Systems and methods for costing reciprocal relationships

• US 7,634,431 B2
• Filed: 03/08/2006
• Issued: 12/15/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 03/08/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: SAS Institute Incorporated
• Original Assignee: SAS Institute Incorporated
• Inventors: Stratton, Alan J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Gart; Matthew S
• Assistant Examiner(s): Hayles; Ashford S
• Application Number:
  US11/370,371
• Publication Number:
  US 20070226090A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,378 Days
• Field of Search: 705/28, 705/30, 705/33
• US Class Current: 705/30
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/12 Accounting
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/128 Check-book balancing, updating or printing arrangements

Abstract

Computer-implemented systems and methods for performing cost analysis. As an example, a system and method can be provided for the generation of a cost allocation that does not include double counting of cost allocation.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for use in analyzing costs associated with relationships among entities, comprising:

receiving on a processor, entity data corresponding to a plurality of entities, relationship data corresponding to direct and indirect reciprocal relationships between two or more entities, and activity-based cost data corresponding to direct and indirect costs distributable among the plurality of entities;

using the entity data, relationship data, and cost data to construct, on the processor, a model of a costing system;

using the model of the costing system to determine, on the processor, a cost allocation among the plurality of entities, wherein the cost allocation excludes double counting by avoiding reallocating costs to an entity that previously allocated or reallocated the costs; and

wherein the allocation of costs is symmetrical among top level entities in the plurality of entities;

allocating on the processor, a direct cost among a plurality of entities, wherein at least one of the plurality of entities has a reciprocal relationship with another of the plurality of entities; and

repeatedly reallocating on the processor, indirect costs of the entities that have reciprocal relationships until all indirect costs are reallocated to entities that have no reciprocal relationships with other entities, and wherein indirect costs are not reallocated to any entity that previously allocated or reallocated the indirect costs.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least two of the entities comprise service departments.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one of the service departments comprises a human resources department, an information technology department, a maintenance department, or an administrative department.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising determining whether to pay for a third party to provide a service department based upon the cost allocation.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the reallocating of indirect costs occurs N-1 times, where N is a number of entities which have reciprocal relationships.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cost allocation does not change based upon the order in which the costs are allocated and reallocated to the entities.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the allocation of costs provides an allocation of costs for each of the entities, thereby allowing a user to establish a cost associated with operating each of the entities.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of reallocating an indirect cost comprises reallocating secondary costs from a first entity to a second entity;

wherein the first entity received an allocation of costs through a previous step of allocating or reallocating.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of reallocation does not reallocate indirect costs from any entity that does not have a reciprocal relationship with another entity.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the entities comprise at least one production department and more than one service department.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the reallocating step reallocates an indirect cost of a first service department to a second service department and a production department without reallocating the cost to any service department that previously allocated or reallocated the cost.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the entities comprise cost pools.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein cost pools include at least one of the group consisting of organizational cost pools, activity-based cost pools, or process-based cost pools, other logical groupings of money, and combinations thereof.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein allocating costs comprises at least one of budgeting, allocating expenses, allocating revenues, allocating profits, assigning capital, and combinations thereof.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein a reciprocal relationship comprises both direct reciprocal relationships and indirect reciprocal relationships.

16. A system for use in analyzing costs associated with relationships among entities, comprising:

a processor;

a computer-readable storage medium containing instructions operable to cause the processor to perform operations including;

receiving entity data corresponding to a plurality of entities, relationship data corresponding to direct and indirect reciprocal relationships between two or more entities, and activity-based cost data corresponding to direct and indirect costs distributable among the plurality of entities;

using the entity data, relationship data, and cost data to construct a model of a costing system;

using the model of the costing system to determine a cost allocation among the plurality of entities, wherein the cost allocation excludes double counting by avoiding reallocating costs to an entity that previously allocated or reallocated the costs; and

wherein the allocation of costs is symmetrical among top level entities in the plurality of entities;

allocating a direct cost among a plurality of entities, wherein at least one of the plurality of entities has a reciprocal relationship with another of the plurality of entities; and

repeatedly reallocating indirect costs of the entities that have reciprocal relationships until all indirect costs are reallocated to entities that have no reciprocal relationships with other entities, and wherein indirect costs are not reallocated to any entity that previously allocated or reallocated the indirect costs.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein at least two of the entities comprise service departments.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein at least one of the service departments comprises a human resources department, an information technology department, a maintenance department, or an administrative department.

19. The system of claim 16, further comprising instructions operable to cause the processor to perform operations including:

providing a cost allocation for each of the entities, thereby allowing a user to establish a cost associated with operating each of the entities.

20. The system of claim 16, further comprising instructions operable to cause the processor to perform operations including:

determining when an operating cost associated with operating an entity is greater than an outsourcing cost associated with outsourcing the entity, and

outsourcing the entity based upon the determination.

21. The system of claim 16, wherein the allocating and reallocating of indirect costs occurs N-1 times, where N is a number of entities which have reciprocal relationships.

22. The system of claim 16, wherein the cost allocation does not change based upon the order in which the costs are allocated and reallocated to the entities.

23. The system of claim 16, wherein reallocating an indirect cost comprises reallocating secondary costs from a first entity to a second entity;

wherein the first entity has an allocation of costs through a previous allocation or reallocation.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein indirect costs are not reallocated from any entity that does not have a reciprocal relationship with another entity.

25. The system of claim 16, wherein the entities comprise at least one production department and more than one service department.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein reallocating includes reallocating an indirect cost of a first service department to a second service department and a production department without reallocating the cost to any service department that previously allocated or reallocated the cost.

27. The method of claim 16, wherein the entities comprise cost pools.

28. The system of claim 27, wherein cost pools include at least one of the group consisting of organizational cost pools, activity-based cost pools, or process-based cost pools, other logical groupings of money, and combinations thereof.

29. The system of claim 16, wherein allocation of costs comprises at least one of budgeting, allocation of expenses, allocation revenues, allocation of profits, allocation of capital, or combinations thereof.

30. The system of claim 16, wherein a reciprocal relationship comprises both direct reciprocal relationships and indirect reciprocal relationships.

31. Computer software stored on one or more computer readable mediums, the computer software comprising program code for carrying out a method for use in analyzing costs associated with relationships among entities, the method comprising:

receiving on a processor, entity data corresponding to a plurality of entities, relationship data corresponding to direct and indirect reciprocal relationships between two or more entities, and activity-based cost data corresponding to direct and indirect costs distributable among the plurality of entities;

using the entity data, relationship data, and cost data to construct, on the processor, a model of a costing system;

using the model of the costing system to determine, on the processor, a cost allocation among the plurality of entities, wherein the cost allocation excludes double counting by avoiding reallocating costs to an entity that previously allocated or reallocated the costs; and

wherein the allocation of costs is symmetrical among top level entities in the plurality of entities;

allocating on the processor, a direct cost among a plurality of entities, wherein at least one of the plurality of entities has a reciprocal relationship with another of the plurality of entities; and

repeatedly reallocating on the processor, indirect costs of the entities that have reciprocal relationships until all indirect costs are reallocated to entities that have no reciprocal relationships with other entities, and wherein indirect costs are not reallocated to any entity that previously allocated or reallocated the indirect costs.