Method of determining failure of an RFID label reader

• US 7,617,979 B2
• Filed: 11/03/2005
• Issued: 11/17/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 11/03/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: NCR Voyix Corporation
• Original Assignee: NCR Corporation
• Inventors: Crooks, John F.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hess; Daniel A
• Application Number:
  US11/265,809
• Publication Number:
  US 20070095915A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,475 Days
• Field of Search: 235/375, 235/451, 235/492
• US Class Current: 235/451
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 7/0008 General problems related to the reading of electronic memory record carriers, independent of its reading method, e.g. power transfer
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 7/0095 Testing the sensing arrangement, e.g. testing if a magnetic card reader, bar code reader, RFID interrogator or smart card reader functions properly testing of electrical circuits G01R31/28
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 7/10336 the antenna being of the near field type, inductive coil
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 7/10465 the interrogation device being capable of self-diagnosis, e.g. in addition to or as part of the actual interrogation process testing of electrical circuits in general G01R31/28

Abstract

A method of determining failure of an RFID label reader.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

a) polling a reference radio frequency identification (RFID) label located adjacent to an RFID label reader by the RFID label reader;

b) attenuating return signals from the reference RFID label, including varying attenuation to simulate various distances between the reference RFID label and the RFID label reader; and

c) issuing an alert to a computer indicative of a failure of the RFID label reader if the RFID label reader fails to receive a response from the reference RFID label.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein step a) comprises:

a-1) sending interrogation signals by the RFID label reader;

a-2) receiving return signals;

a-3) determining first return signals received from the reference RFID label;

a-4) tallying a count of the first return signals.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein step a-3) comprises:

a-3-A) comparing information in the return signals to reference information associated with the reference RFID label and stored in a memory of the RFID label reader.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) comprises:

c-1 issuing the alert via simple network management protocol.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) comprises:

c-1) issuing the alert via electronic mail.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) comprises:

c-1) issuing the alert via a server console popup message.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) comprises:

c-1) issuing the alert by adding an entry in an error log of the computer.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises:

b-1) increasing attenuation to a threshold attenuation level at which the RFID label reader can no longer receive a reliable response from the reference RFID label; and

b-2) comparing the threshold attenuation level to a previously obtained reference attenuation level.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein step c) comprises:

c-1) issuing the alert if the threshold attenuation level substantially differs from the reference attenuation level.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

d) disabling the reference RFID label to prevent unwanted chatter after polling is finished.

11. The method of claim 1,

wherein step a) is initiated by a computer.

12. The method of claim 1,

wherein step a) is initiated by the RFID label reader.

13. A method comprising:

a) polling a reference radio frequency identification (RFID) label located adjacent to an RFID label reader by the RFID label reader;

b) attenuating return signals from the reference RFID label, including increasing attenuation to a threshold attenuation level at which the RFID label reader can no longer receive a reliable response from the reference RFID label, and comparing the threshold attenuation level to a previously obtained reference attenuation level; and

c) issuing an alert to a computer indicative of a failure of the RFID label reader if the RFID label reader fails to receive a response from the reference RFID label.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein step c) comprises:

c-1) issuing the alert if the threshold attenuation level substantially differs from the reference attenuation level.

15. A system comprising:

a radio frequency identification (RFID) label reader; and

a reference RFID label located adjacent an RFID label reader;

wherein the RFID label reader polls the reference RFID label, attenuates return signals from the reference RFID label, varies attenuation to simulate various distances between the reference RFID label and the RFID label reader, and issues an alert to a computer indicative of a failure of the RFID label reader if the RFID label reader fails to receive a response from the reference RFID label.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader comprises a housing and wherein the reference RFID label is located within the housing.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader sends interrogation signals, receives return signals, determines first return signals received from the reference RFID label, and tallies a count of the first return signals during polling.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the RFID label reader compares information in the return signals to reference information associated with the reference RFID label and stored in a memory of the RFID label reader to determine the first return signals.

19. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader issues the alert via simple network management protocol.

20. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader issues the alert via electronic mail.

21. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader issues the alert via a server console popup message.

22. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader issues the alert by adding an entry in an error log of the computer.

23. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader increases attenuation to a threshold attenuation level at which the RFID label reader can no longer receive a reliable response from the reference RFID label, compares the threshold attenuation level to a previously obtained reference attenuation level.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the RFID label reader issues the alert if the threshold attenuation level substantially differs from the reference attenuation level.

25. The system of claim 15, wherein the reference RFID label also attenuates return signals from the reference RFID label.

26. The system of claim 25, further comprising a wireless communicator for controlling the reference RFID label.

27. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader disables the reference RFID label to prevent unwanted chatter after polling is finished.

28. The system of claim 15, wherein the RFID label reader initiates polling.

29. The system of claim 15, wherein the computer initiates polling.

30. A system comprising:

a radio frequency identification (RFID) label reader; and

a reference RFID label located adjacent an RFID label reader;

wherein the RFID label reader polls the reference RFID label, attenuates return signals from the reference RFID label, increases attenuation to a threshold attenuation level at which the RFID label reader can no longer receive a reliable response from the reference RFID label, compares the threshold attenuation level to a previously obtained reference attenuation level, and issues an alert to a computer indicative of a failure of the RFID label reader if the RFID label reader fails to receive a response from the reference RFID label.

31. The system of claim 30, wherein the RFID label reader issues the alert if the threshold attenuation level substantially differs from the reference attenuation level.