Ensuring data integrity in network memory

• US 7,571,344 B2
• Filed: 02/16/2006
• Issued: 08/04/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 08/12/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP (Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company)
• Original Assignee: Silver Peak Systems Incorporated (Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company)
• Inventors: Burns, John, Yin, Zhigang, Hughes, David Anthony
• Primary Examiner(s): Beausoliel; Robert
• Assistant Examiner(s): Manoskey; Joseph D
• Application Number:
  US11/357,657
• Publication Number:
  US 20070038816A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,265 Days
• Field of Search: 714/4, 714/5, 714/6, 714/12, 714/20, 714/21, 714/42, 711/147, 711/154, 709/213, 709/214, 707/8, 707/201
• US Class Current: 714/4.4
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/66 Arrangements for connecting between networks having differing types of switching systems, e.g. gateways

Abstract

A first appliance for ensuring data integrity in network memory is disclosed. The first appliance includes a processor and a communications interface that communicates over a communication network with a second appliance of the network memory. The processor determines whether reconciliation between a first peer state information in the first appliance and a second peer state information in the second appliance is needed. The first peer state information and the second peer state information track the status of data in the network memory. The processor determines an action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information based on a positive determination that the reconciliation is needed. The processor then performs the action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information.

Claims

1. A method for ensuring data integrity in network memory, the method comprising:

determining whether reconciliation between a first peer state information in a first appliance and a second peer state information in a second appliance is needed, the first peer state information and the second peer state information tracking the status of data in the network memory;

determining an action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information based on a positive determination that the reconciliation is needed; and

performing the action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first peer state information and the second peer state information comprise the status of the data in the network memory locally accessible to the first appliance and the status of the data in the network memory locally accessible to the second appliance.

3. The method of claim 1 determining whether reconciliation between the first peer state information and the second peer state information is needed comprises discovery of the first peer state information and discovery of the second peer state information.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein determining whether reconciliation between the first peer state information and the second peer state information is needed comprises determining whether reconciliation is needed based on time.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein determining whether reconciliation between the first peer state information and the second peer state information is needed comprises determining whether reconciliation is needed based on an error condition when obtaining the data from the network memory.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising generating and transmitting an error message between the first appliance and the second appliance based on the error condition.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein performing the action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information comprises exchanging the first peer state information in the first appliance with the second peer state information in the second appliance.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein performing the action further comprises updating the status of the data in the first peer state information with the status of the data in the second peer state information.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein performing the action comprises transmitting a range of addresses of the network memory in the first peer state information and in the second peer state information between the first appliance and the second appliance.

10. A first appliance for ensuring data integrity in network memory, the first appliance comprising:

a communications interface configured to communicate over a communication network with a second appliance of the network memory; and

a processor configured to determine whether reconciliation between a first peer state information in the first appliance and a second peer state information in the second appliance is needed, the first peer state information and the second peer state information tracking the status of data in the network memory, determine an action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information based on a positive determination that the reconciliation is needed, and perform the action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information.

11. The first appliance of claim 10 wherein the first peer state information and the second peer state information comprise the status of the data in the network memory locally accessible to the first appliance and the status of the data in the network memory locally accessible to the second appliance.

12. The first appliance of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured to determine whether reconciliation is needed based on discovery of the first peer state information and discovery of the second peer state information.

13. The first appliance of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured to determine whether reconciliation is needed based on time.

14. The first appliance of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured to determine whether reconciliation is needed based on an error condition when obtaining the data from the network memory.

15. The first appliance of claim 14 wherein the processor is further configured to generate and transmit an error message over the communication network between the first appliance and the second appliance based on the error condition.

16. The first appliance of claim 10 wherein the processor is further configured to exchange the first peer state information in the first appliance with the second peer state information in the second appliance.

17. The first appliance of claim 16 wherein the processor is further configured to update the status of the data in the first peer state information with the status of the data in the second peer state information.

18. The first appliance of claim 10 wherein the processor is further configured to transmit a range of addresses of the network memory in the first peer state information and in the second peer state information over the communication network between the first appliance and the second appliance.

19. A software product for ensuring data integrity in network memory, the software product comprising:

software operational when executed by a processor to direct the processor to determining whether reconciliation between a first peer state information in a first appliance and a second peer state information in a second appliance is needed, the first peer state information and the second peer state information tracking the status of data in the network memory, determine an action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information based on a positive determination that the reconciliation is needed, and perform the action to reconcile the first peer state information with the second peer state information; and

a software storage medium operational to store the software.

20. The software product of claim 19 wherein the first peer state information and the second peer state information comprise the status of the data in the network memory locally accessible to the first appliance and the status of the data in the network memory locally accessible to the second appliance.

21. The software product of claim 19 wherein the software is operational when executed by the processor to direct the processor to determine whether reconciliation is needed based on discovery of the first peer state information and discovery of the second peer state information.

22. The software product of claim 19 wherein the software is operational when executed by the processor to direct the processor to determine whether reconciliation is needed based on time.

23. The software product of claim 19 wherein the software is operational when executed by the processor to direct the processor to determine whether reconciliation is needed based on an error condition when obtaining the data from the network memory.

24. The software product of claim 23 wherein the software is operational when executed by the processor to further direct the processor to generate and transmit an error message between the first appliance and the second appliance based on the error condition.

25. The software product of claim 19 wherein the software is operational when executed by the processor to further direct the processor to exchange the first peer state information in the first appliance with the second peer state information in the second appliance.

26. The software product of claim 25 wherein the software is operational when executed by the processor to further direct the processor to update the status of the data in the first peer state information with the status of the data in the second peer state information.

27. The software product of claim 19 wherein the software is operational when executed by the processor to further direct the processor to transmit a range of addresses of the network memory in the first peer state information and in the second peer state information between the first appliance and the second appliance.