Computerized management system and method for maintenance performance evaluation and improvement

• US 7,613,624 B2
• Filed: 03/02/2004
• Issued: 11/03/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 08/18/1999
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Energetics Pty Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Energetics Pty Ltd.
• Inventors: Jutsen, Jonathan
• Primary Examiner(s): BOYCE, ANDRE D
• Application Number:
  US10/791,563
• Publication Number:
  US 20040167810A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,072 Days
• Field of Search: 705/7
• US Class Current: 705/7.27
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 21/133 by using digital technique
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0633 Workflow analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

A system and method for maintenance management in which data relating to maintenance usage and maintenance-related policies and practices is collected in an automated data processing device. The data is analyzed to arrive at a diagnosis of maintenance management effectiveness from which recommendations for improving the maintenance management effectiveness are generated.

Claims

1. A computerized method for diagnosing and defining actions for improvement in maintenance management comprising the steps of:

collecting data relating to maintenance usage and maintenance-related policies and practices in an automated data processing device;

using a defined set of characteristics, in the automated data processing device, for each of a plurality of levels of achievement to derive a diagnosis of maintenance management effectiveness, said diagnosis comprising a plurality of effectiveness elements and a level of achievement for each said effectiveness element and allowing quantification of a status of maintenance management practices;

determining a relative priority for taking action for each of said effectiveness elements using an element gap analysis wherein a higher priority is accorded to those effectiveness elements in which a gap between a current practice and a best practice is the largest;

determining at least one critical element for action based upon the relative priority for taking action; and

automatically generating recommendations, from the automated data processing device, for improving said maintenance management effectiveness for each of said critical elements.

2. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising benchmarking at least one result of the method against comparable user operations.

3. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising generating an estimate of potential maintenance savings.

4. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein said diagnosis and said recommendations are output to a display means.

5. A method in accordance with claim 4, wherein said display means is selected from the group consisting of a display monitor, a printer, an e-mail file and combinations thereof.

6. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein each of said steps is repeated over time to derive an assessment of overall improvements in maintenance management effectiveness with time.

7. A computerized method for diagnosing and defining actions for improvement in maintenance management comprising the steps of:

collecting data relating to maintenance usage and maintenance-related policies and practices in an automated data processing device;

using a defined set of characteristics, in the automated data processing device, for each of a plurality of levels of achievement to derive a diagnosis of maintenance management effectiveness, said diagnosis comprising a plurality of effectiveness elements and a level of achievement for each said effectiveness element and allowing quantification of a status of maintenance management practices;

determining a relative priority for taking action for each of said effectiveness elements using an element gap analysis, wherein a higher priority is accorded to those effectiveness elements in which a gap between a current practice and a best practice is the largest thereby defining at least one critical element;

determining at least one critical element for action;

automatically generating recommendations, from the automated data processing device, for improving said maintenance management effectiveness for each of said critical elements;

benchmarking at least one result of the method against comparable user operations; and

determining a level of progress for each of said plurality of effectiveness elements.

8. A method in accordance with claim 7, wherein each of said steps is repeated over time to derive an assessment of overall improvements in maintenance management effectiveness with time.

9. A computerized method for diagnosing maintenance management effectiveness and defining actions for improvement in maintenance management comprising the steps of:

collecting data relating to maintenance usage and maintenance-related policies and practices in an automated data processing device;

presenting a set of queried actions, in the automated data processing device, for each of a plurality of levels of achievement for each of a plurality of effectiveness elements;

using responses to the set of queried actions for each effectiveness element to prioritize the plurality of effectiveness elements to define at least one critical element, wherein the prioritization comprises an element gap analysis of each effectiveness element so that a higher priority is accorded to those effectiveness elements in which a gap between a current practice and a best practice is the largest;

diagnosing a maintenance management effectiveness for each effectiveness element wherein the level of achievement is defined by a user with respect to each effectiveness element, the user providing a priority to achievement of each effectiveness element;

providing an indication of effectiveness elements for which critical action is required; and

automatically generating recommendations, from the automated data processing device, for each effectiveness element regarding critical action to be taken for improving maintenance management.

10. A method in accordance with claim 9 further comprising generating an estimate of potential maintenance savings upon achievement of the plurality of effectiveness elements.

11. A method in accordance with claim 9 wherein the method is periodically repeated to compare newly obtained results with previous results to generate a progress report.

12. A method in accordance with claim 11 wherein the element gap analysis for each effectiveness element comprises a determination of a gap between a current practice and a best practice for the effectiveness element.