Method and apparatus for ADS-B validation, active and passive multilateration, and elliptical surviellance

• US 7,570,214 B2
• Filed: 09/29/2006
• Issued: 08/04/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/05/1999
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: ERA as (Omnipol as)
• Original Assignee: ERA Systems Corporation (General Dynamics Corporation)
• Inventors: Smith, Alexander E., Breen, Thomas J., Evers, Carl A., Hulstrom, Russell
• Primary Examiner(s): PHAN, DAO LINDA
• Application Number:
  US11/541,480
• Publication Number:
  US 20070252760A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,040 Days
• Field of Search: 342/450, 342/453, 342/456, 342463-465, 342/451, 701/120, 701/207, 701/300
• US Class Current: 342/463
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 11/02 using radio waves G01S19/00 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/78 discriminating between different kinds of targets, e.g. IFF-radar, i.e. identification of friend or foe G01S13/75, G01S13/79 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/878 Combination of several spaced transmitters or receivers of known location for determining the position of a transponder or a reflector G01S13/874 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/91 for traffic control G01S13/93 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/93 for anti-collision purposes
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 5/0027 of actual mobile position, i.e. position determined on mobile

Abstract

A system and method are disclosed to track aircraft or other vehicles using techniques including multilateration and elliptical surveillance. Unlike conventional approaches that use time difference of arrival for multilateration at a fixed set of reception points, this technique allows targets to be tracked from a number of dynamic or moving reception points. This allows for triangulation/multilateration and elliptical surveillance of targets from combinations of fixed, fixed and moving or only moving ground-based receivers, sea-based receivers, airborne receivers and space-based receivers. Additionally this technique allows for ADS-B validation through data derived from only two receivers to assess the validity and integrity of the aircraft self-reported position by comparing the time of arrival of the emitted message at the second receiver to the predicted time of message arrival at the second receiver based on the self-reported position of the aircraft and the time of arrival at the first receiver. The benefits of using less than three receivers for validation include greater validation coverage areas using a smaller set of ground stations at a lower infrastructure cost.

Claims

1. A method of assessing validity of an aircraft position report, comprising the steps of:

receiving, from a first receiver, a radio signal from the aircraft,

generating a first time-stamp indicating the time the radio signal from the aircraft is received at the first receiver,

calculating, from the aircraft position report and the first time stamp, a predicted value for a second time stamp at a second receiver located at a position different from the first receiver,

receiving, from the second receiver, the radio signal from the aircraft,

generating a second time-stamp indicating the time the radio signal from the aircraft is received at the second receiver,

comparing the predicted value for the second time stamp with the generated second time stamp, and

determining validity of an aircraft position report as a function of the comparison of the predicted value for the second time stamp with the generated second time stamp.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the aircraft position report comprises a self-reported aircraft position generated by the aircraft.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the self-reported aircraft position is an Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS) position report generated by the aircraft.

4. The method of claim 3, the time difference of arrival of the radio signal at the first receiver and the second receiver locates the source of the signal on a hyperboloid and an ellipse.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of determining comprises the step of comparing the ADS self-reported position to positions on the one of a hyperboloid and an ellipse validity and integrity of the ADS self-reported position based on whether the ADS self-reported position lies within an acceptable error of the one of a hyperboloid and an ellipse.

6. A system for assessing validity of an aircraft position report, comprising the steps of:

a first receiver, for receiving a radio signal from the aircraft,

a first time-stamp generator, for generating a first time-stamp indicating the time the radio signal from the aircraft is received at the first receiver,

a processor, for calculating, from the aircraft position report and the first time stamp, a predicted value for a second time stamp at a second receiver located at a position different from the first receiver,

a second receiver, for receiving the radio signal from the aircraft, and

a second time-stamp generator, for generating a second time-stamp indicating the time the radio signal from the aircraft is received at the second receiver,

wherein the processor further compares the predicted value for the second time stamp with the generated second time stamp, and determining validity of an aircraft position report as a function of the comparison of the predicted value for the second time stamp with the generated second time stamp.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the aircraft position report comprises a self-reported aircraft position generated by the aircraft.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the self-reported aircraft position is an Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS) position report generated by the aircraft.

9. The system of claim 8, the time difference of arrival of the radio signal at the first receiver and the second receiver locates the source of the signal on one of a hyperboloid an ellipse.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor compares the ADS self-reported position to positions on the one of a hyperboloid and an ellipse and assesses validity and integrity of the ADS self-reported position based on whether the ADS self-reported position lies within an acceptable error of the one of the hyperboloid and the ellipse.