value specific to a configuration for the reciprocating system.

2. The system set forth in claim 1, wherein the predictive failure value specific to a configuration for the reciprocating system is a pre-selected predictive failure value representing a total energy number at which failure is predicted to occur.

3. The system set forth in claim 1, wherein each received value relates to one of:

pulsation energy, temperature energy, solids energy, Miller number energy, chemical energy, rotational energy, volume energy, spring energy, hydrogen sulfide factor, barite factor, mud base, a corrosion factor, slurry condition and a general constant.

4. The system set forth in claim 3, wherein the aggregated values are based upon a pressure cycle curve.

5. The system set forth in claim 3, wherein the total energy number is determined by the approximate area under a pressure cycle curve for a plurality of pressure cycles.

6. The system set forth in claim 3, wherein each sensor is capable of monitoring the corresponding at least one parameter relating to the system'"'"'s performance over two or more of the reciprocating system'"'"'s cycles.

7. The system set forth in claim 6, wherein the total energy number is computed as an aggregated value determined over the two or more of the reciprocating system'"'"'s cycles.

8. The system set forth in claim 3, wherein the total energy number is computed after the reciprocating system fails for use in selecting a predictive failure value.

9. The system set forth in claim 3, wherein the reciprocating system is a reciprocating pump system.

10. The system set forth in claim 9, wherein each sensor is disposed in or proximate to at least one of:

a piston, a piston seal, a valve, a valve seal, a pump crosshead extension, an eccentric and a pump chamber.

11. A method comprising:

monitoring a plurality of parameters relating to the reciprocating system'"'"'s performance over time with a plurality of sensors;

periodically measuring values for each of the plurality of parameters;

combining values based on measurements during a single measurement interval for different ones of the plurality of parameters;

aggregating combined values over a time interval to compute a total energy number for at least a part of the reciprocating system; and

comparing a current computed value of the total energy number with a predictive failure value specific to a configuration for the reciprocating system.

12. The method set forth in claim 11, wherein the predictive failure value specific to a configuration for the reciprocating system is a pre-selected predictive failure value representing a total energy number at which failure is predicted to occur.

13. The method set forth in claim 11, wherein the parameters relating to the reciprocating system'"'"'s performance are each one of:

pulsation energy, temperature energy, solids energy, Miller number energy, chemical energy, rotational energy, volume energy, spring energy, hydrogen sulfide factor, barite factor, mud base, a corrosion factor, slurry condition and a general constant.

14. The method set forth in claim 13 further comprising:

approximating a pressure cycle curve with the aggregated values.

15. The method set forth in claim 13, wherein the total energy number is determined by the area under a pressure cycle curve for a plurality of pressure cycles.

16. The method set forth in claim 13, wherein the aggregated parameter values are graphically displayed.

17. The method set forth in claim 13 further comprising:

monitoring the parameter relating to the system'"'"'s performance over two or more of the reciprocating system'"'"'s cycles.

18. The method set forth in claim 17 further comprising:

computing the total energy number as an aggregated value determined over the two or more of the reciprocating system'"'"'s cycles.

19. The method set forth in claim 13, wherein the total energy number is computed after the reciprocating system fails for use in selecting a predictive failure value.

20. The method set forth in claim 13, wherein the reciprocating system is a reciprocating pump system.

21. The method set forth in claim 20, wherein monitoring at the least one parameter relating to the reciprocating system'"'"'s performance is accomplished with a sensor disposed in or proximate to at least one of:

a piston, a piston seal, a valve, a valve seal, a pump crosshead extension, an eccentric and a pump chamber.

22. A pump failure prediction system comprising:

a pump;

a plurality of sensors disposed in or proximate to the pump and positioned to periodically sample parameter values, wherein the parameter values is at least one of;

pulsation energy, temperature energy, solids energy, Miller number energy, chemical energy, rotational energy, volume energy, spring energy, hydrogen sulfide factor, barite factor, mud base, corrosion factor, slurry condition and a general constant; and

a data processing system configured to aggregate values based upon the periodically sampled parameter values, to compute a total energy number for the pump and to compare a current computed value of the total energy number with a predictive failure value specific to a configuration for the pump.

23. The pump failure prediction system set forth in claim 22, wherein the data processing system is configured to approximate a pressure cycle curve with the aggregated parameter values.

24. The pump failure prediction system set forth in claim 22, wherein the total energy number is determined by the area under a pressure cycle curve.

25. The pump failure prediction system set forth in claim 22, wherein the total energy number is computed after the pump fails for use in selecting a predictive failure value.