Enhanced cursor control using interface devices

• US 7,696,978 B2
• Filed: 09/28/2004
• Issued: 04/13/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 08/23/1997
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Immersion Corporation
• Original Assignee: Immersion Corporation
• Inventors: Beamer, Jonathan L., Martin, Kenneth M., Rosenberg, Louis B., Braun, Adam C., Chang, Dean C., Mallett, Jeffrey R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Dinh; Duc Q
• Application Number:
  US10/951,350
• Publication Number:
  US 20050057509A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,023 Days
• Field of Search: 345156-173, 715/701, 715/702
• US Class Current: 345/156
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2203/014 Force feedback applied to GUI
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2203/015 Force feedback applied to a joystick
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/016 Input arrangements with force or tactile feedback as computer generated output to the user
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0354 with detection of 2D relative movements between the device, or an operating part thereof, and a plane or surface, e.g. 2D mice, trackballs, pens or pucks
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/03548 Sliders, in which the moving part moves in a plane
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/038 Control and interface arrangements therefor, e.g. drivers or device-embedded control circuitry
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0421 by interrupting or reflecting a light beam, e.g. optical touch-screen

Abstract

An interface device and method for providing enhanced cursor control with force feedback. A force feedback interface device includes a manipulandum, such as a mouse, that is moveable in a local workspace. The device is coupled to a host computer that displays a cursor in a graphical environment, such as a GUI, on a display screen. An interior region and a border region in the local workspace is defined. One mapping of device movement to cursor movement is used for the interior region, and a different mapping is used for the border region. Mapping methods include ballistics, absolute, linear, rate control, and variable absolute. Rate control embodiments can be single axis or dual axis. In one embodiment, when the mouse moves from the interior region to the border region, the mapping providing the greater cursor velocity is used to better conserve device workspace in the direction of travel and to decrease any sense of mapping mode change to the user. Other features include an autocentering function for reducing offset between local and host frames.

Claims

1. A method, comprising

determining a first region and a second region of a workspace;

receiving a signal indicating a movement of a manipulandum in the workspace;

determining a first mapping associating the movement of the manipulandum with a first cursor movement within a graphical environment;

determining a second mapping associating the movement of the manipulandum with a second cursor movement within the graphical environment;

selecting one of the first mapping and the second mapping to be associated with the manipulandum crossing a boundary between the first region and the second region;

displaying a cursor in the graphical environment based at least in part on the selection of one of the first mapping and the second mapping; and

outputting a force effect to the manipulandum, the force effect associated with the movement of the manipulandum relative to a constrained range of motion of the manipulandum.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first region and the second region are associated with an interior region and a border region of the workspace, respectfully.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the first mapping includes one of a ballistics mapping, a linear mapping, and an absolute mapping.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the second mapping includes one of a rate control mapping and a variable absolute mapping.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the force effect is configured to oppose the movement of the manipulandum as the manipulandum moves from the interior region into the border region, a magnitude of the force effect associated with a penetration distance of the manipulandum into the border region.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein the force effect is configured to oppose the movement of the manipulandum as the manipulandum moves towards a boundary of the border region.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the force effect includes a spring force.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein outputting the force effect to the manipulandum comprises outputting the force effect to the manipulandum when the manipulandum crosses the boundary between the first region and the second region.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the selected mapping causes the cursor to move at a greater speed when the manipulandum crosses the boundary between the first region and the second region.

10. A computer-readable medium on which is encoded program code to cause a processor to execute a method, comprising:

determining a first region and a second region of a workspace;

receiving a signal indicating a movement of a manipulandum in the workspace;

determining a first mapping associating the movement of the manipulandum with a first cursor movement within a graphical environment;

determining a second mapping associating the movement of the manipulandum with a second cursor movement within the graphical environment;

selecting one of the first mapping and the second mapping to be associated with the manipulandum crossing a boundary between the first region and the second region; and

displaying a cursor in the graphical environment based at least in part on the selection of one of the first mapping and the second mapping; and

outputting a force effect to the manipulandum, the force effect associated with the movement of the manipulandum relative to a constrained range of motion of the manipulandum.

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the first region and the second region are associated with an interior region and a border region of the workspace, respectfully.

12. The computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the first mapping includes one of a ballistics mapping, a linear mapping, and an absolute mapping.

13. The computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the second mapping includes one of a rate control mapping and a variable absolute mapping.

14. The computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the force effect is configured to oppose the movement of the manipulandum as the manipulandum moves from the interior region into the border region, a magnitude of the force effect being associated with a penetration distance of the manipulandum into the border region.

15. The computer-readable medium claim 11, wherein the force effect is configured to oppose the movement of the manipulandum as the manipulandum moves towards a boundary of the border region.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the force effect includes a spring force.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein outputting the force effect to the manipulandum comprises outputting the force effect to the manipulandum when the manipulandum crosses the boundary between the first region and the second region.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the selected mapping causes the cursor to move at a greater speed when the manipulandum crosses the boundary between the first region and the second region.