Domain specific return on investment model system and method of use

• US 7,603,304 B2
• Filed: 03/08/2005
• Issued: 10/13/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/08/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Kyndryl Incorporated, ServiceNow Incorporated
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Gupta, Vikram, Asthana, Ajay
• Primary Examiner(s): Campen; Kelly
• Application Number:
  US11/075,015
• Publication Number:
  US 20060206374A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,680 Days
• Field of Search: 705/7, 705/1, 705/35, 705/38, 705/8, 705/400, 705/10, 705/36.R
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/06 Asset management; Financial planning or analysis

Abstract

A system and method for creating and executing a business model for domain specific decisions to compare possible alternative business solutions to maximize results is provided. A domain-specific return on investment (ROI) or financial measurements model and a calculator for buying and selling information technology based solutions targeted at improving overall business efficiency and effectiveness by reducing lead time, improving probability of success, creating an innovative environment, enhancing corporate image, and reducing cost and improving revenues. These business objectives are connected to the capabilities provided by vendor solutions which are based on technology, process, people, science, or the like, typically through concrete initiatives. Solution components are quantified and used to calculate financial impacts for solution choices.

Claims

1. A method of deciding business alternatives, which is implemented on computer program code in combination with hardware comprising the steps of:

determining one or more objectives associated with a business using a processor;

determining one or more capabilities of the business using the processor;

analyzing at least one solution for one or more initiatives associated with the one or more objectives and the one or more capabilities using the processor;

generating a financial measurement, using the processor, based on results of the analyzing step which shows the contribution of the one or more initiatives to achieve the one or more objectives of the business; and

associating at least a cost and/or benefit to the at least one solution for use by the generating step, wherein the benefit is calculated, using the processor, based on at least in part industry best practices.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the cost is one of an on-going cost and a one-time cost.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the benefit is one of one-time benefit and an on-going benefit.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

identifying one or more categories for the at least one solution for use by the generating step, each of the one or more categories having an associated cost and a benefit; and

identifying one or more best practices having an associated cost for use by the generating step.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the analyzing step applies a percentage of a best practice parameter to compute a ROI.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising skipping the one or more initiative if the at least one solution associated with the initiative is deemed non-feasible.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising computing a total ROI for a plurality of the one or more initiatives and associated at least one solution.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

documenting the one or more initiatives;

documenting the one or more solutions;

documenting the one or more capabilities; and

documenting one or more scenarios.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the generating step also generates at least any one of a return on investment (ROI), an internal rate of return (IRR), a payback period, a total cost of ownership, and a net present value (NPV).

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising benchmarking a performance against the industry best practices.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the benefit comprises an ongoing benefit, which is configured to relate to savings in operation costs, reductions in lead time, reductions in number of errors in data collection, and improvements in data quality.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the benefit is incremental.

13. A method of comparing business alternatives, which is implemented on computer program code in combination with hardware comprising the steps of:

creating a value matrix having one or more initiatives associated with objectives and capabilities using a processor;

associating one or more solutions to the one or more initiatives, using the processor, the one or more solutions having a cost and a benefit;

calculating a financial measurement, using the processor, based on a selected initiative of the value matrix providing an objective basis to deem the initiative feasible according to a business goal; and

relating the cost and/or the benefit to the at least one solution using the processor, wherein the benefit is calculated based on at least in part industry best practices.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the financial measurement is any one of a net present value (NPV), a return on investment (ROI), a payback period, a total cost of ownership, and an internal rate of return (IRR).

15. The method of claim 13, further comprising establishing a cost basis and a benefit basis for each of the one or more solutions for using in computing the financial measurement.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the cost basis includes ongoing costs and one-time costs and the benefit basis include ongoing benefits and one-time benefits.

17. The method of claim 15, further comprising the step of generating a total financial measurement based on a plurality of financial measurements from a plurality of the one or more solutions.

18. A system for comparing business alternatives, comprising:

means for creating a value matrix having one or more initiatives associated with objectives and capabilities;

means for associating one or more solutions having a cost and a benefit to the one or more initiatives;

means for quantifying a best practice associated with the one or more solutions;

means for calculating a financial measurement based on the one or more solutions derived from the value matrix and at least in part on the quantified best practice providing an objective basis to deem the one or more solutions acceptable; and

means for relating the cost and/or the benefit to the at least one solution, wherein the benefit is calculated based on at least in part industry best practices.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the financial measurement is any one of a net present value (NPV), a return on investment (ROI), a payback period, a total cost of ownership, and an internal rate of return (IRR).

20. The system of claim 18, further comprising means for generating a total financial measurement based on a plurality of financial measurements from a plurality of the one or more solutions.

21. The system of claim 18, further comprising establishing a cost basis and a benefit basis for each of the one or more solutions for using in computing the financial measurement.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the cost basis includes ongoing costs and one-time costs and the benefit basis include ongoing benefits and one-time benefits.

23. A computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having readable program code embodied in the medium, the computer program product includes at least one component to:

determine one or more objectives associated with a business;

determine one or more capabilities of the business;

analyze at least one solution for one or more initiatives associated with the one or more objectives and the one or more capabilities;

create a value matrix having the one or more initiatives associated with the one or more objectives and the one or more capabilities;

generate a return on investment (ROI) based on results of the analysis which shows the contribution of the one or more initiatives to achieve the one or more objectives of the business; and

associate at least a cost and/or benefit to the at least one solution for use when generating the return on investment, wherein the benefit is calculated based on at least in part industry best practices.