Gaming device with offer/acceptance game having offer chosen from multiple formed offers

• US 7,566,272 B2
• Filed: 09/11/2007
• Issued: 07/28/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 09/09/2003
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: IGT (International Game Technology)
• Original Assignee: IGT (International Game Technology)
• Inventors: Gerrard, Peter, Evans, Michael, Jones, Aaron T., Randall, Dov L.
• Primary Examiner(s): Vo; Peter DungBa
• Assistant Examiner(s): Yoo; Jasson H
• Application Number:
  US11/853,603
• Publication Number:
  US 20070298872A1
• Time in Patent Office: 686 Days
• Field of Search: 463/16, 463/20, 463/25
• US Class Current: 463/25
• CPC Class Codes: G07F 17/32 for games, toys, sports, or amusements
• CPC Class Codes: G07F 17/3262 Player actions which determine the course of the game, e.g. selecting a prize to be won, outcome to be achieved, game to be played

Abstract

A primary or secondary game for a gaming device. In one embodiment, the player is provided up to three picks, i.e., picks three contestants. The first two contestants both form potential award offers. The game then provides the greater of the two potential award offers to the player as an initial offer. This initial sequence alternatives includes more than two picks, contestants and potential offers. The offer acceptance feature arises after the initial offer. The player must decide whether to keep the initial offer or forego that offer for a final offer. If the player keeps the offer the game provides that initial offer to the player and ends if the player rejects that initial offer, the game proceeds to build a third and final offer, which is then provided to the player automatically.

Claims

1. A method of operating a gaming device, said method comprising:

(a) causing at least one display device to display a plurality of different value groups, each value group including a plurality of different displayed ranked values;

(b) for one of a plurality of the value groups, randomly determining, in order from lowest ranked value to highest ranked value in said value group, whether to include any of the ranked values in said value group as part of a first offer;

(c) if said determination is not to include one of said ranked values in said value group, repeating (b) to (c) for another of said plurality of the value groups;

(d) causing the at least one display device to display said first determined offer;

(e) receiving a signal representing an acceptance or rejection of said first determined offer;

(f) for one of a plurality of the value groups, randomly determining, in order from lowest ranked value not used to form the first offer to highest ranked value not used to form the first offer, whether to include any of the ranked values in said value group as part of a second offer;

(g) if said determination is not to include one of said ranked values in said value group, repeating (f) to (g) for another of said plurality of the value groups;

(h) causing the at least one display device to display said second determined offer;

(i) receiving a signal representing an acceptance or rejection of said second determined offer; and

(j) providing any accepted offers.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein each ranked value is associated with a probability of being part of an offer.

3. The method of claim 1, which includes weighing a likelihood that at least one of the ranked values of at least one of the value groups is in one of the offers more often than at least one other ranked value from the same value group.

4. The method of claim 1, which includes forming at least two first offers, determining a greater of the at least two formed first offers and providing the determined greater of the at least two first offers to accept or reject.

5. The method of claim 1, which includes causing the at least one display device to randomly display whether ranked values in different value groups are included in one of the offers.

6. The method of claim 1, which includes arranging the value groups in a grid, wherein ranked values of a same relative ranking within their respective groups are arranged adjacently in the grid.

7. The method of claim 1, which includes for each of the value groups, randomly determining, in order from lowest ranked value to highest ranked value in said value group, whether to include any of the ranked values in said value group as part of the first offer.

8. The method of claim 1, which includes for each of the value groups, randomly determining, in order from lowest ranked value not used to form the first offer to highest ranked value not used to form the first offer, whether to include any of the ranked values in said value group as part of the second offer.

9. The method of claim 1, which is controlled through a data network.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the data network includes an internet.

11. A method of operating a gaming device, said method comprising:

(a) determining and causing at least one display device to display a first award, said first award formed from a first quantity of first values, wherein the first quantity is greater than one;

(b) determining and causing the at least one display device to display a second award, said second award formed from a second quantity of second values, wherein the first quantity is, on average, greater than the second quantity, and the second values are, on average, greater than the first values;

(c) determining the greater of the first award and the second award;

(d) receiving a signal representing an acceptance or a rejection of the determined greater of the first award and the second award;

(e) if the determined greater of the first award and the second award is accepted, providing the accepted award; and

(f) if the determined greater of the first award and the second award is rejected, causing the at least one display device to display a third award.

12. The method of claim 11, which includes selecting the quantity of values used to form the first award from a first range of quantities having a greater upper end than a second range of quantities employed to select the quantity of values used to form the second award.

13. The method of claim 12, which includes weighting at least one of the first and second ranges so that at least one quantity of values is selected more often than at least one other quantity of values.

14. The method of claim 11, which includes selecting the quantity of values used to form the second award from a first range of quantities having a greater upper end than a second range of quantities employed to select a quantity of values used to form the third award.

15. The method of claim 11, which includes randomly selecting the values from different groups of varying values, wherein the values of each of the groups are each taken in an order from lowest to highest, the values used to form the first award selected before selecting the values used to form the second award, which are selected before selecting any values used to form the third award.

16. The method of claim 15, which includes arranging the groups in a grid, wherein values of a same relative amount within their respective groups are arranged adjacently in the grid.

17. The method of claim 11, which includes causing the at least one display device to display a plurality of selections, wherein a first one of the selections picked initiates formation of the first award, a second one of the selections picked initiates formation of the second award, and a third one of the selections picked rejects the higher of the first and second award to instead accept the third award.

18. The method of claim 11, which is controlled through a data network.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the data network includes an internet.